Analysis of treatment benefits and prognostic factors for Post-Transplant hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in a large Euro-American-Asian cohort.

BACKGROUND: Post-transplant HCC recurrence significantly impacts survival, yet its management is challenging due to limited evidence. With recent advancements in HCC treatment, updated data on managing recurrent disease is needed. METHODS: In this retrospective study across six centers (2000-2022), we employed Cox proportional-hazards regression and log-rank tests to assess survival differences. A prognostic score model was developed to categorize patient survival. Efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors was evaluated through propensity score matching. RESULTS: In our study, 431 of 3349 (14%) transplanted HCC patients developed recurrence within a median interval of 18 (IQR:9-32) months. 147 (34%) underwent curative-intent treatments, 207 (48%) received palliative treatments, and 77 (18%) were given best-supportive care. Patients undergoing curative-intent treatments had better survival from the time of recurrence with median survival of 45 (95%CI:36-63) months and 1/3/5-year survival of 90%/56%/43% compared to those receiving non-curative treatments (median: 11 (95%CI:10-13) months, 1/3/5-year survival of 46%/10%/7%, log-rank p<0.001). Patients with recurrence diagnosed in the era 2018-2022 showed improved survival over previous era (HR 0.64 (95%CI:0.47-0.86)). Multivariable analysis identified 5 prognostic factors: ineligibility for curative-intent treatment (HR 3.5 (95%CI:2.7-4.6)), recurrence within 1-year (HR 1.7 (95%CI:1.3-2.1)), poor tumor differentiation (HR 1.5 (95%CI:1.1-1.9)), RETREAT score ≥3 (HR 1.4 (95%CI:1.1-1.8)) and AFP at recurrence ≥400 ng/mL (HR 1.4 (95%CI:1.1-1.9)). These factors contributed to a prognostic scoring system (0-9) that stratified patients into three prognosis groups. Both propensity score-matched analysis and multivariable regression indicated that lenvatinib was not statistically superior to sorafenib in terms of efficacy. CONCLUSION: Curative-intent treatments should be advocated for patients with post-transplant recurrence whenever possible. Prognostic factors linked to aggressive tumor biology significantly influence survival. Advancements in HCC management have improved survival outcomes over the past five years.

Novel Benchmark for Adult-to-Adult Living-donor Liver Transplantation: Integrating Eastern and Western Experiences.

OBJECTIVE: To define benchmark values for adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). BACKGROUND: LDLT utilizes living-donor hemiliver grafts to expand the donor pool and reduce waitlist mortality. Although references have been established for donor hepatectomy, no such information exists for recipients to enable conclusive quality and comparative assessments. METHODS: Patients undergoing LDLT were analyzed in 15 high-volume centers (≥10 cases/year) from 3 continents over 5 years (2016-2020), with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Benchmark criteria included a Model for End-stage Liver Disease ≤20, no portal vein thrombosis, no previous major abdominal surgery, no renal replacement therapy, no acute liver failure, and no intensive care unit admission. Benchmark cutoffs were derived from the 75th percentile of all centers' medians. RESULTS: Of 3636 patients, 1864 (51%) qualified as benchmark cases. Benchmark cutoffs, including posttransplant dialysis (≤4%), primary nonfunction (≤0.9%), nonanastomotic strictures (≤0.2%), graft loss (≤7.7%), and redo-liver transplantation (LT) (≤3.6%), at 1-year were below the deceased donor LT benchmarks. Bile leak (≤12.4%), hepatic artery thrombosis (≤5.1%), and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI ® ) (≤56) were above the deceased donor LT benchmarks, whereas mortality (≤9.1%) was comparable. The right hemiliver graft, compared with the left, was associated with a lower CCI ® score (34 vs 21, P < 0.001). Preservation of the middle hepatic vein with the right hemiliver graft had no impact neither on the recipient nor on the donor outcome. Asian centers outperformed other centers with CCI ® score (21 vs 47, P < 0.001), graft loss (3.0% vs 6.5%, P = 0.002), and redo-LT rates (1.0% vs 2.5%, P = 0.029). In contrast, non-benchmark low-volume centers displayed inferior outcomes, such as bile leak (15.2%), hepatic artery thrombosis (15.2%), or redo-LT (6.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Benchmark LDLT offers a valuable alternative to reduce waitlist mortality. Exchange of expertise, public awareness, and centralization policy are, however, mandatory to achieve benchmark outcomes worldwide.

Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Early Bacterial Infections After Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Advancements in surgical techniques, immunosuppression regimens, and peri-operative and postoperative care have resulted in marked improvement in outcomes after pediatric living donor liver transplantation (PLDLT). Despite these developments, infectious complications remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of pediatric recipients from January 2004 to December 2018. Patients were classified into infected and non-infected groups based on the occurrence of bacterial infection during the first 3 months after transplant. Perioperative risk factors for early post-transplant bacterial infections and postoperative outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: Seventy-two out of 221 children developed early bacterial infection (32.6%). The first episodes of bacterial infection most frequently occurred in the second week after LDLT (37.5%). In multivariate analysis, active infection before transplant and complications with Clavien-Dindo grading >3 were the only independent risk factors. Early bacterial infections were independently associated with longer intensive care unit stays, longer hospital stays, and a higher incidence of readmission for bacterial infection during the first year after transplant. Additionally, the overall patient survival rate was significantly higher in the non-infected group (P = .001). Risk factors for infection, such as age, weight, disease severity, ABO-incompatible, and other operative factors, were not identified as independent risk factors. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that there are similarities and disparities in the epidemiology and risk factors for early bacterial infection after transplant between centers. Identification and better characterization of these predisposing factors are essential in the modification of current preventive strategies and treatment protocols to improve outcomes for this highly vulnerable group.

Beyond the Rex: an innovative meso-intrahepatic portal vein bypass for late-onset extrahepatic portal vein occlusion after living donor liver transplantation.

The Meso-Rex bypass (MRB) is recognized as an effective treatment for portal hypertension secondary to extrahepatic portal vein occlusion (EHPVO) both in the pediatric and adult population, within or outside the context of liver transplantation. It is the preferred surgical treatment in most centers because not only does it addresses the portal hypertension, but also restores physiologic portal hepatopetal flow. However, the Rex recess, the landmark for this technique, may not be safely accessible in some patients. We present a 22-year-old male who underwent living donor liver transplant (LDLT) for neonatal hepatitis. He presented with variceal bleeding due to EHPVO at 13 years after transplant. Various endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical interventions were employed to address the recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding, but results have been unsatisfactory. We performed a meso-intrahepatic portal vein bypass (MIPVB), an innovative alternative to the MRB, for this patient with extensive post-operative adhesions, perihilar collaterals, and cavernous transformation. MIPVB creation in patients where the Rex recess is inaccessible is technically challenging. But with a multidisciplinary team approach, meticulous preoperative planning, and close follow-up, the authors have demonstrated that it is a safe and feasible option for patients with late-onset EHPVO after liver transplantation.

Peri-operative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult and pediatric living donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience.

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a potential rescue therapy for patients with acute cardiopulmonary dysfunction refractory to conventional treatment. In this study, we described the clinical profiles and outcomes of adult and pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) patients who received ECMO support during the peri-operative period. Methods: From June 1994 to December 2020, eleven out of the 1,812 LDLTs performed at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital required ECMO support: six for respiratory failure, three for cardiogenic shock, and two for refractory septic shock. Comparison between the survivor and non-survivor groups was made. Results: The survival rate for liver transplantation (LT) patients on ECMO support is 36.4%-40% in adults and 33.3% in pediatrics, while the survival rate per indication is as follows: acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (50%), cardiogenic shock (33.3%), and sepsis (0%). Shorter durations of LT-to-ECMO and pre-ECMO mechanical ventilation were observed in the survivor group. On the other hand, we observed persistently elevated total bilirubin levels in non-survivors, while none of the survivors had aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels >1,000 U/L. A higher proportion of non-survivors were on concurrent continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Conclusions: Our experience has proven ECMO's utility during the peri-operative period for both adult and pediatric LDLT patients, more specifically for indications other than septic shock. Further studies are needed to better understand the factors leading to poor outcomes in order to identify patients who will more likely benefit from ECMO.