The 253-kb inversion and deep intronic mutations in UNC13D are present in North American patients with familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis 3.

BACKGROUND: The mutations in UNC13D are responsible for familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (FHL) type 3. A 253-kb inversion and two deep intronic mutations, c.118-308C > T and c.118-307G > A, in UNC13D were recently reported in European and Asian FHL3 patients. We sought to determine the prevalence of these three non-coding mutations in North American FHL patients and evaluate the significance of examining these new mutations in genetic testing. PROCEDURE: We performed DNA sequencing of UNC13D and targeted analysis of these three mutations in 1,709 North American patients with a suspected clinical diagnosis of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). RESULTS: The 253-kb inversion, intronic mutations c.118-308C > T and c.118-307G > A were found in 11, 15, and 4 patients, respectively, in which the genetic basis (bi-allelic mutations) explained 25 additional patients. Taken together with previously diagnosed FHL3 patients in our HLH patient registry, these three non-coding mutations were found in 31.6% (25/79) of the FHL3 patients. The 253-kb inversion, c.118-308C > T and c.118-307G > A accounted for 7.0%, 8.9%, and 1.3% of mutant alleles, respectively. Significantly, eight novel mutations in UNC13D are being reported in this study. To further evaluate the expression level of the newly reported intronic mutation c.118-307G > A, reverse transcription PCR and Western blot analysis revealed a significant reduction of both RNA and protein levels suggesting that the c.118-307G > A mutation affects transcription. CONCLUSIONS: These specified non-coding mutations were found in a significant number of North American patients and inclusion of them in mutation analysis will improve the molecular diagnosis of FHL3.

The Clinical Utility of a Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Microarray in Patients With Epilepsy at a Tertiary Medical Center.

Microarray testing has revolutionized clinical cytogenetics, as it provides a significantly higher resolution and greater clinical yield than karyotype analysis. This study assessed the clinical utility of single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray in patients with epilepsy. Study subjects were patients between the ages of birth to 23 years who were diagnosed with epilepsy and had a microarray performed at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Statistical analysis explored the association of microarray results and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), seizure type, and structural malformations. Approximately 17.7% (26/147) of participants had an abnormal microarray as defined by laboratory guidelines. There were no differences in frequency of abnormal brain MRI or seizure type between the abnormal and normal microarray groups. There was a higher prevalence of musculoskeletal malformations (P < .0035) and cardiovascular malformations (P < .0081) in subjects with abnormal microarrays. Clinicians should consider microarray analysis in individuals who have epilepsy, especially in combination with musculoskeletal malformation or cardiovascular malformation.

Genetic testing practices in infants with congenital heart disease.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical genetic testing is expanding rapidly, but the application of new testing has not been reported in an unselected, comprehensive congenital heart disease (CHD) patient population. This study aims to identify cytogenetic testing practices and diagnostic yield in infants with CHD as an important first step toward understanding clinical utility of dedicated cytogenetic testing. We hypothesized that chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) would identify genetic abnormalities underlying both syndromic and isolated CHD. DESIGN: This is a single institution retrospective study that characterizes cytogenetic testing practices and diagnostic yield for all cytogenetic testing in each infant identified with CHD over a 32-month period. CHD was classified by type, complexity, and presence or absence of extracardiac anomalies. RESULTS: Among the 1087 infants identified with CHD by echocardiogram, 277 infants (25%) had some form of cytogenetic testing, including karyotype, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and/or CMA. Forty-one percent of infants who had cytogenetic testing had more than one test. CMA was performed in 121 patients (11%), and abnormalities (both clinically significant and variants of unknown significance) were identified in 35/121 (29%). Forty-nine percent of CMA abnormalities were in patients with apparently isolated nonsyndromic CHD. CONCLUSIONS: This single institution study identified that only 25% of infants with CHD underwent cytogenetic testing, indicating possible underutilization of testing in this age group. The high multiple testing rate indicates a need for improved guidelines for cost effective testing approaches. The diagnostic yield in this study suggests that CMA is a particularly useful first screening test when a specific syndrome is not clinically identifiable. Larger studies investigating cardiac lesion-specific diagnostic yield in isolated CHD are warranted.