Defining the next generation of severe malaria treatment: a target product profile.

BACKGROUND: Severe malaria is a life-threatening infection, particularly affecting children under the age of 5 years in Africa. Current treatment with parenteral artemisinin derivatives is highly efficacious. However, artemisinin partial resistance is widespread in Southeast Asia, resulting in delayed parasite clearance after therapy, and has emerged independently in South America, Oceania, and Africa. Hence, new treatments for severe malaria are needed, and it is prudent to define their characteristics now. This manuscript focuses on the target product profile (TPP) for new treatments for severe malaria. It also highlights preparedness when considering ways of protecting the utility of artemisinin-based therapies. TARGET PRODUCT PROFILE: Severe malaria treatments must be highly potent, with rapid onset of antiparasitic activity to clear the infection as quickly as possible to prevent complications. They should also have a low potential for drug resistance selection, given the high parasite burden in patients with severe malaria. Combination therapies are needed to deter resistance selection and dissemination. Partner drugs which are approved for uncomplicated malaria treatment would provide the most rapid development pathway for combinations, though new candidate molecules should be considered. Artemisinin combination approaches to severe malaria would extend the lifespan of current therapy, but ideally, completely novel, non-artemisinin-based combination therapies for severe malaria should be developed. These should be advanced to at least phase 2 clinical trials, enabling rapid progression to patient use should current treatment fail clinically. New drug combinations for severe malaria should be available as injectable formulations for rapid and effective treatment, or as rectal formulations for pre-referral intervention in resource-limited settings. CONCLUSION: Defining the TPP is a key step to align responses across the community to proactively address the potential for clinical failure of artesunate in severe malaria. In the shorter term, artemisinin-based combination therapies should be developed using approved or novel drugs. In the longer term, novel combination treatments should be pursued. Thus, this TPP aims to direct efforts to preserve the efficacy of existing treatments while improving care and outcomes for individuals affected by this life-threatening disease.

Efficacy and safety of temelimab in multiple sclerosis: Results of a randomized phase 2b and extension study.

BACKGROUND: The envelope protein of human endogenous retrovirus W (HERV-W-Env) is expressed by macrophages and microglia, mediating axonal damage in chronic active MS lesions. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: This phase 2, double-blind, 48-week trial in relapsing-remitting MS with 48-week extension phase assessed the efficacy and safety of temelimab; a monoclonal antibody neutralizing HERV-W-Env. The primary endpoint was the reduction of cumulative gadolinium-enhancing T1-lesions in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans at week 24. Additional endpoints included numbers of T2 and T1-hypointense lesions, magnetization transfer ratio, and brain atrophy. In total, 270 participants were randomized to receive monthly intravenous temelimab (6, 12, or 18 mg/kg) or placebo for 24 weeks; at week 24 placebo-treated participants were re-randomized to treatment groups. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was not met. At week 48, participants treated with 18 mg/kg temelimab had fewer new T1-hypointense lesions (p = 0.014) and showed consistent, however statistically non-significant, reductions in brain atrophy and magnetization transfer ratio decrease, as compared with the placebo/comparator group. These latter two trends were sustained over 96 weeks. No safety issues emerged. CONCLUSION: Temelimab failed to show an effect on features of acute inflammation but demonstrated preliminary radiological signs of possible anti-neurodegenerative effects. Current data support the development of temelimab for progressive MS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CHANGE-MS: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02782858, EudraCT: 2015-004059-29; ANGEL-MS: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03239860, EudraCT: 2016-004935-18.

A safety and pharmacodynamics study of temelimab, an antipathogenic human endogenous retrovirus type W envelope monoclonal antibody, in patients with type 1 diabetes.

AIM: To report the first study of temelimab, a monoclonal antibody neutralizing the pathogenic human endogenous retrovirus type W envelope, in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial recruited adult patients with T1D within 4 years postdiagnosis and remaining C-peptide secretion. Sixty-four patients were randomized (2:1) to monthly temelimab 6 mg/kg or placebo during 24 weeks followed by a 24-week, open-label extension, during which all patients received temelimab. The primary objective was the safety and tolerability of temelimab. The secondary objective was to assess the pharmacodynamics response such as C-peptide levels, insulin use, HbA1c, hypoglycaemia and autoantibodies. RESULTS: Temelimab was well tolerated without any group difference in the frequency or severity of adverse events. Concerning exploratory endpoints, there was no difference in the levels of C-peptide, insulin use or HbA1c between treatment groups at weeks 24 and 48. The frequency of hypoglycaemia events was reduced with temelimab (P = 0.0004) at week 24 and the level of anti-insulin antibodies was lower with temelimab (P < 0.01); the other autoantibodies did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Temelimab appeared safe in patients with T1D. Pharmacodynamics signals (hypoglycaemia and anti-insulin antibodies) under temelimab were observed. Markers of ß-cell functions were not modified by treatment. These results need to be further explored in younger patients with T1D with earlier disease onset.