Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 51(7): 2033-9, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23596244

RESUMO

Health care-associated infections with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) contribute to significant hospitalization costs. We report here a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay, which is a next-generation emulsion-based endpoint PCR assay for high-precision MRSA analysis. Reference cultures of MRSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), and confounders were included as controls. Copan swabs were used to sample cultures and collect specimens for analysis from patients at a large teaching hospital. Swab extraction and cell lysis were accomplished using magnetic-driven agitation of silica beads. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) (Roche Light Cycler 480) and ddPCR (Bio-Rad QX100 droplet digital PCR system) assays were used to detect genes for the staphylococcal protein SA0140 (SA) and the methicillin resistance (mecA) gene employing standard TaqMan chemistries. Both qPCR and ddPCR assays correctly identified culture controls for MRSA (76), MSSA (12), and confounder organisms (36) with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Analysis of the clinical samples (211 negative and 186 positive) collected during a study of MRSA nasal carriage allowed direct comparison of the qPCR and ddPCR assays to the Cepheid MRSA GeneXpert assay. A total of 397 clinical samples were examined in this study. Cepheid MRSA GeneXpert values were used to define negative and positive samples. Both the qPCR and ddPCR assays were in good agreement with the reference assay. The sensitivities for the qPCR and ddPCR assays were 96.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.1 to 98.5%) and 96.8% (95% CI, 93.1 to 98.5%), respectively. Both the qPCR and ddPCR assays had specificities of 91.9% (95% CI, 87.5 to 94.9%) for qPCR and 91.0% (95% CI, 86.4 to 94.2%) for ddPCR technology.


Assuntos
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/classificação , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/métodos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Mucosa Nasal/microbiologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico
2.
Adolesc Med State Art Rev ; 18(1): 11-23, vii-viii, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18605388

RESUMO

Timely and appropriate rehabilitation of musculoskeletal injuries is the most effective way of restoring full function and decreasing the likelihood of recurrence of the same injury. Application of specific physical therapy modalities and therapeutic exercises is based on the stages of healing. A typical physical therapy protocol progresses sequentially through the following phases: pain control, restoring range of motion, restoring strength, neuromuscular retraining, and return to full activity. The commonly used modalities reviewed here include heat, cold, ultrasound, phonophoresis, iontophoresis, and electrical stimulation. In this article we provide a basic review of physical therapy modalities.


Assuntos
Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/reabilitação , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Adolescente , Crioterapia/métodos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Temperatura Alta/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Iontoforese/métodos , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/patologia , Terapia por Ultrassom/métodos
3.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) ; 24(3): 224-6, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21738296
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA