Effect of sufentanil on bispectral index in the elderly.

We examined the impact of adding sufentanil during anaesthesia induction with propofol on bispectral index values in elderly patients (≥ 65 years). Patients were randomly assigned to receive a target-controlled sufentanil infusion (effect-site concentration of 0.3 ng.ml-1 ) or matching placebo, followed by a target-controlled propofol induction (initial effect-site concentration of 0.5 µg.ml-1 ; step-wise increase of 0.5 µg.ml-1 ) until loss of consciousness defined as an Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score < 2. Seventy-one patients (sufentanil 35, placebo 36) completed the study. Mean (SD) age was 72.3 (5.8) years; 41% were women. At loss of consciousness, mean (SD) bispectral index value was 75.0 (8.6) with sufentanil and 70.0 (8.0) with placebo; mean difference -5.0 (95% confidence interval -8.9 to -1.1), p = 0.013. Post-hoc analyses suggest that the difference was significant in men only (mean difference -7.3 (-11.8 to -2.6), p = 0.003). Sufentanil co-induction with propofol results in higher bispectral index values at loss of consciousness in elderly patients.

Intravenous lidocaine has no impact on rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. Randomised study.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous lidocaine is increasingly used in surgical patients. As it has neuromuscular blocking effects, we tested the impact of an intravenous lidocaine infusion on the time course of a rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. METHODS: Fifty-two adults undergoing surgery were randomly allocated to intravenous lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion of 2 mg/kg/h or physiological saline (control) throughout surgery. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with a target-controlled propofol infusion and sufentanil. After loss of consciousness, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was given. Neuromuscular transmission was measured using train-of-four (TOF)-watch SX (Organon, Swords Co., Dublin, Ireland) acceleromyography. RESULTS: Onset time (to 95% depression of first twitch) was on average 113.9 s (standard deviation 35.3) with lidocaine and 119.5 s (44.9) with saline (P = 0.618). Total recovery time (TOF ratio 0.9) was on average 58.1 min (15.1) with lidocaine and 54.3 min (16.9) with saline (P = 0.394). Clinical duration (until first twitch has recovered to 25%) was on average 33.3 min (7.2) with lidocaine and 30.6 min (8.1) with saline (P = 0.21). Recovery index (time between 25% and 75% recovery of the first twitch) was on average 11.5 min (5.0) with lidocaine and 10.6 min (4.1) with saline (P = 0.458). Recovery time (between 25% recovery of the first twitch and TOF ratio 0.9) was on average 24.8 min (9.3) with lidocaine and 23.2 min (9.2) with saline (P = 0.541). CONCLUSION: A continuous intravenous infusion of lidocaine has no impact on the time course of the neuromuscular blockade induced by a standard intubation dose of rocuronium.

Time course of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block after pre-treatment with magnesium sulphate: a randomised study.

BACKGROUND: A previously published study suggested that pre-treatment with magnesium sulphate (MgSO(4)) had no impact on the speed of onset of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. We set out to verify this assumption. METHODS: Eighty patients (18-60 years) were randomly allocated to MgSO(4) 60 mg/kg or placebo (saline). Study drugs were given intravenously for 15 min before induction of anaesthesia with propofol, sufentanil and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. Anaesthesia was maintained with a target-controlled propofol infusion. Neuromuscular transmission was measured using train-of-four (TOF)-Watch SX acceleromyography. RESULTS: Onset was analysed in 37 MgSO(4) and 38 saline patients, and recovery in 35 MgSO(4) and 37 saline patients. Onset time (to 95% depression of T1) was on average 77 [SD=18] s with MgSO(4) and 120 [48] s with saline (P<0.001). The total recovery time (DurTOF0.9) was on average 73.2 [22] min with MgSO(4) and 57.8 [14.2] min with saline (P<0.003). The clinical duration (Dur25%) was on average 44.7 [14] min with MgSO(4) and 33.2 [8.1] min with saline (P<0.0002). The recovery index (Dur25-75%) was on average 14.0 [6] min with MgSO(4) and 11.2 [5.2] min with saline (P<0.02). The recovery time (Dur25%TOF0.9) was on average 28.5 [11.7] min with MgSO(4) and 24.7 [8.4] min with saline (P=0.28). CONCLUSION: Magnesium sulphate given 15 min before propofol anaesthesia reduces the onset time of rocuronium by about 35% and prolongs the total recovery time by about 25%.

