RESUMO
Cancer is the number one cause of death in Australia with colorectal cancer being the second most common cancer type. The translation of cancer research into clinical practice is hindered by the lack of integration of heterogeneous and autonomous data from various data sources. Integration of heterogeneous data can offer researchers a comprehensive source for biospecimen identification, hypothesis formulation, hypothesis validation, cohort discovery and biomarker discovery. Alongside the increasing prominence of big data, various translational research tools such as tranSMART have emerged that can converge and analyse different types of data. In this study, we show the integration of different data types from a significant Australian colorectal cancer cohort. Additionally, colorectal cancer datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas were also integrated for comparison. These integrated data are accessible via http://www.tcrn.unsw.edu.au/transmart. The use of translational research tools for data integration can provide a cost-effective and rapid approach to translational cancer research.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica , Biomarcadores , Neoplasias Colorretais/etiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Humanos , Estatística como Assunto , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica/métodosRESUMO
Primary health care is the foundation of effective, sustainable population health and is associated with higher patient satisfaction and reduced aggregate health spending. Although improving patient care requires a sound evidence base, rigorously designed studies remain under-represented in primary care research. The pace of research activity in general practice and the rate and quality of publications do not match the pace of structural change or the level of funding provided. Recruitment difficulties are a major impediment, fuelled by general practitioners' time constraints, lack of remuneration, non-recognition, and workforce shortages. Radical reform is required to redress imbalances in funding allocation, including: funding of GP Research Network infrastructure costs; formalising relationships between primary care researchers and academic departments of general practice and rural health; and mandating that research funding bodies consider only proposals that include in the budget nominal payments for GP participation and salaries for dedicated research nurses.