Everyone else is using it, so why isn't the UK? Silver diamine fluoride for children and young people.

INTRODUCTION: Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is used to prevent and arrest caries across the globe, particularly in the developing world. Whilst its use in the Western World is increasing, it is not yet routinely used in the United Kingdom, nor is it advocated by our national guidelines. OBJECTIVES: To explore the literature surrounding the use of SDF, and consider the reasons why SDF has not yet been widely adopted in the United Kingdom (UK). DISCUSSION: There is a growing evidence base for the use of SDF for the arrest and prevention of dental caries in the primary and permanent dentition. Potential side effects include staining of carious tooth structure, but in some cases this is acceptable to parents. There is no evidence for the cost effectiveness of SDF, although it may be a reasonably cost-effective option. CONCLUSION: SDF is perhaps not yet widely adopted in the UK due to a perceived parental concern about its staining effect. With a growing evidence base and reportedly higher efficacy than fluoride varnish for caries prevention and arrest, SDF has the potential to play an important role in managing dental disease in children and young people in both primary and secondary care.

Dental RECUR Randomized Trial to Prevent Caries Recurrence in Children.

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a dental nurse-delivered intervention-the Dental RECUR Brief Negotiated Interview for Oral Health (DR-BNI)-in reducing the recurrence of dental caries in children who have a primary tooth extracted. It was based on a 2-arm multicenter randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment. Participants were 5- to 7-y-old children (n = 241) scheduled to have primary teeth extracted in 12 UK centers. Test intervention parents (n = 119) received DR-BNI led by trained dental nurses. DR-BNI is a 30-min structured conversation informed by motivational interviewing with a forward focus to prevent future caries. Preventive goals are agreed, and a review appointment is made with child's general dental practitioner, who is advised to treat the child as being at high caries risk. The control intervention (n = 122) was a parent-nurse conversation about child's future tooth eruption, with advice given to visit a general dental practitioner as usual. At baseline, the DR-BNI group's mean dmft was 6.8, and the control group's was 6.3. A median of 5 teeth were extracted, mainly under general anesthesia. Final dental assessments were conducted by a single examiner visiting 189 schools 2 y after intervention; 193 (80%) of 241 children were examined. In the control group, 62% developed new caries in teeth that were caries-free or unerupted at baseline, as compared with 44% in the test group, a significant reduction (P = 0.021). The odds of new caries experience occurring were reduced by 51% in the DR-BNI group as compared with control. There was a 29% decrease in the relative risk of new caries experience in the DR-BNI group as compared with control. This single low-cost, low-intensity intervention was successful in significantly reducing the risk of recurrence of dental caries in children. This trial has implications for changing pediatric dental practice internationally. Training in and implementation of a motivational interviewing-informed brief intervention provides opportunities for dental nurses to facilitate behavior change improving the oral health of children at high caries risk (ISRCTN 24958829).

Child Caries Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Dental Practice.

This multicenter 3-arm, parallel-group, patient-randomized controlled trial compared clinical effectiveness of 3 treatment strategies over 3 y for managing dental caries in primary teeth in UK primary dental care. Participants aged 3 to 7 y with at least 1 primary molar with dentinal carious lesion were randomized across 3 arms (1:1:1 via centrally administered system with variable-length random permuted blocks): C+P, conventional carious lesion management (complete carious tooth tissue removal and restoration placement) with prevention; B+P, biological management (sealing in carious tooth tissue restoratively) with prevention; and PA, prevention alone (diet, plaque removal, fluorides, and fissure sealants). Parents, children, and dentists were not blind to allocated arm. Co-primary outcomes were 1) the proportion of participants with at least 1 episode of dental pain and/or infection and 2) the number of episodes of dental pain and/or infection during follow-up (minimum, 23 mo). In sum, 1,144 participants were randomized (C+P, n = 386; B+P, n = 381; PA, n = 377) by 72 general dental practitioners, of whom 1,058 (C+P, n = 352; B+P, n = 352; PA, n = 354) attended at least 1 study visit and were included in the primary analysis. The median follow-up was 33.8 mo (interquartile range, 23.8 to 36.7). Proportions of participants with at least 1 episode of dental pain and/or infection were as follows: C+P, 42%; B+P, 40%; PA, 45%. There was no evidence of a difference in incidence of dental pain and/or infection when B+P (adjusted risk difference [97.5% CI]: -2% [-10% to 6%]) or PA (4% [-4% to 12%]) was compared with C+P. The mean (SD) number of episodes of dental pain and/or infection were as follows: C+P, 0.62 (0.95); B+P, 0.58 (0.87); and PA, 0.72 (0.98). Superiority could not be concluded for number of episodes between B+P (adjusted incident rate ratio (97.5% CI): 0.95 [0.75 to 1.21]) or PA (1.18 [0.94 to 1.48]) and C+P. In conclusion, there was no evidence of a difference among the 3 treatment approaches for incidence or number of episodes of dental pain and/or infection experienced by these participants with high caries risk and established disease (trial registration: ISRCTN77044005).

