Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 407(1): 403-408, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33963887

RESUMO

PURSPOSE: Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (IBDI) with intrahepatic involvement are a serious and challenging surgical complication that can have disastrous consequences in terms of morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We collected the patients with IBDI type (E4) between January 1991 and March 2020 in our hospital. The objective of the study was to present the long-term results of a extraglissonian approach and intraglissonian biliary reconstruction in a series of patients with intrahepatic bile duct injuries after cholecystectomy. We also detail our preoperative management and the standardization of the technique. RESULTS: An extraglissonian approach with partial hepatic resection of the base of segments 4b and 5 and intraglissonian Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy for biliary reconstruction using to several branches was performed in 10 patients with E4 Strassberg type intrahepatic lesions. Only one patient had postoperative bile leak (Clavien 3a). Surgical time was 260 min (IQR, 210-490). We left transanastomotic catheter (between 2 and 5) in situ for 3 and 6 months after surgery. The patients remained asymptomatic over a median follow-up of 169 months (IQR 129-234). CONCLUSION: This biliary reconstruction technique obtains positive long-term outcomes in patients with severe intrahepatic lesions.


Assuntos
Ductos Biliares , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Anastomose em-Y de Roux/efeitos adversos , Ductos Biliares/cirurgia , Ductos Biliares Intra-Hepáticos , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica
2.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 28(5): 725-730, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38480039

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic bile duct injury (BDI) during cholecystectomy is associated with a complex and heterogeneous management owing to the burden of morbidity until their definitive treatment. This study aimed to define the textbook outcomes (TOs) after BDI with the purpose to indicate the ideal treatment and to improve it management. METHODS: We collected data from patients with an BDI between 1990 and 2022 from 27 hospitals. TO was defined as a successful conservative treatment of the iatrogenic BDI or only minor complications after BDI or patients in whom the first repair resolves the iatrogenic BDI without complications or with minor complications. RESULTS: We included 808 patients and a total of 394 patients (46.9%) achieved TO. Overall complications in TO and non-TO groups were 11.9% and 86%, respectively (P < .001). Major complications and mortality in the non-TO group were 57.4% and 9.2%, respectively. The use of end-to-end bile duct anastomosis repair was higher in the non-TO group (23.1 vs 7.8, P < .001). Factors associated with achieving a TO were injury in a specialized center (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.01; 95% CI, 2.68-5.99; P < .001), transfer for a first repair (aOR, 5.72; 95% CI, 3.51-9.34; P < .001), conservative management (aOR, 5.00; 95% CI, 1.63-15.36; P = .005), or surgical management (aOR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.50-4.00; P < .001). CONCLUSION: TO largely depends on where the BDI is managed and the type of injury. It allows hepatobiliary centers to identify domains of improvement of perioperative management of patients with BDI.


Assuntos
Ductos Biliares , Doença Iatrogênica , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Ductos Biliares/lesões , Ductos Biliares/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Colecistectomia/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Tratamento Conservador
3.
Surgery ; 172(4): 1067-1075, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35965144

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The management of a vascular injury during cholecystectomy is still very complicated, especially in centers not specialized in complex hepatobiliary surgery. METHODS: This was a multi-institutional retrospective study in patients with vascular injuries during cholecystectomy from 18 centers in 4 countries. The aim of the study was to analyze the management of vascular injuries focusing on referral, time to perform the repair, and different treatments options outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were included. Twenty-nine patients underwent vascular repair (27.9%), 13 (12.5%) liver resection, and 1 liver transplant as a first treatment. Eighty-four (80.4%) vascular and biliary injuries occurred in nonspecialized centers and 45 (53.6%) were immediately transferred. Intraoperative diagnosed injuries were rare in referred patients (18% vs 84%, P = .001). The patients managed at the hospital where the injury occurred had a higher number of reoperations (64% vs 20%, P ˂ .001). The need for vascular reconstruction was associated with higher mortality (P = .04). Two of the 4 patients transplanted died. CONCLUSION: Vascular lesions during cholecystectomy are a potentially life-threatening complication. Management of referral to specialized centers to perform multiple complex multidisciplinary procedures should be mandatory. Late vascular repair has not shown to be associated with worse results.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Lesões do Sistema Vascular , Ductos Biliares/cirurgia , Colecistectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/etiologia , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/cirurgia
4.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 26(8): 1713-1723, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35790677

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic bile duct injury (IBDI) is a challenging surgical complication. IBDI management can be guided by artificial intelligence models. Our study identified the factors associated with successful initial repair of IBDI and predicted the success of definitive repair based on patient risk levels. METHODS: This is a retrospective multi-institution cohort of patients with IBDI after cholecystectomy conducted between 1990 and 2020. We implemented a decision tree analysis to determine the factors that contribute to successful initial repair and developed a risk-scoring model based on the Comprehensive Complication Index. RESULTS: We analyzed 748 patients across 22 hospitals. Our decision tree model was 82.8% accurate in predicting the success of the initial repair. Non-type E (p < 0.01), treatment in specialized centers (p < 0.01), and surgical repair (p < 0.001) were associated with better prognosis. The risk-scoring model was 82.3% (79.0-85.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI]) and 71.7% (63.8-78.7%, 95% CI) accurate in predicting success in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Surgical repair, successful initial repair, and repair between 2 and 6 weeks were associated with better outcomes. DISCUSSION: Machine learning algorithms for IBDI are a novel tool may help to improve the decision-making process and guide management of these patients.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Doenças dos Ductos Biliares , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Inteligência Artificial , Ductos Biliares/lesões , Ductos Biliares/cirurgia , Colecistectomia/efeitos adversos , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica , Complicações Intraoperatórias/cirurgia , Aprendizado de Máquina , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA