RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Wide variations exist in the use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) and echocardiography in the field of cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A national survey promoted by the Italian Association of Cardio-Thoracic Anesthesiologists and Intensive Care was conducted. SETTING: The study occurred in Italian cardiac surgery centers (n = 71). PARTICIPANTS: Anesthesiologists-intensivists were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Anonymous questionnaires were used to investigate the use of PACs and echocardiography in the operating room (OR) and intensive care unit (ICU). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 257 respondents (32.2% response rate) from 59 centers (83.1% response rate) participated. Use of PACs seems less common in ORs (median insertion in 20% [5-70] of patients), with slightly higher use in ICUs; in about half of cases, it was the continuous cardiac output monitoring system of choice. Almost two-thirds of respondents recently inserted at least one PAC within a few hours of ICU admission, despite its need being largely preoperatively predictable. Protocols regulating PAC insertion were reported by 25.3% and 28% of respondents (OR and ICU, respectively). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed intraoperatively in >75% of patients by 86.4% of respondents; only 23.7% stated that intraoperative TEE relied on anesthesiologists. Tissue Doppler and/or 3D imaging were widely available (87.4% and 82%, respectively), but only 37.8% and 24.3% of respondents self-declared skills in these modalities, respectively; 77.1% of respondents had no echocardiography certification, nor were pursuing certification (various reasons); 40.9% had not attended recent echocardiography courses. Lower PAC use was associated with university hospitals (OR: p = 0.014, ICU: p = 0.032) and with lower interventions/year (OR: p = 0.023). Higher independence in performing TEE was reported in university hospitals (OR: p < 0.001; ICU: p = 0.006), centers with higher interventions/year (OR: p = 0.019), and by respondents with less experience in cardiology (ICU: p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Variability in the use of PACs and echocardiography was found. Protocols regulating the use of PACs seem infrequent. University centers use PACs less and have greater skills in TEE. Training and certifications in echocardiography should be encouraged.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz , Humanos , Itália , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Artéria Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana/estatística & dados numéricos , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana/métodos , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana/normas , Ecocardiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Ecocardiografia/tendências , Ecocardiografia/normas , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of real-time dynamic ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation as compared to landmark technique in adult patients. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and EMBASE until June 1, 2022, with the EMBASE search restricted to the last 5 years. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the two techniques (real-time ultrasound-guided vs landmark) for subclavian vein cannulation. The primary outcomes were overall success rate and complication rate, whereas secondary outcomes included success at first attempt, number of attempts, and access time. DATA EXTRACTION: Independent extraction by two authors according to prespecified criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: After screening, six RCTs were included. Two further RCTs using a static ultrasound-guided approach and one prospective study were included in the sensitivity analyses. The results are presented in the form of risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% CI. Real-time ultrasound guidance increased the overall success rate for subclavian vein cannulation as compared to landmark technique (RR = 1.14; [95% CI 1.06-1.23]; p = 0.0007; I2 = 55%; low certainty) and complication rates (RR = 0.32; [95% CI 0.22-0.47]; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%; low certainty). Furthermore, ultrasound guidance increased the success rate at first attempt (RR = 1.32; [95% CI 1.14-1.54]; p = 0.0003; I2 = 0%; low certainty), reduced the total number of attempts (MD = -0.45 [95% CI -0.57 to -0.34]; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%; low certainty), and access time (MD = -10.14 s; [95% CI -17.34 to -2.94]; p = 0.006; I2 = 77%; low certainty). The Trial Sequential Analyses on the investigated outcomes showed that the results were robust. The evidence for all outcomes was considered to be of low certainty. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation is safer and more efficient than a landmark approach. The findings seem robust although the evidence of low certainty.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Veia Subclávia , Adulto , Humanos , Veia Subclávia/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Ultrassonografia , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Capillary Refill Time (CRT) is a marker of peripheral perfusion usually performed at fingertip; however, its evaluation at other sites/position may be advantageous. Moreover, arm position during CRT assessment has not been fully standardized. METHODS: We performed a pilot prospective observational study in 82 healthy volunteers. CRT was assessed: a) in standard position with participants in semi-recumbent position; b) at 30° forearm elevation, c and d) at earlobe site in semi-recumbent and supine position. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to calculate bias and limits of agreement (LoA). Correlation was investigated with Pearson test. RESULTS: Standard finger CRT values (1.04 s [0.80;1.39]) were similar to the earlobe semi-recumbent ones (1.10 s [0.90;1.26]; p = 0.52), with Bias 0.02 ± 0.18 s (LoA -0.33;0.37); correlation was weak but significant (r = 0.28 [0.7;0.47]; p = 0.01). Conversely, standard finger CRT was significantly longer than earlobe supine CRT (0.88 s [0.75;1.06]; p < 0.001) with Bias 0.22 ± 0.4 s (LoA -0.56;1.0), and no correlation (r = 0,12 [-0,09;0,33]; p = 0.27]. As compared with standard finger CRT, measurement with 30° forearm elevation was significantly longer (1.17 s [0.93;1.41] p = 0.03), with Bias -0.07 ± 0.3 s (LoA -0.61;0.47) and with a significant correlation of moderate degree (r = 0.67 [0.53;0.77]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In healthy volunteers, the elevation of the forearm significantly prolongs CRT values. CRT measured at the earlobe in semi-recumbent position may represent a valid surrogate when access to the finger is not feasible, whilst earlobe CRT measured in supine position yields different results. Research is needed in critically ill patients to evaluate accuracy and precision at different sites/positions.
