Differential p53-Mediated Cellular Responses to DNA-Damaging Therapeutic Agents.

The gene TP53, which encodes the tumor suppressor protein p53, is mutated in about 50% of cancers. In response to cell stressors like DNA damage and after treatment with DNA-damaging therapeutic agents, p53 acts as a transcription factor to activate subsets of target genes which carry out cell fates such as apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and DNA repair. Target gene selection by p53 is controlled by a complex regulatory network whose response varies across contexts including treatment type, cell type, and tissue type. The molecular basis of target selection across these contexts is not well understood. Knowledge gained from examining p53 regulatory network profiles across different DNA-damaging agents in different cell types and tissue types may inform logical ways to optimally manipulate the network to encourage p53-mediated tumor suppression and anti-tumor immunity in cancer patients. This may be achieved with combination therapies or with p53-reactivating targeted therapies. Here, we review the basics of the p53 regulatory network in the context of differential responses to DNA-damaging agents; discuss recent efforts to characterize differential p53 responses across treatment types, cell types, and tissue types; and examine the relevance of evaluating these responses in the tumor microenvironment. Finally, we address open questions including the potential relevance of alternative p53 transcriptional functions, p53 transcription-independent functions, and p53-independent functions in the response to DNA-damaging therapeutics.

An Optical Surface Applicator for Intraoperative Photodynamic Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intraoperative photodynamic therapy (IO-PDT) is typically administered by a handheld light source. This can result in uncontrolled distribution of light irradiance that impacts tissue and tumor response to photodynamic therapy. The objective of this work was to characterize a novel optical surface applicator (OSA) designed to administer controlled light irradiance in IO-PDT. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: An OSA was constructed from a flexible silicone mesh applicator with multiple cylindrically diffusing optical fibers (CDF) placed into channels of the silicone. Light irradiance distribution, at 665 nm, was evaluated on the OSA surface and after passage through solid tissue-mimicking optical phantoms by measurements from a multi-channel dosimetry system. As a proof of concept, the light administration of the OSA was tested in a pilot study by conducting a feasibility and performance test with 665-nm laser light to activate 2-(1'-hexyloxyethyl) pyropheophorbide-a (HPPH) in the thoracic cavity of adult swine. RESULTS: At the OSA surface, the irradiance distribution was non-uniform, ranging from 128 to 346 mW/cm2 . However, in the tissue-mimicking phantoms, beam uniformity improved markedly, with irradiance ranges of 39-153, 33-87, and 12-28 mW/cm2 measured at phantom thicknesses of 3, 5, and 10 mm, respectively. The OSA safely delivered the prescribed light dose to the thoracic cavities of four swine. CONCLUSIONS: The OSA can provide predictable light irradiances for administering a well-defined and potentially effective therapeutic light in IO-PDT. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

miR-6883 downregulates HIF1α in colorectal and breast cancer cells.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) and breast cancer (BC) are deadly diseases that rank as the second and fourth leading causes of cancer-related deaths, respectively. We have previously shown that miR-6883 targets CDK4/6 and that palbociclib-mediated CDK4/6 inhibition destabilizes HIF1α. We hypothesize that miR-6883 downregulates HIF1α in CRC and BC cells. miR-6883 was transfected into cells under normoxia or hypoxia and western blot analysis revealed that miR-6883 downregulates CDK4/6 and HIF1α in CRC and BC cells, pointing to miR-6883 as a promising therapeutic to target hypoxic tumors or HIF1α-deregulated cancer cells. Future studies will further investigate miR-6883 as a cancer biomarker, effects on HIF-related proteins, and therapeutic uses in vivo .

Temozolomide combined with ipilimumab plus nivolumab enhances T cell killing of MGMT-expressing, MSS colorectal cancer cells.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer and third-deadliest cancer globally. Over 95% of patients with metastatic CRC have tumors that are microsatellite stable (MSS) and do not respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Results from the 2022 MAYA clinical trial suggest that the DNA-damaging agent temozolomide (TMZ), which is usually used to treat glioblastoma (GBM), sensitizes patients with MSS, MGMT-silenced CRC to ipilimumab + nivolumab ICI. The benefit of adding ipilimumab + nivolumab to TMZ and the impact of MGMT silencing remain unclear. Here, we aimed to determine in a controlled in vitro system if adding ICI to TMZ enhances T cell killing of MSS CRC cells. We also aimed to determine the contribution of MGMT to this response. Western blot analysis indicated that CRC cells (n = 4) had significantly elevated MGMT expression as compared to GBM cells (n = 4) likely due to MGMT promoter methylation in GBM cells. In line with this, CRC cells were slightly more resistant to TMZ compared to GBM cells after five days of treatment. TMZ + ICI sensitized MGMT-expressing, MSS CRC cells to T cell killing. TMZ alone did not enhance T cell killing of MSS or MSI CRC cells but did slightly enhance T cell killing of T98G GBM cells. Our results indicate that TMZ sensitizes MSS, MGMT-expressing CRC cells to ipilimumab + nivolumab ICI. Importantly, this suggests that TMZ-mediated sensitization to ipilimumab + nivolumab appears independent of MGMT status and the patient cohort that may benefit from TMZ + ipilimumab + nivolumab may be expanded to CRC patients with MGMT-expressing, MSS tumors.

Broad spectrum integrin inhibitor GLPG-0187 bypasses immune evasion in colorectal cancer by TGF-ß signaling mediated downregulation of PD-L1.

Integrin receptors have long posed as a potentially attractive target for disrupting cancer hallmarks. Promising preliminary findings with integrin inhibition as an adjuvant to chemotherapy have not translated to clinical success. However, the effect of integrin inhibition on tumor-immune cell interactions remains largely unexplored. Further investigation could shed light on a connection between integrin signaling and immune checkpoint expression, opening the path for using integrin inhibitors to sensitize otherwise resistant tumors to immunotherapy. Fluorescently labeled wild-type HCT-116 colorectal cancer cells and TALL-104 T-cells were co-cultured and treated with GLPG-0187, a small molecule integrin inhibitor, at various doses. This assay revealed dose dependent cancer cell killing, indicating that integrin inhibition may be sensitizing cancer cells to immune cells. The hypothesized mechanism involves TGF-ß-mediated PD-L1 upregulation in cancer cells. To investigate this mechanism, both WT and p53-/- HCT-116 cells were pre-treated with GLPG-0187 and subsequently with latent-TGF-ß. Western blot analysis demonstrated that the addition of latent-TGF-ß increased the expression of PD-L1 in cancer cells. Additionally, a low dose of integrin inhibitor rescued these effects, returning PD-L1 expression back to control levels. This indicates that the immunostimulatory effects of integrin inhibition may be due to downregulation of immune checkpoint PD-L1 on cancer cells. It must be noted that the higher dose of the drug did not reduce PD-L1 expression. This could potentially be due to off-target effects conflicting with the proposed pathway; however, these findings are still under active investigation. Ongoing proteomic experiments will include a larger range of both drug and latent-TGF-ß doses. Probing for additional downstream markers of TGF-ß and up-stream markers of PD-L1 will help to further elucidate this mechanism. Further co-culture experiments will also include anti-PD-L1 and anti-PD-1 therapy to investigate the viability of integrin inhibition as an adjuvant to immune checkpoint blockade.

Pan-integrin inhibitor GLPG-0187 promotes T-cell killing of mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer cells by suppression of SMAD/TGF-ß signaling.

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related death and the third most common cause of cancer. As the five-year survival with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is 14%, new treatment strategies are needed. Immune checkpoint blockade, which takes advantage of an individual's immune system to fight cancer, has an impact in the clinic; however, for CRC, it is only effective and approved for treating mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient cancer. Moreover, long-term outcomes in MMR-deficient mCRC suggest that most patients are not cured and eventually develop therapy resistance. We hypothesized that targeting TGF-ß signaling may enhance immune-mediated T-cell killing by MMR-deficient CRC cells. Using GLPG-0187, an inhibitor of multiple integrin receptors and TGF-ß, we demonstrate minimal cytotoxicity against MMR-deficient HCT116 or p53null HCT116 human CRC cells. GLPG-0187 promoted significant immune cell killing of the CRC cells by TALL-104 T lymphoblast cells and reduced phosphoSMAD2 in HCT116 p53-null cells either in the absence or presence of exogenous TGF-ß. We observed a reduction in CCL20, CXCL5, prolactin, and TRAIL-R3, while GDF-15 was increased in TALL-104 cells treated with a T-cell activating dose of GLPG-0187 (4 µM). Our results suggest that TGF-ß signaling inhibition by a general integrin receptor inhibitor may boost T-cell killing of MMR-deficient colorectal cancer cells and suggest that a combination of anti-GDF-15 in combination with TGF-ß blockade be further investigated in the treatment of MMR-deficient mCRC. Our results support the development of a novel immune-based therapeutic strategy to treat colorectal cancer by targeting the TGF-ß signaling pathway through integrin receptor blockade.

The role of p53 in anti-tumor immunity and response to immunotherapy.

p53 is a transcription factor that regulates the expression of genes involved in tumor suppression. p53 mutations mediate tumorigenesis and occur in approximately 50% of human cancers. p53 regulates hundreds of target genes that induce various cell fates including apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and DNA damage repair. p53 also plays an important role in anti-tumor immunity by regulating TRAIL, DR5, TLRs, Fas, PKR, ULBP1/2, and CCL2; T-cell inhibitory ligand PD-L1; pro-inflammatory cytokines; immune cell activation state; and antigen presentation. Genetic alteration of p53 can contribute to immune evasion by influencing immune cell recruitment to the tumor, cytokine secretion in the TME, and inflammatory signaling pathways. In some contexts, p53 mutations increase neoantigen load which improves response to immune checkpoint inhibition. Therapeutic restoration of mutated p53 can restore anti-cancer immune cell infiltration and ameliorate pro-tumor signaling to induce tumor regression. Indeed, there is clinical evidence to suggest that restoring p53 can induce an anti-cancer immune response in immunologically cold tumors. Clinical trials investigating the combination of p53-restoring compounds or p53-based vaccines with immunotherapy have demonstrated anti-tumor immune activation and tumor regression with heterogeneity across cancer type. In this Review, we discuss the impact of wild-type and mutant p53 on the anti-tumor immune response, outline clinical progress as far as activating p53 to induce an immune response across a variety of cancer types, and highlight open questions limiting effective clinical translation.

Anti-cancer immune responses to DNA damage response inhibitors: Molecular mechanisms and progress toward clinical translation.

DNA damage response inhibitors are widely used anti-cancer agents that have potent activity against tumor cells with deficiencies in various DNA damage response proteins such as BRCA1/2. Inhibition of other proteins in this pathway including PARP, DNA-PK, WEE1, CHK1/2, ATR, or ATM can sensitize cancer cells to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and such combinations are currently being tested in clinical trials for treatment of many malignancies including breast, ovarian, rectal, and lung cancer. Unrepaired DNA damage induced by DNA damage response inhibitors alone or in combination with radio- or chemotherapy has a direct cytotoxic effect on cancer cells and can also engage anti-cancer innate and adaptive immune responses. DNA damage-induced immune stimulation occurs by a variety of mechanisms including by the cGAS/STING pathway, STAT1 and downstream TRAIL pathway activation, and direct immune cell activation. Whether or not the relative contribution of these mechanisms varies after treatment with different DNA damage response inhibitors or across cancers with different genetic aberrations in DNA damage response enzymes is not well-characterized, limiting the design of optimal combinations with radio- and chemotherapy. Here, we review how the inhibition of key DNA damage response enzymes including PARP, DNA-PK, WEE1, CHK1/2, ATR, and ATM induces innate and adaptive immune responses alone or in combination with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and/or immunotherapy. We also discuss current progress in the clinical translation of immunostimulatory DNA-damaging treatment regimens and necessary future directions to optimize the immune-sensitizing potential of DNA damage response inhibitors.

Immunotherapy for Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Predictive Biomarkers.

Though early-stage colorectal cancer has a high 5 year survival rate of 65-92% depending on the specific stage, this probability drops to 13% after the cancer metastasizes. Frontline treatments for colorectal cancer such as chemotherapy and radiation often produce dose-limiting toxicities in patients and acquired resistance in cancer cells. Additional targeted treatments are needed to improve patient outcomes and quality of life. Immunotherapy involves treatment with peptides, cells, antibodies, viruses, or small molecules to engage or train the immune system to kill cancer cells. Preclinical and clinical investigations of immunotherapy for treatment of colorectal cancer including immune checkpoint blockade, adoptive cell therapy, monoclonal antibodies, oncolytic viruses, anti-cancer vaccines, and immune system modulators have been promising, but demonstrate limitations for patients with proficient mismatch repair enzymes. In this review, we discuss preclinical and clinical studies investigating immunotherapy for treatment of colorectal cancer and predictive biomarkers for response to these treatments. We also consider open questions including optimal combination treatments to maximize efficacy, minimize toxicity, and prevent acquired resistance and approaches to sensitize mismatch repair-proficient patients to immunotherapy.

Advanced Strategies for Therapeutic Targeting of Wild-Type and Mutant p53 in Cancer.

TP53 is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes a sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factor activated by stressful stimuli; it upregulates target genes involved in growth suppression, cell death, DNA repair, metabolism, among others. TP53 is the most frequently mutated gene in tumors, with mutations not only leading to loss-of-function (LOF), but also gain-of-function (GOF) that promotes tumor progression, and metastasis. The tumor-specific status of mutant p53 protein has suggested it is a promising target for cancer therapy. We summarize the current progress of targeting wild-type and mutant p53 for cancer therapy through biotherapeutic and biopharmaceutical methods for (1) boosting p53 activity in cancer, (2) p53-dependent and p53-independent strategies for targeting p53 pathway functional restoration in p53-mutated cancer, (3) targeting p53 in immunotherapy, and (4) combination therapies targeting p53, p53 checkpoints, or mutant p53 for cancer therapy.

Integrin/TGF-ß1 Inhibitor GLPG-0187 Blocks SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron Pseudovirus Infection of Airway Epithelial Cells In Vitro, Which Could Attenuate Disease Severity.

As COVID-19 continues to pose major risk for vulnerable populations, including the elderly, immunocompromised, patients with cancer, and those with contraindications to vaccination, novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. SARS-CoV-2 infects target cells via RGD-binding integrins, either independently or as a co-receptor with surface receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). We used pan-integrin inhibitor GLPG-0187 to demonstrate the blockade of SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus infection of target cells. Omicron pseudovirus infected normal human small airway epithelial (HSAE) cells significantly less than D614G or Delta variant pseudovirus, and GLPG-0187 effectively blocked SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus infection in a dose-dependent manner across multiple viral variants. GLPG-0187 inhibited Omicron and Delta pseudovirus infection of HSAE cells more significantly than other variants. Pre-treatment of HSAE cells with MEK inhibitor (MEKi) VS-6766 enhanced the inhibition of pseudovirus infection by GLPG-0187. Because integrins activate transforming growth factor beta (TGF-ß) signaling, we compared the plasma levels of active and total TGF-ß in COVID-19+ patients. The plasma TGF-ß1 levels correlated with age, race, and number of medications upon presentation with COVID-19, but not with sex. Total plasma TGF-ß1 levels correlated with activated TGF-ß1 levels. Moreover, the inhibition of integrin signaling prevents SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron pseudovirus infectivity, and it may mitigate COVID-19 severity through decreased TGF-ß1 activation. This therapeutic strategy may be further explored through clinical testing in vulnerable and unvaccinated populations.

Integrin/TGF-ß1 inhibitor GLPG-0187 blocks SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron pseudovirus infection of airway epithelial cells which could attenuate disease severity.

As COVID-19 continues to pose major risk for vulnerable populations including the elderly, immunocompromised, patients with cancer, and those with contraindications to vaccination, novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. SARS-CoV-2 infects target cells via RGD-binding integrins either independently or as a co-receptor with surface receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). We used pan-integrin inhibitor GLPG-0187 to demonstrate blockade of SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus infection of target cells. Omicron pseudovirus infected normal human small airway epithelial (HSAE) cells significantly less than D614G or Delta variant pseudovirus, and GLPG-0187 effectively blocked SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus infection in a dose-dependent manner across multiple viral variants. GLPG-0187 inhibited Omicron and Delta pseudovirus infection of HSAE cells more significantly than other variants. Pre-treatment of HSAE cells with MEK inhibitor (MEKi) VS-6766 enhanced inhibition of pseudovirus infection by GLPG-0187. Because integrins activate TGF-ß signaling, we compared plasma levels of active and total TGF-ß in COVID-19+ patients. Plasma TGF-ß1 levels correlated with age, race, and number of medications upon presentation with COVID-19, but not with sex. Total plasma TGF-ß1 levels correlated with activated TGF-ß1 levels. In our preclinical studies, Omicron infects lower airway lung cells less efficiently than other COVID-19 variants. Moreover, inhibition of integrin signaling prevents SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron pseudovirus infectivity, and may mitigate COVID-19 severity through decreased TGF-ß1 activation. This therapeutic strategy may be further explored through clinical testing in vulnerable and unvaccinated populations.

