FDA Public Workshop Summary-Addressing Challenges in Inhaled Antifungal Drug Development.

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and invasive fungal diseases represent distinct infectious entities that cause significant morbidity and mortality. Currently, administered inhaled antifungal therapies are unapproved, have suboptimal efficacy, and are associated with considerable adverse reactions. The emergence of resistant pathogens is also a growing concern. Inhaled antifungal development programs are challenged by inadequate nonclinical infection models, highly heterogenous patient populations, low prevalence rates of fungal diseases, difficulties defining clinical trial enrollment criteria, and lack of robust clinical trial endpoints. On September 25, 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) convened a workshop with experts in pulmonary medicine and infectious diseases from academia, industry, and other governmental agencies. Key discussion topics included regulatory incentives to facilitate development of inhaled antifungal drugs and combination inhalational devices, limitations of existing nonclinical models and clinical trial designs, patient perspectives, and industry insights.

Use of Proprietary Names by Prescribers for Generic Products.

BACKGROUND: Proprietary names are often used when prescribing drug products in the United States. The purpose of this study is to describe prescribers' use of proprietary names for generic products, branded-generic names, on prescription orders and to identify prescribing practice trends to inform the development and evaluation of new proprietary names. METHODS: To identify Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) with branded-generic names approved between January 2003 and December 2012, we utilized the database provided by the FDA Office of Communications, Drugs@FDA . A national outpatient retail prescription database, IMS's Vector One: National (VONA) was used to identify prescribing trends by examining data for branded-generic names identified in Drugs@FDA as they were written on prescriptions for years 2003 to 2012, the last year of data collection for VONA. IMS Health, IMS National Sales Perspectives (IMS NSP) was used to retrieve the date that product sales were first reported (launch date). RESULTS: Our search of Drugs@FDA identified 65 distinct branded-generic names approved between January 2003 and December 2012. Data show that most of these products with branded-generic names are written on prescriptions and sold to pharmacies within a year of FDA approval. In some cases, the use of branded-generic names persists for up to 9 years after drug approval. CONCLUSION: This descriptive study confirmed that branded-generic names are used in prescribing. Thus, evaluation of orthographic and phonetic similarities between proposed proprietary names and branded-generic names is necessary when formulating and evaluating new proprietary names.

Characteristics That May Help in the Identification of Potentially Confusing Proprietary Drug Names.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to provide a descriptive analysis of characteristics that are common among drug name pairs involved in name confusion medication errors. METHODS: We evaluated drug name pairs that contained at least one proprietary name from the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) List of Confused Drug Names. For each name pair, we analyzed whether the following characteristics were present: (1) the same first letter, (2) a shared letter string of at least 3 letters, and (3) similarity in the number of letters. Additionally, we obtained the combined Phonetic and Orthographic Computer Analysis (POCA) score. RESULTS: Ninety-nine percent of the drug name pairs reflected at least one of the 3 characteristics analyzed. Additionally, 75% of the names had a combined POCA score of ≥50%. CONCLUSIONS: This descriptive analysis provides some insight into characteristics that may be associated with name confusion, which should be considered when formulating and evaluating proposed proprietary drug names.