Correlation of HER2, FCGR2A, and FCGR3A gene polymorphisms with trastuzumab related cardiac toxicity and efficacy in a subgroup of patients from UNICANCER-PACS 04 trial.

The purpose of this study was to investigate, in the context of a prospective node-positive-breast cancer trial HER2 containing-regimen (UNICANCER-PACS 04 trial), the predictive value of HER2, FCGRIIA, and FCGRIIIA gene polymorphisms for cardiac toxicity and efficacy of trastuzumab. We analyzed HER2-I655V, FCGR2A-H131R, and FCGR3A-V158F single nucleotide polymorphisms in patients in adjuvant setting treated by six courses of either fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 100 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2), or epirubicin 75 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks then randomly assigned, in case of HER2 overexpressing tumor, to either trastuzumab for 1 year or nothing. Left ventricular ejection fraction and clinical examination were monitored in each patient, seven times throughout the study to detect congestive heart failure or asymptomatic subclinical cardiac toxicity. All genotypes were analyzed in relation to cardiac toxicity, EFS, and OS. One hundred and thirty-two HER2-positive breast cancer patients were analyzed. The HER2-I655V genotype was significantly associated with cardiac toxicity (p = 0.025). The FCGR2A-131 H/H genotype was significantly correlated with a shorter EFS (p = 0.027). The FCGR3A-158 V/V genotype was not correlated with EFS nor OS. These results might be useful in making a treatment choice of HER2 blockers in adjuvant setting by with an increase in efficacy and decrease in toxicity.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of aplidine, a new marine cyclodepsipeptide in patients with advanced malignancies.

PURPOSE: To establish the safety, pharmacokinetic parameters, maximum-tolerated dose, and recommended dose of aplidine, a novel marine cyclodepsipeptide, in patients with advanced cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a modified Fibonacci method, we performed a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of aplidine administered as a 24-hour intravenous infusion every 2 weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients received aplidine at a dose ranging from 0.2 to 8 mg/m(2). Dose-limiting myotoxicity corresponding to grade 2 to 3 creatine phosphokinase elevation and grade 1 to 2 myalgia and muscle weakness occurred in two of six patients at 6 mg/m(2). No cardiac toxicity was observed. Electron microscopy analysis showed the disappearance of thick filaments of myosin. Grade 3 muscle toxicity occurred in three of 14 patients at the recommended dose of 5 mg/m(2) and seemed to be more readily reversible with oral carnitine (1 g/10 kg). Therefore, dose escalation was resumed using carnitine prophylactically, allowing an increase in the recommended dose to 7 mg/m(2). Other toxicities were nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, asthenia, and transaminase elevation with mild hematologic toxicity. Aplidine displayed a long half-life (21 to 44 hours), low clearance (45 to 49 L/h), and a high volume of distribution (1,036 to 1,124 L) with high interpatient variability in plasma, whereas in whole blood, clearance ranged from 3.0 to 6.2 L/h. Minor responses and prolonged tumor stabilizations were observed in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Muscle toxicity was dose limiting in this study. Recommended doses of aplidine were 5 and 7 mg/m(2) without and with carnitine, respectively. The role of carnitine will be further explored in phase II studies.

Phase I study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with ifosfamide in pretreated ovarian cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the dose limiting toxicity, the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in association with a fixed dose of ifosfamide (IFO) to patients with recurrent, advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). METHODS: Patients with progressing platinum-sensitive or resistant disease were included in 5 dose levels consisting of PLD (25 mg/m2 to 45 mg/m2, day 1) combined with a fixed IFO dose administered as a continuous infusion (1700 mg/m2/d, day 1 to 3) to define the MTD on the basis of acute toxicity during the first 2 cycles, then confirm the MTD, by the evaluation of delayed toxicity (hand-foot syndrome). RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were treated. The MTD was determined in the first 29 patients to be dose level V (45 mg/m2), with 2 cases of febrile neutropenia. The recommended dose (level IV) combines 40 mg/m2 PLD on day 1 and 1700 mg/m2/d IFO day 1 to day 3. The principal toxicity was hematotoxicity (grade 3-4 neutropenia 61.8% of patients, grade 3/4 thrombcytopenia 7.2%, and grade 3/4 anemia 21.8%). Nonhematological toxicity essentially consisted of grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting (14%). Nineteen additional patients were included in levels III (11 patients) and IV (8 patients), to evaluate late-onset toxicity. No hand-foot syndrome was observed in the 48 treated patients, confirming the identification of dose level IV as recommended dose. CONCLUSION: This study regimen presents an acceptable tolerance. The preliminary assessment of efficacy merits confirmation in a phase II study.

Phase I-II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combined with weekly paclitaxel as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) appears to be as active as doxorubicin in first-line metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, with lower cardiac toxicity. This phase I-II trial aimed to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended dose (RD) of a first-line combination of PLD and weekly paclitaxel. METHODS: MBC patients received PLD on day 1, administered over 60 minutes IV. (starting dose 30 mg/m2, escalation by 5 mg/m2 increments), and paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15. Initially (schedule A), paclitaxel was administered over 60 minutes (starting dose 80 mg/m2, 10 mg/m2 increments), then (schedule B) over 24 hours on day 1 (at a dose of 70 mg/m2, 10 mg/m2 increments), and in a 60 minute IV infusion at a fixed dose of 90 mg/m2 on days 8 and 15. Pharmacokinetics were assessed during cycle 1 in schedule B. RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated (schedules A = 9; B = 21). Because of cutaneomucous toxicities in all patients in schedule A with discontinuation in 5 patients, schedule B was explored. Two DLTs (febrile neutropenia) occurred, with PLD 35 mg/m2 with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 day 1 and 90 mg/m2 days 8 and 15 identified as recommended dose. Pharmacokinetic evaluation revealed an interaction, with increased levels of free doxorubicin and PLD during the paclitaxel infusion. CONCLUSIONS: This combination according to schedule and dosages results in cutaneomucous and hematological toxicity, probably because of a pharmacokinetic interaction, which is poorly compatible with a good quality of life for MBC patients.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irofulven and cisplatin administered in a 30-min infusion every two weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: To determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose, safety and pharmacokinetics of irofulven combined with cisplatin in advanced solid tumor patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cisplatin and irofulven were given sequentially i.v. over 30 min on day 1 and 15 every 4 weeks. Four dose levels (DL) were explored: irofulven (mg/kg)/cisplatin (mg/m2): DL1: 0.3/30; DL2: 0.4/30; DL3: 0.4/40; DL4: 0.5/40. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) included dosing omission and delay > 1 week. MTD was the DL with DLT in 2/2 or > or = 2/6 patients during cycle 1-2. RESULTS: Between March 2002 and April 2003, 33 patients were treated. DLT occurred in 1/6 patients in DL1 (hypomagnesemia, hypocalcemia); 1/6 in DL2 (thrombocytopenia); 2 heavily pretreated patients out of 6 patients in DL3 (neutropenic infection, thrombocytopenia, stomatitis); 2/3 in DL4 (asthenia, blurred vision). Three DLT occurred in 12 additional patients treated at DL2. No toxic deaths occurred; grade 4 toxicity and grade 3 non-hematological toxicity were infrequent. Six patients reported grade 1-2 visual events. Antitumor activity was observed over a broad spectrum of tumor types in all DLs: 1 partial response in bulky sarcoma (DL1); 1 clinical response in endometrial carcinoma (DL1); 2 partial responses not confirmed due to discontinuation (ovarian DL2, renal DL4); 8 stabilizations > 3 months; PSA response: 3/9 prostate cancer patients. Irofulven showed rapid elimination and high interpatient variability. Platinum and irofulven pharmacokinetics did not suggest drug-drug interactions. CONCLUSION: Irofulven with cisplatin was adequately tolerated and substantial evidence of antitumor activity was observed. The recommended dose is irofulven 0.4 mg/kg and cisplatin 30 mg/m2.

Phase I study with dose escalation of gemcitabine and cisplatin in combination with ifosfamide (GIP) in patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

Gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin (P) are active reference agents in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ifosfamide (I) has also been approved for NSCLC treatment. This phase I trial aimed to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose [maximum tolerated dosage (MTD)], and recommended dose (RD) of a GIP combination in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC. In this study, one cycle of chemotherapy combined the following: ifosfamide: 3 g/m2 fixed dose (24-hour intravenous infusion) combined with mesna, day 1; gemcitabine: starting dose 1,000 mg/m2/d, escalating by 250 mg/m2 increments, days 1 and 15; cisplatin: starting dose 80 mg/m2, subsequently 100 mg/m2, day 15; in cohorts of at least 3 patients. Cycles were repeated every 28 days and no hematopoietic growth factors were administered. DLT was evaluated after the first chemotherapy cycle. Thirty-three patients (30 men, 3 women) with stage III (14 patients)/IV (19 patients) NSCLC were treated at eight dose levels, receiving 109 cycles of chemotherapy. Neutropenia was the only DLT reported. Although the MTD was not reached at the highest tested dose level, the RD chosen corresponds to the full doses of the GP3000 doublet standard (G: 3,000 mg/m2; P: 100 mg/m2 per cycle) every 28 days. Nonhematologic toxicities were mainly grade I-II. Relative dose intensities of G, I, and P at the RD were 96%, 98%, and 96%, respectively. Sixteen of 33 patients with measurable/evaluable disease had an objective response including two complete responses. In conclusion, GIP chemotherapy is safe and appears to be active in patients with NSCLC. The RD is gemcitabine: 1,500 mg/m2 days 1 and 15; ifosfamide: 3 g/m2 day 1; cisplatin: 100 mg/m2 day 15. A confirmatory phase II study is currently under way, before a phase III trial of GIP versus GP.