Validity and reproducibility of ICDAS II in primary teeth.

The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the validity and reproducibility of the ICDAS II (International Caries Detection and Assessment System) criteria in primary teeth. Three trained examiners independently examined 112 extracted primary molars, ranging from clinically sound to cavitated, set up in groups of 4 to mimic their anatomical positions. The most advanced caries on the occlusal and approximal surfaces was recorded. Subsequently the teeth were serially sectioned and histological validation was undertaken using the Downer and Ekstrand-Ricketts-Kidd (ERK) scoring systems. For occlusal surfaces at the D(1)/ERK(1) threshold, the mean specificity was 90.0%, with a sensitivity of 75.4%. For approximal surfaces, the specificity and sensitivity were 85.4 and 66.4%, respectively. For occlusal surfaces at ICDAS code > or =3 (ERK(3) threshold), the mean specificity and sensitivity were 87.0 and 78.1%, respectively. For approximal surfaces, the equivalent values were 90.6 and 75.3%. At the D(3) threshold for occlusal surfaces, the mean specificity and sensitivity were 92.8 and 63.1%, and for approximal surfaces 94.2 and 58.3%, respectively. Mean intraexaminer reproducibility (Cohen's kappa) ranged from 0.78 to 0.81 at the ICDAS code > or =1 cut-off and at the ICDAS code > or =3 cut-off from 0.74 to 0.76. Interexaminer reproducibility was lower, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 at the ICDAS code > or =1 cut-off and from 0.66 to 0.73 at the ICDAS code > or =3 cut-off. In conclusion, the validity and reproducibility of the ICDAS II criteria were acceptable when applied to primary molar teeth.

Knowledge may not be the best target for strategies to influence evidence-based practice: using psychological models to understand RCT effects.

BACKGROUND: Interventions to enhance the implementation of evidence-based practice have a varied success rate. This may be due to a lack of understanding of the mechanism by which interventions achieve results. PURPOSE: Use psychological models to further an understanding of trial effects by piggy-backing on a randomised controlled trial testing 2 interventions (Audit & Feedback and Computer-aided Learning) in relation to evidence-based third molar management. METHOD: All participants of the parent trial (64 General Dental Practitioners across Scotland), regardless of intervention group, were invited to complete a questionnaire assessing knowledge and predictive measures from Theory of Planned Behaviour and Social Cognitive Theory. The main outcome was evidence-based extracting behaviour derived from patient records. RESULTS: Neither intervention significantly influenced behaviour in the parent trial. This study revealed that the interventions did enhance knowledge, but knowledge did not predict extraction behaviour. However, the interventions did not influence variables that did predict extraction behaviour (attitude, perceived behavioural control, self-efficacy). Results suggest both interventions failed because neither influenced possible mediating beliefs for the target behavior. CONCLUSION: Using psychology models elucidated intervention effects and allowed the identification of factors associated with evidence based practice, providing the basis for improving future intervention design.

A radiographic method of estimating surface area of amalgam restorations.

UNLABELLED: Mercury released from the surface of amalgam fillings has been linked to a variety of disorders, but without proof of correlation. Studies use surface counts to estimate this variable, but large-scale studies would require a tool to rapidly and accurately assess restoration surface area. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated digital analysis of conventional dental radiographs as a means of estimating amalgam surface area. METHODS: Amalgam fillings were placed in 40 typodont teeth, the surface areas of the restorations were determined by measuring standardized photomicrographs of each surface. The teeth were radiographed, and area of the radiographic image of the restorations was measured. Data were used to produce expressions to estimate actual area from radiographic area. RESULTS: Regression analyses showed that surface area estimation from radiographic area was more accurate than estimation from surface counts. The accuracy of the surface area count was further improved by combining the radiographic area with a photographic occlusal area measurement or surface count, the latter giving the highest correlation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that two-dimensional dental radiographs may be used to estimate surface area of amalgam restorations.

Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health.

BACKGROUND: Removing dental plaque may play a key role maintaining oral health. There is conflicting evidence for the relative merits of manual and powered toothbrushing in achieving this. OBJECTIVES: To compare manual and powered toothbrushes in relation to the removal of plaque, the health of the gingivae, staining and calculus, dependability, adverse effects and cost. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register (to 17/06/2004) and Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2004); MEDLINE (January 1966 to week 2 June 2004); EMBASE (January 1980 to week 2 2004) and CINAHL (January 1982 to week 2 June 2004). Manufacturers were contacted for additional data. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were selected for the following criteria: design-random allocation of participants; participants - general public with uncompromised manual dexterity; intervention - unsupervised manual and powered toothbrushing for at least 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were the change in plaque and gingivitis over that period. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Six authors independently extracted information. The effect measure for each meta-analysis was the standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects models. Potential sources of heterogeneity were examined, along with sensitivity analyses for quality and publication bias. For discussion purposes SMD was translated into percentage change. MAIN RESULTS: Forty-two trials, involving 3855 participants, provided data. Brushes with a rotation oscillation action removed plaque and reduced gingivitis more effectively than manual brushes in the short term and reduced gingivitis scores in studies over 3 months. For plaque at 1 to 3 months the SMD was -0.43 (95% CI: -0.72 to -0.14), for gingivitis SMD -0.62 (95% CI: -0.90 to -0.34) representing an 11% difference on the Quigley Hein plaque index and a 6% reduction on the Loe and Silness gingival index. At over 3 months the SMD for plaque was -1.29 (95% CI: -2.67 to 0.08) and for gingivitis was -0.51 (-0.76 to -0.25) representing a 17% reduction on the Ainamo Bay bleeding on probing index. There was heterogeneity between the trials for the short-term follow up. Sensitivity analyses revealed the results to be robust when selecting trials of high quality. There was no evidence of any publication bias. No other powered designs were as consistently superior to manual toothbrushes.Cost, reliability and side effects were inconsistently reported. Any reported side effects were localised and temporary. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Powered toothbrushes with a rotation oscillation action reduce plaque and gingivitis more than manual toothbrushing. Observation of methodological guidelines and greater standardisation of design would benefit both future trials and meta-analyses.

A multicentre, multicycle audit of the prescribing practices of three paediatric dental departments in the North of England.

BACKGROUND: Odontogenic infections are frequently treated with antimicrobials. The inappropriate use of these medications has led to bacterial resistance and the development of species which are resistant to the antimicrobials currently available. This has serious implications for global public health. AIM: A multicycle clinical audit was carried out to compare the prescribing practices of three paediatric dental departments in the North of England. RESULTS: Results revealed deficiencies in prescribing practices in all three centres. Following education and the provision of an aide-memoire in subsequent cycles, improvements were seen in appropriateness of prescribing, increasing from 28% in the first cycle, to 71% in the third cycle.

Visual Inspection for Caries Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

We aimed to perform a systematic review including a meta-analysis to evaluate the overall accuracy of visual methods for detecting carious lesions and to identify possible sources of heterogeneity among the studies included. Two reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and other sources through July 2014 to identify published and nonpublished studies in English. Studies of visual inspection were included that 1) assessed accuracy of the method in detecting caries lesions; 2) were performed on occlusal, proximal, or free smooth surfaces in primary or permanent teeth; 3) had a reference standard; and 4) reported sufficient data about sample size and accuracy of methods. The data were used to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristics curve. Heterogeneity of the studies was also assessed. A total of 102 manuscripts (from 5,808 articles initially identified) and 1 abstract (from 168) met the inclusion criteria. In general, the analysis demonstrated that the visual method had good accuracy for detecting caries lesions. Although laboratory and clinical studies have presented similar accuracy, clinically obtained specificity was higher. We also observed moderate to high heterogeneity and evidence of publication bias in most papers. Moreover, studies employing widely recognized visual scoring systems presented significantly better accuracy as compared to studies that used their own criteria. In conclusion, visual caries detection method has good overall performance. Furthermore, although the identified studies had high heterogeneity and risk of bias, the use of detailed and validated indices seems to improve the accuracy of the method.

Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health.

BACKGROUND: Specific oral bacteria, generically known as "dental plaque" are the primary cause of gingivitis (gum disease) and caries. The removal of dental plaque is thought to play a key role in the maintenance of oral health. There is conflicting evidence for the relative merits of manual and powered toothbrushing in achieving this. OBJECTIVES: To compare manual and powered toothbrushes in relation to the removal of plaque, the health of the gingivae, staining and calculus, dependability, adverse effects and cost. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 22/8/02); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2002); MEDLINE (January 1966 to week 5 2002); EMBASE (January 1980 to week 3 July 2002) and CINAHL (January 1982 to June 2002). Manufacturers of powered toothbrushes were contacted for additional published and unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were selected if they met the following criteria: design-random allocation of participants; participants-general public with uncompromised manual dexterity; intervention- supervised manual and powered toothbrushing for at least four weeks; primary outcomes-the change in plaque and gingivitis over that period. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Six reviewers independently extracted information in duplicate. Indices for plaque and gingivitis were expressed as standardised values for each study. The effect measure for each meta-analysis was the standardised mean difference (SMD) with the appropriate 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effect models. Potential sources of heterogeneity were examined, along with sensitivity analyses for the items assessed for quality and publication bias. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-nine trials, involving 2,547 participants, provided data for the meta-analysis. Brushes that worked with a rotation oscillation action removed more plaque and reduced gingivitis more effectively than manual brushes in the short and long term. For plaque at one to three months the SMD was -0.44 (95% CI: -0.66 to -0.21), for gingivitis SMD -0.44 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.15). These represented an 11% reduction on the Quigley Hein plaque index and a 6% reduction on the Löe and Silness gingival index. At over three months the effects were SMD for plaque -1.15 (95% CI: -2.02,-0.29) and SMD for gingivitis -0.51 (95% CI: -0.76, -0.25). These represented a 7% reduction on the Quigley Hein Plaque Index and a 17% reduction on the Ainamo Bay Bleeding on Probing Gingival Index. The heterogeneity found in these meta-analyses for short term trials was caused by one trial that had exceptionally low standard deviations. Sensitivity analyses revealed the results to be robust when selecting trials of high quality. There was no evidence of any publication bias. No other powered brush designs were consistently superior to manual toothbrushes. In these trials, data on cost, reliability and side effects were inconsistently reported. Those side effects that were reported on in the trials were localised and temporary. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Powered toothbrushes with a rotation oscillation action achieve a modest reduction in plaque and gingivitis compared to manual toothbrushing. Observation of methodological guidelines and greater standardisation of design would benefit both future trials and meta-analyses.

Effect of diagnostic threshold on the validity and reliability of epidemiological caries diagnosis using the Dundee Selectable Threshold Method for caries diagnosis (DSTM).

OBJECTIVES: To develop a method for recording dental caries at the D1 (enamel and dentine) diagnostic threshold (without loss of D3 information) and assess its reliability, 'benchmark' validity and potential effects on reported caries prevalence and needs assessment. METHODS: Multi-examiner training, calibration and validation trial. Two groups of 10 dental examiners were trained to diagnose dental caries at the D1 (enamel and dentine) diagnostic threshold under the conditions of a caries prevalence survey, prior to a calibration trial being undertaken. RESULTS: Where 'experienced examiners' were trained to examine at the D1 (enamel and dentine) diagnostic threshold, under the conditions of a cross-sectional epidemiological survey, there was no significant deterioration in inter-examiner agreement on the assessment of teeth and a significant difference in one of two comparisons on the assessment of surfaces using the kappa statistic. Assessed against a benchmark examiner, there was no significant loss of sensitivity at the D1 diagnostic threshold compared with the D3 threshold and, although there was a significant loss of specificity at the D1 threshold, all specificity values could be considered to be high. CONCLUSIONS: Modifying the diagnostic criteria typically used in surveys of caries prevalence (to allow assessment of the levels of enamel caries which could benefit from preventive care as well as dentinal caries requiring restorative care) in adolescents does not adversely affect the reliability or benchmark validity of experienced examiners to a significant degree.