Bispectral and spectral entropy indices at propofol-induced loss of consciousness in young and elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Bispectral (BIS) and state/response entropy (SE/RE) indices have been widely used to estimate depth of anaesthesia and sedation. In adults, independent of age, adequate and safe depth of anaesthesia for surgery is usually assumed when these indices are between 40 and 60. Since the EEG is changing with increasing age, we investigated the impact of advanced age on BIS, SE, and RE indices during induction. METHODS: BIS and SE/RE indices were recorded continuously in elderly (> or =65 yr) and young (< or =40 yr) surgical patients who received propofol until loss of consciousness (LOC) using stepwise increasing effect-site concentrations. LOC was defined as an observer assessment of alertness/sedation score <2, corresponding to the absence of response to mild prodding or shaking. RESULTS: We analysed 35 elderly [average age, 78 yr (range, 67-96)] and 34 young [35 (19-40)] patients. At LOC, all indices were significantly higher in elderly compared with young patients: BIS(LOC), median 70 (range, 58-91) vs 58 (40-70); SE(LOC), 71 (31-88) vs 55.5 (23-79); and RE(LOC), 79 (35-96) vs 59 (25-80) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). With all three monitors, only a minority of elderly patients lost consciousness within a 40-60 index range: two (5.7%) with BIS and RE each, and seven (20%) with SE. In young patients, the respective numbers were 20 (58.8%) for BIS, 13 (38.2%) for SE, and nine (26.5%) for RE. CONCLUSIONS: In adults undergoing propofol induction, BIS, SE, and RE indices at LOC are significantly affected by age.

Impact of the intubation model on the efficacy of rocuronium during rapid sequence intubation: systematic review of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Propofol-rocuronium is thought to be superior to thiopental-rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation (RSI). The role of the intubation model per se has never been investigated. METHODS: Randomized comparisons of rocuronium with succinylcholine for true RSI (administration of muscle relaxant immediately after the hypnotic, intubation within 60 s) or modified RSI (delay between administration of the hypnotic and the muscle relaxant, intubation within 60 s) were sought. Good or excellent intubation conditions were expressed as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Twelve trials (1,471 patients) used a true RSI. With propofol for induction, RR for good or excellent intubation conditions with conventional rocuronium doses (0.6-0.7 mg/kg) was 0.95 (95%CI, 0.90-1.00), with high doses (0.9-1.2 mg/kg) was 0.96 (0.92-1.01) compared with succinylcholine. With thiopental for induction, RR with conventional rocuronium doses was 0.69 (0.61-0.78) and with high doses was 0.99 (0.95-1.03). Nine trials (340 patients) used a modified RSI. With propofol for induction, RR with conventional rocuronium doses was 0.98 (0.91-1.06); data on high rocuronium doses were lacking. With thiopental for induction, RR with conventional rocuronium doses was 0.97 (0.92-1.02) and with high doses was 1.0. There was no evidence that concomitantly used opioids or the dose of the induction agent had an impact on intubation conditions, independent of the intubation model. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of rocuronium for RSI is influenced by both, the induction agent and the intubation model. To test the clinical usefulness of alternatives to succinylcholine for RSI, a true RSI model should be used.

The effect of cigarette smoking on the hypnotic efficacy of propofol.

The bispectral index (BIS) was used to examine the hypnotic efficacy of propofol in 25 smokers (20 cigarettes/day for 2 years) and 24 matched non-smokers (same gender, age, height, weight). BIS was recorded at baseline, at four incremental effect-site concentrations of propofol and at loss of consciousness. Compared with non-smokers, smokers were found to have higher BIS values at baseline (mean (SD)) (97 (1) vs 98 (1)), at 0.7 microg x ml(-1) (95 (3) vs 97 (1)) and at 1.1 microg x ml(-1) (89 (6) vs 94 (4)), p = 0.0099, and they lost consciousness at higher propofol concentrations (2.0 (0.4) vs 2.4 (0.8) microg x ml(-1)), p = 0.03, and at lower BIS values (66 (10) vs 60 (10)), p = 0.04. The hypnotic efficacy of propofol is reduced when used at low effect-site concentrations in smokers. This phenomenon may have some impact on the management of smokers undergoing sedation using target controlled infusion systems.