A Survey of Cystic Fibrosis Center Recommendations for Nebulizer Cleaning and Disinfection.

BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in cystic fibrosis (CF) therapeutics, the persistence of chronic infections necessitates continued use of nebulized therapies. Though the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends well-defined cleaning and disinfection of nebulizers to mitigate pathogen exposure risks, discrepancies between Cystic Fibrosis Foundation guidelines, manufacturers' instructions, and variability in center recommendations contribute to confusion and non-standardized practices. METHODS: A digital survey was distributed to directors, associate directors, and care coordinators of CF centers across the United States to investigate the methods, frequency, and educational practices surrounding nebulizer care they provide patients. Responses were analyzed using descriptive techniques and chi-square analyses. RESULTS: Of 855 distributed surveys, 129 respondents provided insights into nebulizer care recommendations. Discrepancies in disinfection frequency were notable, with 18% of respondents recommending disinfecting nebulizers less than daily. Approximately 20% of respondents were unsure if their recommendations aligned with Cystic Fibrosis Foundation guidelines while 73% reported that their recommendations strictly adhered to the published guidelines. Of this 73%, all recommended at least daily cleaning, with 69% specifying cleaning before reuse; and 88% recommended disinfection at least daily, with 36% specifying disinfection before reuse. Only 10% recommended both cleaning and disinfection after every use. Disinfection less than daily was recommended by 11% of the respondents who felt they were strictly following the guidelines. We also highlight respondents who cited barriers to strict adhesion to the published guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The highlighted variations in CF centers' recommendations for nebulizer care with deviations from Cystic Fibrosis Foundation guidelines underscore the necessity for developing clear and practical guidelines that consider both efficacy and the realities of patient adherence. Collaboration among CF care centers, patients, guideline committees, and other stakeholders is essential to develop recommendations that effectively address the challenges faced by the CF community, ensuring the safe and effective nebulizer use.

Pediatric Pulmonary Milestones 2.0: Development, Lessons Learned, and Future Directions.

Pediatric pulmonology fellowship training programs are required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education to report Pediatric Subspecialty Milestones biannually to track fellow progress. However, several issues, such as lack of subspecialty-specific context and ambiguous language, have raised concerns about their validity and applicability to use for fellow assessment and curriculum development. In this Perspective, we briefly share the process of the Pediatric Pulmonology Milestones 2.0 Work Group in creating new specialty-specific Milestones and tailoring information on the Harmonized Milestones to pediatric pulmonologists, with the goal of improving the Milestones' utility for stakeholders, including pulmonology fellows, faculty, program directors, and accrediting bodies. In addition, we created a supplemental guide to better link the Milestones to pulmonary-specific scenarios to create a shared mental model between stakeholders and remove a potential detriment to validity. Through the process, a number of guiding principles were clarified, including: 1) every Milestone should be able to be assessed independently, without overlap with other Milestones; 2) there should be clear developmental progression from one Milestone to the next; 3) Milestones should be based on the unique skills expected of pediatric pulmonologists; and 4) health equity should be a core component to highlight as a top priority to all stakeholders. In this Perspective, we describe these principles that guided formulation of the Pediatric Pulmonary Milestones to help familiarize the pediatric pulmonary community with the new Milestones. In addition, we share lessons learned and challenges in our process to inform other specialties that may soon participate in this process.

Bacterial Surface Detachment during Nebulization with Contaminated Reusable Home Nebulizers.

Patients with chronic respiratory diseases use home nebulizers that are often contaminated with pathogenic microbes to deliver aerosolized medications. The conditions under which these microbes leave the surface as bioaerosols during nebulization are not well characterized. The objectives of this study were to (i) determine whether different pathogens detach and disperse from the nebulizer surface during aerosolization and (ii) measure the effects of relative humidity and drying times on bacterial surface detachment and aerosolization. Bacteria were cultured from bioaerosols after Pari LC Plus albuterol nebulization using two different sources, as follows: (i) previously used nebulizers donated by anonymous patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and (ii) nebulizers inoculated with bacteria isolated from the lungs of CF patients. Fractionated bioaerosols were collected with a Next-Generation Impactor. For a subset of bacteria, surface adherence during rewetting was measured with fluorescence microscopy. Bacteria dispersed from the surface of used CF patient nebulizers during albuterol nebulization. Eighty percent (16/20) of clinical isolates inoculated on the nebulizer in the laboratory formed bioaerosols. Detachment from the plastic surface into the chamber solution predicted bioaerosol production. Increased relative humidity and decreased drying times after inoculation favored bacterial dispersion on aerosols during nebulized therapy. Pathogenic bacteria contaminating nebulizer surfaces detached from the surface as bioaerosols during nebulized therapies, especially under environmental conditions when contaminated nebulizers were dried or stored at high relative humidity. This finding emphasizes the need for appropriate nebulizer cleaning, disinfection, and complete drying during storage and informs environmental conditions that favor bacterial surface detachment during nebulization. IMPORTANCE Studies from around the world have demonstrated that many patients use contaminated nebulizers to deliver medication into their lungs. While it is known that using contaminated medications in a nebulizer can lead to a lung infection, whether bacteria on the surface of a contaminated nebulizer detach as bioaerosols capable of reaching the lung has not been studied. This work demonstrates that a subset of clinical bacteria enter solution from the surface during nebulization and are aerosolized. Environmental conditions of high relative humidity during storage favor dispersion from the surface. We also provide results of an in vitro assay conducted to monitor bacterial surface detachment during multiple cycles of rewetting that correlate with the results of nebulizer/bacterial surface interactions. These studies demonstrate for the first time that pathogenic bacteria on the nebulizer surface pose a risk of bacterial inhalation to patients who use contaminated nebulizers.

Nebulizer cleaning and disinfection practices in families with cystic fibrosis: The relationship between attitudes, practice and microbe colonization.

BACKGROUND: The daily burden of health maintenance for children and families with cystic fibrosis (CF) is immense with respect to time and complexity of care. Infection control practices, specifically nebulizer cleaning and disinfection, are a recommended component of home health care for CF families due to colonization of home respiratory equipment with lung pathogens. To better inform education interventions at our center, we were interested in studying how families' views on infection prevention and awareness of CF Foundation infection prevention and control (IP&C) guidelines correlate with actual home nebulizer care and the presence of microorganisms on their nebulizers. METHODS: Twenty families who have children with CF were surveyed to better understand attitudes toward infection prevention, awareness of CFF IP&C guidelines and nebulizer cleaning and disinfection practices in the home. Their nebulizers were also cultured for microbes to correlate recovery with infection control behaviors. RESULTS: A subset of families recognizes the importance of germ avoidance but do not recognize nebulizer cleaning and disinfection as very important for infection control practices. Decreased frequency of disinfection, but not cleaning, was correlated with the recovery of organisms on the nebulizers. CONCLUSIONS: The study questionnaire results identify a gap between recognizing the importance of infection prevention and consistently implementing CFF IP&C guidelines in the home. This demonstrates the need at our center for new educational interventions to promote cleaning and disinfection of home nebulizers after each use as recommended by the CFF.

Ozone disinfection of home nebulizers effectively kills common cystic fibrosis bacterial pathogens.

OBJECTIVE: The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) recommends routine nebulizer disinfection for patients but compliance is challenging due to the heavy burden of home care. SoClean® is a user friendly ozone based home disinfection device currently for home respiratory equipment. The objective of this study was to determine whether SoClean® has potential as a disinfection device for families with CF by killing CF associated bacteria without altering nebulizer output. HYPOTHESIS: Ozone based disinfection effectively kills bacterial pathogens inoculated to home nebulizer equipment without gross changes in nebulizer function. STUDY DESIGN: Common bacterial pathogens associated with CF were inoculated onto the PariLC® jet nebulizer and bacterial recovery compared with or without varied ozone exposure. In separate experiments, nebulizer output was estimated after repeated ozone exposure by weighing the nebulizer. RESULTS: Ozone disinfection was time dependent with a 5 min infusion time and 120 min dwell time effectively killing >99.99% bacteria tested including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Over 250 h of repeat ozone exposure did not alter nebulizer output. This suggests SoClean® has potential as a user-friendly disinfection technique for home respiratory equipment.

Endotracheal intubation and pediatric status asthmaticus: site of original care affects treatment.

OBJECTIVES: Status asthmaticus is a common cause of admission to a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Children unresponsive to medical therapies may require endotracheal intubation; however, this treatment carries significant risk, and thresholds for intubation vary. Our hypothesis was that children who sought care at community hospitals received less aggressive treatment and more frequent intubation than children who sought care at a children's hospital. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A university-affiliated children's hospital PICU. PATIENTS: We retrospectively examined data from all children older than 2 yrs admitted to the PICU with status asthmaticus between April 1997 and July 2005. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 251 children admitted to the PICU with status asthmaticus, 130 initially presented to the emergency department of a children's hospital and 116 presented to the emergency department of a community hospital. Despite similar illness severity, children presenting to a community hospital were significantly more likely to be intubated than those presenting to a children's hospital (17% vs. 5%; p = .004). In addition, those children intubated at community hospitals were intubated sooner after presentation (2.4 +/- 5.2 vs. 7.5 +/- 5.8 hrs; p = .009), had shorter durations of intubation (71 +/- 73 vs. 151 +/- 81 hrs; p = .02), and had shorter PICU length of stays (129 +/- 82 vs. 230 +/- 84 hrs; p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Children with status asthmaticus are more likely to be intubated, and intubated sooner, at a community hospital. The shorter duration of intubation suggests that some children may not have been intubated had they presented to a children's hospital or received more aggressive therapy at their community hospital.