Effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioral group therapy for complicated grief in relatives of patients with cancer: A randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Complicated grief can affect a large number of individuals who have lost a relative due to cancer. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral grief therapy (CBGT) group for complicated grief (CG) in those who have lost a relative due to cancer in comparison with a psychoeducational and emotional expression intervention group (PSDEEI). METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was used, in which 249 relatives of deceased cancer patients with CG were randomly assigned to CBGT or PSDEEI. Complicated grief (Inventory of Complicated Grief [ICG]), depression (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI-II]), hopelessness (Beck Hopelessness Scale [BHS]), anxiety (Beck Anxiety Inventory [BAI]) symptoms, and general health (Goldberg's General Health Questionnaire [GHQ28]) were assessed at pretreatment, posttreatment, and follow-up at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: The CBGT group improved significantly (p < 0.001), with the scores in ICG, BDI-II, BAI, BHS, and GHQ28 (p < 0.001) being higher than those for the PSDEEI group in each of the assessed moments, with high effect sizes: ICG (η2 = 0.16), BDI (η2 = 0.10), BAI (η2 = 0.06), BHS (η2 = 0.21), and GHQ28 (η2 = 0.21). At the 12-month follow-up, the number of cases of CG decreased by 81.1% for the CBGT group vs. 31.7% in the PSDEEI group. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The CBGT treatment was effective for CG, depression, anxiety, and hopelessness symptoms and for mental health and was superior to the PSDEEI treatment.

Psychological well-being in palliative care: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To review which are the most influential variables in achieving levels of psychological well-being at the end of life and to verify whether, as certain studies suggest, spirituality, resilience and social support are the pillars on which the psychological well-being construct is based. METHOD: A systematic search through the Scopus, Pubmed and PsycInfo electronic databases was carried out using keywords such as: "wellbeing" OR "psychological-well-being" AND "resilience" AND "spirituality" AND "social support" AND "palliative care" and their multiple combinations. RESULTS: Eleven studies were selected, in which terms such as spiritual well-being, absence of discomfort and quality of life were used in substitution of psychological well-being and a certain consensus was found regarding whether resilience, spirituality and social support are predictive variables of psychological well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Resilience, social support and spirituality are highly relevant variables at the end of life and contribute decisively towards psychological well-being.

Predictors of Complicated Grief in Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients.

Introduction: It is important to identify the factors s associated with complicated grief (CG) in order to prevent it. Objective: To determine the factors associated with CG in the end-of-life phase within the palliative care context. Method: The PRISMA model was followed for the review. We accessed the following databases: PUBMED, SCOPUS, and PsycoINFO, to review publications from 2006. Results: A total of 17 studies were obtained. A direct relationship between factors prior to bereavement and CG is established: intensity of anticipated grief, previous mental and physical health of the caregiver, social support; quality of patient care, communication at the end-of-life, preparation for death, spirituality, and sociodemographic factors. Conclusions: Previous mental health and level of anticipatory grief in the main caregiver are shown to be the most powerful predictors of CG. Patient age and quality of care are factors considered as strong predictors of CG in almost every study.

Spanish Version of the Death Attitude Profile-Revised. Translation and Validation Into Spanish.

The Death Attitude Profile-Revised (DAP-R) was developed in English-speaking cultures with the aim of measuring attitudes towards death. This measure consists of 32 items, grouped into five factors (Fear of Death, Avoidance of Death, Neutral Acceptance, Approach Acceptance, and Escape Acceptance). The DAP-R was translated and adapted to Spanish (DAP-RSp), and the psychometric properties were analyzed accross a general sample. The face validity was evaluated by 20 experts in palliative care. N = 417 (X = 39.06 years) took part in the validation. DAP-RSp showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.67 for Neutral Acceptance to 0.95 for Escape a Acceptance, and 0.88 for the total), a multitrait scaling analysis and a confirmatory factor analysis reproduced the five dimensions of the original scale. The Spanish version of the DAP-R can be used as a valid scale to assess attitudes towards death in Spanish speaking population.