In vitro validity of the Dundee Selectable Threshold Method for caries diagnosis (DSTM).

OBJECTIVES: It is not generally possible to assess diagnostic accuracy in dental surveys as no histological 'gold standards' are available, therefore examiner agreement tends to be used as a proxy for accuracy. The aim of this study was to investigate, using extracted teeth in arch models, the in vitro validity of a diagnostic system to assess caries at the D1 (enamel and dentine) and D3 (dentine) diagnostic thresholds, for epidemiological purposes. METHOD: Two groups of 10 dental examiners trained in the use of the Dundee Selectable Threshold Method for caries diagnosis (DSTM) each examined (on two occasions) 160 extracted permanent molar and premolar teeth set in arch models in phantom heads according to the codes and criteria of the DSTM. The teeth were subsequently radiographed and sectioned to provide validation of the diagnoses. RESULTS: Intra-examiner agreement according to the kappa statistic was substantial. In general terms the results of the in vitro validation exercise demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity values at the D1 diagnostic threshold than were found at the D3 diagnostic threshold with a consequent loss of specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this in vitro validation exercise demonstrate that at the D1 diagnostic threshold the sensitivity of the DSTM was greater than at the D3 threshold indicating no loss of diagnostic accuracy at the D1 threshold.

A proposed method for assessing the quality of sealants--the CCC Sealant Evaluation System.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper is to introduce the C (colour) C (coverage) C (caries) Sealant Evaluation System and to present results of its use on a sample of adolescent patients in Scotland. METHODS: Baseline data are presented from a 3-year prospective study in general dental practices across Scotland. Subjects were examined under standardised conditions by one trained and calibrated examiner. RESULTS: 78.6% of the subjects had one or more sealed teeth, over half of these sealants being judged inadequate. There was a low prevalence of dentine caries associated with the sealed teeth (2.8%). The CCC sealant Evaluation System proved practical as demonstrated by its use during the project and had substantial intra-examiner reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: There was a high level of sealant provision; however, this provision may not be optimal in terms of both targeting of provision and sealant maintenance. The CCC sealant Evaluation System appeared to be a useful assessment tool for assessing sealed surfaces.

General dental practitioners diagnostic and treatment decisions related to fissure sealed surfaces.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in-vitro study was to assess the validity and reproducibility of the diagnosis and treatment planned for occlusal surfaces prior to and following the placement of a clear sealant by a sample of general dental practitioners (GDPs). METHODS: 160 permanent posterior teeth were examined by 25 GDPs. The GDPs were not given any criteria and were therefore free to diagnose and plan care, as they felt appropriate. Each GDP conducted four examinations, two prior to and two after sealing. The teeth were serially sectioned to provide the validating criterion. RESULTS: After sealant placement, there was a statistically significant increase in specificity and decrease in sensitivity of both diagnostic and treatment decisions. The reproducibility expressed by the kappa-statistic was of the order of 0.5 prior to and after sealing with regard to diagnostic decisions. There was a general tendency to diagnose less disease after placement of a sealant (P<0. 001). There was also significantly less care (preventive or restorative) planned after sealant placement (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The placement of a sealant resulted in the diagnosis of less disease and less restorative treatment. This may be appropriate as evidence exists to support the use of sealants as caries therapeutic agents.

