Racial, Socioeconomic, and Payer Status Disparities in Utilization of Total Ankle Arthroplasty Compared to Ankle Arthrodesis.

Total ankle arthroplasty is increasingly being used for the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis when compared to arthrodesis. However, there has been limited investigation into disparities in utilization of these comparable procedures. This study examined racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and payer status disparities in the likelihood of undergoing total ankle arthroplasty compared with ankle arthrodesis. Patients with a diagnosis of ankle osteoarthritis from 2006 through 2019 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample, then subclassified as undergoing total ankle arthroplasty or arthrodesis. Multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for hospital location, primary or secondary osteoarthritis diagnosis, and patient characteristics (age, sex, infection, and Elixhauser comorbidities), were used to examine the effect of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and payer status on the likelihood of undergoing total ankle arthroplasty versus arthrodesis. Black and Asian patients were 34% and 41% less likely than White patients to undergo total ankle arthroplasty rather than arthrodesis (p < .001). Patients in income quartiles 3 and 4 were 22% and 32% more likely, respectively, than patients in quartile 1 to undergo total ankle arthroplasty rather than arthrodesis (p = .001 and p = .01, respectively). In patients <65 years of age, privately insured and Medicare patients were 84% and 37% more likely, respectively, than Medicaid patients to undergo total ankle arthroplasty rather than arthrodesis (p < .001). Racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and payer status disparities exist in the likelihood of undergoing total ankle arthroplasty versus arthrodesis for ankle osteoarthritis. More work is needed to establish drivers of these disparities and identify targets for intervention, including improvements in parity in relative procedure utilization.

APA Health CARE: A Student-Led Initiative Addressing Health Care Barriers Faced by the Asian and Pacific Islander American Immigrant Population in Los Angeles.

Asian and Pacific Islander Americans face cultural, linguistic, and financial barriers to accessing health care. APA Health CARE (APAHC), a UCLA student-led organization, attempts to bridge these disparities through free community health screenings, health education seminars, and follow-up procedures. From 2011 to 2018, participants' demographic and health-related information were recorded during health fairs and follow-up phone calls. Trends in participant characteristics were analyzed over time. Health fair data were compared to data from follow-up phone calls to assess the effectiveness of health fair education and referral practices. 5635 participants from 69 health fairs were screened over the 8-year period. Follow-up contact was attempted for 2258 participants, of which 555 responded. Over time, a greater proportion of participants reported higher income, health insurance, and access to a regular doctor. Of those contacted at follow-up, 32.3% reported visiting a doctor, 50.2% reported making lifestyle changes, and 68.0% of those who were uninsured at health fairs reported obtaining health insurance within 1 month of attendance. Despite an observed increase in the proportion of participants having insurance and a regular doctor, health fair attendance remained consistent, possibly due to Asian American immigrants' preference for services that are convenient and linguistically and culturally accessible. Attendees reported visiting a physician, making lifestyle changes, and obtaining health insurance based on health fair referrals, suggesting measurable success with referral uptake and follow through. Student-led initiatives similar to APAHC can serve as catalysts to increase health literacy and motivate communities to seek health insurance and care.

Geographic Variation in Physician Payments from Private Insurers for Commonly Performed Inpatient Orthopaedic Surgeries in the United States.

We investigated geographic variation in percentage of private insurance payments to United States physicians for commonly performed orthopaedic procedures. We queried a private administrative claims database for patients who underwent inpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) from 2010 to 2017. Percentage of total payments to physician (PPP) was calculated by dividing physician payments by total payments. Analysis of variance was used to determine geographic differences in PPP. A total of 542,530 patients were included, mean age was 55 ± 8. PPP significantly varied between states for all four procedures (p < 0.001); Colorado and Alabama had the lowest and highest PPP, respectively. There was a significant annual decrease in PPP across all regions in all procedures. There was significant variation in percentage of total payments to physicians across geographic regions in the United States for TKA, THA, ACDF and PLF. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(1):014-019, 2021).

Regular Physician Access and Obesity Status Among Underserved Asian and Pacific Islander American Immigrants in Los Angeles.

According to prior research, Asian and Pacific Islander American (APIA) immigrants often refrain from seeking health care unless necessitated by medical conditions. Utilizing data from health screenings conducted in APIA immigrant enclaves in Los Angeles, we hypothesize that poorer obesity status would predict higher rates of regular physician access. Analyses involved objectively measured percent body fat (%BF) and survey responses collected between 2011 and 2019. We assessed the association between obesity status and regular physician access, adjusting for insurance status, demographic, and socioeconomic factors. The study population (n = 4102) primarily consisted low-income, low English proficiency APIAs. Participants with a regular physician were significantly more likely to be obese compared to participants without (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.03, 1.58], P = .02). This association may suggest that care was sought reactively rather than proactively within this community. Interventions with emphasis on cultural competency and language services may encourage preventative care utilization among this understudied community.

Structural Allograft Versus Mechanical Interbody Devices Augmented With Osteobiologics in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Literature Review. OBJECTIVE: Perform a systematic review evaluating postoperative fusion rates for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using structural allograft vs various interbody devices augmented with different osteobiologic materials. METHODS: Comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed. Included studies were those that reported results of 1-4 levels ACDF using pure structural allograft compared with a mechanical interbody device augmented with an osteobiologic. Excluded studies were those that reported on ACDF with cervical corpectomy; anterior and posterior cervical fusions; circumferential (360° or 540°) fusion or revision ACDF for nonunion or other conditions. Risk of bias was determined using the Cochrane review guidelines. RESULTS: 8 articles reporting fusion rates of structural allograft and an interbody device/osteobiologic pair were included. All included studies compared fusion rates following ACDF among structural allograft vs non-allograft interbody device/osteobiologic pairs. Fusion rates were reported between 84% and 100% for structural allograft, while fusion rates for various interbody device/osteobiologic combinations ranged from 26% to 100%. Among non-allograft cage groups fusion rates varied from 73-100%. One study found PEEK cages filled with combinations of autograft, allograft, and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) to have an overall fusion rate of 26%. In one study comparing plate and zero-profile constructs, there was no difference in fusion rates for two-level fusions. CONCLUSION: There was limited data comparing fusion outcomes of patients undergoing ACDF using structural allograft vs interbody devices augmented with osteobiologic materials to support superiority of one method.

Disparity in Obesity and Hypertension Risks Observed Between Pacific Islander and Asian American Health Fair Attendees in Los Angeles, 2011-2019.

INTRODUCTION: The Pacific Islander American population is understudied due to being aggregated with Asian Americans. In this study, we conduct a comparative analysis of directly measured body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage (%BF), and blood pressure (BP) between Pacific Islander Americans and Asian Americans from health screenings in Los Angeles, California. We hope to reveal intra-APIA health disparities masked by this data aggregation. METHODS: We analyzed BMI, %BF, and BP that were objectively measured by trained personnel at health screenings in Los Angeles between January 2011 and December 2019. We performed multivariable multinomial logistic regression models with obesity and hypertensive categories as outcome variables and ethnicity as the primary independent variable of interest. Models controlled for year of visit, participant age, sex, income, education level, years living in the USA, employment status, English proficiency, regular doctor access, and health insurance status. RESULTS: A total of 4,832 individuals were included in the analysis. Multivariable analyses revealed that Pacific Islander participants were at significantly higher risks for being classified as obese compared with all Asian American subgroups studied, including Chinese, Korean, Thai, Vietnamese, Filipino, and Japanese. Pacific Islanders also exhibited significantly lower predicted probability of having a normal blood pressure compared with Chinese and Thai participants. Some variation between Asian subgroups were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Pacific Islander participants had higher risk of several sentinel health problems compared to Asian American participants. Disaggregation of PI Americans from the APIA umbrella category in future studies is necessary to unmask the critical needs of this important community.

Trends in Health Care Access Disparities Among Asian and Pacific Islander Health Fair Participants in Los Angeles, 2011-2019.

OBJECTIVES: Given several efforts to improve health care access in California and nationally, we studied whether linguistic and socioeconomic disparities in health care access changed from 2011 to 2019 among Asian and Pacific Islander American (APIA) people in Los Angeles, California. METHODS: We analyzed survey responses from APIA health fair participants (n = 5032) in the Greater Los Angeles area from May 15, 2011, through October 20, 2019. To assess the effect of socioeconomic factors on and shifts in health care access (ie, health insurance status/regular doctor), we used a logistic regression model. Covariates included English proficiency, year, age, sex, ethnicity, income, employment, and education. We also ran an interaction analysis between English proficiency and year. RESULTS: Health insurance access increased and doctor access remained stable throughout the study period; however, disparities in health insurance status widened by a factor of 1.08 per year between participants with high English proficiency (HEP) and participants with low English proficiency (LEP) (P = .01). People with HEP were 2.02 times more likely to have a regular doctor than people with LEP (P < .001), and this disparity persisted from 2011 to 2019 (P = .58). Participants who were young (P < .001) and male (P = .005) were significantly less likely to have health insurance and a regular doctor (P < .001) than participants who were older and female. Chinese participants were significantly more likely than Thai (P = .002) and Korean (P < .001) participants to be insured but not more likely to have a regular doctor, when controlling for health insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Policy changes targeting language and cultural barriers to care for APIA people with LEP may address the disparities observed.