Opposing effects of BRCA1 mRNA expression on patient survival in breast and colorectal cancer and variations among African American, Asian, and younger patients.

Breast cancer (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) are common and show poor survival in advanced stages. Using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) computational tool cBioPortal, we evaluated overall patient survival in BRCA1 mRNA-low versus -high cohorts (<-1.29 versus >1.05 SD from mean BRCA1 expression, respectively). Analysis included 1082 BC patients with mRNA data (PanCancer Atlas), 382 CRCs (Firehose Legacy) and 592 CRCs (PanCancer Atlas). As previously reported, BRCA1 mRNA-low tumor expression positively correlated with BC patient survival but was negatively associated in CRC. We observed a correlation between BRCA1 mRNA-high and age <45 years at CRC diagnosis using a Fisher's exact test [Firehose Legacy database (p-value = 0.0091); CRC PanCancer Atlas (p-value = 0.0778)]. We correlated BRCA1 mRNA-low expression and basal BC (p-value = 0.0016) and BRCA1 mRNA-low tumors and frequency of African American patients (p-value = 0.0448) with BC. Other trends included higher frequency of advanced lymph node stage and mucinous adenocarcinoma among BRCA1 mRNA-low CRC and higher frequency of males in BRCA1 mRNA-high BC and CRC. African Americans more frequently had BRCA1 mRNA-low BC and BRCA1 mRNA-high CRC and the opposite was observed among Asians. Using a gene co-expression tool (cBioPortal), we observed TOP2A and ATAD5 levels correlate (Spearman's correlation>0.6) with BRCA1 in BC and CRC, whereas LMNB2 correlates with BRCA1 in CRC, suggesting tissue-specific BRCA1 interactions. Our results indicate potential for BRCA1 mRNA expression levels as a prognostic biomarker in BC and CRC, suggest tissue-specificity in BRCA1 molecular interactions, and point to BRCA1 mRNA-high levels as a characteristic of CRC tumors in younger versus older individuals.

Integrating Molecular Biomarker Inputs Into Development and Use of Clinical Cancer Therapeutics.

Biomarkers can contribute to clinical cancer therapeutics at multiple points along the patient's diagnostic and treatment course. Diagnostic biomarkers can screen or classify patients, while prognostic biomarkers predict their survival. Biomarkers can also predict treatment efficacy or toxicity and are increasingly important in development of novel cancer therapeutics. Strategies for biomarker identification have involved large-scale genomic and proteomic analyses. Pathway-specific biomarkers are already in use to assess the potential efficacy of immunotherapy and targeted cancer therapies. Judicious application of machine learning techniques can identify disease-relevant features from large data sets and improve predictive models. The future of biomarkers likely involves increasing utilization of liquid biopsy and multiple samplings to better understand tumor heterogeneity and identify drug resistance.

Chemotherapy-induced cytokines and prognostic gene signatures vary across breast and colorectal cancer.

The mechanisms by which chemotherapeutic drugs mediate efficacy and toxicity in patients across cancers are not fully understood. A poorly understood aspect of the tumor cell response to chemotherapy is cytokine regulation. Some drug-induced cytokines promote the anti-cancer activity of the drugs, but others may promote proliferation, metastasis, and drug resistance. We evaluated effects of clinical chemotherapeutics oxaliplatin, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, paclitaxel, docetaxel, and carboplatin on a panel of 52 cytokines in MCF7 breast cancer (BC) cells. We observed pan-drug effects, such as the upregulation of TRAIL-R2 and Chitinase 3-like 1 and drug-specific effects on interleukin and CXCL cytokines. We compared cytokine regulation in MCF7 BC and HCT116 colorectal cancer (CRC) cells, revealing tissue-specific drug effects such as enhanced upregulation of TRAIL-R2 and downregulation of IFN-ß and TRAIL in MCF7 by cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and 5-FU. We found that chemotherapy-inducible transcripts have varying potential for prognostic significance in CRC versus BC. Among the non-prognostic CRC genes that were prognostic in BC were NFKBIA and GADD45A, both of which support anti-cancer drug mechanisms. Thus, we establish a novel 7-drug, 52-cytokine signature in MCF7 BC cells and a 3-drug, 40-cytokine signature in HCT116 CRC cells that suggest drug-specific and tissue-specific cytokine regulation. Distinct differences across prognostic gene signatures in BC and CRC further support tissue specificity in the relative impact of drug-regulated genes on patient survival.

