RESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to systematically review and synthesize factors that influence learners' perceptions of credibility when feedback is provided by an authority figure in a healthcare environment. METHODS: This study reviewed literature from medicine, psychology, and education using systematic review and qualitative synthesis methods. In a multi-step process, major electronic bibliographic databases were searched for relevant studies until October 2020. RESULTS: The search identified 9216 articles. A total of 134 abstracts underwent full-text review. Of these, 22 articles met inclusion criteria. The studies were heterogenous and the majority utilized a qualitative design with interviews and focus groups. A few studies employed mixed methodology (n = 2) and two studies used a quantitative design. Four main themes were identified: feedback characteristics, context of feedback, source credibility, and recipient characteristics. CONCLUSION: As programs implement major educational change initiatives to create more formative assessment practices, feedback will become even more crucial. The four main themes identified are important factors that contribute to the perception of feedback credibility. While the factors are described independently, they may be viewed as interrelated and the association between these factors and feedback may be driven more by learning culture than each characteristic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-020-01167-w.
RESUMO
Initial assessment and triage of burns are guided by the American Burn Association criteria for referral to a burn center. These criteria are sensitive but not specific and can potentially lead to over-triage and "unnecessary" clinic visits. We are a Level 1 trauma center with burn subspecialty care, and due to the COVID-19 pandemic, referrals to our multidisciplinary outpatient burn clinic required triaging for virtual care appointments. In order to improve the triage process, we retrospectively reviewed our outpatient burn clinic referrals over a 2-year period, 2018 to 2019, for adherence to American Burn Association criteria. We collected data pertaining to patient and burn characteristics, as well as treatment outcome, to characterize referrals not requiring an in-person appointment. Of the 244 patients referred, 73% met the referral criteria, with 45% of these patients being healed at the first visit and 14.6% requiring surgical management. Mean time from injury to first visit was 9.7 days (mode 6), and the average number of visits was 2. Overall, mean burn size was 2%, with the majority of injuries being partial thickness (71%), located in the hand or extremity (77%). There was a fairly equal distribution of contact (36%), flame (21%), and scald (26%) burns. This study highlights the nonspecific nature of the American Burn Association referral criteria. We found that pediatric and hand burns in particular were over-triaged and lead to "unnecessary" appointments. This information is useful to help adjust referral criteria and to guide triaging of appointments with the evolution of telehealth and virtual care.
Assuntos
Queimaduras/terapia , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Triagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Unidades de Queimados , Queimaduras/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Radiofibrosis of breast tissue compromises breast reconstruction by interfering with tissue viability and healing. Autologous fat transfer may reduce radiotherapy-related tissue injury, but graft survival is compromised by the fibrotic microenvironment. Elevated expression of receptor for hyaluronan-mediated motility (RHAMM; also known as hyaluronan-mediated motility receptor, or HMMR) in wounds decreases adipogenesis and increases fibrosis. The authors therefore developed RHAMM peptide mimetics to block RHAMM profibrotic signaling following radiation. They propose that this blocking peptide will decrease radiofibrosis and establish a microenvironment favoring adipose-derived stem cell survival using a rat mammary fat pad model. METHODS: Rat mammary fat pads underwent a one-time radiation dose of 26 Gy. Irradiated (n = 10) and nonirradiated (n = 10) fat pads received a single intramammary injection of a sham injection or peptide NPI-110. Skin changes were examined clinically. Mammary fat pad tissue was processed for fibrotic and adipogenic markers using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical analysis. RESULTS: Clinical assessments and molecular analysis confirmed radiation-induced acute skin changes and radiation-induced fibrosis in rat mammary fat pads. Peptide treatment reduced fibrosis, as detected by polarized microscopy of picrosirius red staining, increased collagen ratio of 3:1, reduced expression of collagen-1 crosslinking enzymes lysyl-oxidase, transglutaminase 2, and transforming growth factor ß1 protein, and increased adiponectin, an antifibrotic adipokine. RHAMM was expressed in stromal cell subsets and was downregulated by the RHAMM peptide mimetic. CONCLUSION: Results from this study predict that blocking RHAMM function in stromal cell subsets can provide a postradiotherapy microenvironment more suitable for fat grafting and breast reconstruction.