Implementation of a Program for Appendicitis MRI in a Pediatric Hospital.

MRI is increasingly used as an alternate to CT for the evaluation of suspected appendicitis in pediatric patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with abdominal pain, when further imaging is needed after an initial ultrasound examination. The available literature shows a similar diagnostic performance of MRI and CT in this setting. At the authors' institution, to evaluate for appendicitis in children in the ED, MRI is performed using a rapid three-sequence free-breathing protocol without IV contrast media. Implementation of an MRI program for appendicitis in children involves multiple steps, including determination of imaging resource availability, collaboration with other services to develop imaging pathways, widespread educational efforts, and regular quality review. Such programs can face numerous practice-specific challenges, such as those involving scanner capacity, costs, and buy-in of impacted groups. Nonetheless, through careful consideration of these factors, MRI can be used to positively impact the care of children presenting to the ED with suspected appendicitis. This Clinical Perspective aims to provide guidance on the development of a program for appendicitis MRI in children, drawing on one institution's experience while highlighting the advantages of MRI and practical strategies for overcoming potential barriers.

Multiuser immersive virtual reality simulation for interprofessional sepsis recognition and management.

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is a leading cause of pediatric mortality. While there has been significant effort toward improving adherence to evidence-based care, gaps remain. Immersive multiuser virtual reality (MUVR) simulation may be an approach to enhance provider clinical competency and situation awareness for sepsis. METHODS: A prospective, observational pilot of an interprofessional MUVR simulation assessing a decompensating patient from sepsis was conducted from January to June 2021. The study objective was to establish validity and acceptability evidence for the platform by assessing differences in sepsis recognition between experienced and novice participants. Interprofessional teams assessed and managed a patient together in the same VR experience with the primary outcome of time to recognition of sepsis utilizing the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique analyzed using a logistic regression model. Secondary outcomes were perceived clinical accuracy, relevancy to practice, and side effects experienced. RESULTS: Seventy-two simulations included 144 participants. The cumulative odds ratio of recognizing sepsis at 2 min into the simulation in comparison to later time points by experienced versus novice providers were significantly higher with a cumulative odds ratio of 3.70 (95% confidence interval: 1.15-9.07, p = .004). Participants agreed that the simulation was clinically accurate (98.6%) and will impact their practice (81.1%), with a high degree of immersion (95.7%-99.3%), and the majority of side effects were perceived as mild (70.4%-81.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our novel MUVR simulation demonstrated significant differences in sepsis recognition between experienced and novice participants. This validity evidence along with the data on the simulation's acceptability supports expanded use in training and assessment.