Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Int J Occup Environ Health ; 19(1): 35-42, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23582613

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Half of the world's population uses solid fuels for energy and cooking, resulting in 1.5 million deaths annually, approximately one-third of which occur in India. Most deaths are linked to childhood pneumonia or acute lower respiratory tract infection (ALRI), conditions that are difficult to diagnose. The overall effect of biomass combustion on childhood illness is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether type of household fuel is associated with symptoms of ALRI (cough and difficulty breathing), diarrhea or fever in children aged 0-36 months. METHODS: We analyzed nationally representative samples of households with children aged 0-36 months from three national family health surveys conducted between 1992 and 2006 in India. Households were categorized as using low (liquid petroleum gas/electricity), medium (coal/kerosene) or high polluting fuel (predominantly wood/agricultural waste). Odds ratios adjusted for confounders for exposure to high and medium polluting fuel were compared with low polluting fuel (LPF). RESULTS: Use of high polluting fuel (HPF) in India changed minimally (82 to 78 %), although LPF use increased from 8% to 18%. HPF was consistently associated with ALRI [adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 1.48 (1.08-2.03) in 1992-3; 1.54 (1.33-1.77) in 1998-9; and 1.53 (1.21-1.93) in 2005-6). Fever was associated with HPF in the first two surveys but not in the third survey. Diarrhea was not consistently associated with HPF. CONCLUSIONS: There is an urgent need to increase the use of LPF or equivalent clean household fuel to reduce the burden of childhood illness associated with IAP in India.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição Ambiental/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde da Família/estatística & dados numéricos , Combustíveis Fósseis/estatística & dados numéricos , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Pré-Escolar , Carvão Mineral/efeitos adversos , Diarreia/etiologia , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Febre/etiologia , Combustíveis Fósseis/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Petróleo/efeitos adversos , Características de Residência , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/etiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Madeira/efeitos adversos
2.
Indian Pediatr ; 42(5): 433-42, 2005 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15923689

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that daily supplementation of zinc and copper mixed with the oral rehydration solution (ORS) reduces the duration and the severity of acute diarrhea in children. METHODS: In a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial children aged 6 months to 59 months in an urban hospital with acute diarrhea, were assigned to receive the intervention of once daily 40 mg of zinc sulfate and 5 mg of copper sulfate dissolved in a liter of standard ORS (n = 102) or placebo (50 mg of standard ORS powder) dissolved in a liter of ORS (n = 98). RESULT: The baseline characteristics in the two groups were similar. The mean survival time (days) (SE) with diarrhea was not significantly different in the treatment (4.34 (0.2)) as compared to the placebo group (4.48 (0.2)), nor was there any difference in the median time to cure. Cure was less likely with longer duration of diarrhea prior to enrollment (P < 0.001), if the time taken for rehydration was more (P = 0.001) and if intravenous fluids were used (P = 0.03) regardless of the micronutrient supplementation. The proportion of children with diarrhea > 4 days was 46% in the placebo group with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) of 1.19 (1.58, 0.9; P = 0.2) as compared to 39% in the supplemented group. The most important risk factor for diarrhea > 4 days was diarrheal duration prior to enrollment with OR = 6.25 (3.7, 11.1). The supplemented group however had less severity of diarrhea with a lower proportion of children requiring unscheduled intravenous fluids (OR = 0.4; 95% CI 0.05, 2.2), with weight loss (OR = 0.7; 95% CI; 0.4, 1.3), with complications (OR = 0.15; 0.01, 1.3) and had no deaths as compared to two in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the most important predictor for duration of diarrhea in children was the severity of the disease at enrollment, and, not the supplementation. There were clinical beneficial effects of supplementation on rate of any complications and mortality. A larger trial is warranted before supplementation of micronutrients mixed with ORS are recommended for management of acute diarrhea.


Assuntos
Sulfato de Cobre/uso terapêutico , Diarreia/tratamento farmacológico , Hidratação/métodos , Oligoelementos/uso terapêutico , Sulfato de Zinco/uso terapêutico , Doença Aguda , Análise de Variância , Pré-Escolar , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais
3.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc ; 1(1): 7, 2003 Aug 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14498987

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic effects of zinc and copper in reducing diarrheal morbidity have important cost implications. This health services research study evaluated the cost of treating a child with acute diarrhea in the hospital, the impact of micronutrient supplementation on the mean predicted costs and its cost-effectiveness as compared to using only standard oral rehydration solution (ORS), from the patient's and government's (providers) perspective. METHODS: Children aged 6 months to 59 months with acute diarrhea were randomly assigned to receive either the intervention or control. The intervention was a daily dose of 40 mg of zinc sulfate and 5 mg of copper sulfate powder dissolved in a liter of standard ORS (n = 102). The control was 50 mg of standard ORS powder dissolved in a liter of standard ORS (n = 98). The cost measures were the total mean cost of treating acute diarrhea, which included the direct medical, the direct non-medical and the indirect costs. The effectiveness measures were the probability of diarrhea lasting leq; 4 days, the disability adjusted life years (DALYs) and mortality. RESULTS: The mean total cost of treating a child with acute diarrhea was US $14 of which the government incurred an expenditure of 66%. The factors that increased the total were the number of stools before admission (p = 0.01), fever (p = 0.01), increasing grade of dehydration (p = 0.00), use of antibiotics (p = 0.00), use of intra-venous fluids (p = 0.00), hours taken to rehydrate a child (p = 0.00), the amount of oral rehydration fluid used (p = 0.00), presence of any complications (p = 0.00) and the hospital stay (p = 0.00). The supplemented group had a 8% lower cost of treating acute diarrhea, their cost per unit health (diarrhea lasting leq; 4 days) was 24% less and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio indicated cost savings (in Rupees) with the intervention [-452; 95%CI (-11306, 3410)]. However these differences failed to reach conventional levels of significance. CONCLUSION: An emphasis on the costs and economic benefits of an alternative therapy is an important aspect of health services research. The cost savings and the attractive cost-effectiveness indicates the need to further assess the role of micronutrients such as zinc and copper in the treatment of acute diarrhea in a larger and more varied population.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA