Prevalence and Predictors of Postpartum Cosleeping Practices after Midwife-Led Births in the US.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patterns of mother-infant sleeping behaviors among US-based mothers who received care from midwives and breastfed their infants the majority of time at 6 weeks postpartum. STUDY DESIGN: Infant sleep locations were reported for 24 915 mother-infant dyads followed through 6 weeks postpartum, following midwife-led singleton births. Using data derived from medical records, we used multinomial logistic regression to identify predictors of sleep location. RESULTS: The median maternal age was 31 years (IQR, 27-34 years). The majority were White (84.5%), reported having a partner or spouse (95%), had a community birth (87%), and reported bedsharing with their infant for part (13.2%) or most of the night (43.8%). In the adjusted analysis, positive predictors of always bedsharing included increasing maternal age (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.13-1.21; per 5 years), cesarean birth (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18-1.86), Medicaid eligibility (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.62-1.91), and maternal race/ethnicity (Black OR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.09-1.79]; Latinx OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.35-1.74]; multiracial OR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.39-2.07]). Negative predictors of bedsharing included having a partner/spouse (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56-0.77) and birth location in hospitals (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.49-0.64) or birthing centers (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.44-0.51). Partial breastfeeding dyads were less likely to bedshare than those who were exclusively breastfeeding (always bedsharing OR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.41-0.56]; sometimes bedsharing OR 0.69 [95% CI, 0.56-0.83]). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that cosleeping is common among US families who choose community births, most of whom exclusively breastfeed through at least 6 weeks.

Factors affecting third-stage management and postpartum hemorrhage in planned midwife-led home and birth center births in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a potential childbirth complication. Little is known about how third-stage labor is managed by midwives in the United States, including use of uterotonic medication during community birth. Access to uterotonic medication may vary based on credentials of the midwife or state regulations governing midwifery. METHODS: Using data from the Midwives of North America 2.0 database (2004-2009), we describe the PPH incidence for women giving birth in the community, their demographic and clinical characteristics, and methods used by midwives to address PPH. We also examined PPH rates by midwifery credentials and by the presence of regulations for legal midwifery practice. RESULTS: Of the 17 836 vaginal births, 15.9% had blood loss of over 500 mL and 3.3% had 1000 mL or greater blood loss. Midwives used pharmaceuticals to prevent or treat postpartum bleeding in 6.3% and 13.9% of births, respectively, and the rate of hospital transfer after birth was 1.4% (n = 247). In adjusted analyses, PPH was less likely when births occurred at home vs a birth center, if the midwife had a CNM/CM credential vs a CPM/LM/LDM credential, or if the woman was multiparous without a history of PPH or prior cesarean birth. PPH was more likely in states with barriers to midwifery practice compared with regulated states (OR: 1.26; 95% CI, 1.16-1.38). CONCLUSIONS: Women giving birth in the community experienced low overall incidence of PPH-related hospital transfer. However, the occurrence of PPH itself would likely be reduced with improved legal access to uterotonic medication.

Cesarean Birth Regret and Dissatisfaction: A Qualitative Approach.

BACKGROUND: The most consistently noted difference between unplanned cesarean and vaginal births is patient dissatisfaction or regret. This has been explored in multiple quantitative studies. However, the causes of this dissatisfaction remain elusive as a result of the limitations of survey instruments that restrict possible choices. METHODS: Using open-ended, semi-structured interviews (n = 14), the purpose of this study was to identify potentially alterable factors that contribute to cesarean section regret when the surgery is performed during labor. In interviews that took place between 2 and 6 weeks postpartum, patients who had undergone an unscheduled cesarean birth during labor and had volunteered for the study were asked to share the story of their birth. Each participant was prompted to describe her understanding of the indication for her cesarean, and reflect on what felt positive and negative about her experience. Using consensus coding, three investigators independently evaluated the transcribed interviews, identifying recurring themes that were then discussed until consensus on the major themes was achieved. RESULTS: Four key themes emerged from patients' unplanned cesarean narratives: poor communication, fear of the operating room, distrust of the medical team, and loss of control. Lack of or incomplete trust in care providers was a new factor not previously recognized as a cause of distress or dissatisfaction in the literature to date. CONCLUSION: The four factors identified in this study are all potentially ameliorable, suggesting that changes in physician behavior may reduce patient dissatisfaction with unplanned cesarean birth.

Homebirth as systems-challenging praxis: knowledge, power, and intimacy in the birthplace.

In this article, I examine the processes and motivations involved when women in the United States choose to circumvent the dominant obstetric care paradigm by delivering at home with a group of care providers called direct-entry midwives. Using grounded theory, participant observation, and open-ended, semistructured interviewing, I collected and analyzed homebirth narratives from a theoretical sample of women (n = 50) in two research locales. Findings interpreted from the perspective of critical medical anthropology suggest that women who choose to birth at home negotiate fears associated with the "just in case something bad happens" argument that forms the foundation for hospital birth rationales through complex individual and social processes. These involve challenging established forms of authoritative knowledge, valuing alternative and more embodied or intuitive ways of knowing, and knowledge sharing through the informed consent process. Adherence to subjugated discourses combined with lived experiences of personal power and the cultivation of intimacy in the birthplace fuel homebirth not only as a minority social movement, but also as a form of systems-challenging praxis.