Concurrent systemic therapy with radiotherapy for the treatment of poor-risk patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the therapeutic approach to poor-risk patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), despite the increasing number of these patients in current clinical practice. In terms of survival, the combination of concurrent systemic therapy with standard radiotherapy might be advantageous over radiotherapy alone. The purpose of this review is to ascertain the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the combination of concurrent systemic therapy and standard radiotherapy in these patients. METHODS: A computer-based literature search was carried out using PubMed and Science Direct for relevant publications; data reported at major conferences in abstract form were also included. RESULTS: In unresectable stage III NSCLC, advanced age, poor performance status, weight loss and comorbidities are factors that influence treatment options and disease outcomes in clinical practice. Prospective studies including poor-risk patients have been reviewed. Trials specifically recruiting poor-risk patients have been separated into those using chemotherapy and those using targeted agents with or without chemotherapy. Only two phase III studies specifically including poor-risk patients have been published. Some recent studies suggested that tolerable radio-sensitizing therapy combined with radiotherapy can provide longer survival outcomes than those reported earlier with chemo-radiotherapy or with radiotherapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: There is an unmet need to develop well-designed clinical trials with tolerable combinations of systemic therapy and radiotherapy specifically tailored to this lung cancer population. Such trials should incorporate careful comorbidity measurement and, in older adults, a validated geriatric assessment.

A randomized phase II study comparing induction or consolidation chemotherapy with cisplatin-docetaxel, plus radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin-docetaxel, in patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: In stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the role of systemic chemotherapy preceding or following concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CT-RT) is unclear. We carried out a randomized phase II study to study the toxicity involved-field CT-RT with either induction or consolidation cisplatin-docetaxel (Taxotere). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive two cycles of docetaxel (D) 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 and cisplatin (C) 40 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2, either preceding (IND arm) or following (CON arm) concurrent CT-RT, where 66 Gy was delivered using involved-fields concurrent with weekly D 20 mg/m(2) and C 20 mg/m(2). Patients at higher risk for lung toxicity (V(20) > 35%) crossed over to IND arm. Seventy patients were needed to exclude grade (G)3-4 esophagitis in >25%. RESULTS: Of the 70 eligible patients, 26 were treated in IND and 34 CON; five with V(20) >35% switched from CON to IND. The differences in G3-4 esophagitis observed (32/2% IND versus 21/3% CON) were not significantly different from the hypothesized 25% rate. Rates of G≥2 pneumonitis were similar, but IND arm had less G3-4 neutropenia. One-year survival was 63.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 48.4% to 78.0%] and 65.5% (95% CI 48.2% to 82.8%) for the IND and CON arms, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both study arms merit further testing in patients with limited volume stage III NSCLC.

A multicenter international randomized phase III study comparing cisplatin in combination with irinotecan or etoposide in previously untreated small-cell lung cancer patients with extensive disease.

BACKGROUND: This study compared irinotecan plus cisplatin (IP) with etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) in small-cell lung cancer patients with extensive disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) and either irinotecan 65 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8 or etoposide 100 mg/m(2), days 1-3, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were balanced between patients receiving IP (N = 202) or EP (N = 203). Median overall survival was nonsignificantly superior for patients receiving IP versus EP, 10.2 versus 9.7 months [hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.01, P = 0.06] and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 41.9% versus 38.9% and 16.3% versus 8.2%, respectively. Noninferiority of IP versus EP was established, upper bound of the 95% CI of HR 1.01 (prespecified margin IP/EP <1.25). Overall response (39.1% versus 46.6%) and time to tumor progression (5.4 versus 6.2 months) were not superior for IP. Grade 3/4 vomiting (10.9% versus 4.4%) and diarrhea (15.4% versus 0.5%) were more common in the IP versus EP arm; grade 3/4 neutropenia was more frequent in the EP (59.6%) versus IP arm (38.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate the noninferiority of IP versus EP for survival in primarily Western patients with SCLC-ED. A meta-analysis is required to finally assess the role of irinotecan in this setting.

Treatment of patients with unresectable squamous head and neck cancer with induction chemotherapy followed by hyperfractionated radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The contribution of induction chemotherapy (CT) followed by hyperfractionated radiotherapy (hfRT) in unresectable squamous head and neck cancer has been evaluated in a single institution as an assistencial protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 1994 to June 2000 all consecutive patients with unresectable disease were treated with four courses of platin plus fluorouracil based CT followed by hfRT. Tumor resectability and response was assessed by a multidisciplinary committee. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (pts) were treated. All of them had stage IV-M0 disease: 67 T4, 88 N2-N3. Tumor location: 62 oropharynx, 22 hypopharynx, eight oral cavity and seven larynx. Tumor response at the end of treatment: 61 patients complete response, 17 partial response, two stable disease, 10 progressive disease and nine unevaluated. With a median follow-up of 70 months the 5-year loco-regional control and overall survival was 30.3% (95% CI: 21.9-38.6) and 21.6% (95% CI: 13.4-29.8), respectively. Loco-regional control and overall survival is significantly influenced by prior response to induction CT. Main grade 3-4 toxicity related to CT was stomatitis, but there were five patients with an ischemic event. Grade 3-4 acute toxicity related to hfRT: 47 stomatitis, 20 epithelitis. Chronic toxicity related to hfRT: six emergency tracheotomies due to laryngeal edema, five pneumonia and one mucous/soft-tissue necrosis. There were eight toxic related deaths. CONCLUSION: Induction CT followed by hfRT might increase the overall survival rate in unresectable disease. HfRT resulted in a high rate of acute toxicity and its use would not be warranted in those patients with no response to induction CT who had a low probability of long-term control.

Brain functional connectivity in lung cancer population: an exploratory study.

The present study aimed to explore the functional connectivity differences in Resting State Networks (RSNs) induced by cancer and chemotherapy in Lung Cancer (LC) patients using an Independent Component Analysis (ICA). Three matched groups of 15 LC patients following Chemotherapy (C+), 15 LC patients before Chemotherapy (C-) and 15 Healthy Controls (HC) were included. Analysis was performed using ICA and a multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) to classify groups based on profiles of functional connectivity. We found significant differences in four of the RSN identified: Default Mode Network (DMN), Predominantly Left and Right Anterior Temporal Network, and Cerebellum Network. Whereas DMN showed decreased connectivity, the other RSNs exhibited increased connectivity in both LC groups compared to HC and in C+ in comparison to C-. MVPA discriminated significantly and accurately between all groups. Our study showed that disrupted functional connectivity associated with cancer and chemotherapy-induced cognitive deficits is not only related to DMN decreased connectivity abnormalities but also to an increased connectivity of other RSNs, suggesting a potential compensatory mechanism. Graphical abstract.

Serum anti-p53 antibodies and prognosis of patients with small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with cancer develop antibodies against the p53 tumor suppressor protein. The presence of these antibodies in serum has been associated with the expression of mutant p53 by the tumor and in some studies with a poorer survival. PURPOSE: The goals of this study were to determine the prevalence of anti-p53 antibodies in the serum of patients with newly diagnosed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and to assess the clinical relevance of the presence of these antibodies in the serum, particularly their relationship with tumor response to treatment and with patient survival. METHODS: In this prospective study, serum was obtained from 170 patients at the time of diagnosis of SCLC who were to subsequently receive platinum- or doxorubicin-based chemotherapy at any one of four hospitals in Barcelona, Spain, from October 1991 through June 1994. Normal human sera from blood bank donors (n = 50) served as controls. The presence of anti-p53 antibodies was determined by western blot analysis with the use of purified recombinant p53 protein. As of January 1996, 96.5% of the patients had been treated and observed in the study, for a median follow-up time of 33.5 months. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression and unconditional logistic regression analyses were conducted. All P values resulted from two-sided tests. RESULTS: Anti-p53 antibodies were detected in the serum of 27 (16%) of the 170 patients studied. None of 50 serum samples from normal individuals contained anti-p53 antibodies. Analysis of pretreatment clinical characteristics demonstrated that a weight loss of less than 5% (P = .025), a serum lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH) level of less than 450 U/L (P = .002), and limited stage disease (i.e., tumor confined to one hemithorax, with local and regional lymph node positivity for tumor cells and/or ipsilateral pleural effusion allowed) (P < .001) were associated with a statistically significant complete response to therapy. The presence of serum anti-p53 antibodies was not associated with clinical characteristics, such as age (P = .622), functional status (P = 1.0), disease stage (P = .634), complete response to treatment (P = .572), and survival (P = .492) or with any laboratory parameters including known prognostic factors in SCLC, such as serum sodium or LDH concentration (P values of .731 and .246, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The presence of anti-p53 antibodies in the serum of patients with newly diagnosed SCLC was not associated with any clinical characteristics or prognostic markers, suggesting that, in this context, the measurement of anti-p53 antibodies is not a useful prognostic marker.

