Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Med ; 13(9)2024 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38731176

RESUMO

Nosocomial Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia results in a significant increase in morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. We aimed to analyze the impact of applying 10% povidone iodine (PI) twice daily to both nares in addition to chlorhexidine (CHG) bathing on nosocomial (MRSA) bacteremia in critically ill patients. A quality improvement study was completed with pre and post-design. The study period was from January 2018 until February 2020 and February 2021 and June 2021. The control period (from January 2018 to May 2019) consisted of CHG bathing alone, and in the intervention period, we added 10% PI to the nares of critically ill patients. Our primary outcome is rates of nosocomial MRSA bacteremia, and our secondary outcome is central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) and potential cost savings. There were no significant differences in rates of MRSA bacteremia in critically ill patients. Nosocomial MRSA bacteremia was significantly lower during the intervention period on medical/surgical areas (MSA). CLABSIs were significantly lower during the intervention period in critically ill patients. There were no Staphylococcus aureus CLABSIs in critical care area (CCA)during the intervention period. The intervention showed potential significant cost savings. The application of 10% povidone iodine twice a day in addition to CHG bathing resulted in a significant decrease in CLABSIs in critically ill patients and a reduction in nosocomial MRSA in the non-intervention areas. Further trials are needed to tease out individual patients who will benefit from the intervention.

2.
Am J Prev Med ; 62(5): 716-726, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34974936

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to evaluate the temporal trends in systolic blood pressure control over 18 months after blood pressure‒lowering drug initiation in the U.S. METHODS: From U.S. nationally representative electronic health records, 1,036,775 adults initiating and continuing blood pressure‒lowering drugs for ≥18 months during 2006-2018 were identified (January 2021). Prevalence trends of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and depression at blood pressure‒lowering drug initiation, blood pressure‒lowering drug therapy intensification over 18 months, and the adjusted probability of achieving systolic blood pressure control 6 months after baseline and sustaining the control for over 18 months were evaluated. RESULTS: At blood pressure‒lowering drug initiation, the prevalence of diabetes and depression consistently increased during the study period across all age groups, particularly in those aged 18-49 years, whereas the prevalence of cardiovascular disease was stable. Adjusted probabilities of achieving sustainable systolic blood pressure control by age group were 0.62 (95% CI=0.61, 0.63) for ages 18-39 years, 0.55 (95% CI=0.55, 0.56) for ages 40-49 years, 0.50 (95% CI=0.49, 0.50) for ages 50-59 years, 0.43 (95% CI=0.42, 0.43) for ages 60-69 years, and 0.37 (95% CI=0.37, 0.38) for ages 70-80 years. Those with cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular disease and diabetes had approximately 20% lower adjusted probability of achieving systolic blood pressure control (31%/29%) than those without these conditions (52%, p<0.01). Those with depression had a 4% higher probability of systolic blood pressure control than those without the condition (49% vs 45%, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In the U.S., only 30%-50% of the population are achieving sustainable blood pressure control over 18 months after blood pressure‒lowering drug initiation, with no indication of improvement in control over the last decade.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Hipertensão , Adulto , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Pressão Sanguínea , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Prevalência
3.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 5: 112, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30186838

RESUMO

Background: Detecting among patients with aortic stenosis (AS) those who are likely to rapidly progress, yet potentially benefiting from prophylactic aortic valve replacement, is needed for improved patient care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of imaging biomarkers in predicting the progression to clinical symptoms and death in patients with AS. Methods: We searched the Pubmed and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases for studies including patients with AS, and investigating imaging techniques, published in any language until Jan 1, 2018. Eligible sets of data include effect of imaging biomarkers relative to: (1) Overall mortality, (2) Cardiac mortality, and (3) Overall events (Symptom onset and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events). Meta-analysis was used to examine associations between the imaging biomarkers and outcomes of AS using Random Effect models. Results: Eight studies and 1,639 patients were included after systematic review. Four studies investigated aortic valve calcification (AVC) whereas the remaining investigated biomarkers provided by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Four articles investigated the presence of midwall fibrosis on late-gadolinium enhancement imaging, three reported its extent (LGE%) and two, the myocardial extracellular volume (ECV). By decreasing strength of association, there were significant associations between cardiac mortality and LGE% [Relative Risk (RR) = 1.05, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.01-1.10]; overall mortality and AVC (RR = 1.19, 95%CI: 1.05-1.36); overall events and ECV (RR = 1.68, 95%CI: 1.17-2.41); cardiac mortality and midwall fibrosis (RR = 2.88, 95%CI: 1.12-7.39). Conclusion: AVC and myocardial fibrosis imaging biomarkers predict the outcomes in AS, and help understanding AS pathophysiology and setting therapeutic targets.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA