RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine factors predicting complications caused by colonoscopy. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A private hospital in Hong Kong. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing colonoscopy in the Endoscopy Centre of the Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital from 1 June 2011 to 31 May 2012 were included. Immediate complications were those that were recorded by nurses during and up to the day after the examination, while delayed complications were gathered 30 days after the procedure by way of consented telephone interview by trained student nurses. Data were presented as frequency and percentage for categorical variables. Logistic regression was used to fit models for immediate and systemic complications with related factors. RESULTS: A total of 6196 patients (mean age, 53.7 years; standard deviation, 12.7 years; 3143 women) were enrolled and 3657 telephone interviews were completed. The incidence of immediate complications was 15.3 per 1000 procedures (95% confidence interval, 12.3-18.4); 50.5% were colonoscopy-related, including one perforation and other minor presentations. Being female (odds ratioadjusted=1.6), use of monitored anaesthetic care (odds ratioadjusted=1.8), inadequate bowel preparation (odds ratioadjusted=3.5), and incomplete colonoscopy (odds ratioadjusted=4.5) were predictors of risk for all immediate complications (all predictors had P<0.05 by logistic regression). The incidence of delayed complications was 1.6 per 1000 procedures (95% confidence interval, 0.3-3.0), which comprised five post-polypectomy bleeds and one post-polypectomy inflammation. The overall incidence of complications was 17.8 per 1000 procedures (95% confidence interval, 13.5-22.1). The incidences of complications were among the lower ranges across studies worldwide. CONCLUSION: Inadequate bowel preparation and incomplete colonoscopy were identified as factors that increased the risk for colonoscopy-related complications. Colonoscopy-related complications occurred as often as systemic complications, showing the importance of monitoring.
Assuntos
Colonoscopia/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Catárticos/administração & dosagem , Monitores de Consciência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Perfuração Intestinal/etiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Estudos Prospectivos , Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the role of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with inoperable squamous esophageal cancer. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous esophageal carcinoma who received CRT were recruited. The CRT consists of continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil at 200 mg/m(2)/day, and cisplatin at 60 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 22, with concurrent radiotherapy for a total of 50 to 60 Gy in 25 to 30 fractions over 6 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by endoscopy and computed tomographic scan before and 8 weeks after completion of the treatment program. Median survival and the need for palliative esophageal stenting were compared with another group of patients who received endoscopic stenting. RESULTS: From 1996 to 2003, a total of 36 consecutive patients (33 male, mean +/- SD age 63.2 +/- 9.5 years) with T4 disease (81%) with or without cervical nodal metastasis (50%) received CRT, while 36 patients treated with endoscopic stenting alone were recruited as controls. Both groups were comparable in demographics, pretreatment dysphagia score, comorbidities, and tumor characteristics. CRT was completed in 32 patients (89%). There was no treatment-related mortality. Tumor volume was greatly reduced after CRT in 19 patients. Four patients (11%) received salvage esophagectomy 9 to 42 months after CRT. Compared with the stenting group, CRT statistically significantly improved 5-year survival (15% vs. 0%, P = .01), median survival (10.8 months vs. 4.0 months, P < .005), and need for stenting (22% vs. 100%, P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Palliative CRT can effectively improve the symptoms of dysphagia in patients with inoperable squamous esophageal carcinoma. It results in better survival compared with endoscopic stenting in these patients.
Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Esofagoscopia , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Stents , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundário , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Terapia Combinada , Comorbidade , Transtornos de Deglutição/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Deglutição/radioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/secundário , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Cuidados Paliativos , Prognóstico , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
The initial management of patients with suspected acute biliary infection starts with the measurement of vital signs to assess whether or not the situation is urgent. If the case is judged to be urgent, initial medical treatment should be started immediately including respiratory/circulatory management if required, without waiting for a definitive diagnosis. The patient's medical history is then taken; an abdominal examination is performed; blood tests, urinalysis, and diagnostic imaging are carried out; and a diagnosis is made using the diagnostic criteria for cholangitis/cholecystitis. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed, initial medical treatment should be started immediately, severity should be assessed according to the severity grading criteria for acute cholangitis/cholecystitis, and the patient's general status should be evaluated. For mild acute cholangitis, in most cases initial treatment including antibiotics is sufficient, and most patients do not require biliary drainage. However, biliary drainage should be considered if a patient does not respond to initial treatment. For moderate acute cholangitis, early endoscopic or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage is indicated. If the underlying etiology requires treatment, this should be provided after the patient's general condition has improved; endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent choledocholithotomy may be performed together with biliary drainage. For severe acute cholangitis, appropriate respiratory/circulatory management is required. Biliary drainage should be performed as soon as possible after the patient's general condition has been improved by initial treatment and respiratory/circulatory management. Free full articles and mobile app of TG18 are available at: http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=47. Related clinical questions and references are also included.
Assuntos
Colangite/diagnóstico por imagem , Colangite/terapia , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Esfinterotomia Endoscópica/métodos , Doença Aguda , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Colangite/patologia , Colecistite Aguda/patologia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Drenagem/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Design de Software , Tóquio , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
In some cases, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) may be difficult to perform in patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) with severe inflammation and fibrosis. The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) expand the indications for LC under difficult conditions for each level of severity of AC. As a result of expanding the indications for LC to treat AC, it is absolutely necessary to avoid any increase in bile duct injury (BDI), particularly vasculo-biliary injury (VBI), which is known to occur at a certain rate in LC. Since the Tokyo Guidelines 2013 (TG13), an attempt has been made to assess intraoperative findings as objective indicators of surgical difficulty; based on expert consensus on these difficulty indicators, bail-out procedures (including conversion to open cholecystectomy) have been indicated for cases in which LC for AC is difficult to perform. A bail-out procedure should be chosen if, when the Calot's triangle is appropriately retracted and used as a landmark, a critical view of safety (CVS) cannot be achieved because of the presence of nondissectable scarring or severe fibrosis. We propose standardized safe steps for LC to treat AC. To achieve a CVS, it is vital to dissect at a location above (on the ventral side of) the imaginary line connecting the base of the left medial section (Segment 4) and the roof of Rouvière's sulcus and to fulfill the three criteria of CVS before dividing any structures. Achieving a CVS prevents the misidentification of the cystic duct and the common bile duct, which are most commonly confused. Free full articles and mobile app of TG18 are available at: http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=47. Related clinical questions and references are also included.
Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/métodos , Colecistite Aguda/cirurgia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravação em Vídeo , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversos , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Seleção de Pacientes , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Tóquio , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Management bundles that define items or procedures strongly recommended in clinical practice have been used in many guidelines in recent years. Application of these bundles facilitates the adaptation of guidelines and helps improve the prognosis of target diseases. In Tokyo Guidelines 2013 (TG13), we proposed management bundles for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. Here, in Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18), we redefine the management bundles for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. Critical parts of the bundles in TG18 include the diagnostic process, severity assessment, transfer of patients if necessary, and therapeutic approach at each time point. Observance of these items and procedures should improve the prognosis of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. Studies are now needed to evaluate the dissemination of these TG18 bundles and their effectiveness. Free full articles and mobile app of TG18 are available at: http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=47. Related clinical questions and references are also included.
Assuntos
Lista de Checagem , Colangite/terapia , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Doença Aguda , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Colangite/diagnóstico por imagem , Colecistectomia/métodos , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Tratamento Conservador , Drenagem/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , TóquioRESUMO
We propose a new flowchart for the treatment of acute cholecystitis (AC) in the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18). Grade III AC was not indicated for straightforward laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Lap-C). Following analysis of subsequent clinical investigations and drawing on Big Data in particular, TG18 proposes that some Grade III AC can be treated by Lap-C when performed at advanced centers with specialized surgeons experienced in this procedure and for patients that satisfy certain strict criteria. For Grade I, TG18 recommends early Lap-C if the patients meet the criteria of Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≤5 and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA-PS) ≤2. For Grade II AC, if patients meet the criteria of CCI ≤5 and ASA-PS ≤2, TG18 recommends early Lap-C performed by experienced surgeons; and if not, after medical treatment and/or gallbladder drainage, Lap-C would be indicated. TG18 proposes that Lap-C is indicated in Grade III patients with strict criteria. These are that the patients have favorable organ system failure, and negative predictive factors, who meet the criteria of CCI ≤3 and ASA-PS ≤2 and who are being treated at an advanced center (where experienced surgeons practice). If the patient is not considered suitable for early surgery, TG18 recommends early/urgent biliary drainage followed by delayed Lap-C once the patient's overall condition has improved. Free full articles and mobile app of TG18 are available at: http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=47. Related clinical questions and references are also included.
Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/métodos , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Colecistite Aguda/cirurgia , Diagnóstico por Imagem/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Colecistectomia/métodos , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversos , Conversão para Cirurgia Aberta/estatística & dados numéricos , Gerenciamento Clínico , Drenagem/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Design de Software , TóquioRESUMO
Although the diagnostic and severity grading criteria on the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines (TG13) are used worldwide as the primary standard for management of acute cholangitis (AC), they need to be validated through implementation and assessment in actual clinical practice. Here, we conduct a systematic review of the literature to validate the TG13 diagnostic and severity grading criteria for AC and propose TG18 criteria. While there is little evidence evaluating the TG13 criteria, they were validated through a large-scale case series study in Japan and Taiwan. Analyzing big data from this study confirmed that the diagnostic rate of AC based on the TG13 diagnostic criteria was higher than that based on the TG07 criteria, and that 30-day mortality in patients with a higher severity based on the TG13 severity grading criteria was significantly higher. Furthermore, a comparison of patients treated with early or urgent biliary drainage versus patients not treated this way showed no difference in 30-day mortality among patients with Grade I or Grade III AC, but significantly lower 30-day mortality in patients with Grade II AC who were treated with early or urgent biliary drainage. This suggests that the TG13 severity grading criteria can be used to identify Grade II patients whose prognoses may be improved through biliary drainage. The TG13 severity grading criteria may therefore be useful as an indicator for biliary drainage as well as a predictive factor when assessing the patient's prognosis. The TG13 diagnostic and severity grading criteria for AC can provide results quickly, are minimally invasive for the patients, and are inexpensive. We recommend that the TG13 criteria be adopted in the TG18 guidelines and used as standard practice in the clinical setting. Free full articles and mobile app of TG18 are available at: http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=47. Related clinical questions and references are also included.
Assuntos
Colangite/diagnóstico por imagem , Colangite/patologia , Imagem Multimodal/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Doença Aguda , Biópsia por Agulha , Colangite/mortalidade , Diagnóstico Precoce , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Taxa de Sobrevida , Tóquio , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Ultrassonografia Doppler/métodosRESUMO
The Tokyo Guidelines 2013 (TG13) for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis were globally disseminated and various clinical studies about the management of acute cholecystitis were reported by many researchers and clinicians from all over the world. The 1st edition of the Tokyo Guidelines 2007 (TG07) was revised in 2013. According to that revision, the TG13 diagnostic criteria of acute cholecystitis provided better specificity and higher diagnostic accuracy. Thorough our literature search about diagnostic criteria for acute cholecystitis, new and strong evidence that had been released from 2013 to 2017 was not found with serious and important issues about using TG13 diagnostic criteria of acute cholecystitis. On the other hand, the TG13 severity grading for acute cholecystitis has been validated in numerous studies. As a result of these reviews, the TG13 severity grading for acute cholecystitis was significantly associated with parameters including 30-day overall mortality, length of hospital stay, conversion rates to open surgery, and medical costs. In terms of severity assessment, breakthrough and intensive literature for revising severity grading was not reported. Consequently, TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading were judged from numerous validation studies as useful indicators in clinical practice and adopted as TG18/TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis without any modification. Free full articles and mobile app of TG18 are available at: http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=47. Related clinical questions and references are also included.
Assuntos
Colangite/diagnóstico , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico , Imagem Multimodal/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravação em Vídeo , Doença Aguda , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Biliar/métodos , Colangite/cirurgia , Colecistite Aguda/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Tóquio , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Ultrassonografia Doppler em Cores/métodosRESUMO
Antimicrobial therapy is a mainstay of the management for patients with acute cholangitis and/or cholecystitis. The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) provides recommendations for the appropriate use of antimicrobials for community-acquired and healthcare-associated infections. The listed agents are for empirical therapy provided before the infecting isolates are identified. Antimicrobial agents are listed by class-definitions and TG18 severity grade I, II, and III subcategorized by clinical settings. In the era of emerging and increasing antimicrobial resistance, monitoring and updating local antibiograms is underscored. Prudent antimicrobial usage and early de-escalation or termination of antimicrobial therapy are now important parts of decision-making. What is new in TG18 is that the duration of antimicrobial therapy for both acute cholangitis and cholecystitis is systematically reviewed. Prophylactic antimicrobial usage for elective endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is no longer recommended and the section was deleted in TG18. Free full articles and mobile app of TG18 are available at: http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=47. Related clinical questions and references are also included.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Colangite/tratamento farmacológico , Colecistite Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Doença Aguda , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Colangite/diagnóstico por imagem , Colangite/microbiologia , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Colecistite Aguda/microbiologia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Tóquio , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains a serious iatrogenic surgical complication. BDI most often occurs as a result of misidentification of the anatomy; however, clinical evidence on its precise mechanism and surgeons' perceptions is scarce. Surgeons from Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and the USA, etc. (n = 614) participated in a questionnaire regarding their BDI experience and near-misses; and perceptions on landmarks, intraoperative findings, and surgical techniques. Respondents voted for a Delphi process and graded each item on a five-point scale. The consensus was built when ≥80% of overall responses were 4 or 5. Response rates for the first- and second-round Delphi were 60.6% and 74.9%, respectively. Misidentification of local anatomy accounted for 76.2% of BDI. Final consensus was reached on: (1) Effective retraction of the gallbladder, (2) Always obtaining critical view of safety, and (3) Avoiding excessive use of electrocautery/clipping as vital procedures; and (4) Calot's triangle area and (5) Critical view of safety as important landmarks. For (6) Impacted gallstone and (7) Severe fibrosis/scarring in Calot's triangle, bail-out procedures may be indicated. A consensus was reached among expert surgeons on relevant landmarks and intraoperative findings and appropriate surgical techniques to avoid BDI.
Assuntos
Ductos Biliares/lesões , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversos , Doença Iatrogênica/epidemiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/cirurgia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/métodos , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Japão , Coreia (Geográfico) , Masculino , Cirurgiões , Taiwan , Estados UnidosRESUMO
We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare the efficacy and survival outcome by chemoradiation with that by esophagectomy as a curative treatment. From July 2000 to December 2004, 80 patients with potentially resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the mid or lower thoracic esophagus were randomized to esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy. A two- or three-stage esophagectomy with two-field dissection was performed. Patients treated with chemoradiotherapy received continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion (200 mg/m2/day) from day 1 to 42 and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) on days 1 and 22. The tumor and regional lymphatics were concomitantly irradiated to a total of 50-60 Gy. Tumor response was assessed by endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography, and computed tomography scan. Salvage esophagectomy was performed for incomplete response or recurrence. Forty-four patients received standard esophagectomy, whereas 36 were treated with chemoradiotherapy. Median follow-up was 16.9 months. The operative mortality was 6.8%. The incidence of postoperative complications was 38.6%. No difference in the early cumulative survival was found between the two groups (RR = 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-2.17; log-rank test P = 0.45). There was no difference in the disease-free survival. Patients treated with surgery had a slightly higher proportion of recurrence in the mediastinum, whereas those treated with chemoradiation sustained a higher proportion of recurrence in the cervical or abdominal regions. Standard esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy offered similar early clinical outcome and survival for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. The challenge lies in the detection of residue disease after chemoradiotherapy.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Feminino , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Hong Kong , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Probabilidade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Kocuria, previously classified into the genus of Micrococcus, is commonly found on human skin. Two species, K. rosea and K. kristinae, are etiologically associated with catheter-related bacteremia. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the first case of K. kristinae infection associated with acute cholecystitis. The microorganism was isolated from the bile of a 56-year old Chinese man who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. He developed post-operative fever that resolved readily after levofloxacin treatment. CONCLUSION: Our report of K. kristinae infection associated with acute cholecystitis expands the clinical spectrum of infections caused by this group of bacteria. With increasing number of recent reports describing the association between Kocuria spp. and infectious diseases, the significance of their isolation from clinical specimens cannot be underestimated. A complete picture of infections related to Kocuria spp. will have to await the documentation of more clinical cases.
Assuntos
Colecistite/complicações , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/complicações , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Micrococcaceae/isolamento & purificação , Doença Aguda , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Colecistite/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Levofloxacino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ofloxacino/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
We report a rare case of transomental small-bowel herniation in a 91-year-old lady who presented with central abdominal pain and mild distension. Urgent abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed a segment of dilated ileum with features suggestive of strangulation. Emergency exploration revealed a segment of congested small-bowel loop herniated through a defect over the greater omentum. Reduction of the bowel loops and division of the omental defect was performed without the need for bowel resection. The patient made an uneventful recovery. We discuss the value of CT scan and highlight the importance of recognizing this rare cause of small-bowel obstruction.
Assuntos
Hérnia/complicações , Doenças do Íleo/complicações , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Intestino Delgado , OmentoRESUMO
Radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy is frequently used as definitive treatment for esophageal carcinoma. Although thoracic computed tomography (CT) is widely used in staging esophageal carcinoma, its application to radiation therapy planning has been regarded as optional rather than mandatory. Conventional radiation therapy planning is esophagogram-based rather than CT-based. The treatment port is generated by adding 5 cm to the proximal and distal margins of the tumor-involved segment as seen on esophagogram performed in the treatment position. Historically, a maximum port length of 15 cm was recommended to avoid excessive treatment morbidity. The authors examined the limitations of such a planning protocol by projecting conventional treatment ports onto the thoracic CT of 75 consecutive newly diagnosed cases of nondisseminated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The authors assessed the adequacy of coverage of the primary tumor and metastatic nodes, with respect to data from thoracic CT and neck ultrasonography. It was found that up to 38% of T2-T3 tumors and 30% of short-length (< or =5 cm) tumors had metastatic nodes outside the port. The addition of neck ultrasonography led to identification of an additional 5% of patients with nonpalpable nodes outside the port. It is concluded that the frequency of inadequate tumor coverage using an esophagogram-based planning protocol, with a maximum port length of 15 cm, is unacceptably high. Thoracic CT should be a mandatory rather than optional imaging investigation in guiding radiation therapy planning for esophageal cancer.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Radiografia Torácica , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Estudos de Coortes , Endossonografia , Humanos , Pescoço/diagnóstico por imagem , Técnicas de Planejamento , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Massive defects of the upper aerodigestive tract present a reconstructive challenge. We report a case in which a large defect of the naso-oropharyngeal and oesophagus was reconstructed with a combination of a gastric pull-up and a pectoralis major muscle flap. Postoperative function was good and survival was in excess of 16 months. The history of such reconstructions and possible alternative techniques are also discussed.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now accepted as a surgical procedure for acute cholecystitis when it is performed by an expert surgeon. There are several lines of strong evidence, such as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses, supporting the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis. The updated Tokyo Guidelines 2013 (TG13) describe the surgical treatment for acute cholecystitis according to the grade of severity, the timing, and the procedure used for cholecystitis in a question-and-answer format using the evidence concerning surgical management of acute cholecystitis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-eight publications were selected for a careful examination of their full texts, and the types of surgical management of acute cholecystitis were investigated using this evidence. The items concerning the surgical management of acute cholecystitis were the optimal surgical treatment for acute cholecystitis according to the grade of severity, optimal timing for the cholecystectomy, surgical procedure used for cholecystectomy, optimal timing of the conversion of cholecystectomy from laparoscopic to open surgery, and the complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. RESULTS: There were eight RCTs and four meta-analyses concerning the optimal timing of the cholecystectomy. Consequently, it was found that cholecystectomy is preferable early after admission. There were three RCTs and two meta-analyses concerning the surgical procedure, which concluded that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is preferable to open procedures. Literature concerning the surgical treatment according to the grade of severity could not be quoted, because there have been no publications on this topic. Therefore, the treatment was determined based on the general opinions of professionals. CONCLUSION: Surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the updated TG13 is fundamentally the same as in the Tokyo Guidelines 2007 (TG07), and the concept of a critical view of safety and the existence of extreme vasculobiliary injury are added in the text to call the surgeon's attention to the need to reduce the incidence of bile duct injury. Free full-text articles and a mobile application of TG13 are available via http://www.jshbps.jp/en/guideline/tg13.html.
Assuntos
Colecistite Aguda/cirurgia , Colecistectomia , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , HumanosRESUMO
Since its publication in 2007, the Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis (TG07) have been widely adopted. The validation of TG07 conducted in terms of clinical practice has shown that the diagnostic criteria for acute cholecystitis are highly reliable but that the definition of definite diagnosis is ambiguous. Discussion by the Tokyo Guidelines Revision Committee concluded that acute cholecystitis should be suspected when Murphy's sign, local inflammatory findings in the gallbladder such as right upper quadrant abdominal pain and tenderness, and fever and systemic inflammatory reaction findings detected by blood tests are present but that definite diagnosis of acute cholecystitis can be made only on the basis of the imaging of ultrasonography, computed tomography or scintigraphy (HIDA scan). These proposed diagnostic criteria provided better specificity and accuracy rates than the TG07 diagnostic criteria. As for the severity assessment criteria in TG07, there is evidence that TG07 resulted in clarification of the concept of severe acute cholecystitis. Furthermore, there is evidence that severity assessment in TG07 has led to a reduction in the mean duration of hospital stay. As for the factors used to establish a moderate grade of acute cholecystitis, such as leukocytosis, ALP, old age, diabetes, being male, and delay in admission, no new strong evidence has been detected indicating that a change in the criteria used in TG07 is needed. Therefore, it was judged that the severity assessment criteria of TG07 could be applied in the updated Tokyo Guidelines (TG13) with minor changes. TG13 presents new standards for the diagnosis, severity grading and management of acute cholecystitis. Free full-text articles and a mobile application of TG13 are available via http://www.jshbps.jp/en/guideline/tg13.html.
Assuntos
Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico , Colecistite Aguda/patologia , HumanosRESUMO
Since the publication of the Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis (TG07), diagnostic criteria and severity assessment criteria for acute cholangitis have been presented and extensively used as the primary standard all over the world. However, it has been found that there are crucial limitations in these criteria. The diagnostic criteria of TG07 do not have enough sensitivity and specificity, and its severity assessment criteria are unsuitable for clinical use. A working team for the revision of TG07 was organized in June, 2010, and these criteria have been updated through clinical implementation and its assessment by means of multi-center analysis. The diagnostic criteria of acute cholangitis have been revised as criteria to establish the diagnosis where cholestasis and inflammation demonstrated by clinical signs or blood test in addition to biliary manifestations demonstrated by imaging are present. The diagnostic criteria of the updated Tokyo Guidelines (TG13) have high sensitivity (87.6 %) and high specificity (77.7 %). TG13 has better diagnostic capacity than TG07. Severity assessment is classified as follows: Grade III: associated with organ failure; Grade II: early biliary drainage should be conducted; Grade1: others. As for the severity assessment criteria of TG07, separating Grade II and Grade I at the time of diagnosis was impossible, so they were unsuitable for clinical practice. Therefore, the severity assessment criteria of TG13 have been revised so as not to lose the timing of biliary drainage or treatment for etiology. Based on evidence, five predictive factors for poor prognosis in acute cholangitis--hyperbilirubinemia, high fever, leukocytosis, elderly patient and hypoalbuminemia--have been extracted. Grade II can be diagnosed if two of these five factors are present. Free full-text articles and a mobile application of TG13 are available via http://www.jshbps.jp/en/guideline/tg13.html.
Assuntos
Colangite/diagnóstico , Doença Aguda , Colangite/patologia , HumanosRESUMO
We report an unusual cause of hemoperitoneum in an AL amyloid patient on peritoneal dialysis due to spontaneous rupture of a normal-sized spleen not related to any trauma. The rupture was not due to amyloid deposition within the spleen pulp but rather due to amyloid angiopathy causing hemorrhage within the spleen and capsular tear.
Assuntos
Amiloidose/complicações , Ruptura Esplênica/etiologia , Idoso , Amiloidose/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Diálise Peritoneal , Insuficiência Renal/terapia , Ruptura EspontâneaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The variable-stiffness colonoscope incorporates different degrees of stiffness of the insertion tube, which can be adjusted during the examination. Whether its use can lead to reduced procedure-related pain and sedative use is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the use of 3 types of colonoscope with different shaft stiffnesses in relation to procedure-related pain and sedative consumption. DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial. SETTING: Endoscopy unit of a university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy. INTERVENTIONS: Random assignment was made of patients into 3 groups to receive colonoscopic examinations by one of the 3 types of colonoscope: conventional standard adult size, 1.3-m; 1.6-m; and the new variable-stiffness adult size, full-length (1.6-m) colonoscope. A mixture of propofol and afentanil, delivered by a patient-controlled syringe pump, was used for sedation in all groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included dose of patient-controlled sedation consumed, pain score, cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, requirement of abdominal pressure and change of patients' positions during colonoscopy, and endoscopists and patients' satisfaction scores according to a visual analog scale. RESULTS: A total of 335 patients were randomized. Patients in group 3 used significantly less propofol (in milligrams per kilograms, mean [SD]) compared with the other 2 groups (group 1: 1.00 [0.75], group 2: 0.93 [0.62], and group 3: 0.75 [0.65]; P = .02; 1-way analysis of variance). The mean (SD) pain score was also lower in group 3. LIMITATIONS: The endoscopists were not blinded. CONCLUSION: The use of the new variable-stiffness adult-size colonoscope significantly reduced procedure-related pain and doses of sedative medications during colonoscopy.