Combined Analysis of GAD65, miR-375, and Unmethylated Insulin DNA Following Islet Transplantation in Patients With T1D.

Aim: Several biomarkers have been proposed to detect pancreatic ß cell destruction in vivo but so far have not been compared for sensitivity and significance. Methods: We used islet transplantation as a model to compare plasma concentrations of miR-375, 65-kDa subunit of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD65), and unmethylated insulin DNA, measured at subpicomolar sensitivity, and study their discharge kinetics, power for outcome prediction, and detection of graft loss during follow-up. Results: At 60 minutes after transplantation, GAD65 and miR-375 consistently showed near-equimolar and correlated increases proportional to the number of implanted ß cells. GAD65 and miR-375 showed comparable power to predict poor graft outcome at 2 months, with areas under the curve of 0.833 and 0.771, respectively (P = 0.53). Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, we defined likelihood ratios (LRs) for rationally selected result intervals. In GADA-negative recipients (n = 28), GAD65 <4.5 pmol/L (LR = 0.15) and >12.2 pmol/L (LR = ∞) predicted good and poor outcomes, respectively. miR-375 could be used in all recipients irrespective of GAD65 autoantibody status (n = 46), with levels <1.4 pmol/L (LR = 0.14) or >7.6 pmol/L (LR = 9.53) as dual thresholds. The posttransplant surge of unmethylated insulin DNA was inconsistent and unrelated to outcome. Combined measurement of these three biomarkers was also tested as liquid biopsy for ß cell death during 2-month follow-up; incidental surges of GAD65, miR-375, and (un)methylated insulin DNA, alone or combined, were confidently detected but could not be related to outcome. Conclusions: GAD65 and miR-375 performed equally well in quantifying early graft destruction and predicting graft outcome, outperforming unmethylated insulin DNA.

An analytical comparison of three immunoassay platforms for subpicomolar detection of protein biomarker GAD65.

A disproportional increase of circulating GAD65 within hours from an intraportal islet allotransplantation has been validated as biomarker of beta cell loss and poor functional outcome. More sensitive assays are, however, needed to allow detection of episodes of subtle beta cell loss during late-stage graft rejection or in the peri-onset period of type 1 diabetes. We applied the same sandwich monoclonal antibody couple reactive towards the C- and N-terminus of GAD65 on three advanced immunoassay platforms-the Cytometric Bead Array (CBA, Becton, Dickinson and Company), ElectroChemiLuminescence ImmunoAssay (ECLIA, Meso Scale Discovery) and digital ELISA technology (Single Molecule Array-SIMOA, Quanterix. We then compared analytical performance (linearity, imprecision, limit of detection and functional sensitivity), correlation of results, and practicality. All evaluated techniques showed linearity up to at least 500 ng/dL (76.9 pmol/L). SIMOA achieved the lowest imprecision. The 3 platforms correlate well with each other and could all detect subpicomolar concentrations of GAD65 in plasma, but only SIMOA and CBA could quantify down to that range. SIMOA can achieve the highest sample throughput. The three methods tested allow sensitive detection of GAD65, but SIMOA appears best suited for automated quantification of subpicomolar concentrations.

Development of an Enhanced Sensitivity Bead-Based Immunoassay for Real-Time In Vivo Detection of Pancreatic ß-Cell Death.

There is a clinical need for plasma tests to detect and quantify the in vivo destruction of pancreatic ß-cells in type 1 diabetes. We previously developed a time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (TRFIA) to glutamate decarboxylase 65 kDa (GAD65) (GAD65-TRFIA) that was able to detect the synchronous necrotic destruction of transplanted ß-cells in the hours after their infusion in the liver. This GAD65-TRFIA, however, lacked sensitivity to detect continued ß-cell rejection beyond this acute phase. The aim of present study was to gain at least an order of magnitude in analytical sensitivity by switching to Becton Dickinson cytometric bead array (CBA) (GAD65-CBA) enhanced sensitivity format, using the same couple of monoclonal antibodies. We compared the performances of GAD65-CBA and GAD65-TRFIA using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocols for linearity, imprecision, specificity, limit of detection, and functional sensitivity. We conducted a method comparison and assessed the biologic potential on samples from human recipients of islet grafts. The GAD65-CBA showed acceptable linearity and imprecision. Switching from TRFIA to CBA lowered functional sensitivity by a factor 35 and lowered limit of detection by a factor 11 with minimal need for method optimization. The enhanced sensitivity greatly expands the application domain of our biomarker and allowed for the first time to detect ongoing ß-cell destruction up to at least 1 day after islet transplantation. We conclude that the GAD65-CBA is suitable for biological and clinical assessment of the real-time destruction of ß-cells in intraportal transplantation.