Hepatic stellate cells require a stiff environment for myofibroblastic differentiation.

The myofibroblastic differentiation of hepatic stellate cells (HSC) is a critical event in liver fibrosis and is part of the final common pathway to cirrhosis in chronic liver disease from all causes. The molecular mechanisms driving HSC differentiation are not fully understood. Because macroscopic tissue stiffening is a feature of fibrotic disease, we hypothesized that mechanical properties of the underlying matrix are a principal determinant of HSC activation. Primary rat HSC were cultured on inert polyacrylamide supports of variable but precisely defined shear modulus (stiffness) coated with different extracellular matrix proteins or poly-L-lysine. HSC differentiation was determined by cell morphology, immunofluorescence staining, and gene expression. HSC became progressively myofibroblastic as substrate stiffness increased on all coating matrices, including Matrigel. The degree rather than speed of HSC activation correlated with substrate stiffness, with cells cultured on supports of intermediate stiffness adopting stable intermediate phenotypes. Quiescent cells on soft supports were able to undergo myofibroblastic differentiation with exposure to stiff supports. Stiffness-dependent differentiation required adhesion to matrix proteins and the generation of mechanical tension. Transforming growth factor-ß treatment enhanced differentiation on stiff supports, but was not required. HSC differentiate to myofibroblasts in vitro primarily as a function of the physical rather than the chemical properties of the substrate. HSC require a mechanically stiff substrate, with adhesion to matrix proteins and the generation of mechanical tension, to differentiate. These findings suggest that alterations in liver stiffness are a key factor driving the progression of fibrosis.

Transforming growth factor-beta and substrate stiffness regulate portal fibroblast activation in culture.

UNLABELLED: Myofibroblasts derived from portal fibroblasts are important fibrogenic cells in the early stages of biliary fibrosis. In contrast to hepatic stellate cells, portal fibroblasts have not been well studied in vitro, and little is known about their myofibroblastic differentiation. In this article we report the isolation and characterization of rat portal fibroblasts in culture. We demonstrate that primary portal fibroblasts undergo differentiation to alpha-smooth muscle actin-expressing myofibroblasts over 10-14 days. Marker analysis comparing portal fibroblasts to hepatic stellate cells demonstrated that these are distinct populations and that staining with elastin and desmin can differentiate between them. Portal fibroblasts expressed elastin at all stages in culture but never expressed desmin, whereas hepatic stellate cells consistently expressed desmin but never elastin. Immunostaining of rat liver tissue confirmed these results in vivo. Characterization of portal fibroblast differentiation in culture demonstrated that these cells required transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta): cells remained quiescent in the presence of a TGF-beta receptor kinase inhibitor, whereas exogenous TGF-beta1 enhanced portal fibroblast alpha-smooth muscle actin expression and stress fiber formation. In contrast, platelet-derived growth factor inhibited myofibroblastic differentiation. Portal fibroblasts were also dependent on mechanical tension for myofibroblastic differentiation, and cells cultured on polyacrylamide supports of variable stiffness demonstrated an increasingly myofibroblastic phenotype as stiffness increased. CONCLUSION: Portal fibroblasts are morphologically and functionally distinct from hepatic stellate cells. Portal fibroblast myofibroblastic differentiation can be modeled in culture and requires both TGF-beta and mechanical tension.

Chemoprevention: risk reduction with medical therapy of inflammatory bowel disease.

The ideal chemopreventative agent, in addition to being efficacious in the prevention of cancer, must be easily administered, affordable, safe, and well tolerated, with minimal side effects. In the past decade, a growing body of literature has emerged on the prevention of CRC in patients with long-standing CD and UC. The data are not definitive and consist almost exclusively of retrospective case-control and cohort studies rather than the more rigorous prospective RCTs. 5-ASA compounds have been most thoroughly studied, and most of the existing data support the use of 5-ASA in the prevention of CRC. Although the precise dose and duration are unclear, studies suggest that chronic systemic administration of 5-ASA at a dose of at least 1.2 g/d is most likely to be effective. A beneficial effect of folate, albeit not statistically significant, has been consistently shown in every study performed for this purpose. Folate supplementation, which is safe and affordable, should also be recommended for all patients with IBD, especially those taking sulfasalazine. UDCA has been shown to exert a protective effect in most studies on patients with UC and concomitant PSC. Because this patient population is at particularly high risk for CRC, it is advisable to consider UDCA in all patients with colitis complicated by PSC. For patients without PSC, sufficient data do not exist to recommend it for the purpose of cancer prevention. Five of the six corticosteroid studies have found a beneficial effect of systemic steroids, although most did not reach statistical significance. Regardless, given the frequent and serious adverse effects associated with chronic steroid use, systemic corticosteroids should not be prescribed for this indication. Budesonide, an oral corticosteroid with minimal systemic absorption, is a potential alternative, although it has not yet been studied as a chemopreventative agent. Similarly, until the long-term safety of chronic NSAID use can be demonstrated in patients with IBD, the role of NSAIDs in chemoprevention remains undefined. Although the data are conflicting, immune-modulating medications, such as AZA, do not seem to confer any reduction in the risk of dysplasia or CRC. The data on calcium supplementation and statin use are still too limited to endorse their use for the prevention of colitis-related CRC. Chemoprevention is an area that holds great promise in the reduction of morbidity and mortality associated with IBD. Further studies, including prospective trials when possible and cost-effectiveness analyses, need to be performed to develop an optimal strategy for the reduction of cancer risk in patients with IBD.

Endoscopic removal of eroded bands in vertical banded gastroplasty: a novel use of endoscopic scissors (with video).

BACKGROUND: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) as a surgical therapy for morbid obesity was first described in 1982. VBG involves partitioning the stomach with a vertical staple line and restricting the outlet pouch with a Gortex band. Complications of VBG include partial and total erosion of the band through the vertical staple line or through the lesser curvature into the gastric pouch. Band erosion occurs after surgery in 1% to 3% of patients, and patients may present with symptoms of obstruction, weight gain, nausea, pain, and bleeding. Unless a band has freely eroded from the stomach wall, allowing spontaneous elimination or simple endoscopic retrieval, surgical removal has been required heretofore. Previous attempts at endoscopic removal of eroded bands have included the use of neodymium-yttrium aluminum garnet laser ablation and other electrosurgical devices. Endoscopic scissors transection to remove an eroded laparoscopic band has been described in Europe but has not been performed in the United States. OBJECTIVE: In this series, we describe the endoscopic removal of partially eroded bands embedded in the gastric wall by using flexible endoscopic scissors to sever and subsequently withdraw the bands endoscopically through the mouth. CONCLUSIONS: Eroded gastric bands have been safely removed endoscopically in 2 ambulatory outpatients. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Tertiary-care academic center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Efficacy and safety. LIMITATIONS: Highly selected motivated patient population.