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Risk and Reason for Revision in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Data regarding racial/ethnic and socioeconomic differences in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) have been inconsistent. This study examined racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in comorbidity-adjusted risk and reason for rTHA and rTKA. METHODS: Patients who underwent rTHA or rTKA between 2006 and 2014 in the National Inpatient Sample were identified. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for payer status, hospital geographic setting, and patient characteristics (age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index) were used to examine the effect of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status on trends in annual risk of rTHA/rTKA and causes of rTHA/rTKA. RESULTS: Black patients were less likely to undergo rTHA and more likely to undergo rTKA while Hispanic patients were more likely to undergo rTHA and less likely to undergo rTKA ( P < 0.001 for all) compared with White patients. Patients residing in areas of lower income quartiles were more likely to undergo rTHA and rTKA compared with those in the highest quartile ( P < 0.001), and these disparities persisted and widened over time. Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients were less likely to undergo rTHA/rTKA because of dislocation compared with White patients ( P < 0.001 for all). Patients from areas of lower income quartiles were more likely to undergo rTHA because of septic complications and less likely to require both rTHA and rTKA because of mechanical complications ( P < 0.001 for all). DISCUSSION: Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities exist in risk and cause of rTHA and rTKA. Increasing awareness and a focus on minimizing variability in hospital quality may help mitigate these disparities.

Disparities in Telemedicine Literacy and Access in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Because of the expansion of telehealth services through the 2020 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, the potential of telemedicine in plastic surgery has gained visibility. This study aims to identify populations who may have limited access to telemedicine. METHODS: The authors created a telemedicine literacy index (TLI) using a multivariate regression model and data from the US Census and Pew Research Institute survey. A multivariate regression model was created using backwards elimination, with TLI as the dependent variable and demographics as independent variables. The resulting regression coefficients were applied to data from the 2018 US Census at the county level to create a county-specific technological literacy index (cTLI). Significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: On multivariable analysis, the following factors were found to be significantly associated with telemedicine literacy: age, sex, race, employment status, income level, marital status, educational attainment, and urban or rural classification. Counties in the lowest tertile had significantly lower median annual income levels ($43,613 versus $60,418; P < 0.001) and lower proportion of the population with at least a bachelor's degree (16.7% versus 26%; P < 0.001). Rural areas were approximately three times more likely to be in the lowest cTLI compared with urban areas ( P < 0.001). Additional associations with low cTLI were Black race ( P = 0.045), widowed marital status ( P < 0.001), less than high school education ( P = 0.005), and presence of a disability ( P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight disadvantaged groups at risk of being underserved with telehealth. Using these findings, key stakeholders may be able to target these communities for interventions to increase telemedicine literacy and access.

Abnormal Postoperative PROMIS Scores are Associated with Patient Satisfaction in Adult Spinal Deformity and Degenerative Spine Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate 1) patient satisfaction after adult spine surgery; 2) associations between number of abnormal PROMIS domain scores and postoperative satisfaction; and 3) associations between normalization of a patient's worst preoperative PROMIS domain score and postoperative satisfaction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although "legacy" patient-reported outcome measures correlate with patient satisfaction after adult spine surgery, it is unclear whether PROMIS scores do. METHODS: We included 1119 patients treated operatively for degenerative spine disease (DSD) or adult spinal deformity (ASD) from 2014-2019 at our tertiary hospital who completed questionnaires preoperatively and at ≥1 postoperative timepoints up to 2 years. Postoperative satisfaction was measured in ASD patients using items 21 and 22 from the SRS 22-revised questionnaire and in DSD patients using the NASS Patient Satisfaction Index. "Worst" preoperative PROMIS domain was that with the greatest clinically negative deviation from the mean. "Normalization" was a postoperative score within 1 standard deviation of the general population mean. Multivariate logistic regression identified factors associated with satisfaction. RESULTS: Satisfaction was reported by 88% of DSD and 86% of ASD patients at initial postoperative follow-up; this proportion did not change during the first year after surgery. We observed an inverse relationship between postoperative satisfaction and number of abnormal PROMIS domains at all postoperative timepoints beyond 6 weeks. Only among ASD patients was normalization of the worst preoperative PROMIS domain associated with greater odds of satisfaction at all timepoints up to 1 year. CONCLUSION: The proportion of DSD and ASD patients satisfied postoperatively did not change from 6 weeks to 1 year. Normalizing the worst preoperative PROMIS domain and minimizing the number of abnormal postoperative PROMIS scores may reduce the number of dissatisfied patients. PROMIS data can guide perioperative patient management to improve satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Are There Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Management and Outcomes of Surgically Treated Distal Radius Fractures?

