Tumescent local anesthesia for the surgical treatment of burns and postburn sequelae in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Tumescent local anesthesia is a technique for regional anesthesia of the skin and the subcutaneous tissue, using infiltration of large volumes of local anesthetic. The advantages of this technique are (1) simplicity, (2) prolonged postoperative analgesia, (3) low incidence of bleeding, and (4) anesthetization of a large area of the body. There are no reports on the use of tumescent local anesthesia in pediatric patients. METHODS: In 30 consecutive pediatric burn patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I or II who were 1-120 months old (34 +/- 31.6 months), after induction of anesthesia with nitrous oxide-oxygen-sevoflurane, infiltration with 0.05% (14 ml/kg) or 0.1% (7 ml/kg) lidocaine solution was performed. Anesthesia was maintained with patients spontaneously breathing with 1.5% sevoflurane in nitrous oxide-oxygen (50%). The maximum dose of lidocaine used was 7 mg/kg. Postoperative pain was assessed by using the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (for patients aged up to 5 yr) and by using a visual analog scale (for patients older than 5 yr). A comparison with a historic control group not treated with the tumescent local anesthesia technique was performed. RESULTS: No patients were excluded from the study, and no significant variations in the monitored intraoperative parameters were observed. Five patients had an increase in heart rate and respiratory rate at the beginning of surgery, and of these, two needed a temporary increase in sevoflurane concentration. After the initial incision, no response to painful stimulus was observed. No complications occurred. Six patients required postoperative acetaminophen administration, and 24 patients did not require analgesic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Tumescent local anesthesia with maximum dose of 7 mg/kg lidocaine seems to be safe and the sole possible effective locoregional anesthesia technique for the surgical treatment of noncontiguous pediatric burns.

Motion sickness and postoperative vomiting in children.

BACKGROUND: Motion sickness is considered an important risk factor for postoperative nausea and vomiting in children. The aim of this study was to verify the impact of motion sickness on the incidence of vomiting after routine surgery in children, and to compare the incidence of vomiting, after combined regional/general anaesthesia, using either halothane or sevoflurane. METHODS: We prospectively studied 420 children (369 males and 51 females) who received general anaesthesia and inguinal field block for common paediatric surgery. The children were randomly allocated into one of two groups (halothane or sevoflurane). In the 200 children in the first group (H), general anaesthesia was induced and maintained with halothane, whereas in the 220 children in the second group (S), anaesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane. RESULTS: There were 79 children with a prior history of motion sickness (MS+) and 341 without such a history (MS-). In the MS+ population, the incidence of vomiting was similar in both H and S groups, being around 33%. However, repeated episodes of vomiting in MS+ children were more frequent when halothane was used. In the MS- group, the incidence of vomiting was significantly greater in the H group (19%) than in the S group (8%). CONCLUSIONS: In the postoperative period, we found that MS+ children vomit more than MS- children, regardless of the inhalation anaesthetic used. However, MS- children displayed a higher incidence of vomiting when halothane was used rather than sevoflurane.