A screening method for sleep disturbances at the end-of-life.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sleep disturbances and to verify the accuracy of three screening tests to detect them in patients at the end-of-life admitted in a hospital palliative care unit. METHOD: The level of sleep disturbances was evaluated through the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) in 150 palliative patients. This questionnaire was the criterion variable for testing the three screening tests used: Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-Sleep subscale); the single question "How much do you worry about your sleep problems?" which is answered on a scale of 0-10 (Sleep-Worry-Q) and another single question: "Do you think you have sleep problems?" with two response categories, Yes/No (Sleep-Problem-Q). RESULTS: According to the PSQI (cut-off point: 8), 87% of patients presented sleep disturbances. The ESAS-Sleep (cut-off point: 3) showed a sensitivity of 0.87, a specificity of 0.58, and an AUC of 0.729; the Sleep-Worry-Q (cut-off point: 4) showed a sensitivity of 0.95, a specificity of 0.68, and an AUC of 0.854; the Sleep-Problem-Q obtained a sensitivity of 0.92 and a specificity of 0.65. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Patients at the end-of-life, near the time of death, have high levels of sleep disturbances that can be detected early, with better diagnostic accuracy, with the Sleep-Worry-Q. Although from a clinical point of view, the application of the Sleep-Problem-Q may be more advantageous, as it presents good diagnostic accuracy, greater simplicity, and brevity.

Use of hypnosis for the placement of a midline catheter in a patient at the end of life.

OBJECTIVE: The case of a non-oncological patient at the end of his life, admitted to a Palliative Care Unit (PCU), is presented. After a failed attempt to place a central venous catheter (CVC) and another placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), the patient exhibited high anxiety regarding a midline catheter (MC) and refused its placement, even though this was necessary for the administration of intravenous drugs to control dyspnea and other complex symptoms that he presented. METHOD: An intervention through clinical hypnosis for successful MC placement and symptom control is described. RESULT: Through clinical hypnosis and interdisciplinary teamwork, it was possible to place a MC, necessary for symptomatic control of a complex patient. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULT: This case exemplifies hypnosis as a simple procedure that is easy to apply, accepted by the patient, and effective in the implementation of invasive procedures and symptom control in PCUs.

Mental disorder screening on cancer patients before and after radiotherapy and at the 1-month follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to study the accuracy of different screening tests to detect psychopathological disorders in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy before (T1) and after radiotherapy (T2), and at the 1-month follow-up (T3). METHODS: The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the distress thermometer (DT) (0-10) were administered, together with a depression scale (DEPQ) (1-5), an anxiety scale (ANSQ) (1-5), and a physical symptoms questionnaire, to patients treated with radiotherapy at T1 (232 participants), T2 (130 participants), and T3 (130 participants). RESULTS: The accuracy of the screening tests was higher at T2, with the HADS-T test (cut-off ≥ 10) yielding the best results: sensitivity = 0.80, specificity = 0.92, with an excellent AUC (0.91). The DT test (cut-off ≥ 4) showed a sensitivity = 0.66, a specificity = 0.91, and an AUC = 0.825, and the DEPQ (cut-off > 1) yielded a sensitivity = 0.74, a specificity = 0.78, and an AUC = 0.776. The ANSQ (cut-off > 1) showed a sensitivity = 0.60, a specificity = 0.97, and an AUC = 0.831. At T1 and T3, the sensitivity tests were unsatisfactory. The increase in sensitivity at T2 may be due to an increase of physical symptoms at such time, which occurred more frequently in those patients who scored higher on screening tests and showed mental disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of the screening tests was higher at T2. At this time, HADS-T proved to be a good screening instrument; whereas at T1 and T3, screening instruments were only useful to detect cases without mental disorders, but not to identify those who suffer from them.

Longitudinal study of cognitive dysfunctions induced by adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy can induce cognitive impairment in cancer patients. The main goal of this longitudinal study was to determine the incidence, characteristics, and duration of cognitive dysfunction in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed cognitive function, quality of life, anxiety and depression, fatigue, and hemoglobin levels in colon cancer patients at three assessment points: pre-chemotherapy (n=81), post-chemotherapy (n=73), and after 6-month follow-up (n=54). All patients were treated with oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for 6 months. RESULTS: Thirty patients (37%) had cognitive impairment in the pre-chemotherapy evaluation, mainly in processing speed and psychomotor executive function (Trail Making Test A and B). At the end of treatment, the main domain affected was the verbal memory, with an acute decline detected in 56% of patients. Fifty-four percent of the patients improved their dysfunction after 6 months of follow-up, whereas 18 (33%) of them showed worsening in at least one test. Cognitive impairment was most common in older patients and in those with less years of education. Quality of life, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and hemoglobin did not influence the results of the cognitive tests. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant FOLFOX4 in patients with colon cancer can have a negative effect on verbal memory. This deterioration is usually mild and transient.

Preoperative detection and evaluation of the need for psychological intervention in cancer and non-cancer patients referred to thoracic surgery.

OBJECTIVES: (a) to evaluate and compare the psychological treatment needs of patients with cancer and non-cancer, who are going to undergo scheduled thoracic surgery, and (b) evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of the screening tests of psychological treatment needs for cancer and non-cancer patients. METHOD: The need for psychological treatment was evaluated in a total of 169 patients prior to thoracic surgery, through a clinical interview. The screening tests used were: the physician's judgment (yes/no), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and, the single-item interview to assess depression "Do you feel depressed?" (DEPQ). RESULTS: The number of patients who needed psychological treatment in the total sample was 47 (27.81%), in non-cancer-patients: 22 (30.99%) and in cancer patients: 25 (25.51%). The participants with treatment needs were more often young women with primary education levels, with more fears and concerns regarding their disease. With respect to the screening tests, the HADS-T (cut-off point ≥13) obtained a sensitivity (SE) of 0.75 and Specificity (SP) of 0.81 in the total sample. In patients with cancer, the HADS total score (cut-off point ≥10) obtained an SE=0.84 and SP=0.80, and, in non-cancer patients, the HADS total score (cut-off point ≥13) showed an SE=0.59 and SP=0.84. The DEPQ and the physician's judgment did not achieve adequate levels of precision. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of patients have psychological treatment needs before performing thoracic surgery, which are similar for cancer and non-cancer patients. Preoperative detection of patients who need psychological intervention is feasible with a simple screening test: HADS, which achieves greater precision in cancer patients.

Preoperative detection and evaluation of the need for psychological intervention in cancer and non-cancer patients referred to thoracic surgery.

OBJECTIVES: (a) to evaluate and compare the psychological treatment needs of patients with cancer and non-cancer, who are going to undergo scheduled thoracic surgery, and (b) evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of the screening tests of psychological treatment needs for cancer and non-cancer patients. METHOD: The need for psychological treatment was evaluated in a total of 169 patients prior to thoracic surgery, through a clinical interview. The screening tests used were: the physician's judgment (yes/no), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and, the single-item interview to assess depression "Do you feel depressed?" (DEPQ). RESULTS: The number of patients who needed psychological treatment in the total sample was 47 (27.81%), in non-cancer-patients: 22 (30.99%) and in cancer patients: 25 (25.51%). The participants with treatment needs were more often young women with primary education levels, with more fears and concerns regarding their disease. With respect to the screening tests, the HADS-T (cut-off point ≥13) obtained a sensitivity (SE) of 0.75 and Specificity (SP) of 0.81 in the total sample. In patients with cancer, the HADS total score (cut-off point ≥10) obtained an SE=0.84 and SP=0.80, and, in non-cancer patients, the HADS total score (cut-off point ≥13) showed an SE=0.59 and SP=0.84. The DEPQ and the physician's judgment did not achieve adequate levels of precision. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of patients have psychological treatment needs before performing thoracic surgery, which are similar for cancer and non-cancer patients. Preoperative detection of patients who need psychological intervention is feasible with a simple screening test: HADS, which achieves greater precision in cancer patients.

