Clinical impact of a novel three-dimensional electrocardiographic imaging for non-invasive mapping of ventricular arrhythmias-a prospective randomized trial.

AIMS: ECVUE™ technology, a novel, three-dimensional, non-invasive mapping system, offers a unique arrhythmia characterization and localization. We sought to evaluate the clinical impact of this system in routine clinical mapping and ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with monomorphic premature ventricular contractions with or without monomorphic ventricular tachycardia were enrolled prospectively and randomized into two groups: ventricular ectopy localization using either 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) algorithms or with ECVUE™, followed by conventional guided ablation. Forty-two patients were enrolled in the study. The ECVUE™ system accurately identified both the chamber and sub-localized the VA origin in 20 of 21 (95.2%) patients. In contrast, using 12-lead ECG algorithms, the chamber was accurately diagnosed in 16 of 21 (76.2%) patients, while the arrhythmia origin in only 8 of 21 (38.1%), (P = 0.001 vs. ECVUE™). Acute success in ablation was achieved in all patients. Regarding the number of radiofrequency-energy applications (in total 2 vs. 4, P = 0.005) in the ECVUE™ arm, ablation was more precise than the ECG group which used standard of care activation and pace mapping-guided ablation. Three months success in ablation was 95.2% for the ECVUE™ and 100% for the ECG group (P = ns). Time to ablation was 35.3 min in the conventional arm and 24.4 min in ECVUE Group, (P = 0.035). The X-ray radiation exposure was 3.21 vs. 0.39 mSv, P = 0.001 for the ECVUE™ group and ECG group. CONCLUSION: ECVUE™ technology offers a clinically useful tool to map VAs with high accuracy and more targeted ablations superior to the body surface ECG but had significantly higher radiation exposure due to computed tomography scan.

Repeated catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: how to predict outcome?

BACKGROUND: Pre-procedural predictors (PP) of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence (AFR) after repeated catheter ablation of AF (RCAF) are unknown. The aim of this study was identification of PP of outcome after RCAF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 213 patients (73% male) with drug-refractory AF (47% paroxysmal AF; PAF) RCAF was performed. CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc and ALARMEc (AF type, Left Atrium size, Renal insufficiency, MEtabolic syndrome, cardiomyopathy) scores were calculated for each patient. Complete success was defined as no AFR. After RCAF, 125 patients (59%) were free of atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia (AFLAT) on long-term follow-up (FU). The univariate predictors of AFR were: type of AF (non-PAF vs. PAF, P=0.001), normalized left atrium area (NLA ≥10.25 vs. NLA <10.25, P=0.012) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (<68ml/min vs. ≥68ml/min, P=0.048). The independent predictors of AFLAT-free survival after RCAF were non-PAF (P=0.002) and NLA ≥10.25 (P=0.018). Among combined predictors, only ALARMEc score, and neither CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc, predicted outcome after RCAF (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RCAF results in a moderate success rate on very long-term FU. Lower success was observed in patients with non-PAF and enlarged LA. ALARMEc score allows for clear description of expected outcome after RCAF.