Assuntos
Capilares , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Voluntários Saudáveis , DedosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The induction of pneumoperitoneum (PP) during laparoscopy may cause hemodynamic alterations, especially in patients with unknown cardiovascular diseases. While invasive arterial monitoring could be considered excessive, continuous noninvasive arterial pressure (CNAP) monitoring may allow careful evaluation of hemodynamic variations during laparoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The objective of this single center observational study was to evaluate hemodynamic changes after insufflation and after deflation of PP with CNAP monitoring. Patients included where adults undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification II and III). The Hemodynamic data (blood-pressure, cardiac-index, heart-rate, stroke-volume index, stoke-volume variation and arterialelastance) were collected 30 seconds before pneumoperitoneum (t1), and compared to values at 2 (t2), 10 (t3) and 20 (t4) minutes after pneumoperitoneum insufflation. We also compared data 30 seconds before and 2 minutes after release of pneumoperitoneum. RESULTS: 65 patients were included. Compared with reference values at t1, blood-pressure values increased at all timepoints (t2-t3-t4); cardiac-index augmented at t3 and t4 (p<0.05); heart-rate increased at t3 (p<0.005); stroke-volume index decreased at t2 (p<0.005) and was higher at t4 (p<0.005). While stoke-volume variation remained always stable after pneumoperitoneum induction, arterial-elastance increased significantly at all time-points (t2-t3-t4). The only difference at pneumoperitoneum deflation was a reduction in stoke-volume variation (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy, CNAP monitoring showed significant hemodynamic changes that would have been underappreciated with standard non-invasive monitoring with increase in arterial elastance under stable preload conditions. Whether this effect is due to unknown cardiovascular diseases facilitating ventriculo-arterial decoupling remains to be determined. KEY WORDS: Arterial Elastance, Cardiac Outp, Pneumoperitoneum, Stroke Volume, Stroke Volume Variation.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Insuflação , Laparoscopia , Pneumoperitônio , Adulto , Humanos , Pressão Arterial , Pneumoperitônio/etiologia , HemodinâmicaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Elective cesarean section (CS) is usually performed using spinal anesthesia (SA), which requires the use of local anesthetic (LA) agents, commonly combined with adjuvant drugs. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at studying the advantages of α-2 agonists as compared to fentanyl during SA for CS. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We screened PubMed and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We calculated the mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, and the relative risk for dichotomous outcomes, using a random-effect model with 95% confidence interval (CI). We performed a Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) assuming an alpha risk of 5%. The primary outcome was the time to first rescue analgesia. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Eight RCTs were included. Time to first rescue analgesia was significantly longer when the α-2 agonists were used (MD 85.9 min [95% CI: 23.8, 147.9]; P=0.007). Duration of sensory block was also longer in the α-2 group (MD 40.5 [95% CI: 20.21,60.7]; P<0.0001), while no differences were found for onset of sensory block and onset and duration of motor block. Rates of shivering and nausea or vomiting were significantly lower in the α-2 agonist group, while risk of hypotension or respiratory depression were not different. The TSA on the primary outcome suggests the need of further research before drawing conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: α2-agonists seem to increase the time to first rescue analgesia and to prolong the duration of sensory block when used as adjuvants to LA in CS patients compared to fentanyl. Also, α2-agonists may reduce the incidence of shivering and nausea or vomiting.