Association Between Baseline Driving Pressure and Mortality in Very Old Patients with ARDS.

RATIONALE: Due to effects of aging on the respiratory system, it is conceivable that the association between driving pressure and mortality depends on age. OBJECTIVE: We endeavored to evaluate whether the association between driving pressure and mortality of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) varies across the adult lifespan, hypothesizing that it is stronger in older, including very old (≥80 years), patients. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of individual patient-level data from seven ARDS Network and PETAL Network randomized controlled trials ("ARDSNet cohort"). We tested our hypothesis in a second, independent, national cohort ("Hellenic cohort"). We performed both binary logistic and Cox regression analyses including the interaction term between age (as a continuous variable) and driving pressure at baseline (i.e., the day of trial enrollment) as the predictor, and 90-day mortality as the dependent variable. FINDINGS: Based on data from 4567 patients with ARDS included in the ARDSNet cohort, we found that the effect of driving pressure on mortality depended on age (p=0.01 for the interaction between age as a continuous variable and driving pressure). The difference in driving pressure between survivors and non-survivors significantly changed across the adult lifespan (p<0.01). In both cohorts, a driving pressure threshold of 11 cmH2O was associated with mortality in very old patients. INTERPRETATION: Data from randomized controlled trials with strict inclusion criteria suggest that the effect of driving pressure on mortality of patients with ARDS may depend on age. These results may advocate for a personalized age-dependent mechanical ventilation approach.

Prone Position Ventilation in Severe ARDS due to COVID-19: Comparison between Prolonged and Intermittent Strategies.

Ventilation in a prone position (PP) for 12 to 16 h per day improves survival in ARDS. However, the optimal duration of the intervention is unknown. We performed a prospective observational study to compare the efficacy and safety of a prolonged PP protocol with conventional prone ventilation in COVID-19-associated ARDS. Prone position was undertaken if P/F < 150 with FiO2 > 0.6 and PEEP > 10 cm H2O. Oxygenation parameters and respiratory mechanics were recorded before the first PP cycle, at the end of the PP cycle and 4 h after supination. We included 63 consecutive intubated patients with a mean age of 63.5 years. Of them, 37 (58.7%) underwent prolonged prone position (PPP group) and 26 (41.3%) standard prone position (SPP group). The median cycle duration for the SPP group was 20 h and for the PPP group 46 h (p < 0.001). No significant differences in oxygenation, respiratory mechanics, number of PP cycles and rate of complications were observed between groups. The 28-day survival was 78.4% in the PPP group versus 65.4% in the SPP group (p = 0.253). Extending the duration of PP was as safe and efficacious as conventional PP, but did not confer any survival benefit in a cohort of patients with severe ARDS due to COVID-19.

COVID-19 Outcomes and Diabetes Mellitus: A Comprehensive Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

The link between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and the severe outcomes of COVID-19 has raised concerns about the optimal management of patients with T2D. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of T2D patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and explore the potential associations between chronic T2D treatments and adverse outcomes. This was a multicenter prospective cohort study of T2D patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Greece during the third wave of the pandemic (February-June 2021). Among the 354 T2D patients included in this study, 63 (18.6%) died during hospitalization, and 16.4% required ICU admission. The use of DPP4 inhibitors for the chronic management of T2D was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio (adj. OR) 2.639, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.148-6.068, p = 0.022), ICU admission (adj. OR = 2.524, 95% CI: 1.217-5.232, p = 0.013), and progression to ARDS (adj. OR = 2.507, 95% CI: 1.278-4.916, p = 0.007). Furthermore, the use of DPP4 inhibitors was significantly associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events (adjusted OR of 2.249, 95% CI: 1.073-4.713, p = 0.032) during hospitalization. These findings highlight the importance of considering the potential impact of chronic T2D treatment regiments on COVID-19 and the need for further studies to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.