A survey of UK practice patterns in the delivery of intravitreal injections.

PURPOSE: To assess UK practice patterns related to the prescription of antibiotics before, during and after intravitreal injections, the location where injections are carried out and the qualifications of those administering the injections. METHODS: Every ophthalmology unit featured in the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (UK) training directory was contacted. A healthcare professional involved in giving intravitreal injections at each institution completed a questionnaire regarding local practice patterns. RESULTS: A response rate of 85% (115/136) was achieved. Seventy four percent of hospitals (85/115) gave take home antibiotics post intravitreal injection. Twenty three percent (26/115) of hospitals employed non-medical healthcare professionals to administer injections and 83% (96/115) administered intravitreal injections in a dedicated clean room as opposed to an operating theatre. CONCLUSION: Practice patterns for intravitreal injection vary considerably. Guidelines alone do not appear to be effective in reducing practices which are considered wasteful and other approaches need to be developed.

Reducing the carbon footprint of cataract surgery: co-creating solutions with a departmental Delphi process.

BACKGROUND: Climate change is arguably the greatest threat to global health of the 21st century. Although cataract surgery is a major contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions, recent literature review identified a paucity of evidence-based strategies for improving the environmental impact of cataract services. Our study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a departmental Delphi process for improving cataract services' environmental sustainability. METHODS: All members of ophthalmology theatre teams in a UK teaching hospital were invited to participate in a three-stage Delphi process. Team members were surveyed for suggestions for reducing the department's environmental impact. Suggested interventions were refined during a plenary face-to-face discussion and ranked. The highest ranked interventions were combined into a mutually agreed action plan. Data on the economic and environmental cost of cataract services was collected prior to and six months after the Delphi process using the Eyefficiency mobile application. RESULTS: Twenty-three interventions were suggested by a range of staff cadres. Interventions were ranked by 24 team members. The 2nd, 4th, 5th, 8th and 11th ranked interventions were combined into an "Eco-packs" project in collaboration with suppliers (Bausch + Lomb), saving 675 kg of waste and 350 kg of CO2 equivalent annually. CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi process is an effective method for provoking departmental engagement with the sustainability agenda that we would encourage all ophthalmology departments to consider utilising. The baseline per case CO2 equivalent measured in our department was reproducible and could serve as a maximum benchmark to be improved upon.

Improving productivity, costs and environmental impact in International Eye Health Services: using the 'Eyefficiency' cataract surgical services auditing tool to assess the value of cataract surgical services.

OBJECTIVE: Though one of the most common surgeries, there is limited information on variability of practices in cataract surgeries. 'Eyefficiency' is a cataract surgical services auditing tool to help global units improve their surgical productivity and reduce their costs, waste generation and carbon footprint. The aim of the present research is to identify variability and efficiency opportunities in cataract surgical practices globally. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 9 global cataract surgical facilities used the Eyefficiency tool to collect facility-level data (staffing, pathway steps, costs of supplies and energy use), and live time-and-motion data. A point person from each site gathered and reported data on 1 week or 30 consecutive cataract surgeries. Environmental life cycle assessment and descriptive statistics were used to quantify productivity, costs and carbon footprint. The main outcomes were estimates of productivity, costs, greenhouse gas emissions, and solid waste generation per-case at each site. RESULTS: Nine participating sites recorded 475 cataract extractions (a mix of phacoemulsification and manual small incision). Cases per hour ranged from 1.7 to 4.48 at single-bed sites and 1.47 to 4.25 at dual-bed sites. Average per-case expenditures ranged between £31.55 and £399.34, with a majority of costs attributable to medical equipment and supplies. Average solid waste ranged between 0.19 kg and 4.27 kg per phacoemulsification, and greenhouse gases ranged from 41 kg carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) to 130 kg CO2e per phacoemulsification. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate the global diversity of cataract surgical services and non-clinical metrics. Eyefficiency supports local decision-making for resource efficiency and could help identify regional or global best practices for optimising productivity, costs and environmental impact of cataract surgery.

An indeterminate malignant soft-tissue tumour treated by exenteration.

PURPOSE. To present a case of malignant soft-tissue tumour, which has yet to be categorised despite review by an international panel of experts, and which was treated by exenteration. PATIENT & METHODS. A 15-year-old Caucasian girl presented with progressive, non-axial proptosis and diplopia. CT scan showed an extraconal mass in the supero-medial part of the orbit suggestive of a vascular neoplasm. After initial incisional biopsy, the pathology of the tumour was felt to be malignant but so unique that further tissue was required for classification/categorisation and that exenteration was the best way to proceed. RESULTS. Despite there being an adequate amount of tissue and opinions being sought from international experts, including the Children(1)s Soft Tissue Panel (of the United Kingdom), this tumour has yet to be categorised. Reports have suggested it to be anything from a malignant desmoplastic round-cell tumour or a synovial sarcoma to an epithelioid haemangioendothelioma, which is our current working diagnosis. CONCLUSION. This case is unique in that it has not been possible to classify the tumour. Categorisation is important in order to give a reasonably accurate prognosis to the patient. Exenteration was required to offer complete tumour excision and will hopefully prevent local recurrence and metastatic spread.

Better value eye care for the 21st century: the population approach.

Health services globally and in the UK face challenges from increasing need and rising expectations to inequalities and financial constraints. The UK government has recently published a Public Health Framework for the first time. This has included preventable sight loss as an outcome measure for the nation's public health reflecting increasing recognition of eye health issues in the broader public health agenda. This presents a real opportunity to improve eye care services at a population level. However, the chief executive of the National Health Service (NHS) has set his own challenge to the NHS to find £20 billion in efficiency savings in the next 3 years in order to maintain services within the available healthcare budget. We have reviewed national routine healthcare data in order to understand the current financial expenditure, activity and outcomes in ophthalmology. Our results have found a wide variation in expenditure in healthcare and activity across the country. We discuss a population based, value-orientated approach to dealing with healthcare issues which will provide a sustainable framework for the future.