Impact of prolonged PPE use on Canadian health professionals.

AIM: To explore the impact that prolonged use of personal protective equipment (PPE) has on the skin integrity of Canadian health professionals. METHOD: A descriptive, pan-Canadian, cross-sectional, online survey was carried out to explore the type and prevalence of PPE-related skin injury among Canadian health professionals. Convenience sampling was used to disseminate the online survey link to health professionals. RESULTS: There were responses from 757 health professionals. Masks worn included surgical masks (90%), a combination of surgical or N95/KN95 masks (7.7%) and an N95/KN95 mask alone (2.7%). Responses showed 84.6% of providers always wear a mask while at work with 38.5% wearing the same mask all shift; 90% of participants wore protective eye wear. Complications included soreness or pressure injuries behind the ears (70%), new or worsening acne (52%), a runny nose or sneezing (45%), itching (39%), and dry skin (37%). Hand issues included dry skin (53%), red skin (30%), itching (26%), broken skin (20%), rash (16%), and dermatitis (11%) - 51% of respondents did not moisturise their hands. Complications related to gown use included itching (6%), moisture-associated skin damage (5.5%), feeling claustrophobic (4.5%), and new or worsening acne (3%). Increased perspiration due to PPE was experienced in 87.5% of respondents. Some 43% of respondents noted their mental health became worse due to wearing PPE for prolonged periods. CONCLUSION: These findings should be used in the development of guidelines to prevent and manage PPE-related skin injuries among health professionals. Education for professionals should focus on skin protection, prevention of PPE-related skin complications and support for mental health issues.

The Financial Impact of Living in Canada With an Ostomy: A Cross-sectional Survey.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore how living with an ostomy financially impacts Canadians. METHODS: A descriptive, pan-Canadian, cross-sectional online and paper-based survey was conducted using a convenience sample. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 467 individuals. Seventy-six percent (n = 355) reported spending more than $1000 annually on ostomy supplies, with 58% (n = 271) paying partially out of pocket. Atlantic regions relied primarily on insurance (n = 81), and the central, prairies, and western regions used a combination of funding (provincial government funding and/or insurance) (n = 385) with no significant out-of-pocket funding differences between regions (χ = 18.267, P = .079). Fifteen percent (n = 70) reported frequent peristomal skin problems, and 19% (n = 89) indicated that having an ostomy negatively affected their ability to work. When experiencing ostomy-related problems, 60% (n = 280) sought assistance from a nurse specialized in wound, ostomy, and continence (NSWOC) and spent significantly less on ostomy supplies (χ = 231.267, P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that living with an ostomy may result in financial burden and that Canadian regional variations in funding and access to an NSWOC should be explored.

Algorithmic approaches to ostomy management: An integrative review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to describe approaches to ostomy management utilizing algorithmic approaches found within the literature. DESIGN: An integrative review approach was used based on a modified Cooper's five-stage research review framework. DATA SOURCES: Systematic searches occurred using the CINAHL and MEDLINE databases searching for peer-reviewed, English publications. REVIEW METHODS: There were 640 articles identified through the review process, 608 of which were excluded based on title and abstract review. The remaining 12 articles were assessed in full text after which two studies were removed as duplicates and six studies were excluded based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Four studies were included in this synthesis. Studies were critically analysed using a critical appraisal tool developed for both qualitative and quantitative study assessments. RESULTS: Utilizing inductive content analysis, included literature was presented within two categories: validation of ostomy algorithms and implementation of ostomy algorithms in practice. Four themes emerged from these categories including the following: algorithm validation, identifying underlying causes, focus on accessories and large-scale implementation. CONCLUSION: No currently available validated algorithms published in full were found during this literature review. Current literature demonstrates the potential benefit for ostomy management algorithms to standardize and improve ostomy patient care. IMPACT: This study sought to determine the availability and supporting research of ostomy management algorithms which may assist in standardizing and improving ostomy care. This review has demonstrated a lack of available ostomy management algorithms. Given the potential benefit of ostomy algorithms identified within the literature, further studies should be completed to develop, validate and test new ostomy management algorithms.