Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 38(1): 158, 2023 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37261538

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: After tumor resection, a preventive diverting loop ileostomy creation is a routine surgical procedure to prevent anastomotic leakage and infections and to preclude secondary surgeries. Despite its benefits, several studies have proposed potential complications that extend the disease course by impairing the feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy and adherence. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of ileostomy complications on the adherence to adjuvant treatment and overall survival (OS) of colon cancer (CC) patients. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study. Patients diagnosed with colon adenocarcinoma were treated between January 2010 and December 2020 at the National Cancer Institute in Mexico. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: χ2 and t-test, Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and Cox regression. Statistical significance differences were assessed when p was bilaterally < 0.05. RESULTS: The most frequent complications of loop-derived ileostomy were hydro-electrolytic dehydration (50%), acute kidney injury (AKI) (26%), grade 1-2 diarrhea (28%), and grade 3-4 diarrhea (21%) (p = 0.001). Patients with complete chemotherapy did not reach the median OS. In contrast, the median OS for patients with non-complete chemotherapy was 56 months (p = 0.023). Additionally, 5-year OS reached to 100% in the early restitution group, 85% in the late restitution group, and 60% in the non-restitution group (p = 0.016). Finally, AKI (p = 0.029; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.348 [1.133-9.895]), complete chemotherapy (p = 0.028; 95% CI 0.376 [0.105-0.940]), and reversed ileostomy (p = 0.001; 95% CI 0.125 [0.038-0.407]) remained as predictors of overall survival for patients with CC treated with a loop ileostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize the early stoma reversal restitution as a safe and feasible alternative to prevent severe complications related to ileostomies which improve chemotherapy adherence and overall survival of colon cancer patients. This is one of the pioneer studies analyzing the impact of ileostomy on treatment adherence and outcome of Latin American patients with colon cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospective study No. 2021/045, in April 2021.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Ileostomia/efeitos adversos , Ileostomia/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Diarreia/complicações , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia
2.
Rev Invest Clin ; 70(3): 112-116, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29943771

RESUMO

Mexico has seen an increase in cancer prevalence in its entire population as well as particular age ranges, predominantly the older segment. The most frequently reported pelvic cancers in Mexico are cervical, endometrial, bladder, prostate, rectum, and anal canal. Approximately 80% of the population diagnosed with pelvic cancers present with locally advanced tumors and require concomitant chemoradiotherapy, sequential chemoradiotherapy, or radiotherapy alone. The toxicity of any of these treatment modalities may be manifested as intestinal injury, a significant problem that can compromise the response to treatment, the patient's nutritional state, quality of life, and survival. In this article, we will approach key aspects in nutrition as well as the epidemiological characteristics and toxicities in patients affected by these pelvic tumors.


Assuntos
Gastroenteropatias/etiologia , Neoplasias Pélvicas/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Gastroenteropatias/fisiopatologia , Humanos , México/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pélvicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pélvicas/patologia , Prevalência , Lesões por Radiação/epidemiologia , Lesões por Radiação/fisiopatologia
3.
J Gastrointest Oncol ; 14(5): 2018-2027, 2023 Oct 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37969836

RESUMO

Background: Incidence of young patients (aged 40 years or younger) diagnosed with gastric carcinoma has increased worldwide. Young GC diagnosis, have clinicopathological features that differ from elderly, and is correlated with bad prognosis factors. The purpose of this work is to describe the prevalence, clinic-pathological features, and prognosis of overall survival (OS) of young Latin-American patients with GC. Methods: Retrospective, observational study. Included patients treated at the National Cancer Institute [2004-2020]. Statistical analysis: χ2 and t-test, Kaplan-Meier, Log-Rank and Cox-Regression. Statistical significance differences were assessed when P was bilaterally <0.05. Results: A total of 2,543 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Young-patients were predominantly female (54%), with diffuse-type adenocarcinoma (68%), signet-ring-cell (72%), poor-differentiation (90%), and metastatic (79%). In OS analysis, patients with metastatic disease, showed differences regarding age, young patients reported a median-OS of 8 versus 13 months for elderly patients (P=0.001). Among young patients, differences were also observed regarding gender, young-female patients had a median-OS of 5 versus 11 months for young-man (P=0.001). Conclusions: This is one of the pioneer studies correlating age with gender and the prognostic features of bad prognosis in Latin-American population. Besides, supports the idea that a global effort is required to improve awareness, prevention, and early diagnosis of GC.

4.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(17)2023 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37686649

RESUMO

Advances in genomic technologies have significantly improved the management of colorectal cancer (CRC). Several biomarkers have been identified in CRC that enable personalization in the use of biologic agents that have shown to enhance the clinical outcomes of patients. However, technologies used for their determination generate massive amounts of information that can be difficult for the clinician to interpret and use adequately. Through several discussion meetings, a group of oncology experts from Spain and several Latin American countries reviewed the latest literature to provide practical recommendations on the determination of biomarkers in CRC based on their clinical experience. The article also describes the importance of looking for additional prognostic biomarkers and the use of histopathology to establish an adequate molecular classification. Present and future of immunotherapy biomarkers in CRC patients are also discussed, together with several techniques for marker determination, including liquid biopsy, next-generation sequencing (NGS), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and fecal immunohistochemical tests. Finally, the role of Molecular Tumor Boards in the diagnosis and treatment of CRC is described. All of this information will allow us to highlight the importance of biomarker determination in CRC.

5.
Clin Transl Sci ; 8(5): 573-8, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26365589

RESUMO

Grant writing is an essential skill necessary to secure financial support for community programs and research projects. Increasingly, funding opportunities for translational biomedical research require studies to engage community partners, patients, or other stakeholders in the research process to address their concerns. However, there is little evidence on strategies to prepare teams of academic and community partners to collaborate on grants. This paper presents the description and formative evaluation of a two-part community-academic partnered grant writing series designed to help community organizations and academic institutions build infrastructure for collaborative research projects using a partnered approach. The first phase of the series was a half-day workshop on grant readiness, which was open to all interested community partners. The second phase, open only to community-academic teams that met eligibility criteria, was a 12-week session that covered partnered grant writing for foundation grants and National Institutes of Health grants. Participants in both phases reported an increase in knowledge and self-efficacy for writing partnered proposals. At 1-year follow-up, participants in Phase 2 had secured approximately $1.87 million in funding. This community-academic partnered grant writing series helped participants obtain proposal development skills and helped community-academic teams successfully compete for funding.


Assuntos
Autoria , Pesquisa Biomédica/métodos , Fortalecimento Institucional/métodos , Relações Comunidade-Instituição , Educação Profissionalizante/métodos , Revisão da Pesquisa por Pares/métodos , Pesquisadores , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto , Redação , Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Pesquisa Biomédica/educação , Fortalecimento Institucional/economia , Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade , Comportamento Cooperativo , Currículo , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Pesquisadores/economia , Pesquisadores/educação , Pesquisadores/psicologia , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA