Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Tob Control ; 31(3): 487-492, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33414266

RESUMO

Restricting youth access to tobacco is an essential component of a comprehensive tobacco control policy. While there has been a growing movement to raise the minimum legal age (MLA) of purchasing tobacco from 18 to 21, more restrictive measures, such as raising the MLA to 25 (MLA25), have been criticised as being overly restrictive on adult's free choice. We argue that, even within a policy approach that prioritises freedom of choice, there is a strong case for MLA25 in view of neurobiological evidence which shows that, before age 25, people are neurobiologically vulnerable to developing an addiction. We discuss further considerations for an MLA25 policy, in particular its potential impact on the free choice of young adults to start or quit smoking, potential public health impact and potential effectiveness considering that most underage youth source cigarettes from older peers.


Assuntos
Nicotiana , Produtos do Tabaco , Adolescente , Adulto , Comércio , Humanos , Fumar , Uso de Tabaco , Adulto Jovem
2.
Ann Acad Med Singap ; 53(3): 170-186, 2024 Mar 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38920244

RESUMO

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) remains endemic in Singapore. Singapore's clinical practice guidelines for the management of tuberculosis were first published in 2016. Since then, there have been major new advances in the clinical management of TB, ranging from diagnostics to new drugs and treatment regimens. The National TB Programme convened a multidisciplinary panel to update guidelines for the clinical management of drug-susceptible TB infection and disease in Singapore, contextualising current evidence for local practice. Method: Following the ADAPTE framework, the panel systematically reviewed, scored and synthesised English-language national and international TB clinical guidelines published from 2016, adapting recommendations for a prioritised list of clinical decisions. For questions related to more recent advances, an additional primary literature review was conducted via a targeted search approach. A 2-round modified Delphi process was implemented to achieve consensus for each recommendation, with a final round of edits after consultation with external stakeholders. Results: Recommendations for 25 clinical questions spanning screening, diagnosis, selection of drug regimen, monitoring and follow-up of TB infection and disease were formulated. The availability of results from recent clinical trials led to the inclusion of shorter treatment regimens for TB infection and disease, as well as consensus positions on the role of newer technologies, such as computer-aided detection-artificial intelligence products for radiological screening of TB disease, next-generation sequencing for drug-susceptibility testing, and video observation of treatment. Conclusion: The panel updated recommendations on the management of drug-susceptible TB infection and disease in Singapore.


Assuntos
Antituberculosos , Técnica Delphi , Tuberculose Pulmonar , Tuberculose , Humanos , Singapura , Antituberculosos/uso terapêutico , Tuberculose Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Tuberculose Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Tuberculose/tratamento farmacológico , Tuberculose/diagnóstico , Consenso
3.
Lancet Reg Health West Pac ; 21: 100414, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35252911

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tobacco flavours such as menthol and fruits, which appeal to youth, remain unregulated in Western Pacific countries. Our goal was to evaluate the potential impact of tobacco flavour bans in Singapore, which has the region's highest flavoured cigarette market share. METHODS: Using an open-cohort microsimulation model, we estimated the impact of full ban and partial ban (excluding menthol and clove) scenarios versus the status quo (no ban) over a 50-year horizon. We used a Markov chain with four states (never, unflavoured, flavoured and ex-smokers), updating each individual's state across each year. We estimated between-state transition probabilities using Markov chain Monte Carlo, with prior distributions derived from national survey data. FINDINGS: Without a ban, smoking prevalence gradually increases from 12.7% (2018) to 15.2% (2068). In both ban scenarios, smoking prevalence decreases immediately after the ban: by 1.6% points in the full ban, and 0.4% points in the partial ban scenario. In addition, there is a sustained long-term impact as fewer initiate. In the full ban scenario, smoking prevalence decreases to 10.6% by 2068 with a cumulative gain of over 40,000 QALYs. In the partial ban scenario, it remains stable at 12.5% with a cumulative gain of over 20,000 QALYs. INTERPRETATIONS: A tobacco flavours ban would reap substantial public health benefits in countries that, like Singapore, have a large flavoured cigarette market share, especially with a full ban compared to a partial ban not covering menthol or clove-flavoured cigarettes. FUNDING: This study was funded by the Singapore Ministry of Health.

4.
Ann Acad Med Singap ; 49(8): 561-572, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33164026

RESUMO

Singapore, an island country with 5.6 million population and a large volume of tourists from mainland China, was one of the first countries to report imported COVID-19 cases and had the highest number of cases outside mainland China for a time in February 2020. The government responded with a series of broadscale public health measures and managed to contain this first wave of infection. Notwithstanding that, an evolving pandemic situation in other countries eventually triggered a second, and much larger, wave of infection. This case study narrates the developments, influencing factors, and outcomes related to events starting from Singapore's first response to COVID-19 and up to the point of its entry into Circuit Breaker. It serves as a reference for the understanding and analysis of developments in an evolving pandemic and a nation's response from a systems level perspective.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/organização & administração , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Humanos , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , SARS-CoV-2 , Singapura/epidemiologia
5.
J Clin Med ; 9(3)2020 Feb 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32110875

RESUMO

Rapid diagnostics, vaccines and therapeutics are important interventions for the management of the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak. It is timely to systematically review the potential of these interventions, including those for Middle East respiratory syndrome-Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV, to guide policymakers globally on their prioritization of resources for research and development. A systematic search was carried out in three major electronic databases (PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library) to identify published studies in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Supplementary strategies through Google Search and personal communications were used. A total of 27 studies fulfilled the criteria for review. Several laboratory protocols for confirmation of suspected 2019-nCoV cases using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) have been published. A commercial RT-PCR kit developed by the Beijing Genomic Institute is currently widely used in China and likely in Asia. However, serological assays as well as point-of-care testing kits have not been developed but are likely in the near future. Several vaccine candidates are in the pipeline. The likely earliest Phase 1 vaccine trial is a synthetic DNA-based candidate. A number of novel compounds as well as therapeutics licensed for other conditions appear to have in vitro efficacy against the 2019-nCoV. Some are being tested in clinical trials against MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV, while others have been listed for clinical trials against 2019-nCoV. However, there are currently no effective specific antivirals or drug combinations supported by high-level evidence.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA