Comparison of the different imaging modalities used to image pediatric oncology patients: A COG diagnostic imaging committee/SPR oncology committee white paper.

Diagnostic imaging is essential in the diagnosis and management, including surveillance, of known or suspected cancer in children. The independent and combined roles of the various modalities, consisting of radiography, fluoroscopy, ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and nuclear medicine (NM), are both prescribed through protocols but also function in caring for complications that may occur during or subsequent to treatment such as infection, bleeding, or organ compromise. Use of a specific imaging modality may be based on situational circumstances such as a brain CT or MR for a new onset seizure, chest CT for respiratory signs or symptoms, or US for gross hematuria. However, in many situations, there are competing choices that do not easily lend themselves to a formulaic approach as options; these situations depend on the contributions of a variety of factors based on a combination of the clinical scenario and the strengths and limitations of the imaging modalities. Therefore, an improved understanding of the potential influence of the imaging decision pathways in pediatric cancer care can come from comparison among the individual diagnostic imaging modalities. The purpose of the following material to is to provide such a comparison. To do this, pediatric imaging content experts for the individual modalities of radiography and fluoroscopy, US, CT, MRI, and NM will discuss the individual modality strengths and limitations.

Leveraging diversity, equity and inclusion for promoting wellness in the radiology workplace.

Over the last decade, health care professionals in the field of radiology have experienced increasing rates of burnout. A study in 2017 showed high prevalence of burnout in pediatric radiology, and other studies have identified several drivers for burnout. An important factor in promoting wellness and mitigating burnout is leveraging diversity, equity and inclusion in the workplace. This manuscript highlights the importance of diversity in high-functioning teams as well as the critical role of equity and inclusion in the workplace to help create an organization where people belong and can effectively succeed.

2021 update on the urinary tract dilation (UTD) classification system: clarifications, review of the literature, and practical suggestions.

In 2014, a multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of pre- and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification) was developed. Its goal was to provide a standardized system for evaluating and reporting urinary tract dilation both in the prenatal and postnatal periods. In this review, we summarize insights learned from the implementation of the UTD classification system since its inception, providing clarifications on common points of confusion. In addition, we review current literature in the clinical validation of the UTD classification system to provide credence for its use in managing fetuses and children with urinary tract dilation.

Diagnostic performance of ultrasound hepatorenal index for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis in children.

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasing in prevalence and is the most common cause of pediatric chronic liver disease. Objective US-based measures of hepatic steatosis are an unmet clinical need. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of quantitative measurement of liver echogenicity (hepatorenal index, or HRI) for hepatic steatosis in a pediatric cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified pediatric patients (≤18 years old) who underwent both clinically indicated abdominal US and MRI with liver proton-density fat fraction (PDFF) within the 3-month period during the timeframe of July 2015-April 2020 (n=69). Using ImageJ, we drew small circular regions of interest (ROIs) and large freehand ROIs in the liver and right kidney on single longitudinal and transverse images to measure echogenicity (arbitrary units). We calculated four HRIs (liver-to-kidney ratio) as well as liver histogram features. Five pediatric radiologists independently reported the qualitative presence/absence of hepatic steatosis. We used Pearson correlation (r) to assess associations and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to evaluate diagnostic performance. Multivariable logistic regression was used to further assess relationships. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 11.6 (standard deviation [SD] 4.7, range 0.3-18) years; 27/69 (39.1%) were female. Mean PDFF was 12.5% (SD 13.1%, range 1-48%); 34/69 (49.3%) patients were classified as having hepatic steatosis by MRI (PDFF ≥6%). There were significant, positive correlations between all four US HRI methods and PDFF (r=0.51-0.61); longitudinal freehand ROIs exhibited the strongest correlation (r=0.61; P<0.0001). Longitudinal freehand ROI HRI had moderate diagnostic performance for the binary presence of steatosis (area under the curve [AUC]=0.80, P<0.0001), with an optimal cut-off value >1.75 (sensitivity=70.6%, specificity=77.1%). Radiologists' sensitivity for detecting hepatic steatosis ranged from 79.4% to 97.1%, and specificity ranged from 91.2% to 100%. Significant multivariable predictors of PDFF ≥6% included HRI (P=0.002; odds ratio [OR]=34.2), body mass index (BMI) percentile (P=0.005; OR=1.06), and liver gray-scale echogenicity standard deviation (P=0.02; OR=0.79) (receiver operating characteristic AUC = 0.92). CONCLUSION: Quantitative US HRI has moderate diagnostic performance for detecting liver fat in children and positively correlates with MRI PDFF. Incorporation of BMI-percentile and gray-scale echogenicity standard deviation improved diagnostic performance.

Ultrasound of congenital spine anomalies.

Ultrasonography (US) is the first-line imaging modality for screening neonates and young infants with suspected spinal abnormalities. Whether performed for a suspicious congenital skin lesion, such as a lumbosacral tract or lipomatous mass, or abnormal neurological findings, US can help define spinal anatomy, characterize congenital spine malformations, and direct further work-up and management. The purpose of this article is to review the diagnostic imaging approach to infant spine US, including technique and indications, normal anatomy and variants with a focus on embryological origins, and classification and diagnosis of congenital spine malformations.

The use of a patient advocate to improve the experience in pediatric radiology.

There is increasing emphasis on improving the patient experience with a shift to patient- and family-centered care throughout all areas of health care. In 2013, the American College of Radiology launched Imaging 3.0, an initiative aimed at encouraging and enabling radiologists to work on culture change to increase focus on appropriateness, efficiency, quality, safety and patient satisfaction. Many groups have subsequently used these and other tools to improve the overall patient experience, focusing on the entire imaging journey to include initial order placement, registration in the department, image acquisition, departure from the department, and how and when the patient and family receive the imaging results. In our department we have used multiple strategies and have applied quality-improvement methods and patient/family-centered care models to improve quality, safety and the patient experience. Most of these efforts have included team members across the department, including radiologists, technologists, quality-improvement personnel, managers and nurses. In addition, for the last 12 years, a key member of these teams has been our patient and family advocate (PFA). We describe the important role that a PFA can play in improving the patient and family experience in pediatric radiology.

Proceedings: Beyond Ultrasound First Forum on improving the quality of ultrasound imaging in obstetrics and gynecology.

The Beyond Ultrasound First Forum was conceived to increase awareness that the quality of obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound can be improved, and is inconsistent throughout the country, likely due to multiple factors, including the lack of a standardized curriculum and competency assessment in ultrasound teaching. The forum brought together representatives from many professional associations; the imaging community including radiology, obstetrics and gynecology, and emergency medicine among others; in addition to government agencies, insurers, industry, and others with common interest in obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound. This group worked together in focus sessions aimed at developing solutions on how to standardize and improve ultrasound training at the resident level and beyond. A new curriculum and competency assessment program for teaching residents (obstetrics and gynecology, radiology, and any other specialty doing obstetrics and gynecology ultrasound) was presented, and performance measures of ultrasound quality in clinical practice were discussed. The aim of this forum was to increase and unify the quality of ultrasound examinations in obstetrics and gynecology with the ultimate goal of improving patient safety and quality of clinical care. This report describes the proceedings of this conference including possible approaches to resident teaching and means to improve the inconsistent quality of ultrasound examinations performed today.

Proceedings: Beyond Ultrasound First Forum on Improving the Quality of Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The Beyond Ultrasound First Forum was conceived to increase awareness that the quality of obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound can be improved, and is inconsistent throughout the country, likely due to multiple factors, including the lack of a standardized curriculum and competency assessment in ultrasound teaching. The forum brought together representatives from many professional associations; the imaging community including radiology, obstetrics and gynecology, and emergency medicine among others; in addition to government agencies, insurers, industry, and others with common interest in obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound. This group worked together in focus sessions aimed at developing solutions on how to standardize and improve ultrasound training at the resident level and beyond. A new curriculum and competency assessment program for teaching residents (obstetrics and gynecology, radiology, and any other specialty doing obstetrics and gynecology ultrasound) was presented, and performance measures of ultrasound quality in clinical practice were discussed. The aim of this forum was to increase and unify the quality of ultrasound examinations in obstetrics and gynecology with the ultimate goal of improving patient safety and quality of clinical care. This report describes the proceedings of this conference including possible approaches to resident teaching and means to improve the inconsistent quality of ultrasound examinations performed today.

Ultrasound imaging of renin-mediated hypertension.