Implementing a distress screening program in a thoracic surgery service. / Implementación de un programa de cribado del malestar emocional en un servicio de cirugía torácica.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests in detecting cases requiring psychological intervention among patients referred for thoracic surgery. METHODS: Emotional distress was evaluated in 105 patients referred for thoracic surgery by means of a diagnostic psychological interview (criterion variable). The screening ability of the following methods was analyzed: the physician's opinion (Yes/No), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), single-item interview: «Are you depressed?¼ (Depression Question, ADEP) (1-5) and the single-item interview: «Are you anxious?¼ (Anxiety Question, ANXQ) (1-5). RESULTS: According to the clinical interview, 34% of the patients were clinical cases requiring psychological intervention. The total HADS (cut-off point of 10) showed a sensitivity=0.89, specificity=0.75 and AUC=0.883; the ADEP scale (>1) showed a sensitivity=0.79, specificity=0.74 and AUC=0.795; the ANXQ scale (>1) showed a sensitivity=0.78, specificity=0.41 and AUC=0.690; and the physician's opinion showed a sensitivity=0.47 and specificity=0.86. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of patients referred for thoracic surgery required psychological intervention. The best instrument to identify those patients requiring psychological care, taking a psychological interview as the criterion variable, was the total HADS score. This test is brief, simple and well accepted by patients; it is easy to implement within a thoracic surgery service and has a good diagnostic accuracy.

A longitudinal study on anxiety, depressive and adjustment disorder, suicide ideation and symptoms of emotional distress in patients with cancer undergoing radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the presence of anxiety, depressive and adjustment disorders, suicide ideation, and symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients with cancer before (T1), and after radiotherapy (T2) and at the 1-month follow-up (T3). METHODS: A longitudinal study on 103 patients with cancer treated as outpatients undergoing radiotherapy was carried out, evaluating them three times (T1-T2-T3) according to DSM-IV criteria with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RESULTS: Prevalence of the depressive disorders was: T1=6.8%, T2=3.9% and T3=3.9%; for anxiety disorders: T1=16.5%, T2=18.4% and T3=16.5%; for adjustment disorder: 10.7%, 5.8% and 7.8%; and for suicide ideation: T1=11.7%, T2=7.8% and T3=7.8%. In all, the presence of disorders was: T1=35%, T2=26.2%0.4% and T3=29.1%. At least one mental disorder was diagnosed in 46.6% of patients in one of the three times of the study. In relation to the symptoms, the prevalence of the possible cases of clinical anxiety was: T1=35.9%, T2=18.4% and T3=22.3%; the prevalence of possible cases of clinical depression was 19.4%, 16.5% and 10.7%, respectively; and the prevalence of emotional distress was 27.2%, 17.5% and 18.4%, respectively. All symptoms decreased significantly from T1 to T2 and from T1 to T3, with moderate effect sizes. No changes were observed between the end of the radiotherapy and the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: High prevalence of mental disorders and symptoms of anxiety, depression and distress were observed in the patients with cancer before finishing radiotherapy treatment and during the follow-up. FUNDING: Basurto University Hospital and Basque Foundation for Innovation and Research in Health-BIOEF.

Psychological treatments to improve quality of life in cancer contexts: A meta-analysis.

This study aimed to analyze the effects of psychological treatments on quality of life among cancer patients and survivors. Additionally, it was explored the moderating influence of some medical- and treatment-related features on these effects. Scientific studies published between 1970 and 2012 were analyzed. Seventy-eight studies were included in a meta-analysis. Concerns related to samples, interventions, and standard of methodological evidence were explored across the studies. A significant overall effect size of psychological interventions was revealed (g = .35). Clinical state and use of adjuvant psychological treatment for managing medical side effects moderated this result (p < .05). Furthermore, a meta-regression model was showed significant (R 2  = .30) so as to explain the quality of life change associated with psychological interventions. The psychotherapeutic benefits on depressive symptomatology were included as a moderating factor. To sum up, quality of life is improved by psychological interventions, especially when patients have to cope with medical treatment or with adjustment after the disease is treated. Psychological treatments tend to promote better outcomes when depressive symptomatology is managed. These findings support that providing psychological treatments should be considered as crucial for the patient's health in cancer contexts.

