Premenstrual mood symptoms: study of familiality and personality correlates in mood disorder pedigrees.

We sought to determine whether premenstrual mood symptoms exhibit familial aggregation in bipolar disorder or major depression pedigrees. Two thousand eight hundred seventy-six women were interviewed with the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies as part of either the NIMH Genetics Initiative Bipolar Disorder Collaborative study or the Genetics of Early Onset Major Depression (GenRED) study and asked whether they had experienced severe mood symptoms premenstrually. In families with two or more female siblings with bipolar disorder (BP) or major depressive disorder (MDD), we examined the odds of having premenstrual mood symptoms given one or more siblings with these symptoms. For the GenRED MDD sample we also assessed the impact of personality as measured by the NEO-FFI. Premenstrual mood symptoms did not exhibit familial aggregation in families with BP or MDD. We unexpectedly found an association between high NEO openness scores and premenstrual mood symptoms, but neither this factor, nor NEO neuroticism influenced evidence for familial aggregation of symptoms. Limitations include the retrospective interview, the lack of data on premenstrual dysphoric disorder, and the inability to control for factors such as medication use.

A comparison of the familiality of chronic depression in recurrent early-onset depression pedigrees using different definitions of chronicity.

BACKGROUND: The study of chronicity in the course of major depression has been complicated by varying definitions of this illness feature. Because familial clustering is one component of diagnostic validity we compared family clustering of chronicity as defined in the DSM-IV to that of chronicity determined by an assessment of lifetime course of depressive illness. METHODS: In 1750 affected subjects from 652 families recruited for a genetic study of recurrent, early-onset depression, we applied several definitions of chronicity. Odds ratios were determined for the likelihood of chronicity in a proband predicting chronicity in an affected relative. RESULTS: There was greater family clustering of chronicity as determined by assessment of lifetime course (OR=2.54) than by DSM-IV defined chronic major depressive episode (MDE) (OR=1.93) or dysthymic disorder (OR=1.76). In families with probands who had preadolescent onset of MDD, familiality was increased by all definitions, with a much larger increase observed for chronicity by lifetime course (ORs were 6.14 for lifetime chronicity, 2.43 for chronic MDE, and 3.42 for comorbid dysthymic disorder). Agreement between these definitions of chronicity was only fair. LIMITATIONS: The data used to determine chronicity were collected retrospectively and not blindly to relatives' status, and assessment of lifetime course was based on global clinical impressions gathered during a semi-structured diagnostic interview. Also, it can be difficult to determine whether individuals with recurrent major depressive episodes who frequently experience long periods of low grade depressive symptoms meet the strict timing requirements of DSM-IV dysthymic disorder. CONCLUSIONS: An assessment of lifetime symptom course identifies a more familial, and thus possibly a more valid, type of chronic depression than the current DSM-IV categories which are defined in terms of particular cross-sectional features of illness.

Familial aggregation of illness chronicity in recurrent, early-onset major depression pedigrees.

OBJECTIVE: The authors used a large sample collected for genetic studies to determine whether a chronic course of illness defines a familial clinical subtype in major depressive disorder. METHOD: A measure of lifetime chronicity of depressive symptoms (substantial mood symptoms most or all of the time) was tested for familial aggregation in 638 pedigrees from the Genetics of Recurrent Early-Onset Depression (GenRED) project. RESULTS: In subjects with chronic depression, the mean age at illness onset was lower and rates of attempted suicide, panic disorder, and substance abuse were higher than among those with nonchronic depression. Chronicity was assessed in 37.8% of affected first-degree relatives of probands with chronic depression and in 20.2% of relatives of probands with nonchronic depression. Analysis using the generalized estimating equation model yielded an odds ratio of 2.52 (SE=0.39, z=6.02, p<0.0001) for the likelihood of chronicity in a proband predicting chronicity in an affected relative. With stratification by proband age at illness onset, the odds ratio for chronicity in relatives by proband chronicity status was 6.17 (SE=2.09, z=5.35, p<0.0001) in families of probands whose illness onset was before age 13 and 1.92 (SE=0.34, z=3.72, p<0.0001) in families of probands whose illness started at age 13 or later. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that chronicity of depressive symptoms is familial, especially in preadolescent-onset illness. Chronicity is also associated with other indicators of illness severity in recurrent, early-onset major depression. Further study using chronicity as a subtype in the genetic analysis of depressive illness is warranted. Refinement of the definition of chronicity in depressive illness may increase the power of such studies.