Different Techniques of Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Their Efficacy: A Systematic Review.

Background: Atrial fibrillation has been identified as an independent risk factor for thromboembolic events. Since 1948 different surgical techniques have described the feasibility and the rationale of left atrial surgical appendage closure. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the reported patency rates of different surgical techniques. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two independent investigators searched the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and OVID® (Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands) to identify relevant studies. Consecutively, a PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes) strategy assessment of literature was performed to search eventual other relevant studies that may have been ignored. Results: A total of 42 studies were included in our analysis. The total number of patients who underwent surgical left atrial appendage closure was 5671, and in 61.2% an imaging follow up was performed, mostly with transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation. Success rate for the different techniques was: Clip deployment 98%; Lariat procedure 88%; Surgical amputation 91%; Endocardial suture 74.3%, Epicardial suture 65%; Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) ligation 60.9%; Stapler technique with excision of left atrial appendage (LAA) 100%; Stapler without excision 70%. Conclusions: To date, data on surgical left atrial appendage closure are poor and not standardized, even if reported rates are acceptable and comparable to transcatheter procedures. If validated on large-scale non-retrospective and multicentric studies, these promising developments may offer a valuable alternative for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and ineligible for oral anticoagulation therapy.

Acute thrombotic occlusion of a brachiocephalic branch graft and pseudoaneurysm formation after debranching surgery for a "non-A non-B" aortic dissection.

Non-A non-B aortic dissection is a pathology with potentially life-threatening consequences, and aortic debranching followed by thoracic endovascular aortic repair is one of the possible treatment options. Branch graft occlusion is an infrequent complication and no definite guidelines exist about postoperative antithrombotic therapy nor preoperative evaluation of individual anatomical characteristics-in particular regarding cerebral circulation-in such patients. We present the case of a 54-year-old man undergoing an aortic debranching procedure for a thoracoabdominal aortic dissection originating in the aortic arch, complicated by thrombotic occlusion of the brachiocephalic branch of the prosthesis and pseudoaneurysm of the ascending aorta, with our management and considerations.

Potential Role of eNOS Genetic Variants in Ischemic Heart Disease Susceptibility and Clinical Presentation.

Background: IHD is determined by an inadequate coronary blood supply to the myocardium, and endothelial dysfunction may represent one of the main pathophysiological mechanisms involved. Genetic predisposition to endothelial dysfunction has been associated with IHD and its clinical manifestation. However, studies are often confounding and inconclusive for several reasons, such as interethnic differences. Validation of results in larger cohorts and new populations is needed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the associations between the allelic variants of the eNOS rs1799983 single-nucleotide polymorphism, IHD susceptibility and its clinical presentation. Methods: A total of 362 consecutive patients with suspected myocardial ischemia were enrolled. Patients were divided into three groups: G1, coronary artery disease (CAD); G2, coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD); and G3, a control group with anatomically and functionally normal coronary arteries. Analysis of three allelic variants, GT, GG and TT, of rs1799983 for the NOS3 gene, encoding for eNOS, was performed. Results: rs1799983_GT was significantly more expressed by the ischemic groups (G1 and G2) compared to G3. The TT variant was significantly more expressed by the G1 group, compared to the G2 group. Among ischemic patients, GT was significantly more expressed in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) presentation, compared to other clinical presentations. In the multivariate analysis, the allelic variant GT was found to potentially represent an independent predictor of IHD and ACS presentation. Conclusion: The presence of the SNP rs1799983_GT, encoding for eNOS, is an independent risk factor for IHD and, remarkably, for ACS presentation, independently of cardiovascular risk factors. These results may be useful for the prediction of IHD development, particularly with an acute clinical manifestation. They may allow the early identification of patients at high risk of developing IHD with an ACS, promoting a genetic-based prevention strategy against IHD.

Susceptibility to ischaemic heart disease: Focusing on genetic variants for ATP-sensitive potassium channel beyond traditional risk factors.

AIMS: Ischaemic heart disease is classically associated with coronary artery disease. Recent evidences showed the correlation between coronary microvascular dysfunction and ischaemic heart disease, even independently of coronary artery disease. Ion channels represent the final effectors of blood flow regulation mechanisms and their genetic variants, in particular of Kir6.2 subunit of the ATP-sensitive potassium channel (KATP), are reported to be involved in ischaemic heart disease susceptibility. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the role of KATP channel and its genetic variants in patients with ischaemic heart disease and evaluate whether differences exist between coronary artery disease and coronary microvascular dysfunction. METHODS: A total of 603 consecutive patients with indication for coronary angiography due to suspected myocardial ischaemia were enrolled. Patients were divided into three groups: coronary artery disease (G1), coronary microvascular dysfunction (G2) and normal coronary arteries (G3). Analysis of four single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs5215, rs5216, rs5218 and rs5219) of the KCNJ11 gene encoding for Kir6.2 subunit of the KATP channel was performed. RESULTS: rs5215 A/A and G/A were significantly more represented in G1, while rs5215 G/G was significantly more represented in G3, rs5216 G/G and C/C were both more represented in G3, rs5218 C/C was more represented in G1 and rs5219 G/A was more represented in G1, while rs5219 G/G was significantly more represented in G2. At multivariate analysis, single nucleotide polymorphism rs5215_G/G seems to represent an ischaemic heart disease independent protective factor. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the potential role of KATP genetic variants in ischaemic heart disease susceptibility, as an independent protective factor. They may lead to a future perspective for gene therapy against ischaemic heart disease.