The effectiveness of manual versus powered toothbrushes for dental health: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To compare manual and powered toothbrushes in everyday use, principally in relation to plaque removal and gingival health. Stain, calculus removal, dependability, adverse effects and cost were also considered. METHOD: A systematic review was undertaken in collaboration with the Cochrane Oral Health Group. Five electronic databases were searched to identify randomised controlled trials comparing powered and manual toothbrushes. Trials of less than 28 days duration, or where toothbrushing was supervised, were excluded. Assessment of relevance, data extraction and validity assessment were all undertaken independently and in duplicate by two reviewers. Included studies were grouped according to the mode of action of the powered toothbrush. The primary outcomes were plaque and gingival health with data defined as either short-term (1-3 months) or long-term (greater than 3 months) duration were analysed. Powered brushes were categorised into six groups depending on mode of action. Numerical data extracted were checked by a third reviewer for accuracy and entered into RevMan (version 4.1). RESULTS: The initial search identified 354 studies. Two hundred and fifteen full articles were obtained of which 29 trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria with results, which could be entered in the meta-analysis. Twenty-six trials (1786 participants) reported short-term and 10 trials (798 participants) long-term plaque scores. Twenty-nine trials (2236 participants) reported short-term and 10 trials (798 participants) long-term gingivitis scores. Powered brushes reduced plaque and gingivitis at least as effectively as manual brushing. Rotation oscillation powered brushes statistically significantly reduced plaque and gingivitis in both the short and long-term. For plaque at one to 3 months the standardised mean difference was -0.44 (95% CI: -0.66 to -0.21), for gingivitis SMD -0.45 (95% CI: -0.76, -0.15). These represented an 11% reduction on the Quigley Hein Plaque index and a 6% reduction on the Löe and Silness gingival index. At over 3 months the effects were SMD for plaque -1.15 (95% CI: -2.02, -0.29) and SMD for gingivitis -0.51 (95% CI: -0.76, -0.25). These represented a 7% reduction on the Quigley Hein Plaque Index and a 17% reduction on the Ainamo Bay Bleeding on Probing Gingival Index. Sensitivity analyses revealed the results to be robust when selecting trials of high quality. There was no evidence of any publication bias. No other powered brush designs were consistently superior to manual toothbrushes. In these trials, data on cost, reliability and side effects were inconsistently reported. CONCLUSION: In general there was no evidence of a statistically significant difference between powered and manual brushes. However, rotation oscillation powered brushes significantly reduce plaque and gingivitis in both the short and long-term. The clinical significance of this reduction is not known. Observation of methodological guidelines and greater standardisation of design would benefit both future trials and meta-analyses.

The differentiation of sealant restorations from preventive fissure sealants, in subjects with clear sealants.

The aim of this study was to assess whether preventive fissure sealants could be differentiated from sealant restorations. The problem of being unable to differentiate between these two tooth states has implications for practitioners and epidemiologists (Davies, 1990). One hundred and seventeen permanent molar teeth, all sealed with a clear sealant, were examined under two types of conditions. These were the Daray 'Versatile light'; mirror, wet teeth, and the Daray 'Operating light 2'; mirror, dry teeth. The subjects' records were subsequently consulted to provide the validating criteria. The results suggest that in a dental hospital environment, when a clear sealant material is in place, it is possible to differentiate between preventive fissure sealants and sealant restorations. It would seem, however, that the 'sealant-alone' variety of sealant restoration was the one most often mistaken for a preventive fissure sealant. The different examination conditions did not markedly affect the examiners' ability to differentiate between the two tooth stage.

Developmental defects of enamel in regularly attending adolescent dental patients in Scotland; prevalence and patient awareness.

Contemporary dental literature contains many reports of the prevalence of developmental defects of enamel in a variety of populations. Little information is available relating to patients' perceptions of such defects. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of developmental defects of enamel in a sample of regularly attending adolescent dental patients with the patients' own views as to whether they thought they had marks on their teeth. The index used for the assessment of defects, the SCOTS Version of the Modified DDE Index (SCOTS/DDE Index), includes both a dentist and patient assessment of defects. Four hundred and eighty-five adolescent dental patients of 41 general dental practitioners in Scotland were examined under standardised conditions in a mobile dental surgery by one trained and calibrated examiner. Approximately half the sample had some sort of developmental defect of enamel, as classified by the SCOTS/DDE Index. However, only 14 per cent of the sample claimed to be aware of marks on their front teeth which would not brush off.

