How we treat primary central nervous system lymphoma.

Primary diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL) lymphoma of the central nervous system (CNS) (PCNSL) is a new lymphoma entity, recognized by the 2017 WHO classification of hematopoietic and lymphoid tumors. Unlike systemic DLBCL, the use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy combinations is associated with disappointing outcomes, due to low CNS bioavailability of related drugs. Therefore, international researchers investigated alternative strategies, mostly including drugs able to cross the blood-brain-barrier at low or high doses, with a progressive improvement in survival. Some effective chemotherapy combinations of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) with alkylating agents and rituximab with or without cytarabine have been tested in international randomized trials and represent the induction treatment in everyday practice, with some variations among different geographical areas. In patients aged 70 years or younger, MATRix (HD-MTX/cytarabine/thiotepa/rituximab) chemotherapy followed by consolidative high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation or whole-brain irradiation has been associated with a significant improvement in overall survival. Other treatment options, such as non-myeloablative high-dose chemotherapy, oral drug maintenance, and some targeted drugs like ibrutinib or lenalidomide, are being tested in high-level international trials. These steps toward further effective treatments are motivated by an incessant search for less neurotoxic options. Thanks to international cooperation, we can affirm that PCNSL is a potentially curable tumor, especially in young patients. However, several questions remain unanswered: the optimal treatment for elderly patients as well as the management of intraocular and meningeal disease require further scientific efforts. Beside treatments, advances on molecular and radiological diagnostic tools will increase our knowledge of this disease, allowing the possibility to anticipate diagnosis and to better categorize patients' responses. This article analyzes the available literature in this setting and provides evidence-based recommendations for the management of PCNSL patients.

Quantitative muscle mass biomarkers are independent prognosis factors in primary central nervous system lymphoma: The role of L3-skeletal muscle index and temporal muscle thickness.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of quantitative muscle biomarkers assessed with skeletal muscle index at the third lumbar vertebra (L3-SMI) and temporal muscle thickness (TMT) in predicting progression-free and overall survival in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) undergoing first-line high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy. METHODS: L3-SMI and TMT were calculated on abdominal CT and brain high-resolution 3D-T1-weighted MR images, respectively, using predefined validated methods. Standardized sex-specific cut-off values were used to divide patients in different risk categories. Kaplan-Meier plots were calculated, and survival analysis was performed using log-rank tests, univariate, and multivariable Cox-regression models, calculating hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), also adjusting for potential confounders (age, sex, and performance status). RESULTS: Forty-three patients were included in this study. Median follow-up was 23 months (interquartile range 12-40); at median follow-up, rates of progression-free and overall survival for the cohort were 46% and 57%, respectively. Thirteen (30%) and 11 (26%) patients showed L3-SMI or TMT values below the predefined cut-offs. In Cox-regression multivariable analysis patients with low L3-SMI or TMT showed significantly worse progression-free (HR 4.40, 95% CI 1.66-11.61, p = 0.003; HR 4.40, 95% CI 1.68-11.49, p = 0.003, respectively) and overall survival (HR 3.16, 95% CI 1.09-9.11, p = 0.034; HR 4.93, 95% CI 1.78-13.65, p = 0.002, respectively) compared to patients with high L3-SMI or TMT. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative muscle mass evaluation assessed by both L3-SMI and TMT is a promising tool to identify PCNSL patients at high risk of negative outcome. Confirmatory studies on larger independent series are warranted.

Challenging the current approaches to multiple myeloma-related bone disease: from bisphosphonates to target therapy.

Bone disease (BD) is the hall-mark clinical feature of multiple myeloma (MM), accounting up to 60% of patients with bone pain at diagnosis and 60% with a pathologic fracture during the course of their disease. Experimental models, which recapitulate in vivo the human bone marrow microenvironment (HBMM) in immunodeficient mice have been recently developed as valuable tool for the study of MM pathophysiology as well as the experimental treatment of BD. At present, bisphosphonates are the mainstay treatment of MM-related BD. The growing information on the cellular and molecular bases of BD as well as the availability of novel anti-resorptive agents, such as the IgG1-anti-RANKL (AMG 161) Denosumab, are now depicting a new scenario where the treatment will be afforded by the use of different agents. Furthermore the availability of highthroughput molecular profiling approaches, including DNA microarrays and proteomics, is likely to provide new platforms for patients stratification and treatment individualization on specific targets. It is now the right time for a therapeutical approach which is rationally based on the complexity of the biopathology of MM-related BD.