Improving Indigenous health equity within the emergency department: a global review of interventions.

INTRODUCTION: Indigenous health equity interventions situated within emergency care settings remain underexplored, despite their potential to influence patient care satisfaction and empowerment. This study aimed to systematically review and identify Indigenous equity interventions and their outcomes within acute care settings, which can potentially be utilized to improve equity within Canadian healthcare for Indigenous patients. METHODS: A database search was completed of Medline, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Scopus and CINAHL from inception to April 2023. For inclusion in the review, articles were interventional and encompassed program descriptions, evaluations, or theoretical frameworks within acute care settings for Indigenous patients. We evaluated the methodological quality using both the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist and the Ways Tried and True framework. RESULTS: Our literature search generated 122 publications. 11 articles were selected for full-text review, with five included in the final analysis. Two focusing on Canadian First Nations populations and three on Aboriginal Australians. The main intervention strategies included cultural safety training, integration of Indigenous knowledge into care models, optimizing waiting-room environments, and emphasizing sustainable evaluation methodologies. The quality of the interventions was varied, with the most promising studies including Indigenous perspectives and partnerships with local Indigenous organizations. CONCLUSIONS: Acute care settings, serving as the primary point of access to health care for many Indigenous populations, are well-positioned to implement health equity interventions such as cultural safety training, Indigenous knowledge integration, and optimization of waiting room environments, combined with sustainable evaluation methods. Participatory discussions with Indigenous communities are needed to advance this area of research and determine which interventions are relevant and appropriate for their local context.

RéSUMé: INTRODUCTION: Les interventions sur l'équité en santé des Autochtones dans les milieux de soins d'urgence demeurent sous-explorées, malgré leur potentiel d'influencer la satisfaction des patients et leur autonomisation. Cette étude visait à examiner et à déterminer systématiquement les interventions en matière d'équité envers les Autochtones et leurs résultats dans les milieux de soins de courte durée, qui pourraient être utilisés pour améliorer l'équité au sein des soins de santé canadiens pour les patients autochtones. MéTHODES: Une recherche dans la base de données a été effectuée de Medline, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Scopus et CINAHL de la création à avril 2023. Pour être inclus dans la revue, les articles étaient interventionnels et comprenaient des descriptions de programmes, des évaluations ou des cadres théoriques dans les milieux de soins de courte durée pour les patients autochtones. Nous avons évalué la qualité méthodologique à l'aide de la liste de contrôle de l'Institut Joanna Briggs et du cadre Ways Tried and True. RéSULTATS: Notre recherche documentaire a généré 122 publications. 11 articles sélectionnés pour la revue de texte intégral, dont cinq inclus dans l'analyse finale. Deux se concentrent sur les populations des Premières nations canadiennes et trois sur les Australiens autochtones. Les principales stratégies d'intervention comprenaient la formation sur la sécurité culturelle, l'intégration des connaissances autochtones dans les modèles de soins, l'optimisation des environnements des salles d'attente et l'accent mis sur les méthodes d'évaluation durables. La qualité des interventions était variée, avec les études les plus prometteuses, y compris les perspectives autochtones et les partenariats avec les organisations autochtones locales. CONCLUSIONS: Les établissements de soins de courte durée, qui servent de principal point d'accès aux soins de santé pour de nombreuses populations autochtones, sont bien placés pour mettre en œuvre des interventions en matière d'équité en santé, comme la formation en sécurité culturelle, l'intégration des connaissances autochtones, l'optimisation des environnements des salles d'attente, associée à des méthodes d'évaluation durables. Discussions participatives avec Les communautés autochtones sont nécessaires pour faire avancer ce domaine de recherche et déterminer quelles interventions sont pertinentes et appropriées pour leur contexte local.

Geographic Differences in Pediatric Surgical Mortality in Canada: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study describes differences in postoperative mortality for pediatric patients in rural communities compared to urban communities. BACKGROUND: Canada has the second largest land mass in the world, with a population density of 4 people per km2. There are 18 children's hospitals in Canada offering pediatric surgical services, all in urban centres, yet nearly one-fifth of the population lives in rural or remote communities. Children who live in rural settings may have worse surgical outcomes, including mortality rates, compared with urban populations. METHODS: Pediatric patients, from birth to 18 years old, who had surgery from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2021, at a single Children's Hospital were included in the study. Data was obtained from the provincial Operating Room Information System (ORIS) database. Postal code, rural and urban status, distance to children's hospital (0-50 km, 51-100 km, 101-150 km, 151-200 km, and >200 km), and procedure urgency were collected. 30-day mortality for all procedures was collected. RESULTS: 85,998 surgical procedures were performed at ACH between 2011 and 2021. 17,773 (20.7%) of patients lived >50 km or more from the hospital - 5,329 (6.2%) 51- 100 km, 4,053 (4.7%) 101-150 km, n=2,323 (2.7%) 151-200 km, and 6,070 (7.1%) >200 km. Rural patients had higher 30-day mortality rates than urban patients, with an odds ratio of mortality (rural vs urban) of 2.30 (95% CI, 0.95 to 5.60). When stratified by distance, patients living closer to the hospital (0-50 km) had lower odds of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Canadian Rural patients have higher operative mortality risks than urban patients. This study identifies a vulnerable group of patients who do not have equal access to care and may experience worse outcomes.

Bringing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery to the NICU: An Implementation Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines are bundled evidence-informed recommendations implemented to improve quality and safety of perioperative care. This study aims to determine feasibility of NICU implementation of an ERAS Guideline for Intestinal Resection, describing clinical outcomes and adherence to recommendations following light-touch implementation. METHODS: Infants <28 days undergoing laparotomy for intestinal resection in a closed-NICU were prospectively enrolled. Exclusion criteria included prematurity (<32wks), instability, or major comorbidity. Clinical data reflecting 13 ERAS recommendations were collected through chart review. Descriptive statistics are presented as median [interquartile range]. Thirty-day post-discharge outcomes include NICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), ventilator days, surgical site infection (SSI), re-intubation, readmission, reoperation, and mortality. Adherence was calculated as the percentage of patients eligible for each recommendation whose care was adherent. RESULTS: Ten infant-parent dyads were enrolled (five females; GA 37 weeks [35, 38.8]; birthweight 2.97 kg [2.02, 3.69]). Surgical diagnoses included intestinal atresia/web (n = 6), anorectal malformation (n = 3), and segmental volvulus (n = 1). NICU LOS was 16 days [11, 21], hospital LOS 20 days [18, 30], and 2.5 ventilator days/patient [2, 3]. There was reduced opioid use, no SSIs, one re-intubation, three readmissions, three reoperations, and no mortalities. Adherence to ERAS recommendations ranged 0-100 % with a pooled adherence rate of 73 %. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to introduce ERAS to the NICU with acceptable overall adherence. Assessing adherence was challenging for some measures. There were promising early clinical findings including a reduction in opioid use. This implementation trial will inform development of an ERAS protocol for surgical NICUs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (Cohort Study).

Optimizing Implementation of the Neonatal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guideline.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocols require multidisciplinary team engagement from healthcare professionals (HCPs), where limited studies exist on neonatal ERAS®protocols. Therefore, we aimed to capture perceptions of HCPs on facilitation and implementation of the neonatal ERAS®guideline. METHODS: 10 neonates were recruited. 13 HCPs involved in these patient's care were interviewed and 8 surveyed consisting of pediatric anesthesiologists, neonatologists, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) registered nurses (RNs), and pediatric surgeons. Using a multi-methods design, recruitment, semi-structured interviews and surveys were conducted from May 17, 2021 to November 1, 2022. Data was coded using The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Studies and then thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 4 pediatric anesthesiologists, 4 neonatologists, 2 NICU RNs, and 3 pediatric surgeons and surveys with 1 pediatric anesthesiologist, 2 neonatologists, 3 NICU RNs, and 2 pediatric surgeons. From interviews, the top 3 facilitation strategies were utilization of: (1) multidisciplinary guideline champions, (2) reminders and education, and (3) results to facilitate adherence. Incorporation of these strategies resulted in perceived: (1) stronger buy-in and engagement and (2) improved team communication, job satisfaction, care quality, and parental involvement. CONCLUSION: HCPs stressed the importance of guideline champions, reminders and education, and results distribution. Given implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic, awareness and education were mixed. Nonetheless, HCPs perceived improved buy-in and engagement, communication, job satisfaction, quality of care, and parental involvement. Incorporation of these strategies can promote successful ERAS® guideline facilitation and implementation and should be considered for future ERAS® projects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Going beyond compliance: A qualitative study of the practice of surgical safety checklist.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is a tool designed to enhance team communication and patient safety. When used properly, the SSC acts as a layer of defence against never events. In this study, we performed secondary qualitative analysis of operating theatres (OT) SSC observational notes to examine how the SSC was used after an intensive SSC re-implementation effort and drew on relevant theories to shed light on the observed patterns of behaviours. We aimed to go beyond assessing checklist compliance and to understand potential sociopsychological mechanisms of the variations in SSC practices. METHODS: Direct observation notes of 109 surgical procedures across 13 surgical disciplines were made by two trained nurses in the OT of a large tertiary hospital in Singapore from February to April 2022, three months after SSC re-implementation. Only notes relevant to the use of SSC were extracted and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Data were coded following an inductive process to identify themes or patterns of SSC practices. These patterns were subsequently interpreted against a relevant theory to appreciate the potential sociopsychological forces behind them. RESULTS: Two broad types of SSC practices and their respective sub-themes were identified. Type 1 (vs. Type 2) SSC practices are characterized by patience and thoroughness (vs. hurriedness and omission) in carrying out the SSC process, dedication and attention (vs. delegation and distraction) to the SSC safety checks, and frequent (vs. absence of) safety voices during the conduct of SSC. These patterns were conceptualized as safety-seeking action vs. ritualistic action using Merton's social deviance theory. CONCLUSION: Ritualistic practice of the SSC can undermine surgical safety by creating conditions conducive to never events. To fully realize the SSC's potential as an essential tool for communication and safety, a concerted effort is needed to balance thoroughness with efficiency. Additionally, fostering a culture of collaboration and collegiality is crucial to reinforce and enhance the culture of surgical safety.

Adapting the World Health Organization's Surgical Safety Checklist to High-Income Settings: A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial Protocol.

Objectives: The proposed study aims to assess users' perceptions of a surgical safety checklist (SSC) reimplementation toolkit and its impact on SSC attitudes and operating room (OR) culture, meaningful checklist use, measures of surgical safety, and OR efficiency at 3 different hospital sites. Background: The High-Performance Checklist toolkit (toolkit) assists surgical teams in modifying and implementing or reimplementing the World Health Organization's SSC. Through the explore, prepare, implement, and sustain implementation framework, the toolkit provides a process and set of tools to facilitate surgical teams' modification, implementation, training on, and evaluation of the SSC. Methods: A pre-post intervention design will be used to assess the impact of the modified SSC on surgical processes, team culture, patient experience, and safety. This mixed-methods study includes quantitative and qualitative data derived from surveys, semi-structured interviews, patient focus groups, and SSC performance observations. Additionally, patient outcome and OR efficiency data will be collected from the study sites' health surveillance systems. Data analysis: Statistical data will be analyzed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions, while qualitative data will be analyzed thematically using NVivo. Furthermore, interview data will be analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance implementation frameworks. Setting: The toolkit will be introduced at 3 diverse surgical sites in Alberta, Canada: an urban hospital, university hospital, and small regional hospital. Anticipated impact: We anticipate the results of this study will optimize SSC usage at the participating surgical sites, help shape and refine the toolkit, and improve its usability and application at future sites.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations for Neonatal Perioperative Care.

Importance: Neonates requiring surgery are often cared for in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Despite a breadth of surgical pathology, neonates share many perioperative priorities that allow for the development of unit-wide evidence-based Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) recommendations. Observations: The guideline development committee included pediatric surgeons, anesthesiologists, neonatal nurses, and neonatologists in addition to ERAS content and methodology experts. The patient population was defined as neonates (first 28 days of life) undergoing a major noncardiac surgical intervention while admitted to a NICU. After the first round of a modified Delphi technique, 42 topics for potential inclusion were developed. There was consensus to develop a search strategy and working group for 21 topic areas. A total of 5763 abstracts were screened, of which 98 full-text articles, ranging from low to high quality, were included. A total of 16 recommendations in 11 topic areas were developed with a separate working group commissioned for analgesia-related recommendations. Topics included team communication, preoperative fasting, temperature regulation, antibiotic prophylaxis, surgical site skin preparation, perioperative ventilation, fluid management, perioperative glucose control, transfusion thresholds, enteral feeds, and parental care encouragement. Although clinically relevant, there were insufficient data to develop recommendations concerning the use of nasogastric tubes, Foley catheters, and central lines. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite varied pathology, neonatal perioperative care within NICUs allows for unit-based ERAS recommendations independent of the planned surgical procedure. The 16 recommendations within this ERAS guideline are intended to be implemented within NICUs to benefit all surgical neonates.

Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: A Joint Consensus Statement by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Cardiac Society, ERAS International Society, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS).

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have been shown to lessen surgical insult, promote recovery, and improve postoperative clinical outcomes across a number of specialty operations. A core tenet of ERAS involves the provision of protocolized evidence-based perioperative interventions. Given both the growing enthusiasm for applying ERAS principles to cardiac surgery and the broad scope of relevant interventions, an international, multidisciplinary expert panel was assembled to derive a list of potential program elements, review the literature, and provide a statement regarding clinical practice for each topic area. This article summarizes those consensus statements and their accompanying evidence. These results provide the foundation for best practice for the management of the adult patient undergoing cardiac surgery.