Este estudio pretende conocer el efecto de los tratamientos psicológicos sobre la calidad de vida de pacientes y supervivientes de cáncer, así como la influencia moderadora de variables médicas y propias del tratamiento sobre dicho efecto. Para ello, se realizó un meta-análisis que incluyó 78 trabajos publicados entre 1970 y 2012. Se analizaron aspectos relacionados con la muestra, el tratamiento y la calidad metodológica de estos estudios. Como resultado, se encontró un tamaño del efecto significativo de los tratamientos psicológicos sobre la calidad de vida (g = 0,35). Dicho efecto estaba moderado por el estado clínico del paciente y la adyuvancia del tratamiento psicológico con el médico (p < 0,05). También se observó que mayores reducciones de sintomatología depresiva debidas al tratamiento llevaban a mayores beneficios sobre la calidad de vida según las meta-regresiones ejecutadas (R 2  = 0,30). En conclusión, los tratamientos psicológicos pueden mejorar la calidad de vida de pacientes oncológicos, principalmente cuando deben afrontar tratamientos médicos, así como de los supervivientes. Además, cuando se reduce la sintomatología depresiva la calidad de vida suele mejorar. Estos resultados destacan la influencia decisiva de los tratamientos psicológicos para la salud integral en contextos oncológicos.

Cirugía abierta vs. laparoscópica: calidad de vida y sintomatología ansioso-depresiva en cáncer colorrectal / Laparoscopic vs. open surgery: quality of life and anxious-depressive symptomatology in colorectal cancer

Introducción: El objetivo del presente estudio es evaluar la calidad de vida, y la sintomatología ansioso-depresiva, en una muestra de pacientes de cáncer colorrectal sometidos a tratamiento quirúrgico, por vía abierta o laparoscópica. Material y Métodos: 60 pacientes fueron evaluados en Calidad de vida, mediante el cuestionario de la EORTC QLQ-C30, y sintomatología ansioso-depresiva mediante la escala de Ansiedad y Depresión Hospitalaria (HADS). Además se realizaron análisis en función de tres variables sociodemográficas: edad, género y nivel socioeducativo. Resultados: No se encontraron diferencias significativas en función de la modalidad quirúrgica en calidad de vida y sintomatología ansioso-depresiva. La mayor parte de los pacientes presenta niveles de calidad de vida muy satisfactorios, si bien un 27% presentan problemas de calidad de vida. Las medias en sintomatología ansioso-depresiva se encuentran en los rangos normales, no obstante el 18% presenta sintomatología depresiva y el 22% ansiosa. Discusión y Conclusiones: Se puede concluir que los dos tipos de cirugía, a medio y largo plazo, tienen efectos similares sobre la calidad de vida y la sintomatología ansioso-depresiva de los pacientes. No obstante, aun estando libres de tratamiento activo y habiendo transcurrido más de un año de media desde la cirugía, se ha encontrado que hay pacientes que presentan problemas en su calidad de vida, y sintomatología ansioso-depresiva. Por ello es necesario que éstos sean evaluados psicológicamente para prestarles la atención necesaria, y así optimizar la calidad asistencial.

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life, and anxious-depressive symptoms in a sample of colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment, open or laparoscopic approach. Material and Method: 60 patients were assessed on quality of life, through the questionnaire of the EORTC QLQ-C30, and anxious-depressive symptomatology scale by Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HADS). Further analyzes were conducted according to three demographic variables: age, gender and socio-educational level. Results: No significant differences were found related to surgical type in quality of life and anxious-depressive symptomatology. Most of the patients have very satisfactory quality of life levels, while 27% of them have problems about it. Means in anxious-depressive symptoms are at normal range, despite of 18% whom presented depressive symptoms and 22% anxiety. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the two types of surgery, in a medium and long term, have similar effects on quality of life and anxious-depressive symptoms of patients. However, even free of active treatment and over a year after surgery, we found that there are patients who have problems in their quality of life and anxious-depressive syndrome. Therefore it is necessary to evaluate and to give them the attention needed and optimize quality of care.