Differentiation of groups of patients with cognitive complaints at breast cancer diagnosis: Results from a sub-study of the French CANTO cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive complaints are more frequent in women with breast cancer (BC) than in healthy controls and can be present before any treatment. Findings regarding contributive factors remain inconsistent. This study aimed to identify different groups of patients with cognitive complaints at BC diagnosis and to determine whether these different groups were associated with demographic, medical, or psychological characteristics. METHODS: Cognitive complaints were assessed in a subset of 264 women from the French multicenter prospective CANTO cohort, at baseline before any treatment. Clustering analyzes were performed using the six-cognitive dimension Costa's scoring of the FACT-Cog V3. Univariable analyses were used to study how cognitive function (standardized neuropsychological tests, ICCTF), anxiety, depression, fatigue, and quality of life (HADS, FA12, QLQ-C30) were associated with specific cognitive complaints groups. RESULTS: Results included 263 women (54±11 years), newly diagnosed with BC (69% stages I-III). Four distinct groups emerged, ranged from "no complaints" (22.8%), "low complaints" (55.1), "mixed complaints" (14.5%), to "consistent complaints" (7.6%). No significant differences were found in terms of demographic and medical factors between the four groups. However, the groups with higher proportions of patients with complaints were found to have more impairment in executive function, higher scores of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and fatigue, and lower quality of life, than the groups with lower proportions of cognitive complaints. CONCLUSION: Using complete cognitive assessment prior to BC treatment, we identified four distinct cognitive complaints groups with specific characteristics. This work provides valuable clinical basis to further investigations for a better understanding of cognitive complaints and their associates.

Cognitive rehabilitation program to improve cognition of cancer patients treated with chemotherapy: A 3-arm randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: There is no treatment for cancer-related cognitive impairment, an important adverse effect that negatively impacts quality of life (QOL). We conducted a 3-arm randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation (CR) on cognition, QOL, anxiety, and depression among cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients who reported cognitive complaints during or after completing chemotherapy were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 12-week CR programs: computer-assisted CR with a neuropsychologist (experimental group A), home cognitive self-exercises (active control group B), or phone follow-up (active control group C). Subjective cognition was assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog), objective cognition was assessed by neuropsychological tests, QOL was assessed by the FACT-General, and depression and anxiety were assessed by psychological tests. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a 7-point improvement in the FACT-Cog perceived cognitive impairment (PCI) score. RESULTS: Among the 167 enrolled patients (median age, 51 years), group A had the highest proportion of patients with a 7-point PCI improvement (75%), followed by groups B (59%) and C (57%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .13). Compared with groups B and C, the mean difference in PCI score was significantly higher in group A (P = .02), with better perceived cognitive abilities (P < .01) and a significant improvement in working memory (P = .03). Group A reported higher QOL related to cognition (FACT-Cog QOL) (P = .01) and improvement in depression symptoms (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a benefit of a computer-based CR program in the management of cancer-related cognitive impairment and complaints.

Phase I/IIa study of concomitant radiotherapy with olaparib and temozolomide in unresectable or partially resectable glioblastoma: OLA-TMZ-RTE-01 trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Despite multimodality treatments including neurosurgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, glioblastoma (GBM) prognosis remains poor. GBM is classically considered as a radioresistant tumor, because of its high local recurrence rate, inside the irradiation field. The development of new radiosensitizer is crucial to improve the patient outcomes. Pre-clinical data showed that Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) could be considered as a promising class of radiosensitizer. The aim of this study is to evaluate Olaparib, a PARPi, as radiosensitizing agent, combined with the Stupp protocol, namely temozolomide (TMZ) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in first line treatment of partially or non-resected GBM. METHODS: The OLA-TMZ-RTE-01 study is a multicenter non-randomized phase I/IIa trial including unresectable or partially resectable GBM patients, from 18 to 70 years old. A two-step dose-escalation phase I design will first determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of olaparib, delivered concomitantly with TMZ plus conventional irradiation for 6 weeks and as single agent for 4 weeks (radiotherapy period), and second, the RP2D of olaparib combined with adjuvant TMZ (maintenance period). Phase IIa will assess the 18-month overall survival (OS) of this combination. In both phase I and IIa separately considered, the progression-free survival, the objective response rate, the neurocognitive functions of patients, emotional disorders among caregivers, the survival without toxicity, degradation nor progression, the complications onset and the morphologic and functional MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) parameters will be also assessed as secondary objectives. Ancillary objectives will explore alteration of the DNA repair pathways on biopsy tumor, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy parameters to differentiate tumor relapse and radionecrosis, and an expanded cognition evaluation. Up to 79 patients will be enrolled: 30 patients in the phase I and 49 patients in the phase IIa. DISCUSSION: Combining PARP inhibitors, such as olaparib, with radiotherapy and chemotherapy in GBM may improve survival outcomes, while sparing healthy tissue and preserving neurocognitive function, given the replication-dependent efficacy of olaparib, and the increased PARP expression in GBM as compared to non-neoplastic brain tissue. Ancillary studies will help to identify genetic biomarkers predictive of PARPi efficacy as radiosensitizer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03212742 , registered June, 7, 2017. Protocol version: Version 2.2 dated from 2017/08/18.

Correction to: Impact of new generation hormone-therapy on cognitive function in elderly patients treated for a metastatic prostate cancer: Cog-Pro trial protocol.

CORRECTION: After publication of the original article [1] the authors found that Table 2 had been formatted incorrectly, meaning that some rows in the Table did not display the correct information. An updated version of Table 2 is included with this Correction. The original article has also been updated.

Impact of new generation hormone-therapy on cognitive function in elderly patients treated for a metastatic prostate cancer: Cog-Pro trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: New generation hormone-therapies (NGHT) targeting the androgen signalling pathway are nowadays proposed to elderly patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPCa). The impact of these treatments on cognitive function has never been evaluated whereas cognitive impairment may have an impact on the autonomy and the treatment adherence. The aim of this study is to prospectively assess the incidence of cognitive impairment in elderly men after treatment by NGHT for a metastatic CRPCa. METHODS/DESIGN: The Cog-Pro study is a multicentre longitudinal study including CRPCa patients ≥70 years old treated with NGHT (n = 134), control metastatic prostate cancer patients without castration resistance treated with first generation androgen deprivation therapy (n = 55), and healthy participants (n = 33), matched on age and education. Cognitive, geriatric and quality of life assessment and biological tests will be performed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after start of the treatment (inclusion time). The primary endpoint is the proportion of elderly patients receiving a NGHT who will experience a decline in cognitive performances within 3 months after study enrollment. Secondary endpoints concern: autonomy, quality of life, anxiety, depression, cognitive reserve, adherence to hormone-therapy, comparison of the cognitive impact of 2 different NGHT (abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide), impact of co-morbidities and biological assessments. DISCUSSION: Evaluating, understanding and analyzing the incidence, severity of cognitive impairments and their impact on quality of life, autonomy and adherence in this group of patients with advanced disease is a challenge. This study should help to improve cancer care of elderly patients and secure the use of oral treatments as the risk of non-observance does exist. Our results will provide up-to date information for patients and caregivers on impact of these treatments on cognitive function in order to help the physicians in the choice of the treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02907372 , registered: July 26, 2016.

Digital cognitive stimulation in elderly breast cancer patients: the Cog-Tab-Age feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Elderly cancer patients often experience cognitive difficulties that can affect their quality of life and autonomy. However, they are rarely included in clinical trials, and only one study has explored the feasibility of cognitive training in this population. While digital cognitive training has been successful in improving cognition in younger patients, its feasibility in elderly patients requires evaluation. OBJECTIVES: This feasibility study primarily focused on evaluating patients' ability to use digital cognitive stimulation (usability). Secondary objectives were to evaluate acceptability, adherence, and satisfaction with regard to digital cognitive stimulation in elderly breast cancer patients. METHODS: Elderly breast cancer patients at least 70 years old who were receiving cancer treatment (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and/or radiotherapy) were recruited. Cognitive complaints were evaluated at baseline using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function scale (FACT-Cog). Participants were invited to attend three 20-minute sessions of digital cognitive stimulation using HappyNeuron PRESCO software App on tablets, with the first session being supervised by a neuropsychologist and the two others being performed independently either at home or at the cancer center. We hypothesized that participants would spend 10 of the 20 min of the given time with the tablet completing exercises (training time). Thus, the usability of digital cognitive stimulation was defined as completing at least three exercises during the training time (10 min) of one of the two training sessions in autonomy. The proportion of patients who agreed to participate (acceptability) and completion of planned sessions (adherence) were also estimated. Satisfaction was evaluated post-intervention through a self-report questionnaire. RESULTS: 240 patients were initially screened, 60% (n = 145) were eligible and 38% agreed to participate in the study. Included patients (n = 55) had a mean age of 73 ± 3 years, 96% an ECOG score of 0-1 and were undergoing radiotherapy (64%), and/or chemotherapy (47%) and/or targeted therapy (36%) for stage I-II breast cancer (79%). Most patients reported significant cognitive complaints (82%) and 55% had previous experience with digital tools (n = 30). The usability rate was 92%, with 46 out of 50 evaluable participants completing at least three exercises during the training time. The adherence rate was 88%, with 43/50 participants completing all planned sessions. Participants were largely satisfied with the cognitive intervention format (87%). They preferred to complete sessions at the cancer center under the supervision of the neuropsychologist than alone at home (90%). CONCLUSIONS: The high level of usability, adherence and satisfaction in this study shows for the first time the feasibility of digital cognitive stimulation in cancer patients older than 70 years. However, the intervention should be proposed only to patients reporting cognitive complaints and should be structured and supervised to improve acceptability and adherence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials identifier: NCT04261153, registered on 07/02/2020.

Cognitive change in breast cancer patients up to 2 years after diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Using the large nationwide French, national, multicenter, prospective cancer and toxicities (CANTO) cohort, we assessed cognitive functioning change after cancer treatments in a subgroup of breast cancer (BC) patients. METHODS: We included patients with newly diagnosed invasive stage I-III BC enrolled in the CANTO substudy focused on cognitive evaluation and healthy control women matched for age and education. Episodic and working memory, executive functions, processing speed, attention, self-report cognitive difficulties (SRCD), fatigue, anxiety and depression were assessed with neuropsychological tests and self-report questionnaires before treatment (baseline) and approximately 1 (year 1) and 2 years (year 2) after diagnosis. We used linear mixed models to study changes in cognition and tested the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: We studied 276 localized BC patients (62% chemotherapy) compared with 135 healthy controls (HC). After adjustment, patients had lower baseline working memory, processing speed, and attention scores than HC (P ≤ .001), and the difference remained statistically significant over follow-up for working memory and processing speed. Executive function scores were similar between groups at baseline but decreased at year 1 among patients compared with HC (Pchange = .006). This decrease in chemotherapy patients was statistically significant compared with HC scores (Pchange < .001). After adjustment, SRCD were similar between BC patients and HC at baseline but increased in patients after treatment at year 1 (Pchange = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive difficulties are an important concern in BC patients, starting at diagnosis. Cancer treatments induce executive function decline and SRCD, which decrease over follow-up.

Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Breast Cancer before Surgery: Results from a CANTO Cohort Subgroup.

BACKGROUND: Twenty to 30% of patients with breast cancer have cognitive impairment after surgery and before adjuvant treatment, but very few studies have focused on cognition before any treatment. This study used a subgroup of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer from the French cancer and toxicities (CANTO) cohort to describe cognition before any treatment in comparison with a group of healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Cognitive assessment was performed before any breast cancer treatment (surgery or neoadjuvant treatment) on women with newly diagnosed invasive stage I-III breast cancer and HCs. Objective cognitive performance, cognitive complaints, anxiety, depression, and fatigue were assessed. Objective cognitive impairment was defined according to International Cognition and Cancer Task Force recommendations. RESULTS: Of the 264 included patients with breast cancer (54 ± 11 years) and 132 age-matched HCs (53 ± 9 years), overall objective cognitive impairment was observed in 28% of patients with breast cancer and 8% of HCs (P < 0.001). Cognitive complaints were reported by 24% of patients versus 12% of HCs (P < 0.01). Patients reported significantly more anxiety and emotional and cognitive fatigue than HCs (P < 0.01). After adjustment, significantly more patients with breast cancer had overall objective cognitive impairment than HCs [OR = 3.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31-6.88] without significant difference between groups for cognitive complaints (OR = 1.38; 95% CI: 0.65-2.92). Cognitive complaints were positively associated with fatigue (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02-1.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study, compared with HCs, patients with localized breast cancer had more objective cognitive impairment before any treatment. Cognitive complaints were mostly related to fatigue. IMPACT: Baseline assessment before treatment is important to assess the impact of each cancer treatment on cognition.