BACKGROUND: Racial/ethnic disparities have been demonstrated across multiple orthopedic sub-specialties. There is a paucity of literature examining disparities in distal radius fracture (DRF) management. METHODS: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we analyzed 15 559 non-Hispanic (NH) White, NH Black, NH Asian, and Hispanic adults who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for DRF from 2013 to 2019. We evaluated time from hospital admission to surgery and length of stay using Poisson regression. Deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), and wound complications were reported using descriptive statistics. Thirty-day reoperation and readmission were analyzed using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Wait time to surgery was longer for Hispanic patients than NH White patients (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 2.54, P < .001); this narrowed over time (IRR: 0.944, P = .047). Length of stay was longer for NH Black (IRR: 1.78, P < .001) and Hispanic patients (IRR: 1.83, P < .001), but shorter for NH Asian (IRR: 0.715, P = .019) than NH White patients; this temporally narrowed for NH Black patients (IRR: 0.908, P = .001). Deep venous thrombosis, PE, and wound complications occurred at a rate less than 0.30% across all groups. Hispanic patients were less likely to undergo reoperation than NH White patients (odds ratio [OR]: 0.254, P = .003). While there was no difference in readmission between groups in the aggregated study period, NH Black patients experienced a temporal increase in readmissions relative to NH White patients (OR: 1.40, P = .038). CONCLUSIONS: Racial and ethnic disparities exist in DRF management. Further investigation on causes for and solutions to combat these disparities in DRF care may help improve the inequities observed.

Does Time to Imaging and Surgery for Distal Radius Fractures Vary based on Geographic Socioeconomic Disadvantage?

BACKGROUND: While disparities in aspects of distal radius fracture (DRF) management and orthopedics at large have been studied, disparities in time to DRF evaluation and treatment are unknown. We sought to determine if geographic socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with time to imaging in the emergency department (ED) and time to surgery for DRFs. METHODS: We performed a time-to-event analysis of 105 patients undergoing DRF surgery after ED triage within our hospital system between January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2020. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) national percentile was used as the metric of geographic socioeconomic disadvantage for each patient's ZIP code of residence. We performed Cox regression analysis to determine hazard ratios to undergo DRF imaging and surgery for patients in each ADI group, adjusting for potential confounders, α = 0.05. RESULTS: There was no association between geographic socioeconomic disadvantage and time to DRF imaging, after adjusting for confounders. However, compared to patients from the least disadvantaged areas, patients from the most disadvantaged areas (ADI Quartiles 3 and 4) had an adjusted hazard ratio for surgery of 0.55 [0.32, 0.94] (P = .03), and were thus 45% [6%, 68%] less likely to undergo surgery for DRF at any time following ED triage. CONCLUSIONS: Operative patients from more socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods see disparities in time to surgery for DRF. Equitable access to timely surgical care is needed and may be improved with increased access to orthopedic surgeons, patient education, support in navigating the health system, and improved continuity of fracture care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Annual Trends and Geographic Variation in the Utilization of Imaging in Pediatric Patients with Low Back Pain in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is increasing in the pediatric population. Advanced imaging, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, performed for LBP imposes significant costs with little benefit. We investigated annual trends and demographic and geographic variation in spinal imaging for first-time pediatric presenters with LBP in primary care clinics. METHODS: We queried a private administrative claims database for patients presenting with LBP who underwent plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging from 2011 to 2017. We used a Cochrane Armitage test of trend to determine significant annual variation in diagnostic imaging utilization during the study period. The χ2 test was used to determine demographic and geographic variation. RESULTS: The study included 67,423 patients with mean age 15.2 ± 3 years. There was no significant change in radiography (34.8% in 2011 vs. 35.5% in 2017, P = 0.795) or computed tomography (1.6% in 2011 vs. 1.1% in 2017, P = 0.073), but there was a significant increase in magnetic resonance imaging (3.3% in 2011 vs. 4.5% in 2017, P = 0.017). Overall, there was no significant change in total imaging use (P = 0.895). Boys had higher rates of imaging compared with girls (40.2% vs. 35.6%, P < 0.001). Imaging rates significantly varied between regions across the United States (P < 0.001). The Midwest had the highest imaging rates (41%), while the Northeast had the lowest rates (31%). CONCLUSIONS: There was significant demographic and geographic variation but no significant annual change in total diagnostic spinal imaging for pediatric patients with LBP between 2011 and 2017, with rates of advanced imaging remaining relatively low.

