Systematic hand-held echocardiography in patients hospitalised with acute coronary syndrome.

AIMS: Transthoracic echocardiography is recommended in all patients with acute coronary syndrome but is time-consuming and lacks an evidence base. We aimed to assess the feasibility, diagnostic accuracy and time-efficiency of hand-held echocardiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome and describe the impact of echocardiography on clinical management in this setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with acute coronary syndrome underwent both hand-held and transthoracic echocardiography with agreement between key imaging parameters assessed using kappa statistics. The immediate clinical impact of hand-held echocardiography in this population was systematically evaluated.Overall, 262 patients (65±12 years, 71% male) participated. Agreement between hand-held and transthoracic echocardiography was good-to-excellent (kappa 0.60-1.00) with hand-held echocardiography having an overall negative predictive value of 95%. Hand-held echocardiography was performed rapidly (7.7±1.6 min) and completed a median of 5 [interquartile range 3-20] hours earlier than transthoracic echocardiography. Systematic hand-held echocardiography in all patients with acute coronary syndrome identified an important cardiac abnormality in 50% and the clinical management plan was changed by echocardiography in 42%. In 85% of cases, hand-held echocardiography was sufficient for patient decision-making and transthoracic echocardiography was no longer deemed necessary. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute coronary syndrome, hand-held echocardiography provides comparable results to transthoracic echocardiography, can be more rapidly applied and gives sufficient imaging information for decision-making in the vast majority of patients. Systematic echocardiography has clinical impact in half of patients, supporting the clinical utility of echocardiography in this population, and providing an evidence-base for current guidelines.

Comparison of outcomes of trans-subclavian versus trans-apical approaches in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Many patients are unsuitable for conventional femoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) but there is limited evidence as to which alternative approach has the best outcomes. We compared clinical outcomes in patients undergoing trans-subclavian (TS) or trans-apical (TA) TAVI. METHODS: This was a national retrospective observational study of patients undergoing surgical TAVI in Scotland between January 2013 and March 2020. The pre-operative patient characteristics, intraoperative details and post-operative outcomes were compared between TS and TA cohorts using data from the National Institute of Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR) registry. RESULTS: Among 1055 patients who underwent TAVI, TS or TA access was used in 50 (4.7%) and 90 (8.5%) patients respectively. Self-expanding Medtronic Evolut R valves were used in 84% of TS procedures, while balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN valves were used in all TA procedures. The TS group had a lower mean logistic EuroSCORE than the TA group (27.31 ± 19.44% vs 34.92 ± 19.61% p = 0.029). The TS approach was associated with a higher incidence of moderate postprocedural aortic regurgitation (12.5% vs 2.4%, p = 0.025). There was no significant difference in 30-day, 1-year or overall all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Both trans-subclavian and trans-apical access are viable approaches for patients requiring non-transfemoral TAVI. Differences in peri-procedural indices reflect the disparate patient populations and factors governing prosthesis choice, and short- and long-term mortality was similar.

Clinical Outcomes and OCT Analysis After Culotte Stenting With 2nd- and 3rd-Generation Everolimus-Eluting Stents: Two-Year Follow-Up of the CELTIC Bifurcation Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to provide 2-year clinical outcomes for patients with Medina 1,1,1 bifurcation lesions treated with a culotte technique, comparing Synergy and Xience drug eluting stent (DES) platforms. A sub-group analysis of 9-month Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) was performed to assess stent healing. METHODS: A total of 170 patients with non-left main stem Medina 1,1,1 lesions, were randomized to treatment with Synergy or Xience DES. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel failure, stent thrombosis and angiographic restenosis. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of 30 bifurcations were carried out on OCT images taken at 9-month follow-up. RESULTS: After 2 years, the primary outcome had occurred in 17.7% of patients in the Synergy group and 18.8% of patients in the Xience group. The non-inferiority test was met (p = 0.0055). MACCE occurred in 7.3% of all patients by 2 years. OCT analysis found smaller stent and lumen areas in patients treated with Synergy stents. There was a higher proportion of malapposed struts in patients treated with Xience stents. CONCLUSIONS: The first report of the CELTIC bifurcation study demonstrated a low MACCE rate after 9 months. There was little accrual of events after this timepoint. There was no difference in clinical outcomes between the platforms tested. OCT analysis demonstrated excellent healing of both platforms.

Clinical outcomes following balloon aortic valvuloplasty.

BACKGROUND: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) remains a treatment option for the selected patients with severe aortic stenosis. We examined clinical outcomes and predictors of prognosis in patients undergoing BAV for severe aortic stenosis. METHODS: We identified all patients undergoing BAV from January 2010 to March 2018 (n=167) at a single transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) centre. Patient demographics, investigations, subsequent interventions and clinical outcomes were obtained from electronic health records. RESULTS: Patients undergoing BAV were elderly (median age 80, IQR 73-86 years) and half (n=87, 52%) were male. All-cause mortality at 30 days and 12 months was 11% and 43%, respectively. Reduce ejection fraction (EF 30%-50%: HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.94; EF <30%: HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.20) was the only independent predictor at baseline of overall mortality. Median survival was 212 (IQR 54-490) days from the index procedure. Mortality at 1 year was lowest in patients who subsequently underwent TAVI or SAVR but high among those who had no further interventions or those who had a repeat BAV (14%, 19%, 60%, 89% respectively, log-rank p<0.001). CONCLUSION: BAV as a bridge to definitive aortic valve intervention in carefully selected patients offers acceptable outcomes. These contemporary observational findings demonstrate the ongoing potential utility of BAV in the TAVI era.

Validation of a Novel System for Co-Registration of Coronary Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging.

INTRODUCTION: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a useful adjunct to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Correlating IVUS images with angiographic findings can be challenging. We evaluated the utility of a novel co-registration system for IVUS and coronary angiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 3-D virtual catheter trajectory was constructed from separate angiographic imaging runs using bespoke software. Intravascular ultrasound images were obtained using a commercially available mechanical rotational transducer with motorized pullback. Co-registration of ultrasound and angiographic images was then performed retrospectively based on the length of pullback, the 3-D trajectory and the start position of the catheter. Validation was performed in a spherical phantom model and in vivo in the coronary circulation of patients undergoing coronary angiography and intravascular imaging for clinical purposes. 111 paired angiographic and IVUS runs were performed in 3 phantom models. The differences between the reference length and the length measured on the 3D reconstructed path was -0.01 ±â€¯0.40 mm. Intra-observer variability was 0.4%. We enrolled 25 patients in 3 European hospitals and performed 35 co-registration attempts with an 86% success rate. 71 landmarks were selected by the first operator, 68 by the second. Differences between angiographic and IVUS landmarks were -0.22 ±â€¯0.72 mm and 0.05 ±â€¯1.01 mm, respectively. Inter-observer variability was 0.23 ±â€¯0.63 mm. CONCLUSION: We present a novel method for the co-registration of IVUS and coronary angiographic images. This system performed well in a phantom model and using images obtained from the human coronary circulation. CLASSIFICATIONS: Innovation, intravascular ultrasound, other technique.

Culotte stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions with 2nd and 3rd generation everolimus-eluting stents: the CELTIC Bifurcation Study.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to provide contemporary outcome data for patients with de novo coronary disease and Medina 1,1,1 lesions who were treated with a culotte two-stent technique, and to compare the performance of two modern-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) platforms, the 3-connector XIENCE and the 2-connector SYNERGY. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with Medina 1,1,1 bifurcation lesions who had disease that was amenable to culotte stenting were randomised 1:1 to treatment with XIENCE or SYNERGY DES. A total of 170 patients were included. Technical success and final kissing balloon inflation occurred in >96% of cases. Major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (MACCE: a composite of death, myocardial infarction [MI], cerebrovascular accident [CVA] and target vessel revascularisation [TVR]) occurred in 5.9% of patients by nine months. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, MI, CVA, target vessel failure (TVF), stent thrombosis and binary angiographic restenosis. At nine months, the primary endpoint occurred in 19% of XIENCE patients and 16% of SYNERGY patients (p=0.003 for non-inferiority for platform performance). CONCLUSIONS: MACCE rates for culotte stenting using contemporary everolimus-eluting DES are low at nine months. The XIENCE and SYNERGY stents demonstrated comparable performance for the primary endpoint.

Patent haemostasis prevents radial artery occlusion in patients with an acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: A haemostatic technique that maintains radial artery flow ("patent haemostasis") following transradial catheterization reduces rates of radial artery occlusion (RAO) in patients with stable coronary disease. It is unclear whether this benefit extends to patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: Patients undergoing inpatient transradial catheterization for an ACS were prospectively enrolled in a consecutive cohort study (n=300). Radial haemostasis was obtained using standard radial compression (cohort 1; n=150) or patent haemostasis (cohort 2; n=150). An end-of-case activated clotting time (ACT) was recorded and radial artery patency assessed within 24 hours of sheath removal by reverse Barbeau's test. RESULTS: The incidence of RAO was 16.0% following standard radial compression and 5.3% following patent haemostasis (p=0.003). Univariate predictors of RAO were patent haemostasis (OR 0.30; [0.13-0.68], p=0.004), hyperlipidaemia (OR 0.46; [0.21-0.98], p=0.04), history of current smoking (OR 2.86; [1.3-6.0], p=0.015) and longer procedure times (OR 1.03/additional minute; [1.01-1.05], p=0.003). There was no association between the end-of-case ACT and RAO (OR 1.00; [0.9-1.01] p=1.00). After adjusting for covariates, patent haemostasis reduced the risk of RAO by 70% compared to standard compression (OR 0.30; [0.12-0.77], p=0.12). The c-statistic for model discrimination was 0.79 (95% CI [0.71-0.86], p<0.001). Inverse probability treatment weighted analysis also confirmed patent haemostasis as an independent predictor of reduced RAO (OR 0.38 [0.15-0.95], p=0.039). CONCLUSION: Patent haemostasis is highly effective in preventing early RAO in patients with ACS.