Economic burden in non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: The French Lymphoma Study Association SIMONAL cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: No study has focused on the economic burden in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survivors, even though this knowledge is essential. This study reports on health care resource use and associated health care costs as well as related factors in a series of 1671 French long-term NHL survivors. METHODS: Health care costs were measured from the payer perspective. Only direct medical costs (medical consultations, outpatient treatments, hospitalizations, and medical transport) in the past 12 months were included (reference year 2015). Multiple linear regression was used to search for explanatory factors of health care costs. RESULTS: In total, 1100 survivors (66%) reported having used at least 1 health care resource, and 867 (52%) reported having used at least 1 outpatient treatment. After the authors accounted for missing data, the mean health care cost was estimated at €702 ± €2221. Hospitalizations and outpatient treatments were the main cost drivers. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. For the 1100 survivors who reported using at least 1 health care resource, the mean health care cost was €1067 ± €2268. Several factors demonstrated statistically significant relationships with health care costs. For instance, cardiovascular disorders increased costs by 66% ± 16%. In contrast, rituximab or autologous stem cell transplantation as initial therapy had no effect on health care costs. CONCLUSIONS: The consideration of economic constraints in health care is now a reality. This retrospective study reports on a better understanding of health care resource use and associated health care costs as well as related factors. It may help health care professionals in their ongoing efforts to design person-centered health care pathways.

Influence of factor VIII level and its inhibitor titer on the therapeutic response to corticosteroids alone in the management of acquired hemophilia: A retrospective single-center study.

The treatment of acquired hemophilia (AH) involves discussing whether corticosteroids should be administered alone or combined with immunosuppressant drugs, which increase the risk of infection especially in elderly patients and/or those with autoimmunity or neoplastic diseases, who represent the target population of the disease. Prognostic factors highlighting adequate responses to corticosteroids alone must be identified for satisfactory clinical response and lower infectious risk.We aimed to evaluating the efficacy of corticosteroids alone in the management of AH depending on factor VIII (FVIII, ≥ or <1 IU/dL) levels and/or inhibitor (INH, ≤ or >20 Bethesda units per milliliter [BU/mL]) titer.We conducted a retrospective single-center study including 24 patients treated for AH with corticosteroids alone.Time to achieve partial remission (PR: absence of hemorrhage and FVIII levels >50 IU/dL) was significantly shorter in the FVIII ≥ 1 IU/dL group than in the FVIII < 1 IU/dL group (20 [10-55] vs 39 [20-207] days, P = 0.044) and in the INH ≤ 20 BU/mL and FVIII ≥ 1 IU/dL group than in the FVIII < 1 IU/dL and/or INH > 20 BU/mL group (15 [11-35] vs 41 [20-207] days, P = 0.003). In both subgroups, time to achieve complete remission (CR: negative INH and corticosteroids below 10 mg/d) was also significantly shorter than that observed in the opposite subgroups. INH titer, considered alone, did not affect the length of time to onset of PR or CR. CR and PR rates did not differ significantly depending on these variables.Our study suggests that in AH, patients with FVIII levels ≥1 IU/dL considered alone or combined with INH titer ≤20 BU/mL could be treated by corticosteroids alone, given that this subgroup of patients displayed faster therapeutic responses to this strategy.