Anti-Hu antibodies in patients with small-cell lung cancer: association with complete response to therapy and improved survival.

PURPOSE: Anti-Hu antibodies (HuAb) recognize antigens expressed by neurons and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). High titers of HuAb were initially reported in serum from patients with paraneoplastic encephalomyelitis/sensory neuropathy (PEM/SN) and SCLC. Preliminary studies have indicated that some SCLC patients without PEM/SN harbor low titer of HuAb in their serum, and that the SCLC of these patients may grow more indolently. Based on these observations, we conducted a multicenter prospective study of SCLC patients without PEM/SN to determine the incidence and prognostic implications of HuAb. METHODS: Serum samples were collected at diagnosis of SCLC in 196 patients without PEM/SN. HuAb were determined by immunoblot of purified recombinant HuD antigen. RESULTS: HuAb were detected in 32 (16%) of the 196 patients. Of the 170 patients who received treatment for the tumor, 27 (16%) were HuAb positive. HuAb was associated with limited disease stage (59.3% v 38.6%; P = .047), complete response to therapy (55.6% v 19.6%; P < .001), and longer survival (14.9 v 10.2 months; P = .018). In a logistic regression analysis, HuAb status was an independent predictor of complete response induction. The probability of achieving a complete response was more than five times higher in HuAb-positive than in HuAb-negative patients (odds ratio, 5.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.71 to 16.89; P = .004). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that HuAb status was not independently associated with survival. CONCLUSION: The presence of HuAb at diagnosis of SCLC is a strong and independent predictor of complete response to treatment. This feature accounts for the association between HuAb and longer survival.

Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine-cisplatin versus etoposide-cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted a randomized trial to compare gemcitabine-cisplatin with etoposide-cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary end point of the comparison was response rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 135 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8 or etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 3 along with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 IV day 1. Both treatments were administered in 21-day cycles. One hundred thirty-three patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis of response. RESULTS: The response rate (externally validated) for patients given gemcitabine-cisplatin was superior to that for patients given etoposide-cisplatin (40.6% v 21.9%; P = .02). This superior response rate was associated with a significant delay in time to disease progression (6.9 months v 4.3 months; P = .01) without an impairment in quality of life (QOL). There was no statistically significant difference in survival time between both arms (8.7 months for gemcitabine-cisplatin v 7.2 months for etoposide-cisplatin; P = .18). The overall toxicity profile for both combinations of drugs was similar. Nausea and vomiting were reported more frequently in the gemcitabine arm than in the etoposide arm. However, the difference was not significant. Gemcitabine-cisplatin produced less grade 3 alopecia (13% v 51%) and less grade 4 neutropenia (28% v 56% ) but more grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia (56% v 13%) than did etoposide-cisplatin. However, there were no thrombocytopenia-related complications in the gemcitabine arm. CONCLUSION: Compared with etoposide-cisplatin, gemcitabine-cisplatin provides a significantly higher response rate and a delay in disease progression without impairing QOL in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus a cisplatin-based triplet versus nonplatinum sequential doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a Spanish Lung Cancer Group phase III randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the survival benefit obtained with cisplatin plus gemcitabine, a cisplatin-based triplet, and nonplatinum sequential doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage IIIB to IV NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 plus gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for six cycles (CG); cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for six cycles (CGV); or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 plus vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for three cycles, followed by vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 plus ifosfamide 3 g/m2 day 1, every 3 weeks for three cycles (GV-VI). RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-seven patients were assigned to treatment (182 CG, 188 CGV, 187 GV-VI). Response rates were significantly inferior for the nonplatinum sequential doublet (CG, 42%; CGV, 41%; GV-VI, 27%; CG v GV-VI, P =.003). No differences in median survival or time to progression were observed. Toxicity was higher for the triplet: grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (GC, 32%; CGV, 57%; GV-VI, 27%; P <.05); neutropenic fever (CG, 4%; CGV, 19%; GV-VI, 5%; P <.0001); grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia (CG, 19%; CGV, 23%; GV-VI, 3%; P =.0001); and grade 3 to 4 emesis (GC, 22%; GCV, 32%; GV-VI, 6%; P <.0001). CONCLUSION: On the basis of these results, CG remains a standard regimen for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Three-week schedule of irinotecan and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicentre phase II study.

