Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 50(12): 3845-52, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22993178

RESUMO

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a relatively new addition to the clinical microbiology laboratory. The performance of the MALDI Biotyper system (Bruker Daltonics) was compared to those of phenotypic and genotypic identification methods for 690 routine and referred clinical isolates representing 102 genera and 225 unique species. We systematically compared direct-smear and extraction methods on a taxonomically diverse collection of isolates. The optimal score thresholds for bacterial identification were determined, and an approach to address multiple divergent results above these thresholds was evaluated. Analysis of identification scores revealed optimal species- and genus-level identification thresholds of 1.9 and 1.7, with 91.9% and 97.0% of isolates correctly identified to species and genus levels, respectively. Not surprisingly, routinely encountered isolates showed higher concordance than did uncommon isolates. The extraction method yielded higher scores than the direct-smear method for 78.3% of isolates. Incorrect species were reported in the top 10 results for 19.4% of isolates, and although there was no obvious cutoff to eliminate all of these ambiguities, a 10% score differential between the top match and additional species may be useful to limit the need for additional testing to reach single-species-level identifications.


Assuntos
Bactérias/química , Bactérias/classificação , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz/métodos , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Humanos , Tipagem Molecular
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 49(3): 1104-6, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21227988

RESUMO

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry is a rapid and accurate tool for the identification of many microorganisms. We assessed this technology for the identification of 103 Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Aggregatibacter aphrophilus, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, and Kingella kingae (HACEK) clinical isolates and 20 Haemophilus influenzae clinical isolates. Ninety-three percent of HACEK organisms were identified correctly to the genus level using the Bruker database, and 100% were identified to the genus level using a custom database that included clinical isolates.


Assuntos
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Cardiobacterium/química , Eikenella corrodens/química , Haemophilus/química , Kingella kingae/química , Pasteurellaceae/química , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz/métodos , Cardiobacterium/classificação , Eikenella corrodens/classificação , Haemophilus/classificação , Humanos , Kingella kingae/classificação , Pasteurellaceae/classificação , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
3.
J Med Microbiol ; 58(Pt 6): 774-778, 2009 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19429754

RESUMO

Phenotypic identification of AmpC, KPC and extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) among members of the Enterobacteriaceae remains challenging. This study compared the Phoenix Automated Microbiology System (BD Diagnostics) with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute confirmatory method to identify ESBL production among 200 Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates. The Phoenix system misclassified nearly half of the isolates as ESBL-positive, requiring manual testing for confirmation. Inclusion of aztreonam +/- clavulanic acid (CA) and cefpodoxime +/- CA in the testing algorithm increased the ESBL detection rate by 6 %. Boronic acid-based screening identified 24 isolates as AmpC(+), but in a subset of genotypically characterized isolates, appeared to have a high false-positivity rate. PCR screening revealed eight KPC(+) isolates, all of which tested as ESBL(+) or ESBL(+) AmpC(+) by phenotypic methods, but half were reported as carbapenem-susceptible by the Phoenix system. Overall, these results indicate that laboratories should use the Phoenix ESBL results only as an initial screen followed by confirmation with an alternative method.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias/biossíntese , Escherichia coli , Klebsiella pneumoniae , beta-Lactamases/biossíntese , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Automação , Proteínas de Bactérias/análise , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão/métodos , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/enzimologia , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzimologia , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/instrumentação , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Fenótipo , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Resistência beta-Lactâmica/genética , beta-Lactamases/análise , beta-Lactamas/farmacologia
4.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 46(3): 189-95, 2003 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12867094

RESUMO

While culture for Bordetella species is highly specific, sensitivity is extremely variable due to patient age, immunization status, antibiotic treatment, and specimen transport conditions. We evaluated a real-time multiplex PCR assay as an alternative to culture for the detection and differentiation of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis. The PCR conditions allowed the simultaneous detection of one B. pertussis organism and five B. parapertussis organisms per reaction. An inhibition control was incorporated into the assay. Of 163 total samples evaluated, 37 of 38 samples positive by either culture or direct fluorescent antibody testing (DFA) were also positive by PCR (97% sensitivity). Of 125 culture- or DFA-negative samples, 101 were also negative by PCR (81% specificity). The described multiplex assay is a rapid, sensitive, contamination-limiting, real-time PCR assay that controls for inhibition. The assay performs well using liquid or swab samples and from dried material on slides.


Assuntos
Infecções por Bordetella/diagnóstico , Bordetella pertussis/isolamento & purificação , Bordetella/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Coqueluche/diagnóstico , Adulto , Bordetella/classificação , Bordetella/genética , Bordetella pertussis/genética , Criança , Meios de Cultura , Humanos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
6.
J Clin Microbiol ; 44(12): 4400-6, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17050811

RESUMO

Laboratories often receive clinical isolates for bacterial identification that have ambiguous biochemical profiles by conventional testing. With the emergence of 16S rRNA gene sequencing as an identification tool, we evaluated the usefulness of SmartGene IDNS, a 16S rRNA sequence database and software program for microbial identification. Identification by conventional methods of a diverse group of bacterial clinical isolates was compared with gene sequences interrogated by the SmartGene and MicroSeq databases. Of 300 isolates, SmartGene identified 295 (98%) to the genus level and 262 (87%) to the species level, with 5 (2%) being inconclusive. MicroSeq identified 271 (90%) to the genus level and 223 (74%) to the species level, with 29 (10%) being inconclusive. SmartGene and MicroSeq agreed on the genus for 233 (78%) isolates and the species for 212 (71%) isolates. Conventional methods identified 291 (97%) isolates to the genus level and 208 (69%) to the species level, with 9 (3%) being inconclusive. SmartGene, MicroSeq, and conventional identifications agreed for 193 (64%) of the results. Twenty-seven microorganisms were not represented in MicroSeq, compared to only 2 not represented in SmartGene. Overall, SmartGene IDNS provides comprehensive and accurate identification of a diverse group of bacteria and has the added benefit of being a user-friendly program that can be modified to meet the unique needs of clinical laboratories.


Assuntos
Bactérias/classificação , DNA Ribossômico/genética , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos , Genes de RNAr , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Software , Bactérias/genética , DNA Bacteriano/química , DNA Bacteriano/genética , DNA Ribossômico/química , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Análise de Sequência de DNA
7.
J Clin Microbiol ; 42(2): 578-84, 2004 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14766819

RESUMO

Identification of clinically significant nocardiae to the species level is important in patient diagnosis and treatment. A study was performed to evaluate Nocardia species identification obtained by partial 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequencing by the MicroSeq 500 system with an expanded database. The expanded portion of the database was developed from partial 5' 16S rDNA sequences derived from 28 reference strains (from the American Type Culture Collection and the Japanese Collection of Microorganisms). The expanded MicroSeq 500 system was compared to (i). conventional identification obtained from a combination of growth characteristics with biochemical and drug susceptibility tests; (ii). molecular techniques involving restriction enzyme analysis (REA) of portions of the 16S rRNA and 65-kDa heat shock protein genes; and (iii). when necessary, sequencing of a 999-bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene. An unknown isolate was identified as a particular species if the sequence obtained by partial 16S rDNA sequencing by the expanded MicroSeq 500 system was 99.0% similar to that of the reference strain. Ninety-four nocardiae representing 10 separate species were isolated from patient specimens and examined by using the three different methods. Sequencing of partial 16S rDNA by the expanded MicroSeq 500 system resulted in only 72% agreement with conventional methods for species identification and 90% agreement with the alternative molecular methods. Molecular methods for identification of Nocardia species provide more accurate and rapid results than the conventional methods using biochemical and susceptibility testing. With an expanded database, the MicroSeq 500 system for partial 16S rDNA was able to correctly identify the human pathogens N. brasiliensis, N. cyriacigeorgica, N. farcinica, N. nova, N. otitidiscaviarum, and N. veterana.


Assuntos
DNA Ribossômico/genética , Nocardia/genética , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Bases de Dados Factuais , Biblioteca Gênica , Humanos , Nocardia/classificação , Nocardia/isolamento & purificação , Nocardiose/microbiologia , Fenótipo , Filogenia , Proibitinas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA