Correction to: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and Tractography of the spinal cord in pediatric population with spinal lipomas: preliminary study.

The article which was recently published contained error. The figures and figure captions were interchanged during the publication process of the paper.

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and Tractography of the spinal cord in pediatric population with spinal lipomas: preliminary study.

PURPOSE: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) allows studying the micro and macro architecture. One of the major challenges in dysraphism is to know the morphologic organization of the spinal cord. In a preliminary work, spinal lipoma was chosen for analyzing the micro-architecture parameters and fiber morphology of the spinal cord by DTI with tractography. METHODS: Twelve patients (0-8 years) related to spinal lipomas treated between May 2017 and March 2018 were included. Tractography reconstruction of the conus medullaris of 12 patients were obtained using the MedINRIA software. The diffusion parameters have been calculated by Osirix DTImap plugin. RESULTS: We found a significant difference in the FA (p = 0.024) between two age groups (< 24 months old and > 24 months old). However, no significant differences in the mean values of FA, RD, and MD between the level of the lipoma and the level above were noted. The tractography obtained in each case was coherent with morphologic sequences and reproducible. The conus medullaris was deformed and shifted. Destruction or disorganization of fibers and any passing inside the lipomas was not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Tractography of the conus medullaris in a very young pediatric population (0-8 years old) with a spinal lipoma is possible, reproductive, and allows visualization of the spinal cord within the dysraphism. Analysis of the FA shows that the presence of a lipoma seems to have an effect on the myelination of the conus medullaris. It is during the probable myelination phase that the majority of symptoms appear. Is the myelination per se the cause?

[The ethics of fetal myelomeningocele surgery]. / Réflexions éthiques concernant la chirurgie fœtale de réparation des myéloméningocèles.

Fetal myelomeningocele surgery was introduced in France in 2014. Developments in prenatal diagnosis of neural tube defects have accompanied the development of prenatal diagnosis. This fetal surgery represents one of the three possible care paths for pregnant women faced with this prenatal diagnosis. The ethical issues of this fetal surgery are discussed and in particular regarding prenatal counselling and patient autonomy of choice.

Endoscopic versus stereotactic procedure for pineal tumour biopsies: Comparative review of the literature and learning from a 25-year experience.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pineal tumours account for 1% to 4% of brain tumours in adults and for around 10% in children. Except in a few cases where germ cell markers are elevated, accurate histological samples are mandatory to initiate the treatment. Open surgery still has a high morbidity and is often needless. Biopsies can either be obtained by endoscopic or stereotactic procedures. METHODS: Following an extensive review of the literature (PubMed 1970-2013; keywords pineal tumour, biopsy; English and French), 33 studies were analysed and relevant data compared regarding the type of procedure, diagnosis rate, cerebrospinal fluid diversion type and rate, perioperative mortality, morbidity. RESULTS: Endoscopic and stereotactic biopsies showed a diagnosis rate of 81.1% (20%-100%) and 93.7% (82%-100%), respectively. Endoscopic biopsies involved 21.0% of minor and 2.0% of major complications whereas stereotactic biopsies involved 6.4% of minor and 1.6% of major complications. The most frequently reported complication was haemorrhage for both endoscopic and stereotactic procedures, accounting for 4.8% and 4.3%, respectively. Mortality rate was low for both endoscopic and stereotactic procedures, equal to 0.4% and 1.3%, respectively. Local experience of stereotactic biopsies was also reported and corroborated the previous data. CONCLUSIONS: The difference between both procedures is not statistically significant (p>0.05) across large series (≥20patients). Nevertheless, tissue diagnosis appears less accurate with endoscopic procedures than with stereotactic procedures (81.1% versus 93.7%, weighted mean across all series). In our opinion, the neuroendoscopic approach is the best tool for managing hydrocephalus, whereas stereotactic biopsies remain the best way to obtain a tissue diagnosis with accuracy and low morbidity.