RESUMO
Background: In TANGO and SALSA, switching to dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) was noninferior to continuing a baseline regimen among adults who were treatment experienced, although few switched from bictegravir (B) / emtricitabine (F) / tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). Here, we present the efficacy and safety of switching to DTG/3TC as compared with continuing with B/F/TAF among adults with virologic suppression. Methods: DYAD is an open-label clinical trial that randomized adults with HIV-1 RNA <50â copies/mL and no prior virologic failure (2:1) to switch to once-daily fixed-dose DTG/3TC or maintain B/F/TAF. The primary end point is the proportion with HIV-1 RNA ≥50â copies/mL at week 48 (Food and Drug Administration Snapshot algorithm, intention-to-treat exposed population, 6% noninferiority margin). Results: Overall, 222 adults were randomized (16% women, 51% aged ≥50 years, 28% Black). At week 48, 6 (4%) with DTG/3TC and 5 (7%) with B/F/TAF had HIV-1 RNA ≥50â copies/mL (treatment difference, -2.8%; 95% CI, -11.4% to 3.1%), meeting noninferiority criteria. Through week 48, 18 participants (12 with DTG/3TC, 6 with B/F/TAF) met confirmed virologic withdrawal (CVW) criteria, and 2 of 18 had resistance: 1 with B/F/TAF developed M184M/I and G140G/S at week 12, and 1 with DTG/3TC had M184V at week 12. One participant with DTG/3TC and non-CVW developed M184V and K65R at week 12. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) and withdrawals due to AEs occurred in 31 (21%) and 6 (4%) participants with DTG/3TC and 2 (3%) and 0 participants with B/F/TAF, respectively. Conclusions: Switching to DTG/3TC was noninferior to continuing B/F/TAF among adults with virologic suppression at week 48. Drug-related AEs and withdrawals were higher in the DTG/3TC arm, which is likely consistent with the open-label nature of this switch study.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cohort studies suggest higher discontinuation rates with integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) than are seen in clinical trials. We assessed discontinuations and adverse events (AEs) that were considered related to the initial INSTI in the first year following initiation among treatment-naïve people living with HIV (PLWH). METHODS: Newly diagnosed PLWH initiating raltegravir, elvitegravir/cobicistat, dolutegravir or bictegravir in combination with emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide or emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate between 10/2007 and 1/2020 at the Orlando Immunology Center were included. Unadjusted incidence rates (IRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated for treatment-related discontinuations and AEs associated with the initial INSTI in the first year following initiation. RESULTS: Of 331 enrolled, 26 (8%) initiated raltegravir, 151 (46%) initiated elvitegravir/cobicistat, 74 (22%) initiated dolutegravir and 80 (24%) initiated bictegravir. Within the first year, treatment-related discontinuations occurred in 3 on elvitegravir/cobicistat (IR 0.02 per person-years (PPY)) and 5 on dolutegravir (IR 0.08 PPY); no treatment-related discontinuations occurred among those initiating raltegravir or bictegravir. Eleven treatment-related AEs occurred in 7 on raltegravir (IR 0.46 PPY), 100 treatment-related AEs occurred in 63 on elvitegravir/cobicistat (IR 0.72 PPY), 66 treatment-related AEs occurred in 37 on dolutegravir (IR 0.97 PPY) and 65 treatment-related AEs occurred in 34 on bictegravir (IR 0.88 PPY). Unadjusted IRRs did not reveal any significant difference between INSTIs in terms of early treatment-related discontinuations or AEs. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, treatment-related AEs occurred in 43% initiating INSTIs but were responsible for early discontinuation in only 2% with no treatment-related discontinuations observed among those initiating RAL or BIC.