Same-day Discharge for Cleft Palate Repair: A Single-Surgeon Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of same-day discharge for patients undergoing primary cleft palate repair. DESIGN: Single-surgeon retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary care institution. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 40 consecutive patients that underwent primary cleft palate repair by a single surgeon from September 2018 to June 2023. INTERVENTIONS: Same-day discharge versus overnight admission after primary palatoplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 30-day readmission, reoperation, wound and all-cause complication rate and 1-year fistula incidence. RESULTS: Of 40 total cases, 20 patients were discharged on the same calendar day and 20 patients were admitted for overnight stay following primary cleft palate repair. In the same-day discharge group, readmission incidence was 10%(n = 2), wound complication incidence was 5%(n = 1), and postoperative complication incidence was 15%(n = 3). In comparison, patients admitted overnight had a readmission incidence of 5%(n = 1, P = 1.00), wound complication incidence of 10%(n = 2, P = 1.00), and postoperative complications of 20%(n = 4, P = 1.00) No patients had 30-day reoperations or fistulas at 1 year. A higher proportion of admitted patients held a preoperative diagnosis of unilateral cleft palate and alveolus (Veau 3) as compared to patients discharged on the same day (P = .019). During the postoperative hospital course, admitted patients received significantly more oxycodone at median of 2 doses (IQR 1.00-3.75) and acetaminophen at a median of 4 doses (IQR 3.00-5.00) than patients with same-day discharge with a median of 1 dose (IQR 0.00 -1.00, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In a low-risk patient population, same-day discharge following primary cleft palate repair may be safely undertaken and result in similar short-term outcomes and 1-year fistula incidence as patients admitted for overnight stay.

Virtual Reality Simulation of Airway Management Post-Cleft Palate Surgery: A Model for Sustainable and Equitable Education.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of virtual-reality (VR) simulation-based training in cleft surgery has not been tested. The purpose of this study was to evaluate learners' acceptance of VR simulation in airway management of a pediatric patient post-cleft palate repair. METHODS: This VR simulation was developed through collaboration between BioDigital and Smile Train. 26 medical students from a single institution completed 10 min of standardized VR training and 5 min of standardized discussion about airway management post-cleft palate repair. They spent 4-8 min in the VR simulation with guidance from a cleft surgery expert. Participants completed pre- and post-surveys evaluating confidence in using VR as an educational tool, understanding of airway management, and opinions on VR in surgical education. Satisfaction was evaluated using a modified Student Evaluation of Educational Quality questionnaire and scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to evaluate responses. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in respondents' confidence using VR as an educational tool and understanding of airway management post-cleft palate repair after the simulation (P < .001). Respondents' opinions on incorporating VR in surgical education started high and did not change significantly post-simulation. Participants were satisfied with VR-based simulation and reported it was stimulating (4.31 ± 0.88), increased interest (3.77 ± 1.21), enhanced learning (4.12 ± 1.05), was clear (4.15 ± 0.97), was effective in teaching (4.08 ± 0.81), and would recommend the simulation (4.2 ± 1.04). CONCLUSION: VR-based simulation can significantly increase learners' confidence and skills in airway management post-cleft palate repair. Learners find VR to be effective and recommend its incorporation in surgical education.

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System: How Are Plastic Surgeons Performing?

PURPOSE: Merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS) is a payment model implemented to promote high-value care through performance-based adjustments of Medicare reimbursements. Higher scores indicate superior performance in healthcare quality, efficiency, and interoperability, which can result in financial advantages. Given the paucity of literature, we aimed to characterize plastic surgery performance in MIPS. METHOD: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) online data repository was queried for data on MIPS performance of plastic surgeons from 2019-2021. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression were conducted to identify predictors of receiving bonus payment for exceptional performance. RESULTS: Approximately 1400 surgeons were sampled in each year. The median number of Medicare beneficiaries and percent of dually eligible beneficiaries-eligible for Medicare and Medicaid-were higher in 2019 (p<0.001). Beneficiary median HCC risk score, which measures expected healthcare costs and needs based on health status, was lower in 2021 (p<0.001). The most common reporting schema was reporting as a group. Total MIPS score increased from 2019 to 2020 to 2021 (90.2 vs 96.4 vs 98.3, p<0.001), but quality score progressively decreased (98.8 vs 95.5 vs 89.90, p<0.001). Fewer physicians received positive adjustment and bonus payments in 2020 and 2021. Predictors of receiving bonus payments were reporting as an alternative payment model, practice size >24, and having 10-49% of dually eligible beneficiaries (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Understanding performance of plastic surgeons in MIPS can guide future policy direction and ensure that high-quality care translates into improved patient outcomes across all fields and levels of social vulnerability.