Pan-drug and drug-specific mechanisms of 5-FU, irinotecan (CPT-11), oxaliplatin, and cisplatin identified by comparison of transcriptomic and cytokine responses of colorectal cancer cells.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) caused over 900,000 deaths worldwide in 2020. A majority of late-stage CRC patients are treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with either irinotecan (CPT-11), oxaliplatin, or both. Despite their widespread use, the mechanisms of efficacy and toxicity of these drugs remain incompletely understood. While previous work has investigated cellular responses to these agents individually, we directly compare the transcriptomic and cytokine profiles of HCT116 wild-type and p53-/- colorectal cancer cells treated with these drugs and report pan-drug, drug-specific, drug class-specific, p53-independent, and p53-dependent signatures. We observed downregulation of histone genes by 5-FU (that significantly correlates with improved survival in CRC patients) and upregulation of FOS and ATF3 by oxaliplatin (which may contribute to peripheral neuropathy). BTG2 was identified as a top gene upregulated by all four drugs, suggesting its critical role in the cellular response to chemotherapy in CRC. Soluble TRAILR2 (death receptor 5; DR5) is a decoy receptor for TRAIL, an apoptosis-inducing cytokine. TRAILR2 was down-regulated by oxaliplatin and 5-FU, was not affected by CPT-11, and was increased by cisplatin. There was an increase in IL-8 by oxaliplatin and increase in ferritin by cisplatin which may contribute to cancer cell survival. Novel drug-specific mechanisms of efficacy or toxicity identified in these signatures may be targeted with combination therapies or development of new targeted therapies. Together, the findings here contribute to our understanding of the molecular bases of efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents often used for treatment of GI cancer such as CRC.

Therapeutic Targeting of Autophagy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive disease characterized by early metastasis, late detection, and poor prognosis. Progress towards effective therapy has been slow despite significant efforts. Novel treatment approaches are desperately needed and autophagy, an evolutionary conserved process through which proteins and organelles are recycled for use as alternative energy sources, may represent one such target. Although incompletely understood, there is growing evidence suggesting that autophagy may play a role in PDAC carcinogenesis, metastasis, and survival. Early clinical trials involving autophagy inhibiting agents, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, have been disappointing. Recently, evidence has demonstrated synergy between the MAPK pathway and autophagy inhibitors in PDAC, suggesting a promising therapeutic intervention. In addition, novel agents, such as ONC212, have preclinical activity in pancreatic cancer, in part through autophagy inhibition. We discuss autophagy in PDAC tumorigenesis, metabolism, modulation of the immune response, and preclinical and clinical data with selected autophagy modulators as therapeutics.

Natural Killer cell activation, reduced ACE2, TMPRSS2, cytokines G-CSF, M-CSF and SARS-CoV-2-S pseudovirus infectivity by MEK inhibitor treatment of human cells.

COVID-19 affects vulnerable populations including elderly individuals and patients with cancer. Natural Killer (NK) cells and innate-immune TRAIL suppress transformed and virally-infected cells. ACE2, and TMPRSS2 protease promote SARS-CoV-2 infectivity, while inflammatory cytokines IL-6, or G-CSF worsen COVID-19 severity. We show MEK inhibitors (MEKi) VS-6766, trametinib and selumetinib reduce ACE2 expression in human cells. In some human cells, remdesivir increases ACE2-promoter luciferase-reporter expression, ACE2 mRNA and protein, and ACE2 expression is attenuated by MEKi. In serum-deprived and stimulated cells treated with remdesivir and MEKi we observed correlations between pRB, pERK, and ACE2 expression further supporting role of proliferative state and MAPK pathway in ACE2 regulation. We show elevated cytokines in COVID-19-(+) patient plasma (N=9) versus control (N=11). TMPRSS2, inflammatory cytokines G-CSF, M-CSF, IL-1α, IL-6 and MCP-1 are suppressed by MEKi alone or with remdesivir. We observed MEKi stimulation of NK-cell killing of target-cells, without suppressing TRAIL-mediated cytotoxicity. Pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2 virus with a lentiviral core and SARS-CoV-2 D614 or G614 SPIKE (S) protein on its envelope infected human bronchial epithelial cells, small airway epithelial cells, or lung cancer cells and MEKi suppressed infectivity of the pseudovirus. We show a drug class-effect with MEKi to stimulate NK cells, inhibit inflammatory cytokines and block host-factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection leading also to suppression of SARS-CoV-2-S pseudovirus infection of human cells. MEKi may attenuate SARS-CoV-2 infection to allow immune responses and antiviral agents to control disease progression.

MEK inhibitors reduce cellular expression of ACE2, pERK, pRb while stimulating NK-mediated cytotoxicity and attenuating inflammatory cytokines relevant to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

COVID-19 affects vulnerable populations including elderly individuals and patients with cancer. Natural Killer (NK) cells and innate-immune TRAIL suppress transformed and virally-infected cells. ACE2, and TMPRSS2 protease promote SARS-CoV-2 infectivity, while inflammatory cytokines IL-6, or G-CSF worsen COVID-19 severity. We show MEK inhibitors (MEKi) VS-6766, trametinib and selumetinib reduce ACE2 expression in human cells. In some human cells, remdesivir increases ACE2-promoter luciferase-reporter expression, ACE2 mRNA and protein, and ACE2 expression is attenuated by MEKi. In serum-deprived and stimulated cells treated with remdesivir and MEKi we observed correlations between pRB, pERK, and ACE2 expression further supporting role of proliferative state and MAPK pathway in ACE2 regulation. We show elevated cytokines in COVID-19-(+) patient plasma (N = 9) versus control (N = 11). TMPRSS2, inflammatory cytokines G-CSF, M-CSF, IL-1α, IL-6 and MCP-1 are suppressed by MEKi alone or with remdesivir. We observed MEKi stimulation of NK-cell killing of target-cells, without suppressing TRAIL-mediated cytotoxicity. Pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2 virus with a lentiviral core and SARS-CoV-2 D614 or G614 SPIKE (S) protein on its envelope infected human bronchial epithelial cells, small airway epithelial cells, or lung cancer cells and MEKi suppressed infectivity of the pseudovirus. We show a drug class-effect with MEKi to stimulate NK cells, inhibit inflammatory cytokines and block host-factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection leading also to suppression of SARS-CoV-2-S pseudovirus infection of human cells. MEKi may attenuate SARS-CoV-2 infection to allow immune responses and antiviral agents to control disease progression.

ONC201 and imipridones: Anti-cancer compounds with clinical efficacy.

ONC201 was originally discovered as TNF-Related Apoptosis Inducing Ligand (TRAIL)-inducing compound TIC10. ONC201 appears to act as a selective antagonist of the G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2), and as an allosteric agonist of mitochondrial protease caseinolytic protease P (ClpP). Downstream of target engagement, ONC201 activates the ATF4/CHOP-mediated integrated stress response leading to TRAIL/Death Receptor 5 (DR5) activation, inhibits oxidative phosphorylation via c-myc, and inactivates Akt/ERK signaling in tumor cells. This typically results in DR5/TRAIL-mediated apoptosis of tumor cells; however, DR5/TRAIL-independent apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, or antiproliferative effects also occur. The effects of ONC201 extend beyond bulk tumor cells to include cancer stem cells, cancer associated fibroblasts and immune cells within the tumor microenvironment that can contribute to its efficacy. ONC201 is orally administered, crosses the intact blood brain barrier, and is under evaluation in clinical trials in patients with advanced solid tumors and hematological malignancies. ONC201 has single agent clinical activity in tumor types that are enriched for DRD2 and/or ClpP expression including specific subtypes of high-grade glioma, endometrial cancer, prostate cancer, mantle cell lymphoma, and adrenal tumors. Synergy with radiation, chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immune-checkpoint agents has been identified in preclinical models and is being evaluated in clinical trials. Structure-activity relationships based on the core pharmacophore of ONC201, termed the imipridone scaffold, revealed novel potent compounds that are being developed. Imipridones represent a novel approach to therapeutically target previously undruggable GPCRs, ClpP, and innate immune pathways in oncology.