The reliability of two methods of utility assessment in dentistry.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the modification of two utility assessment techniques (visual analogue scale and daily time trade-off) used in medicine to the dental setting, with a focus on their test-retest reliability and ease of use. BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN: The study involved a postal questionnaire survey which incorporated a dental visual analogue scale (DVAS) to assess utility values for 12 specified tooth states, and a specifically designed instrument, the dental freetime trade-off (DFTO) to assess utility of the participants' current dental health state. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 582 regularly attending adolescent dental patients were sent the questionnaire. A further 100 of those who fully completed the relevant sections of the questionnaire were sent a repeat questionnaire to facilitate assessment of test-retest reliability. RESULTS: A final response rate of 74.7% was achieved with the mean age of respondents being 17 years. Fifty per cent of those sent a repeat questionnaire for the purposes of reliability assessment returned the questionnaire. Test-retest reliability of both utility assessment techniques appeared acceptable. Spearman correlation coefficients for the dental freetime trade-off (DFTO) and the dental visual analogue scale (DVAS) were (0.67 and 0.83 respectively. Promising results, in terms of utility values, were elicited from the DVAS whilst utility values elicited using the DFTO were highly skewed. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed modification to the daily time trade-off technique, the DFTO, showed a good level of test-retest reliability and ease of completion although the highly skewed utility results produced may indicate a design flaw. The DVAS however, appears to show promise, in terms of test-retest reliability, ease of completion and resultant utility values.

The dental caries status of Scottish adolescents reported to be regular attenders. Initial results from a primary dental care based research network.

AIM: To investigate the caries status of, and the delivery of care to, a group of regularly attending adolescent dental patients. To conduct research in primary dental care. A subsidiary aim was to compare the caries status of this sample to population samples. SETTING: General dental practices across Scotland. DESIGN: A 3-year cohort study. SUBJECTS: 41 volunteer general dental practitioners and 616 adolescent patients (mean age = 12.1 years at baseline) defined by the practitioners as 'regular' attenders. RESULTS: All practices remained in the study. 403 subjects were seen at both baseline and final examination and 329 were examined at all 4 annual examinations. The mean D3MFT (dentine caries threshold) was 1.8 at baseline and 3.9 at the final examination, three years later. Of the 541 subjects seen at baseline 62% had experienced either restored or unrestored dentinal caries. Thirty-four percent of all those examined at baseline had all the unrestored dentinal caries. The majority of the disease was to be found in the molar teeth, particularly the first permanent molars. The provision of sealants was relatively high with 85% of subjects having at least one sealed tooth by the final examination. Although disease levels were related to socio-economic status, the Care Index was not. CONCLUSIONS: The 'regularly attending' subjects had a better normative level of dental health than their peers in the Scottish population. However, wide variation was found. The project also demonstrated the feasibility of undertaking research in partnership with general dental practitioners.

Can psychological models bridge the gap between clinical guidelines and clinicians' behaviour? A randomised controlled trial of an intervention to influence dentists' intention to implement evidence-based practice.

OBJECTIVE: The lag between publication of evidence for clinical practice and implementation by clinicians may be decades. Research using psychological models demonstrates that changing intention is very important in changing behaviour. This study examined an intervention (rehearsing alternative actions) to change dentists' intention to implement evidence-based practice (EBP) for third molar (TM) management. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial / postal. SETTING: Primary care. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Dentists were randomly selected from the Scottish Dental Practice Board Register, then randomly allocated to intervention or control groups, and sent a questionnaire. The intervention group listed management alternatives to TM extraction prior to their TM extraction intention, and the control group did not. Based on psychological models for reducing a behaviour's frequency (EBP is weighted against TM extraction), prior listing of alternatives should decrease extraction intention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intention to extract TMs. RESULTS: A total of 99 dentists - 70 Males, 29 Females; mean age = 41.42 years (SD = 8.62) participated in the study. The intervention significantly influenced intention to extract TMs, as desired. Despite similar background and knowledge of management alternatives, participants in the intervention group had significantly lower intention to extract: control group mean (SD) = 0.39 (1.99); intervention group mean (SD) = -0.78 (1.89); mean difference (SE) = 1.17 (0.42); 95% confidence interval for the difference = 0.34 to 1.99. CONCLUSION: Results suggest this intervention, which successfully influenced a proximal predictor of behaviour pertinent to dental EBP, may result in improved EBP in a service-level trial. Basing implementation interventions and trial methodology on psychological models may effectively bridge the gap between clinical guidelines and practice.