Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol ; 19(5): 292-7, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20868303

RESUMO

The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic treatment of distal infiltrative ureteral endometriosis with segmental ureteral resection, ureteroneocystostomy, and vesicopsoas hitch. We performed a retrospective analysis of perioperative data and looked at follow-up outcomes of patients with deep endometriosis with ureteral involvement treated by laparoscopic vesicopsoas hitch. Six patients were treated for left ureteral endometriosis in the study period. Four of those were diagnosed during previous laparoscopies. A ureteroneocystostomy (Lich-Gregoir reimplantation procedure) with vesicopsoas hitch was fashioned laparoscopically in all cases, and a double-J stent was applied intraoperatively. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications and no cases of extravasation of contrast at cystogram one week after surgery. The median follow-up time was 38 months (range 12-56). All patients had normal renal ultrasound or intravenous pyelogram results at one year follow-up. This study confirmed that laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy and vesicopsoas hitch is a safe and effective option in the management of distal ureteral endometriosis. In view of the small size of this series, multicenter studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.


Assuntos
Cistostomia/métodos , Endometriose/cirurgia , Doenças Ureterais/cirurgia , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Adulto , Cistostomia/efeitos adversos , Endometriose/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Doenças Ureterais/patologia , Ureteroscopia/efeitos adversos
2.
Ann Ital Chir ; 81(3): 221-5, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21090561

RESUMO

AIM: We report our recent experience with the TriPort system (trademark of Advanced Surgical Concepts, Wicklow, Ireland) to perform a laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy via a single periumbilical incision. CASE REPORT: A 48-year-old multiparous woman was referred to us on March 2009 because of menometrorrhagia and uterine fibroids. RESULTS: The procedure was performed without intraoperative complications. The weight of the uterus was 360 gr. At the 10 months follow-up the patient did not refer any problem. DISCUSSION: Although our experience represented a potentially difficult surgery because of the size of the uterus, severe adhesions (two previous caesarean sessions) and the lack of experience with the new system, the procedure demonstrated to be feasible. As for our knowledge the present report represents the first case of single port laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy performed with the TriPort system in Italy. CONCLUSION: Single port laparoscopy is feasible and could potentially decrease postoperative pain as well as increase patient satisfaction. Although the early experience with TriPort system is promising, experienced laparoscopic skills are essential for the safe and effective performing of the procedure.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/instrumentação , Laparoscopia , Leiomioma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 138(2): 222-5, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17913330

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the three-step hysteroscopic endometrial ablation (EA) technique without endometrial preparation, and its long-term outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Four hundred and thirty-eight premenopausal women with menorrhagia or menometrorrhagia underwent three-step hysteroscopic EA, which consists of rollerball ablation of the fundus and cornual regions, a cutting loop endomyometrial resection of the rest of the cavity, and rollerball redessication of the whole pre-ablated uterine cavity. The main outcome measures were menstrual status, level of satisfaction with the procedure, and the need for repeat ablation or hysterectomy. Questionnaires were completed for 385 women (87.9%) with a mean follow-up of 48.2 months. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-four responders (47.8%) reported amenorrhea; 177 (46%) had light to normal flow. One patient (0.3%) underwent repeat ablation and 20 (5.2%) underwent hysterectomy: 15 (3.9%) because of endometrial ablation failure and 5 (1.3%) because of indications unrelated to the ablation (three cases of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and two cases of fibroids). Two hundred and ninety-two patients (75.8%) were very satisfied, and 78 (20.3%) satisfied with the results. No major complications occurred and three women (0.8%) became pregnant during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: EA is safe and effective means of treating of menorrhagia and menometrorrhagia in premenopausal women, and helps avoid hysterectomy in 95% of patients suffering from heavy bleeding, with or without uterine fibroids. Women should be informed that the procedure is not contraceptive and that pregnancy is possible after treatment.


Assuntos
Endométrio/cirurgia , Histeroscopia/métodos , Menorragia/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA