The critical role of neuroimaging in hemicrania continua: A systematic review and case series.

BACKGROUND: Hemicrania continua is a primary unilateral headache characterized by ipsilateral parasympathetic and sympathetic autonomic features. A key diagnostic criterion is its dramatic response to indomethacin treatment; however, various vascular or structural abnormalities have been reported to cause secondary hemicrania continua, presenting with clinical features similar to those of the primary headache presentation. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed the literature to compile secondary hemicrania continua cases, highlighting the importance of imaging during the evaluation. Additionally, we also contributed our three cases to the existing studies. METHODS: We conducted a review of articles from the PubMed and EMBASE databases that described reported cases of secondary hemicrania continua, covering the period from 1993 to 2021. Our review included detailed patient information, signs, and symptoms of hemicrania continua, as well as information on indomethacin usage and headache resolution (if pertinent). RESULTS: Secondary hemicrania continua can result from a remarkably diverse range of structural and vascular lesions, yet clinical reports on long-term follow-up are lacking. Notably, cases may exhibit a classical response to indomethacin, emphasizing the importance of neuroimaging in excluding secondary cases. Our search yielded 41 cases meeting our criteria. We excluded six cases that were not treated with indomethacin or were unresponsive to it. Additionally, we present three cases that highlight the necessity of neuroimaging in evaluating hemicrania continua, along with short- and long-term clinical outcomes following indomethacin and lesion-directed treatments. Case 1 presented with daily right-sided headaches and cranial autonomic symptoms. Her pain completely resolved with indomethacin use. Neuroimaging of the brain revealed a laterally directed saccular aneurysm of the right internal carotid artery. Case 2 presented with continuous left-sided unilateral headaches with superimposed exacerbations. She complained of left-sided photophobia with a dull sensation in the left ear. Her symptoms decreased after 2 weeks of indomethacin use. Neuroimaging of the head indicated a benign tumor with mass effect into the left lateral medulla and inferior cerebellar peduncle. Case 3 presented with a right side-locked headache with daily, severe superimposed exacerbations. She had photophobia in the right eye and a right-sided Horner's syndrome, along with tearing during her exacerbations. Neuroimaging of the brain revealed a pituitary tumor and her pain completely resolved with indomethacin. CONCLUSION: Hemicrania continua is a rare headache disorder that can be either primary or secondary. Importantly, response to indomethacin can still occur in secondary hemicrania continua. Thus, neuroimaging should be considered to rule out underlying structural etiology in all cases, regardless of their clinical responsiveness to indomethacin therapy.

Effect of levodopa on postural blood pressure changes in Parkinson disease: a randomized crossover study.

PURPOSE: We investigated the effect of levodopa on postural blood pressure changes in individuals with Parkinson disease (PD) with (PD+OH) and without neurogenic OH (PD-OH). METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized crossover study with autonomic testing performed ON and OFF levodopa. The primary outcome was the change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from supine to 70° tilt at 3 min (ΔSBP-3'). Secondary outcomes included indices of baroreflex function and blood pressure and heart rate during tilt. RESULTS: We enrolled 40 individuals with PD (21 PD+OH, 19 PD-OH), mean age (SD) 73.2 years (7.9), 13 women (32.5%)). There was no difference in age, sex, disease duration, and severity between PD+OH and PD-OH. Mean difference in ΔSBP-3' ON versus OFF levodopa in the whole study population was - 3.20 mmHg [- 7.36 to 0.96] (p = 0.14). Mean difference in ΔSBP-3' was - 2.14 mmHg [- 7.55 to 3.28] (p = 0.45) in PD+OH and - 5.14 mmHg [- 11.63 to 1.35] (p = 0.14) in PD-OH. Mean difference in ΔSBP ON versus OFF levodopa was greater at 7 and 10 min (- 7.52 mmHg [- 11.89 to - 3.15], p = 0.002, and - 7.82 mmHg [- 14.02 to - 1.67], p = 0.02 respectively). Levodopa was associated with lower absolute values of blood pressure in both PD+OH and PD-OH and cardiovascular noradrenergic baroreflex impairment. CONCLUSION: Levodopa decreases blood pressure in both PD with and without autonomic failure, but it does not cause a greater fall in blood pressure from supine to standing at 3 min. Levodopa-induced baroreflex sympathetic noradrenergic impairment may contribute to lower blood pressure. Lower standing blood pressure with levodopa may increase the risks of fall and syncope.

Sensory hypersensitivities are associated with post-traumatic headache-related disability.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether sensory hypersensitivity contributes to headache-related disability in a secondary analysis of patients with post-traumatic headache. BACKGROUND: Up to one-third of individuals with traumatic brain injuries report persistent headache 3 months post-injury. High rates of allodynia and photophobia have been observed in clinical studies and animal models of post-traumatic headache, but we do not fully understand how sensory amplifications impact post-traumatic headache-related disability. METHODS: We identified a cross-sectional sample of patients from the American Registry for Migraine Research database with new or worsening headaches post-head injury from 2016 to 2020 and performed a secondary analysis of those data. We modeled the relationship between sensory sensitivity and Migraine Disability Assessment scores using questionnaires. Candidate variables included data collection features (study site and year), headache-related and general clinical features (headache frequency, migraine diagnosis, abuse history, sex, age, cognitive and affective symptom scores), and sensory symptoms (related to light, sound, and touch sensitivity). RESULTS: The final sample included 193 patients (median age 46, IQR 22; 161/193, 83.4% female). Migraine Disability Assessment scores ranged from 0 to 260 (median 47, IQR 87). The final model included allodynia, hyperacusis, photosensitivity, headache days per month, abuse history, anxiety and depression, cognitive dysfunction, and age (R2 = 0.43). An increase of one point in allodynia score corresponded to a 3% increase in headache disability (95% CI: 0%-7%; p = 0.027), an increase of one-tenth of a point in the photosensitivity score corresponded to a 12% increase (95% CI: 3%-25%; p = 0.002), and an increase of one point in the hyperacusis score corresponded to a 2% increase (95% CI: 0%-4%; p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Increased photosensitivity, allodynia, and hyperacusis were associated with increased headache-related disability in this sample of patients with post-traumatic headache. Symptoms of sensory amplification likely contribute to post-traumatic headache-related disability and merit an ongoing investigation into their potential as disease markers and treatment targets.

Validation of the Utah Photophobia Symptom Impact Scale (version 2) as a headache-specific photophobia assessment tool.

OBJECTIVE: To present an updated version of the Utah Photophobia Symptom Impact Scale version 2 (UPSIS2), providing robust clinical and psychometric validation, to improve headache-specific evaluation of light sensitivity and headache-related photophobia. BACKGROUND: The original UPSIS filled a gap in available tools for assessment of headache-associated light sensitivity by providing patient-reported evaluation of the impact of light sensitivity on activities of daily living (ADLs). We have since revised the original questionnaire to provide a more robust item construct and refined validation approach. METHODS: We conducted a psychometric validation of the UPSIS2 through a primary analysis of an online survey of volunteers with recurrent headaches recruited from the University of Utah clinics and surrounding community. Volunteers completed the original UPSIS and UPSIS2 questionnaire versions in addition to measures of headache impact, disability, and frequency. The UPSIS2 now includes a pre-defined recall period and a 1-4 Likert scale with standardized response anchors to improve clarity. Internal construct validity, external construct validity, and test-retest reliability, were evaluated. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 163 volunteers, with UPSIS2 scores ranging from 15 to 57 (out of a possible 15-60) with a mean (standard deviation) of 32.4 (8.80). Construct validity was satisfactory, as evidenced by sufficient unidimensionality, monotonicity, and local independence. Reliability was excellent, with Rasch test reliability = 0.90 and Cronbach's alpha = 0.92, and an intraclass correlation of 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.65-0.88) for participants who took the test twice. UPSIS2 correlates well with other headache measures (Spearman's correlations >0.50), as well as the original UPSIS (Spearman's correlation = 0.87), indicating good convergent validity. UPSIS2 scores differ significantly across International Classification of Headache Disorders (third edition) groups, indicating good known group validity. CONCLUSION: The UPSIS2 provides a well-validated headache-specific outcome measure for the assessment of photophobia impact on ADLs.

Autonomic dysfunction and exercise intolerance in concussion: a scoping review.

PURPOSE: Concussion commonly results in exercise intolerance, often limiting return to activities. Improved understanding of the underlying mechanisms of post-concussive exercise intolerance could help guide mechanism-directed rehabilitation approaches. Signs of altered cardiovascular autonomic regulation-a potential contributor to exercise intolerance-have been reported following concussion, although it is not clear how these findings inform underlying mechanisms of post-concussive symptoms. Systematic summarization and synthesis of prior work is needed to best understand current evidence, allowing identification of common themes and gaps requiring further study. The purpose of this review was to (1) summarize published data linking exercise intolerance to autonomic dysfunction, and (2) summarize key findings, highlighting opportunities for future investigation. METHODS: The protocol was developed a priori, and conducted in five stages; results were collated, summarized, and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies including injuries classified as mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)/concussion, regardless of mechanism of injury, were included. Studies were required to include both autonomic and exercise intolerance testing. Exclusion criteria included confounding central or peripheral nervous system dysfunction beyond those stemming from the concussion, animal model studies, and case reports. RESULTS: A total of 3116 publications were screened; 17 were included in the final review. CONCLUSION: There was wide variability in approach to autonomic/exercise tolerance testing, as well as inclusion criteria/testing timelines, which limited comparisons across studies. The reviewed studies support current clinical suspicion of autonomic dysfunction as an important component of exercise intolerance. However, the specific mechanisms of impairment and relationship to symptoms and recovery require additional investigation.

The impact of pre-morbid headaches on headache features and long-term health outcomes following traumatic brain injury: Insights from the American Registry for Migraine Research.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of having headaches prior to traumatic brain injury (TBI) on headache features and long-term patient health outcomes. BACKGROUND AND METHODS: This was an exploratory analysis of patients with TBI who were enrolled in the American Registry for Migraine Research (ARMR), a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal patient registry composed of patients with International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3)-defined headache diagnoses. The ARMR study enrolled 2,707 patients between February 1, 2016 and May 6, 2020, 565 of whom qualified for this analysis. Those with headaches prior to their TBI were compared to those without headaches prior to their TBI for ICHD-3 diagnoses, headache frequency and intensity, headache-related disability (Migraine Disability Assessment score), symptoms of anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder [GAD-7]), depression (two items from Patient Health Questionnaire-9), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), cutaneous allodynia (12-item Allodynia Symptom Checklist [ASC-12]), cognitive dysfunction (Migraine Attacks Subjective Cognitive Impairments Scale [Mig-SCog]), pain interference (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain Interference), and work productivity (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment). RESULTS: Among 565 participants with TBI, 350 had headaches prior to their TBI. Those with pre-TBI headaches were less likely to receive a diagnosis of post-traumatic headache (PTH; 14/350 [4.0%] vs. 21/215 [9.8%], p = 0.006), even though 25.7% reported new or worsening headaches within 7 days of their TBI. Those with pre-TBI headaches had higher ASC-12 scores (2.4 ± 3.5 vs. 1.8 ± 3.4, p = 0.030), Mig-SCog scores (9.3 ± 4.7 vs. 8 ± 4.9, p = 0.004), and GAD-7 scores (6.9 ± 5.1 vs. 6.2 ± 5.4, p = 0.039), and were more likely to have a migraine diagnosis (335/350 [95.7%] vs. 192/215 [89.3%], p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Those with headaches prior to TBI are less likely to receive a diagnosis of PTH. They have more severe symptoms of cutaneous allodynia, cognitive impairment, and generalized anxiety. This analysis suggests that pre-TBI headaches might impact post-TBI headache diagnoses and associated features.

Cutaneous heat and light-induced pain thresholds in post-traumatic headache attributed to mild traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize cutaneous heat and light-induced pain thresholds in people with post-traumatic headache (PTH) compared with healthy controls (HCs). BACKGROUND: Photophobia and allodynia are common in PTH, and there is emerging evidence to support multimodal sensory dysfunction. METHODS: In this age- and sex-matched cohort study, individuals with PTH (n = 20) and HCs (n = 20), aged 18-65 years, were recruited from an institutional database of research volunteers, from the concussion clinic, and via the use of approved flyers posted on the Mayo Clinic Campus in Scottsdale, Arizona. Participants were assessed using the Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC-12), Photosensitivity Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ), State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Quantitative sensory testing quantified heat pain thresholds. A light stimulation device quantified light-induced pain thresholds. Subsequently, heat pain thresholds were obtained immediately, 10, and 40 min after a bright light stressor. RESULTS: The mean photophobia symptom severity score, based on the PAQ, was higher in participants with PTH compared with HCs, mean 0.62 (SD = 0.25) versus mean 0.24 (SD = 0.24), p < 0.001. Light-induced pain thresholds were lower in participants with PTH (median = 90.5 lux and quartiles = 17.8 to 378.5) compared with HCs (median = 863.5 lux and quartiles = 519.9 to 4906.5) and were independent from BDI and STAI (p < 0.001). Allodynia scores did not differ between participants with PTH and HCs after adjusting for BDI and STAI scores. Baseline forehead heat pain thresholds were not different, participants with PTH mean 41.9°C (SD = 0.89) versus HCs mean 44.3°C (SD = 0.89), p = 0.061; however, forearm heat pain thresholds were lower in participants with PTH compared with HCs, mean 40.8°C (SD = 0.80) versus mean 44.4°C (SD = 0.80), p = 0.002. The forehead heat pain threshold change from baseline post bright light stressor in participants with PTH versus HCs was different immediately (mean -1.2 (SD = 0.53), p = 0.025), 10 min (mean -1.8 (SD = 0.74), p = 0.015), and 40 min (mean -1.8 (SD = 0.88), p = 0.047). The forearm heat pain threshold change immediately post bright light stressor in participants with PTH versus HCs was different, mean -1.9°C (SD = 0.58), p = 0.001, however, not different at 10 and 40 min. CONCLUSIONS: Photophobia is higher and light-induced pain thresholds are lower in participants with PTH. Exposure to a light stressor reduced heat pain thresholds in participants with PTH immediately post bright light stressor, but not in HCs. This study provides evidence for multimodal sensory dysfunction in people with PTH.

Photophobia and allodynia in persistent post-traumatic headache are associated with higher disease burden.

OBJECTIVE: To assess photophobia and allodynia in subjects with post-traumatic headache and examine how these sensory hypersensitivities associate with clinical measures of disease burden. BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic headache is the most frequent and disabling long-term consequence of mild traumatic brain injury. There is evidence of sensory dysfunction in acute post-traumatic headache, and it is known from other headache conditions that sensory amplifications correlate with more severe disease. However, systematic studies in post-traumatic headache are surprisingly scarce. METHODS: We tested light and tactile sensitivity, along with measures of disease burden, in 30 persistent post-traumatic headache subjects and 35 controls. RESULTS: In all, 79% of post-traumatic headache subjects exhibited sensory hypersensitivity based on psychophysical assessment. Of those exhibiting hypersensitivity, 54% exhibited both light and tactile sensitivity. Finally, sensory thresholds were correlated across modalities, as well as with headache attack frequency. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, post-traumatic headache subjects with both light and tactile sensitivity had significantly higher headache frequencies and lower sensitivity thresholds to both modalities, compared to those with single or no sensory hypersensitivity. This pattern suggests that hypersensitivity across multiple modalities may be functionally synergistic, reflect a higher disease burden, and may serve as candidate markers of disease.

Determinants of pain interference and headache impact in patients who have chronic migraine with medication overuse: Results from the MOTS trial.

OBJECTIVE: "Pain interference" and "headache impact" refer to negative consequences that pain and headache have on one's life. This study investigated determinants of these negative impacts in a large patient cohort who have chronic migraine with medication overuse. METHODS: Six hundred and eleven adults were enrolled from 34 headache, neurology, and primary care clinics. Negative consequences of chronic migraine with medication overuse were determined using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference 6b questionnaire and the Headache Impact Test 6. Relationships between PROMIS-6b and Headache Impact Test 6 scores with demographics, headache characteristics, medication use, anxiety symptoms, and depression symptoms were assessed with linear regression. Elastic Net regression was used to develop a multiple regression model. RESULTS: PROMIS-6b T-Scores averaged 65.2 (SD 5.4) and Headache Impact Test 6 scores averaged 65.0 (SD 5.3), indicating severe negative consequences of chronic migraine with medication overuse. Chronic migraine with medication overuse interfered with enjoyment of life, concentration, daily activities, doing tasks away from home, and socializing. Depression symptom severity had the strongest relationship with pain interference and headache impact. Moderate-to-severe headache frequency, headache intensity, and anxiety symptoms were also associated with pain interference and headache impact. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic migraine with medication overuse is associated with substantial negative consequences, the extent of which is most strongly related to depression symptoms.

Arachnoiditis, a complication of epidural blood patch for the treatment of low-pressure headache: A case report and systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of arachnoiditis as a complication of epidural blood patch procedures and to systematically review the diagnostic workup, clinical outcomes, and treatment modalities reported in the literature. BACKGROUND: Epidural blood patching is an effective treatment for low-pressure headache secondary to spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak or iatrogenic post-dural puncture. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension is believed to be a rare headache disorder, but recently has been diagnosed at higher frequencies, making it an important differential diagnosis for intractable headaches. Arachnoiditis has surfaced as a rare complication of epidural blood patching. Symptom presentation does not always correlate with evidence of meningeal enhancement on imaging. Optimal methods for treatment remain largely unknown. METHODS: Databases Embase and PubMed were searched for all published studies on arachnoiditis post-epidural blood patch using a combination of the following medical subject headings and keywords: arachnoiditis, arachnoid inflammation, adverse event, and epidural blood patch. All original English-language articles that described arachnoid and/or meningeal inflammation in conjunction with epidural blood patch procedures were included for analysis. Title and abstract screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently and in duplicate by two reviewers. RESULTS: Seven other cases of arachnoiditis post-blood patch placement have been documented, most of which were diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging. Six of these were a result of a spinal-epidural anesthesia for labor and delivery. Common symptoms reported were headache, back and radicular pain, paresthesia, and motor weakness. There are currently no proven consensus-based treatment recommendations available. While intravenous methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone taper was found to be effective in the case presented, the benefit of other multi-modal therapies was unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Headache specialists who treat postural headache should be aware of arachnoiditis as a potentially severe complication of epidural blood patch. The case presented is the first of its kind to report arachnoiditis as a complication of high-volume blood patch for the treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. More studies are required to determine suitable treatment options for post-epidural blood patch arachnoiditis.

Synergistic but separable sensory changes in postural tachycardia syndrome and chronic migraine.

PURPOSE: Up to 90% of patients with postural tachycardia syndrome (PoTS) report headaches, and comorbid migraine headaches are common. Given this, pathophysiological interaction is possible, which may reveal key aspects of disease expression and treatment opportunities. We hypothesized that PoTS subjects-both with and without migraine-would show features of central sensitization, including allodynia and photophobia. METHODS: Eighty participants were evaluated, including 30 PoTS, 30 chronic migraine (CM), and 20 non-headache healthy controls (NH), using tilt table testing, psychophysical assessment of sensory sensitivity thresholds, and an online questionnaire to assess measures of headache burden and associated symptoms. Clinical characteristics and sensory thresholds were compared between disease groups and controls, as well as in a subgroup analysis within the PoTS group, based on headache phenotype. RESULTS: Sensory sensitivity thresholds were significantly lower and symptom scores were higher in both the PoTS and CM groups compared to controls. However, the patterns of expression differed between PoTS and CM, with pain threshold reductions in the forearm only of PoTS subjects (non-trigeminal sensory sensitization), compared to both periorbital and forearm sites in CM. Unexpectedly, light sensitivity thresholds were significantly lower in PoTS than in both CM and NH. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal an underappreciated aspect of disease burden in PoTS, and suggest network sensitization similar to, but separable from, that of migraine. The presence of both photophobia and allodynia in PoTS is reflective of exteroceptive rather than strictly interoceptive disruption, and expands our fundamental understanding of the disorder.

Mild traumatic brain injury affects the features of migraine.

BACKGROUND: Headache is one of the most common symptoms after concussion, and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a risk factor for chronic migraine (CM). However, there remains a paucity of data regarding the impact of mTBI on migraine-related symptoms and clinical course. METHODS: Of 2161 migraine patients who participated in the American Registry for Migraine Research between February 2016 and March 2020, 1098 completed questions assessing history of TBI (50.8%). Forty-four patients reported a history of moderate to severe TBI, 413 patients reported a history of mTBI. Patients' demographics, headache symptoms and triggers, history of physical abuse, allodynia symptoms (ASC-12), migraine disability (MIDAS), depression (PHQ-2), and anxiety (GAD-7) were compared between migraine groups with (n = 413) and without (n = 641) a history of mTBI. Either the chi-square-test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate, was used for the analyses of categorical variables. The Mann-Whitney test was used for the analyses of continuous variables. Logistic regression models were used to compare variables of interest while adjusting for age, gender, and CM. RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of patients with mTBI had CM (74.3% [307/413] vs. 65.8% [422/641], P = 0.004), had never been married or were divorced (36.6% [147/402] vs. 29.4% [187/636], P = 0.007), self-reported a history of physical abuse (24.3% [84/345] vs. 14.3% [70/491], P <  0.001), had mild to severe anxiety (50.5% [205/406] vs. 41.0% [258/630], P = 0.003), had headache-related vertigo (23.0% [95/413] vs. 15.9% [102/640], P = 0.009), and difficulty finding words (43.0% [174/405] vs. 32.9% [208/633], P <  0.001) in more than half their attacks, and headaches triggered by lack of sleep (39.4% [155/393] vs. 32.6% [198/607], P = 0.018) and reading (6.6% [26/393] vs. 3.0% [18/607], P = 0.016), compared to patients without mTBI. Patients with mTBI had significantly greater ASC-12 scores (median [interquartile range]; 5 [1-9] vs. 4 [1-7], P < 0.001), MIDAS scores (42 [18-85] vs. 34.5 [15-72], P = 0.034), and PHQ-2 scores (1 [0-2] vs. 1 [0-2], P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Patients with a history of mTBI are more likely to have a self-reported a history of physical abuse, vertigo, and allodynia during headache attacks, headaches triggered by lack of sleep and reading, greater headache burden and headache disability, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. This study suggests that a history of mTBI is associated with the phenotype, burden, clinical course, and associated comorbid diseases in patients with migraine, and highlights the importance of inquiring about a lifetime history of mTBI in patients being evaluated for migraine.

Craniofacial Autonomic Dysfunction in Migraine: Implications for Treatment and Prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Craniofacial autonomic signs and symptoms (CASS) are relatively underrecognized in the evaluation of migraine headache. Yet, these features provide insight into diagnostic criterion, therapeutic approaches, and overarching disease burden. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This review aims to summarize relevant literature evaluating autonomic dysfunction, with focus on CASS, in migraine through targeted literature searches in PubMed. Full articles of original data published between 1974 and 2019 were identified using MeSH terms with no search limits. RESULTS: Although CASS are typically clinically evaluated by subjective patient report, investigational measures of cranial autonomic function have identified marked distinctions between headache attack and attack-free intervals. The presence of CASS during an attack does not differ based on age, sex, or presence of aura. Unilateral CASS may be predictive of longer, more frequent, and/or severe attacks and often co-occur with sensory dysfunction such as allodynia and photophobia. Although limited research has been performed to evaluate targeted therapeutics for migraine with CASS, triptans and onabotulinumtoxinA may demonstrate greater effects in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Migraine remains a debilitating disorder with significant community-wide impacts, necessitating continued evaluation of contributing features. Consideration of CASS provides important insight into potential treatment approaches and the effectiveness of novel therapeutic interventions aimed at improving overall disease burden. However, further investigation is needed to fully understand primary craniofacial features in migraine, and how these might inform individualized treatment decisions.

Validation of a photophobia symptom impact scale.

BACKGROUND: Routine assessment of photophobia in the clinical setting may underestimate the presence and severity of this condition. We aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire to improve evaluation of the impact of photophobia on activities of daily living, and to determine the relationship of this questionnaire to psychophysical assessment of light sensitivity thresholds. METHODS: We developed the 17-item Utah Photophobia Symptom Impact Scale (UPSIS-17) and compared its psychometric properties to the 8-item Korean Photophobia Questionnaire (KUMC-8). Ninety five subjects with or without light sensitivity completed both questionnaires; 72 also completed laboratory-based assessment of light sensitivity thresholds. We used Rasch analysis to evaluate instrument targeting, including internal consistency and reliability. Correlation analysis was used to assess the relationship between questionnaire scores and light sensitivity thresholds. RESULTS: We observed correlation between UPSIS-17 and KUMC-8, r = 0.72 (p < 0.0001). Higher UPSIS-17 scores correlated with light sensitivity thresholds, r = -0.42 (p < 0.0001), whereas KUMC-8 scores did not significantly correlate with light sensitivity thresholds, r = -0.21 (p = 0.072). UPSIS-17 showed better instrument targeting than KUMC-8 on Rasch analysis. Person-item maps allowed for identification of questions that could be removed without affecting questionnaire validity measures. CONCLUSION: This study resulted in a shortened, 12-item questionnaire. The UPSIS-12 retained significant correlation with both the KUMC-8 and light sensitivity thresholds, yielding a simpler tool for symptom assessment, while retaining validity. This expanded tool may be useful in clinical, as well as research settings, for collection of data about disability due to photophobia.

Patients With Migraine Have Substantial Reductions in Measures of Visual Quality of Life.

OBJECTIVE: Migraine is associated with several important visual symptoms, during both acute attacks and headache-free intervals. The purpose of this investigation was to use validated vision-related quality of life instruments to assess the effect of migraine on visual quality of life. BACKGROUND: Many migraineurs experience visual aura, increased photophobia during and between headache attacks, and increased symptoms of dry eye with structural changes in corneal nerve endings. Other visual symptoms associated with migraine include positive persistent visual phenomenon (visual snow) and transient vision changes. Previous research looking at the disability associated with migraine has shown that patient-reported quality of life data can be useful in determining the severity of disease burden. Recent published literature has suggested that visual symptoms related to migraine represent a proportionally minor burden to patients, compared to other manifestations of migraine, but no previous studies have assessed how migraine affects visual quality of life. METHODS: In this cross-sectional quantitative survey, visual quality of life in individuals with chronic and episodic migraine was assessed using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25, and the 10-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 Neuro-Ophthalmic Supplement. Overall headache severity and impact was assessed using the Migraine-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (Version 2.1) and the Headache Impact Test-6. Participants were recruited from Headache and Neuro-ophthalmology subspecialty clinics. The target sample size was 30 participants per subgroup. The results were compared to those from disease-free controls and to results from other neuro-ophthalmic disease quality of life studies. RESULTS: Among 29 participants with chronic migraine, vision-specific quality of life scores were all statistically significantly decreased compared to disease-free controls. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 median composite score was 85 for chronic migraineurs and 96 for controls (P < .001). The 10-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 Neuro-Ophthalmic Supplement median score was 72 for chronic migraineurs and 95 for controls (P < .001). Among 37 participants with episodic migraine, vision-specific quality of life scores were also decreased compared to disease-free controls. In the episodic migraine group, decreases in the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 scores were not statistically significant (median score 91, P = .01 compared to the control group), but decreases in the 10-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 Neuro-Ophthalmic Supplement remained statistically significant (median score 85, P = .003 compared to the control group). Chronic migraineurs had decreased visual quality of life scores compared to those with episodic migraines. Participants with chronic migraine had visual quality of life scores that were as poor as those previously published for patients with other neuro-ophthalmic disorders such as multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, and ischemic optic neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: Visual quality of life is significantly adversely affected in migraine sufferers. In fact, patients with chronic migraine may have visual quality of life impacts that are as significant as those associated with other common neuro-ophthalmic disorders. Future studies of the overall disease burden in patients with migraine should include an evaluation of the effects on visual functioning.

Altered pupillary light response scales with disease severity in migrainous photophobia.

Background Autonomic dysfunction and light sensitivity are core features of the migraine attack. Growing evidence also suggests changes in these parameters between attacks. Though sensory and autonomic responses likely interact, they have not been studied together across the spectrum of disease in migraine. Methods We performed digital infrared pupillometry while collecting interictal photophobia thresholds (PPT) in 36 migraineurs (14 episodic; 12 chronic; 10 probable) and 24 age and sex-matched non-headache controls. Quantitative pupillary light reflexes (PLR) were assessed in a subset of subjects, allowing distinction of sympathetic vs parasympathetic pupillary function. A structured questionnaire was used to ascertain migraine diagnosis, headache severity, and affective symptoms. Results Photophobia thresholds were significantly lower in migraineurs than controls, and were lowest in chronic migraine, consistent with a disease-related gradient. Lower PPT correlated with smaller dark-adapted pupil size and larger end pupil size at PPT, which corresponded to a reduced diameter change. On PLR testing, measures of both parasympathetic constriction and sympathetic re-dilation were reduced in migraineurs with clinically severe migraine. Conclusions In summary, we show that severity of photophobia in migraine scales with disease severity, in association with shifts in pupillary light responses. These alterations suggest centrally mediated autonomic adaptations to chronic light sensitivity.

Quality of life after intra-arterial therapy for acute ischemic stroke.

Few data exist about health-related quality of life outcomes after intra-arterial therapy (IAT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We assessed stroke-specific quality of life (SS-QOL) in survivors of stroke after IAT. Consecutive patients undergoing IAT for AIS from 2005 to 2010 were retrospectively identified via an institutional database. SS-QOL (using the SS-QOL score) and disability status (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) were prospectively assessed via mailed questionnaire. We analyzed quality of life (QOL) scores by domain and summary score, with a summary score of 4 or more defined as a good outcome. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to model the effect of final recanalization status, stroke severity, and mRS on total QOL score. ANOVA and Pearson correlations were used to test the association between stroke severity/mRS and QOL/time since stroke, respectively. Of 99 patients with AIS, 61 responded, yielding 11 interim deaths, 7 incomplete surveys, and 43 complete surveys for analysis. Among responding survivors, overall QOL score was 3.9 (standard deviation 0.7); 77% of these reported good QOL. Scores were higher in recanalized patients in 11 of 12 domains but was significant only for mood. Although mRS was associated with stroke severity, QOL was independent of both. Seventy-seven percent of survivors of AIS who received IAT reported good QOL. Furthermore, these data suggest that SS-QOL is an independent outcome from stroke severity and disability status.

Orthostatic Hypotension in Adults With Hypertension: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Although orthostatic hypotension (OH) has long been recognized as a manifestation of autonomic dysfunction, a growing body of literature has identified OH as a common comorbidity of hypertension. This connection is complex, related to pathophysiology in blood pressure regulation and the manner by which OH is derived as the difference between 2 blood pressure measurements. While traditional therapeutic approaches to OH among patients with neurodegenerative disorders focus on increasing upright blood pressure to prevent cerebral hypoperfusion, the management of OH among patients with hypertension is more nuanced; resting hypertension is itself associated with adverse outcomes among these patients. Although there is substantial evidence that intensive blood pressure treatment does not cause OH in the majority of patients with essential hypertension, some classes of antihypertensive agents may unmask OH in patients with an underlying autonomic impairment. Practical steps to manage OH among adults with hypertension start with (1) a thorough characterization of its patterns, triggers, and cause; (2) review and removal of aggravating factors (often pharmacological agents not related to hypertension treatment); (3) optimization of an antihypertensive regimen; and (4) adoption of a tailored treatment strategy that avoids exacerbating hypertension. These strategies include countermaneuvers and short-acting vasoactive agents (midodrine, droxidopa). Ultimately, further research is needed on the epidemiology of OH, the impact of hypertension treatment on OH, approaches to the screening and diagnosis of OH, and OH treatment among adults with hypertension to improve the care of these patients and their complex blood pressure pathophysiology.