Pediatric Back Pain Associated with Bertolotti Syndrome: A Report of 3 Cases with Varying Treatment Strategies.

CASE: Three pediatric patients with back pain associated with Bertolotti syndrome are presented. After failing conservative management, 1 patient underwent mega-apophysis resection, another underwent resection with decompression, and the final underwent posterior fusion. All patients had complete resolution of back pain and returned to full activity at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae are congenital anomalies spanning a spectrum from partial/complete L5 sacralization to partial/complete S1 lumbarization with varying clinical presentations. Identification of variable anatomy and symptoms guides surgical management. We present 3 cases with differing surgical techniques including pseudoarticulation resection, arthrodesis of the involved levels, and neuroforaminal decompression.

COVID-19 Significantly Impacted Hospital Length of Stay and Discharge Patterns for Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to compare length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition of adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients undergoing surgery before and during the pandemic. Secondary aims were to compare the rates of 30-day complications, reoperations, readmissions, and unplanned emergency department (ED) visits. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ASD patients often require extended LOS and non-routine discharge. Given resource limitations during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and caution regarding hospital stays, surgeons modified standard postoperative protocols to minimize patient exposure. METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent elective thoracolumbar ASD surgery with more than or equal to five levels fusion at a tertiary care center during two distinct time intervals: July to December 2019 (Pre-COVID, N = 60) and July to December 2020 (During-COVID, N = 57). Outcome measures included LOS and discharge disposition (home vs. non-home), as well as 30-day major complications, reoperations, readmissions, and ED visits. Regression analyses controlled for demographic and surgical factors. RESULTS: Patients who underwent ASD surgery during the pandemic were younger (61 vs. 67 yrs) and had longer fusion constructs (nine vs. eight levels) compared with before the pandemic (P < 0.05 for both). On bivariate analysis, patients undergoing surgery during the pandemic had shorter LOS (6 vs. 9 days) and were more likely to be discharged home (70% vs. 28%) (P < 0.05 for both). After controlling for age and levels fused on multivariable regression, patients who had surgery during the pandemic had shorter LOS (IRR = 0.83, P = 0.015) and greater odds of home discharge (odds ratios [OR] = 7.2, P < 0.001). Notably, there were no differences in major complications, reoperations, readmissions, or ED visits between the two groups. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, LOS for patients undergoing thoracolumbar ASD surgery decreased, and more patients were discharged home without adversely affecting complication or readmission rates. Lessons learned during the pandemic may help improve resource utilization without negatively influencing short-term outcomes.Level of Evidence: 3.

Optimal resection margin for head and neck cutaneous melanoma.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to examine the difference between a narrow (between 1 and 2 cm) and a wide (>2 cm) margin in the surgical resection of head and neck cutaneous melanoma. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based cohort analysis. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was employed to identify patients who had cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck from 2004 to 2014. Outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). RESULTS: Among the total of 3,583 cases of cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck with known resection margins, 2,641 individuals had narrow resection margins, and 942 patients had wide margins. Most of the tumors presented in the skin of the scalp and neck, followed by the face, external ear, and other areas. The 5-year and 10-year Kaplan-Meier OS probabilities for narrow and wide margins were 65% and 66%, respectively, compared with 49% and 48%, respectively. The DSS probabilities exhibited similar trends between the two groups at these time points. In the Cox regression model, the patients who received narrow margins had similar OS (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.918-1.217) and DSS (95% CI: 0.856-1.352) compared with the wide resection margin group, even when controlled for age, sex, T stage, and histology. CONCLUSIONS: The survival of patients with cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck depends on age, depth of tumor invasion, and histology. Within the head and neck, a wider resection margin of >2 cm does not confer any additional survival benefit compared with a narrower margin. Future studies should examine whether wider surgical margins would confer survival benefit in local or recurrent melanoma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 129:1386-1394, 2019.