Combinatorial expression of GPCR isoforms affects signalling and drug responses.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are membrane proteins that modulate physiology across human tissues in response to extracellular signals. GPCR-mediated signalling can differ because of changes in the sequence1,2 or expression3 of the receptors, leading to signalling bias when comparing diverse physiological systems4. An underexplored source of such bias is the generation of functionally diverse GPCR isoforms with different patterns of expression across different tissues. Here we integrate data from human tissue-level transcriptomes, GPCR sequences and structures, proteomics, single-cell transcriptomics, population-wide genetic association studies and pharmacological experiments. We show how a single GPCR gene can diversify into several isoforms with distinct signalling properties, and how unique isoform combinations expressed in different tissues can generate distinct signalling states. Depending on their structural changes and expression patterns, some of the detected isoforms may influence cellular responses to drugs and represent new targets for developing drugs with improved tissue selectivity. Our findings highlight the need to move from a canonical to a context-specific view of GPCR signalling that considers how combinatorial expression of isoforms in a particular cell type, tissue or organism collectively influences receptor signalling and drug responses.

Location-biased activation of the proton-sensor GPR65 is uncoupled from receptor trafficking.

The canonical view of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) function is that receptor trafficking is tightly coupled to signaling. GPCRs remain on the plasma membrane (PM) at the cell surface until they are activated, after which they are desensitized and internalized into endosomal compartments. This canonical view presents an interesting context for proton-sensing GPCRs because they are more likely to be activated in acidic endosomal compartments than at the PM. Here, we show that the trafficking of the prototypical proton-sensor GPR65 is fully uncoupled from signaling, unlike that of other known mammalian GPCRs. GPR65 internalizes and localizes to early and late endosomes, from where they signal at steady state, irrespective of extracellular pH. Acidic extracellular environments stimulate receptor signaling at the PM in a dose-dependent manner, although endosomal GPR65 is still required for a full signaling response. Receptor mutants that were incapable of activating cAMP trafficked normally, internalize and localize to endosomal compartments. Our results show that GPR65 is constitutively active in endosomes, and suggest a model where changes in extracellular pH reprograms the spatial pattern of receptor signaling and biases the location of signaling to the cell surface.

Compartmentalized GPCR Signaling from Intracellular Membranes.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are integral membrane proteins that transduce a wide array of inputs including light, ions, hormones, and neurotransmitters into intracellular signaling responses which underlie complex processes ranging from vision to learning and memory. Although traditionally thought to signal primarily from the cell surface, GPCRs are increasingly being recognized as capable of signaling from intracellular membrane compartments, including endosomes, the Golgi apparatus, and nuclear membranes. Remarkably, GPCR signaling from these membranes produces functional effects that are distinct from signaling from the plasma membrane, even though often the same G protein effectors and second messengers are activated. In this review, we will discuss the emerging idea of a "spatial bias" in signaling. We will present the evidence for GPCR signaling through G protein effectors from intracellular membranes, and the ways in which this signaling differs from canonical plasma membrane signaling with important implications for physiology and pharmacology. We also highlight the potential mechanisms underlying spatial bias of GPCR signaling, including how intracellular membranes and their associated lipids and proteins affect GPCR activity and signaling.

Spectrin tetramer formation is not required for viable development in Drosophila.

The dominant paradigm for spectrin function is that (αß)2-spectrin tetramers or higher order oligomers form membrane-associated two-dimensional networks in association with F-actin to reinforce the plasma membrane. Tetramerization is an essential event in such structures. We characterize the tetramerization interaction between α-spectrin and ß-spectrins in Drosophila. Wild-type α-spectrin binds to both ß- and ßH-chains with high affinity, resembling other non-erythroid spectrins. However, α-spec(R22S), a tetramerization site mutant homologous to the pathological α-spec(R28S) allele in humans, eliminates detectable binding to ß-spectrin and reduces binding to ßH-spectrin ∼1000-fold. Even though spectrins are essential proteins, α-spectrin(R22S) rescues α-spectrin mutants to adulthood with only minor phenotypes indicating that tetramerization, and thus conventional network formation, is not the essential function of non-erythroid spectrin. Our data provide the first rigorous test for the general requirement for tetramer-based non-erythroid spectrin networks throughout an organism and find that they have very limited roles, in direct contrast to the current paradigm.

Compartment-Specific Activation of the Proton-Sensor GPR65 is Uncoupled from Receptor Trafficking.

The canonical view of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) function is that receptor trafficking is tightly coupled to signaling. GPCRs remain on the plasma membrane (PM) at the cell surface until they are activated, after which they are desensitized and internalized into endosomal compartments. This canonical view presents an interesting context for proton-sensing GPCRs because they are more likely to be activated in acidic endosomal compartments than at the PM. Here we show that the trafficking of the prototypical proton-sensor GPR65 is fully uncoupled from signaling, unlike that of other known mammalian GPCRs. GPR65 internalized and localized to early and late endosomes, from where they signal at steady state, irrespective of extracellular pH. Acidic extracellular environments stimulated receptor signaling at the PM in a dose-dependent manner, although endosomal GPR65 was still required for a full signaling response. Receptor mutants that were incapable of activating cAMP trafficked normally, internalized, and localized to endosomal compartments. Our results show that GPR65 is constitutively active in endosomes, and suggest a model where changes in extracellular pH reprograms the spatial pattern of receptor signaling and biases the location of signaling to the cell surface.

Conformational specificity of opioid receptors is determined by subcellular location irrespective of agonist.

The prevailing model for the variety in drug responses is that different drugs stabilize distinct active states of their G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) targets, allowing coupling to different effectors. However, whether the same ligand generates different GPCR active states based on the immediate environment of receptors is not known. Here we address this question using spatially resolved imaging of conformational biosensors that read out distinct active conformations of the δ-opioid receptor (DOR), a physiologically relevant GPCR localized to Golgi and the surface in neuronal cells. We have shown that Golgi and surface pools of DOR both inhibit cAMP, but engage distinct conformational biosensors in response to the same ligand in rat neuroendocrine cells. Further, DOR recruits arrestins on the surface but not on the Golgi. Our results suggest that the local environment determines the active states of receptors for any given drug, allowing GPCRs to couple to different effectors at different subcellular locations.

Spatial encoding of GPCR signaling in the nervous system.

Several GPCRs, including receptors previously thought to signal primarily from the cell surface, have been recently shown to signal from many intracellular compartments. This raises the idea that signaling by any given receptor is spatially encoded in the cell, with distinct sites of signal origin dictating distinct downstream consequences. We will discuss recent developments that address this novel facet of GPCR physiology, focusing on the spatial segregation of signaling from the cell surface, endosomes, and the Golgi by receptors relevant to the nervous system.

Dual RXR motifs regulate nerve growth factor-mediated intracellular retention of the delta opioid receptor.

The delta opioid receptor (DOR), a physiologically relevant prototype for G protein-coupled receptors, is retained in intracellular compartments in neuronal cells. This retention is mediated by a nerve growth factor (NGF)-regulated checkpoint that delays the export of DOR from the trans-Golgi network. How DOR is selectively retained in the Golgi, in the midst of dynamic membrane transport and cargo export, is a fundamental unanswered question. Here we address this by investigating sequence elements on DOR that regulate DOR surface delivery, focusing on the C-terminal tail of DOR that is sufficient for NGF-mediated regulation. By systematic mutational analysis, we define conserved dual bi-arginine (RXR) motifs that are required for NGF- and phosphoinositide-regulated DOR export from intracellular compartments in neuroendocrine cells. These motifs were required to bind the coatomer protein I (COPI) complex, a vesicle coat complex that mediates primarily retrograde cargo traffic in the Golgi. Our results suggest that interactions of DOR with COPI, via atypical COPI motifs on the C-terminal tail, retain DOR in the Golgi. These interactions could provide a point of regulation of DOR export and delivery by extracellular signaling pathways.