Daylight photodynamic therapy with methyl-aminolevulinate for the treatment of actinic cheilitis.

Actinic cheilitis (AC) is a common premalignant condition that requires an effective treatment to reduce the risk of malignant transformation. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been recently added to the armamentarium available for AC treatment. Daylight PDT (D-PDT) is a novel PDT modality in which the activation of the topical photosensitizer is induced by the exposure to natural daylight instead of artificial light sources without preliminary occlusion. This simplified procedure was found to be more tolerated as compared to conventional PDT. We report our preliminary experience on the use of D-PDT using methyl-aminolevulinate cream in 10 patients with refractory AC of the lower lip. Patients received two consecutive D-PDT sessions with an interval of 7-14 days. At 3 months after therapy, a complete response was observed in seven patients, with sustained results in five patients over an observational period of 6-12 months. Treatment was well tolerated.

Efficacy of lidocaine 7 %, tetracaine 7 % self-occlusive cream in reducing MAL-cPDT-associated pain in subjects with actinic keratosis: A randomized, single-blind, vehicle-controlled trial (The "3P-Trial").

INTRODUCTION: Conventional photodynamic therapy (cPDT) is considered a very effective treatment of actinic keratosis (AK) lesions. However, its use is limited by the fact that this procedure could be very painful. The use of topical anesthetics such as tetracaine or lignocaine/prilocaine has shown disappointing results in term of pain reduction. A self-occlusive topical 7% lidocaine/7% tetracaine anesthetic cream (LT-C) approved by the FDA to provide local topical anesthesia in adults undergoing superficial dermatological procedures is available. There are no data regarding its pain reducing effect during cPDT. We perform a prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-center trial (The 3P-Trial) to assess the pain reduction effect of LT-C versus vehicle in subjects with AK undergoing cPDT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty AK subjects (74 ± 10 years, 32 men, 18 women) with on average 17 lesions were enrolled after their written informed consent. Eight subjects presented also a total of 16 basal cell carcinoma lesions. Twenty-five were randomized to LT-cream, applied 1 h before the Methyl amino levulinate (MAL)-cPDT session and 25 to cream vehicle. The main outcome was the patient-assessed evaluation of pain score during and just after the conclusion of cPDT session (mean of the two values) using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS). The cPDT session (LED Red light 630 nm) was performed with a duration of 6 ± 2 min with a standard fluence of 37 J/cm2. All treated lesions were prepared by gentle superficial curettage. RESULTS: All the randomized subjects concluded the trial. The mean ± SD of VAS score in vehicle group was 6.2 ± 2.7 (95 % CI of the mean: 5.0-7.5). In the group treated with LT-cream the VAS score was 3.3 ± 1.9 (95 % CI of the mean: 2.5-4.1). The active cream reduced the VAS score by 47 %. Median values of pain VAS score in the active group was reduced by 60 % in comparison with vehicle group (3.0 vs 7.5). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.0009; Mann-Whitney test). DISCUSSION: The 3P-trial has demonstrated that the preventive application of the self-occlusive lidocaine 7%-tetracaine 7% cream is very effective in reducing the procedure-associated pain during MAL-cPDT for the treatment of AK lesions.

Radiodermatitis after spinal arteriovenous fistula embolisation.

We report acute radiation dermatitis on a patient's back and left arm, which developed 4 weeks after endovascular embolisation of a spinal arteriovenous malformation. Vesciculation and erosions were followed by a gradual re-epithelisation of the skin resulting in rectangular hyperpigmented patches that resolved almost completely within 1 month. Fluoroscopic radiodermatitis has been reported with more frequency over the past decades because of the rise in duration and number of procedures performed under fluoroscopic guidance. Articles concerning this issue are mostly limited to case reports after coronary interventions, renal artery catheterisations, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedures and embolisations of intracranial arteriovenous malformation. To the best of our knowledge, only two cases of radiation dermatitis after spinal arteriovenous malformation embolisation have been reported to date.