The incidence of primary (i.e. essential) hypertension in children and adolescents is increasing; however, secondary hypertension, with an identifiable cause, remains relatively common and might be treatable or even curable. Renovascular hypertension is an uncommon but important secondary cause of hypertension in the pediatric population that can be associated with substantial morbidity. In this article we discuss renin-mediated causes of hypertension in children and related complications, review renal Doppler ultrasound techniques for the evaluation of renin-mediated hypertension (including both direct and indirect assessments), and briefly appraise the literature pertaining to renal Doppler ultrasound and the assessment of pediatric hypertension. Finally, we describe a proposed role for renal Doppler ultrasound in the workup of suspected renin-mediated hypertension in children and adolescents.

Quality measures and pediatric radiology: suggestions for the transition to value-based payment.

Recent political and economic factors have contributed to a meaningful change in the way that quality in health care, and by extension value, are viewed. While quality is often evaluated on the basis of subjective criteria, pay-for-performance programs that link reimbursement to various measures of quality require use of objective and quantifiable measures. This evolution to value-based payment was accelerated by the 2015 passage of the Medicare Access and CHIP (Children's Health Insurance Program) Reauthorization Act (MACRA). While many of the drivers of these changes are rooted in federal policy and programs such as Medicare and aimed at adult patients, the practice of pediatrics and pediatric radiology will be increasingly impacted. This article addresses issues related to the use of quantitative measures to evaluate the quality of services provided by the pediatric radiology department or sub-specialty section, particularly as seen from the viewpoint of a payer that may be considering ways to link payment to performance. The paper concludes by suggesting a metric categorization strategy to frame future work on the subject.

Lung Ultrasonography: A Viable Alternative to Chest Radiography in Children with Suspected Pneumonia?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the interrater reliability (IRR) of lung ultrasonography (LUS) and chest radiography (CXR) and evaluate the accuracy of LUS compared with CXR for detecting pediatric pneumonia compared with chest computed tomography (CT) scan. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study of children aged 3 months to 18 years with a CXR and LUS performed between May 1, 2012, and January 31, 2014 with or without a clinical diagnosis of pneumonia. Four pediatric radiologists blinded to clinical information reported findings for the CXR and LUS images. IRR was estimated for 50 LUS and CXR images. The main outcome was the finding from CT ordered clinically or the probability of the CT finding for patients clinically requiring CT. Two radiologists reviewed CT scans to determine an overall finding. Latent class analysis was used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity for findings (eg, consolidation) for LUS and CXR compared with CT. RESULTS: Of the 132 patients in the cohort, 36 (27%) had CT performed for a clinical reason. Pneumonia was clinically documented in 47 patients (36%). The IRR for lung consolidation was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.40-0.70) for LUS and 0.36 (95% CI, 0.21-0.51) for CXR. The sensitivity for detecting consolidation, interstitial disease, and pleural effusion was statistically similar for LUS and CXR compared with CT; however, specificity was higher for CXR. The negative predictive value was similar for CXR and LUS. CONCLUSIONS: LUS has a sufficiently high IRR for detection of consolidation. Compared with CT, LUS and CXR have similar sensitivity, but CXR is more specific for findings indicating pneumonia.

Worldwide Argus II implantation: recommendations to optimize patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: A position paper based on the collective experiences of Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System investigators to review strategies to optimize outcomes in patients with retinitis pigmentosa undergoing retinal prosthesis implantation. METHODS: Retinal surgeons, device programmers, and rehabilitation specialists from Europe, Canada, Middle East, and the United States were convened to the first international Argus II Investigator Meeting held in Ann Arbor, MI in March 2015. The recommendations from the collective experiences were collected. Factors associated with successful outcomes were determined. RESULTS: Factors leading to successful outcomes begin with appropriate patient selection, expectation counseling, and preoperative retinal assessment. Challenges to surgical implantation include presence of staphyloma and inadequate Tenon's capsule or conjunctiva. Modified surgical technique may reduce risks of complications such as hypotony and conjunctival erosion. Rehabilitation efforts and correlation with validated outcome measures following implantation are critical. CONCLUSIONS: Bringing together Argus II investigators allowed the identification of strategies to optimize patient outcomes. Establishing an on-line collaborative network will foster coordinated research efforts to advance outcome assessment and rehabilitation strategies.