A phase II multicentre study of a 3-week schedule of irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin providing the highest recommended dose intensity of both agents in combination, was conducted in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Seventy-four stage IIIB (not suitable for radiotherapy) or stage IV NSCLC patients were enrolled to receive CPT-11 200 mg/m(2) i.v. and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1 every 3 weeks. Relative dose-intensities for CPT-11 and cisplatin were 92 and 95%, respectively. No complete responses were observed. Twenty-five patients out of 73 obtained a partial response (34.2%). Partial responses were confirmed in 18 patients (24.7%: 95% CI, 15.3-36.1%). Median survival overall was 8.2 months, 9.7 months for patients with baseline performance status (PS) 0 and 1, and 4 months for patients with PS 2. The 1-year survival rate was 31%. Major clinical toxicities were grade 3 and 4 delayed diarrhoea (29% of patients) and febrile neutropenia (14% of patients). In conclusion, the present once-every-3-week schedule of CPT-11 and cisplatin is feasible and active in PS 0-1 advanced NSCLC patients, but results do not seem superior to those reported with other schedules.

Treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome by endovascular stent insertion. Experience on 52 patients with lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is a frequent presentation of malignancies involving the mediastinum and can seriously compromise treatment options and prognosis. Stenting of superior vena cava is a well-known but not so commonly used technique to alleviate this syndrome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 1993 and December 2000 we performed 52 stenting procedures in patients affected by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RESULTS: Phlebographic resolution of the obstruction was achieved in 100% of cases with symptomatic and subjective improvement in more than 80%. One major complication was observed due to bleeding during anticoagulation. Re-obstruction of the stent occurred in only 17% of the cases, the majority due to disease progression. Improvement of the syndrome allowed hydration necessary for full dose platinum treatment when indicated in patients affected by lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Stenting of the superior vena cava syndrome is a safe and effective procedure achieving a rapid alleviation of symptoms in almost all patients, and allowing for full dose treatment in lung cancer patients. This procedure could change the traditional poorer prognosis attributed to non-small cell lung cancer patients presenting with this syndrome.

Economic evaluation in a randomized phase III clinical trial comparing gemcitabine/cisplatin and etoposide/cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Information on the relative cost-effectiveness of treatments for cancer is being increasingly sought as pressure on health care resources increases. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) versus cisplatin/etoposide (CE) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), using resource utilization data collected in conjunction with the first randomized clinical trial comparing both combinations. METHODS: Efficacy and medical care resource utilization data were collected prospectively in an open-label, multicenter, randomized, comparative, phase III trial conducted in Spain which compared gemcitabine/cisplatin and cisplatin/etoposide in 135 chemonaive patients with Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC. There were no differences between both regimens when survival was used as primary end-point, so a cost-minimization analysis was used to compare them. In addition, cost-effectiveness analyses were conducted when percentage of responses and time to progression were used as secondary end-points. RESULTS: There were no differences between both regimens when survival was selected as the efficacy end-point. Despite the higher chemotherapy cost of GC when compared to CE, there were no differences in total direct costs (584523 pts for GC and 589630 pts for CE; P=NS) between both regimens. Potential savings with GC were mainly associated with a decrease in hospitalization rate. There were differences in favor of GC when response rate (40.6% for GC and 21.9% for CE; P<0.05) and time to disease progression (8.7 months for GC and 7.2 months for CE; P<0. 05) were used as clinical end-points. GC presented a favorable cost-effectiveness profile when compared to CE. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective economic evaluation conducted alongside a clinical trial offers valuable preliminary information on the potential efficiency of the combination gemcitabine-cisplatin in NSCLC. Future assessments based on larger clinical trials focused on survival and naturalistic economic studies conducted in real clinical practice settings are necessary to confirm these findings.

Preoperative high-dose cisplatin versus moderate-dose cisplatin combined with ifosfamide and mitomycin in stage IIIA (N2) non small-cell lung cancer: results of a randomized multicenter trial.

Preoperative chemotherapy has become an accepted treatment for stage IIIA (N2) non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The majority of induction regimens employ cisplatin, although the importance of cis-platin dose in combination is unclear. A randomized trial was conducted to address whether higher pre-operative cisplatin doses result in improved survival and increased pathologic complete response in NSCLC. Patients with stage IIIA clinically enlarged and biopsy-proven N2 lesions were randomly assigned to receive either high-dose cisplatin (HDCP) (100 mg/m2) or moderate-dose cisplatin (MDCP) (50 mg/ m2) in combination with ifosfamide (3 g/m2) and mitomycin (6 mg/m2). Disease was restaged after 3 cycles, and those patients with response or stable disease underwent thoracotomy. From March 1993 to February 1997, 83 patients were randomized: 46 received HDCP, and 37 received MDCP. Clinical characteristics were well matched. Radiographic response rate was 59% for HDCP patients and 30% for MDCP patients (P = 0.01). Thoracotomy was performed in 71 patients (86%), 58 of whom had resectable disease. Complete resection rate was 61% in the HDCP group, and 51% in the MDCP group (P = 0.5). Postoperative mortality was 11%. Pathologic complete response was observed in one patient who received MDCP. Median survival in the HDCP and MDCP groups was 13 and 11 months, respectively (P = 0.3). In conclusion, higher radiographic response rate is observed in patients who receive HDCP, but this study fails to show any significant improvement in either overall survival or pathologic complete response in this group of patients.

Lenograstim as support for ACE chemotherapy of small-cell lung cancer: a phase III, multicenter, randomized study.

This phase III study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of lenograstim as support for ACE (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide) chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer. Patients were randomized to receive up to six 3-week cycles of either ACE alone (n = 139) or ACE with lenograstim support (150 microg/m2/day subcutaneously, days 4-13, n = 141). Compared with the chemotherapy-alone group, the lenograstim support group was more likely to achieve neutrophil recovery (absolute neutrophil count, > or =1.5 x 10(9) cells/l) by day 14 (95.8-100% vs. 14.3-24.1% across the cycles) and less likely to experience at least one infectious episode (36.7 vs. 54.0%; p = 0.004), chemotherapy delay (51.8 vs. 56.2%; NS), or dose reduction (17.3 vs. 27.7%; p = 0.037). Objective response and event-free and overall survival rates were similar. Lenograstim was well tolerated. Lenograstim may allow the interval between cycles of ACE to be reduced to 2 weeks; such dose intensification may lead to more favorable objective response and survival rates.

[Germinal tumors of the testis. A caseload and review of the literature]. / Tumores germinales de testículo. Casuística y revisión bibliográfica.

Between 1974 and 1988, 35 testicle germinal tumours, 16 seminomas and 19 non seminomas, were studied. Mean age in seminoma cases was 34 years and 26 in non seminoma cases; the former were mainly presented as located stages at the time of diagnosis (75%) while the latter were, on the contrary, mostly stages II and III. Following orchiectomy, all histologically pure seminomas received radiotherapy with the exception of two cases. All of them are presently free from the disease with an average follow-up of 2.8 years (range 0.5-5 Yr.) Radiotherapy continues to be proposed as first choice therapeutic action for siminomas in located stages, although we do not disagree with other more conservative possibilities. In the non seminoma group, all three patients diagnosed in stage I were clinically controlled without supplementary therapy, two of them having a recurrence during the first year of follow-up, but currently free of the disease after chemotherapy and surgery of residual masses. Of the three non seminoma patients in stage II, with negative post-orchiectomy markers, two underwent lymphadenectomy and the other one only chemotherapy. In the remaining group of non seminoma patients, and always after an orchiectomy, chemotherapy was performed as first choice therapy, although rescue lymphadenectomy was required in eight cases. Chemotherapy schemes with cisplatin have relegated to a second level any other therapy for the non seminoma patients. The excellent response and reduction of side effects allow the adoption of more conservative attitudes. This paper explains our retrospective study and, following a wide review of exiting literature, discussed any conflictive prognostic and therapeutic items.

[Chemoprevention in cancer of the head and neck]. / Quimioprevención en el cáncer de cabeza y cuello.

The world-wide incidence of cancer of the head and neck of 500,000 cases/year has remained unchanged in recent years in spite of anti-smoking campaigns. Moreover, long-term survivors of cancer of the head and neck or of other respiratory and digestive tumors have a constant annual 5-7% risk of developing a second primary tumor in the same area. Lately, prevention programs have added synthetic and natural products to prevention programs for the purpose of reversing the progression of premalignant lesions to invasive cancer or reducing the probability of developing cancer in high-risk individuals. These products are known as chemoprevention agents. In the case of tumors of the head and neck, it is known that leukoplasia and erythroplasia are epithelial lesions on which invasive tumors may develop. Recent studies have demonstrated that the use of retinoids can produce regression rates over 60%, thus reducing the risk of secondary neoplasms of the respiratory and digestive tract by 35-55%. The current status of chemoprevention in head and neck cancer and the use of retinoids as chemoprevention agents in this type of neoplasm are reviewed.

Prospective assessment of XRCC3, XPD and Aurora kinase A single-nucleotide polymorphisms in advanced lung cancer.

PURPOSE: New therapeutic approaches are being developed based on findings that several genetic abnormalities underlying non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can influence chemosensitivity. The identification of molecular markers, useful for therapeutic decisions in lung cancer, is thus crucial for disease management. The present study evaluated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in XRCC3, XPD and Aurora kinase A in NSCLC patients in order to assess whether these biomarkers were able to predict the outcomes of the patients. METHODS: The Spanish Lung Cancer Group prospectively assessed this clinical study. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed stage IV or IIIB (with malignant pleural effusion) NSCLC, which had not previously been treated with chemotherapy, and a World Health Organization performance status (PS) of 0-1. Patients received intravenous doses of vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles. Venous blood was collected from each, and genomic DNA was isolated. SNPs in XRCC3 T241M, XPD K751Q, XPD D312N, AURORA 91, AURORA 169 were assessed. RESULTS: The study included 180 patients. Median age was 62 years; 87 % were male; 34 % had PS 0; and 83 % had stage IV disease. The median number of cycles was 4. Time to progression was 5.1 months (95 % CI, 4.2-5.9). Overall median survival was 8.6 months (95 % CI, 7.1-10.1). There was no significant association between SNPs in XRCC3 T241M, XPD K751Q, XPD D312N, AURORA 91, AURORA 169 in outcome or toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that SNPs in XRCC3, XPD or Aurora kinase A cannot predict outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in MDR1 gen correlates with outcome in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with cisplatin plus vinorelbine.

UNLABELLED: New therapeutic approaches are being developed based on the findings that several genetic abnormalities underlying NSCLC could influence chemosensitivity. In this study, we assessed whether the presence of polymorphisms in ERCC1, XPD, RRM1 and MDR1 genes can affect the efficacy and the tolerability of cisplatin and vinorelbine in NSCLC patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eligible patients had histological confirmed stage IV or IIIB (with malignant pleural effusion) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously untreated with chemotherapy; World Health Organization performance status (PS) 0-1. Patients received intravenous doses of vinorelbine 25 mg/m² on day 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m² on day 1, every 21 days, for a maximum of eight cycles. RESULTS: 94 patients were included. Median age was 61 years; 84% were male; WHO performance status (PS) was 0 in 24%; and 88% of patients had stage IV disease. The median number of cycles was 6. Overall median survival was 10.92 months (95% CI 9.0-12.9). Overall median time to progression was 5.89 months (95% CI 5.2-6.6). Results of the multivariate analysis for time to progression showed that ECOG 0 (hazard ratio [HR] ECOG 1 vs. ECOG 0, 1.74; p=0.036), MDR13435CC (HR CT vs. CC, 2.01; p=0.017; HR TT vs. CC, 1.54; p=0.22), and decreasing age (HR of age, 0.97; p=0.016) were the most powerful prognostic factors significantly related to lower risk of progression. Whereas ECOG 0 was the only prognostic factor for survival (HR ECOG 1 vs. ECOG 0, 3.02; p=0.001). There was no significant association between any of the SNPs analysed and the occurrence of vinorelbine and cisplatin-related toxicity. CONCLUSION: In our results, the most important prognostic factors associated with lower risk of progression were MDR1 3435 CC genotype, PS 0 and younger age.