Predictive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Angiography for the Technical Success of Transarterial Embolization of Type II Endoleaks Arising from the Lumbar Arteries.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of preprocedural computed tomography angiography (CTA) to predict the technical success of embolization of type II endoleak arising from a lumbar artery after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients at a single academic institution who underwent angiography with possible embolization for a post-EVAR lumbar-supplied type II endoleak from 2009 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who did not undergo CTA before the procedure were excluded. CTAs were reviewed for the ability to trace the entire course of a feeding vessel from the internal iliac artery (IIA) to the lumbar artery at the site of the endoleak. Procedural imaging was reviewed for technical success, defined as the catheterization and embolization of the aneurysm sac through a lumbar artery. RESULTS: Fifty-seven angiograms with a type II endoleak and suspected feeding lumbar artery were identified. On CTA acquired before the procedure, the arterial path supplying this lumbar artery could be traced from the IIA to the aneurysm sac in 18 (32%) patients. Embolization was technically successful in 16 of these 18 (89%) procedures compared with 10 of 39 (26%) procedures in which the supplying artery could not be traced using CTA (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A potential catheter path from the IIA through the iliolumbar and lumbar arteries to the aneurysm sac can be traced on preprocedural CTA in the minority of lumbar-supplied type II endoleaks. The ability to trace these inflow vessels may predict technical success during embolization. The low rate of technical success when the feeding vessel could not be traced using CTA suggests that these patients should be considered for percutaneous or transcaval sac puncture.

Spontaneous Rectus Sheath Hematoma: Factors Predictive of Conservative Management Failure.

PURPOSE: To evaluate radiographic, laboratory, and clinical factors associated with conservative management (CM) failure in spontaneous rectus sheath hematoma (RSH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 72 patients with spontaneous RSH between 2006 and 2017 was performed. Patients were initially managed conservatively and then divided into 2 groups based on decision to embolize. No differences were found between embolization (n = 32) and CM (n = 40) groups in age (67.5 vs 69.5 y; P = .79), sex (31% vs 38% male; P = .58), body mass index (27.7 vs 25.7 kg/m2; P = .20), or medical comorbidities. Univariate analyses compared initial hemoglobin level, change in hemoglobin level, coagulation parameters, transfusion requirements, hematoma volume, and active extravasation on computed tomographic (CT) angiography between groups. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors predictive of CM failure. A scoring system was then created to predict CM failure. RESULTS: CM failed in 32 of 72 patients. Multivariable regression identified active extravasation on CT angiography (P = .02), hematoma volume (P = .01), and packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion of ≥ 4 U (P = .03) as predictors of embolization. A scoring system using these factors along with maximum rate of hemoglobin decrease yielded a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 98% in determining need for embolization. CONCLUSIONS: CM for RSH was more likely to fail in patients with active extravasation on CT angiography, larger hematoma volume, pRBC transfusion of ≥ 4 U, and higher rate of hemoglobin decrease. Using these parameters, a scoring system was created that achieved high sensitivity and specificity in identifying patients who would require embolization.

The impact of bariatric surgery on qualitative and quantitative breast density.

BACKGROUND: Obesity and breast density are associated with breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Bariatric surgery effectively treats morbid obesity, with sustainable weight loss and reductions in cancer incidence. We evaluated changes in qualitative and quantitative density; hypothesizing breast density would increase following bariatric surgery. METHODS: Women undergoing bariatric surgery from 1990 to 2015 were identified, excluding patients without a mammogram performed both before and after surgery. Changes in body mass index (BMI), time between mammograms and surgery, and American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) scores were assessed. VolparaDensity™ automated software calculated volumetric breast density (VBD), fibroglandular volume (FGV), and total breast volume for the 82 women with digital data available. Differences between pre- and postsurgery values were assessed. RESULTS: One hundred eighty women were included. Median age at surgery was 50.0 years, with 8.8 months between presurgery mammogram and surgery and 62.3 months between surgery and postsurgery mammogram. Median BMI significantly decreased over the study period (46.0 vs 35.4 kg/m2 ; P < 0.001). No change in BI-RADS scores was seen between the pre- and postsurgery mammograms. Eighty-two women had VolparaDensity™ data available. While VBD increased in these patients, FGV and total breast volume both decreased following bariatric surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Increased VBD, decreased FGV, and decreased total breast volume were seen following bariatric surgery-induced weight loss. There was no difference in qualitative breast density, highlighting the discrepancy between BI-RADS and VolparaDensity™ measurements. Further investigation will be required to determine how differential changes in components of breast density may affect breast cancer risk.

Outcomes of Coverage of the Left Subclavian Artery during Endovascular Repair of the Thoracic Aorta.

PURPOSE: To report outcomes of coverage of the left subclavian artery (LSCA) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 285 patients (160 male) with a mean age of 62 years (range, 13-91 y) who underwent TEVAR at a single institution between March 2005 and May 2013. The LSCA was covered to obtain an adequate proximal landing zone, and a selective LSCA revascularization and embolization strategy was employed. All patient outcomes were recorded including neurologic complications, left arm claudication, endoleak rates, and repeat procedures. RESULTS: The origin of the LSCA was covered in 98/285 (34%) patients. Median follow-up was 533 days (range, 2-2,895 d). Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) rates for covered LSCA and noncovered groups were 11/98 (11%) and 5/188 (3%), respectively (P = .005). LSCA was revascularized at time of initial TEVAR in 44/98 (45%) patients. Of the remaining 54 patients, 10 (19%) required subsequent revascularization for claudication. LSCA embolization was done to prevent or treat endoleak in 41/98 (42%) patients, with 33/98 (34%) patients undergoing LSCA embolization at the time of LSCA coverage and 8 of the remaining 65 (12%) patients requiring subsequent embolization for persistent endoleak. CONCLUSIONS: Coverage of the LSCA during TEVAR is feasible with low complication rates, although it carries an increased risk of CVA. The selective LSCA revascularization and embolization strategy was well tolerated. A more liberal strategy may be required to decrease the rate of delayed revascularization and embolization procedures to treat arm claudication and endoleaks, respectively.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Workup of Noncerebral Systemic Arterial Embolic Source.

Noncerebral systemic arterial embolism, which can originate from cardiac and noncardiac sources, is an important cause of patient morbidity and mortality. When an embolic source dislodges, the resulting embolus can occlude a variety of peripheral and visceral arteries causing ischemia. Characteristic locations for noncerebral arterial occlusion include the upper extremities, abdominal viscera, and lower extremities. Ischemia in these regions can progress to tissue infarction resulting in limb amputation, bowel resection, or nephrectomy. Determining the source of arterial embolism is essential in order to direct treatment decisions. This document reviews the appropriateness category of various imaging procedures available to determine the source of the arterial embolism. The variants included in this document are known arterial occlusion in the upper extremity, lower extremity, mesentery, kidneys, and multiorgan distribution that are suspected to be of embolic etiology. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm or Dissection: Treatment Planning and Follow-Up.

As the incidence of thoracoabdominal aortic pathology (aneurysm and dissection) rises and the complexity of endovascular and surgical treatment options increases, imaging follow-up of patients remains crucial. Patients with thoracoabdominal aortic pathology without intervention should be monitored carefully for changes in aortic size or morphology that could portend rupture or other complication. Patients who are post endovascular or open surgical aortic repair should undergo follow-up imaging to evaluate for complications, endoleak, or recurrent pathology. Considering the quality of diagnostic data, CT angiography and MR angiography are the preferred imaging modalities for follow-up of thoracoabdominal aortic pathology for most patients. The extent of thoracoabdominal aortic pathology and its potential complications involve multiple regions of the body requiring imaging of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in most patients. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Sudden Onset of Cold, Painful Leg: 2023 Update.

Acute onset of a cold, painful leg, also known as acute limb ischemia, describes the sudden loss of perfusion to the lower extremity and carries significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Acute limb ischemia requires rapid identification and the management of suspected vascular compromise and is inherently driven by clinical considerations. The objectives of initial imaging include confirmation of diagnosis, identifying the location and extent of vascular occlusion, and preprocedural/presurgical planning. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Endovascular Management of Malperfusion Syndromes in Aortic Dissection.

Malperfusion Syndrome (MPS) refers to inadequate perfusion of end organs secondary to ongoing arterial obstruction of the aorta and its branches resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. While uncomplicated type B dissection can typically be monitored, type A or type B dissections with malperfusion syndrome are should be considered for hybrid treatment with an endovascular intervention.  In addition to pre-procedure CTA and labs, intra-procedure evaluation of the true lumen, false lumen, and branch vessels is performed with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and manometry to delineate static versus dynamic obstruction. Dynamic obstruction of the visceral arteries is typically treated first and can be relieved either with supraceliac dissection flap fenestration or exclusion of the entry tear by thoracic endovascular aortic repair, both of which will restore flow to the true lumen. Static obstruction requires stenting or other branch-artery intervention including branch artery fenestration, suction embolectomy, or thrombolysis. Throughout the procedure, IVUS and manometry are used to evaluate results of interventions with respect to continued hemodynamically significant obstruction. Endovascular intervention should be performed in conjunction with a multi-disciplinary team as patients are often complex and may require further procedures such as bowel resection or open aortic repair.

Issues Most Pressing to Early-Career Interventional Radiologists: Results of a Descriptive Survey.

PURPOSE: To determine demographics, practice patterns, needs from Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR), and preferences of interventional radiologists (IRs) early in their careers. METHODS: A 28-question descriptive survey was used to identify demographic and practice composition, practice issues, and needs of early career IRs. The survey was distributed to SIR members in the United States (US) (n = 859) within the first 8 years of practice, with 213 respondents (25%). RESULTS: Respondents were primarily male (n = 181, 87%), less than 40 years old (n = 156, 73%), in practice for 6 years or less (n = 167, 79%), and satisfied with IR as a career (n = 183, 92.4%). The majority were in academic practice (n = 89, 43.2%) or large private practice group (n = 67, 32.5%). Most respondents read diagnostic imaging daily or weekly (n = 130, 61%). The majority of respondents perform complex procedures regularly including transarterial tumor therapy, percutaneous tumor ablation, peripheral arterial interventions, and biliary interventions monthly. Many respondents (n = 49, 23%) have changed jobs at least once citing career advancement, practice issues/disagreements, or compensation as reason. Most respondents would serve as mentors (n = 170, 80%) for trainees and were satisfied with their career mentorship (n = 166, 78%). Respondents felt that mentorship, identification of barriers facing early career IRs, and networking should be the most important functions of the Early Career Section (ECS)of the SIR. CONCLUSION: As nearly all survey respondents indicated that early career IRs have different needs and priorities than established physicians, they felt that mentorship, identification of barriers facing early career IRs, and networking should be the most important functions of the ECS. Additionally, this same group of IRs report low comfort with the business side of medicine and may benefit from directed content provided by the SIR ECS.