CT contrast extravasation in children: a single-center experience and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Extravasation of iodinated contrast material during computed tomography (CT) is a rare complication. A few patients may develop severe complications such as compartment syndrome. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the prevalence, severity, management, and outcome of contrast extravasations in our institution and to perform a comparison to what has been reported in the existing literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a research ethics board (REB)-approved retrospective study comprising 11 patients who had intravenous contrast-enhanced CT between 2019 and 2022 in a tertiary pediatric center, and experienced extravasation of iodinated contrast as a complication. Age, weight, sex, co-morbidities, angiocatheter size, venous access location, total contrast volume, flow rate, patient's symptoms, severity of injury, and management were collected. For the systematic review, PRISMA guidelines were followed. RESULTS: Only 11 (0.3%) (0.17-0.54 (95%CI)) contrast extravasations occurred in a total of 3638 CTs performed with intravenous contrast during the same period in children. The median age (IQR) was 12.5 (10.0, 15.0) years. In our cohort, 1/11 patients developed compartment syndrome and required fasciotomy. The systematic review assessed 12 articles representing a population of 110 children with extravasations. Pooled prevalence from articles stratified by age was 0.32% (0.06-0.58% (95%CI)). Only three children experienced moderate to severe complications. CONCLUSIONS: We confirm that severe complications of contrast extravasation are rare and can occur at any age. No strong associations were seen with the need for surgical consultation (including age, sex, weight, flow rate, injection site, catheter size, and type of contrast).

Image-guided abscess drainage in children with perforated appendicitis - can it wait?

BACKGROUND: Image-guided drainage is the management of choice for perforated appendicitis with intra-abdominal abscess/es. However, there is paucity of data regarding the optimal time for intervention in children. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between the time from diagnosis of a drainable abscess to abscess drainage (delta time) and the clinical outcome in patients with complicated acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an institutional review board (IRB)-approved retrospective study comprising 80 pediatric patients who had image-guided abscess drainage due to perforated acute appendicitis. Delta time was associated with clinical outcome including length of stay, catheter dwell time, need for additional interventions, and need for tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). Gamma regression models were used to assess the adjusted effect of delta time on the "length of stay" and "catheter dwell time" using "volume of the largest abscess" and "number of collections" as severity indices. Logistic regression was used to assess the effect of delta time on the "need for the t-PA" and "need for additional interventions." RESULTS: Mean age (SD) was 10.2 (3.8) years. Mean time between diagnosis and intervention (delta time) was 1.5 (1.2) days. There was no evidence that delta time effects the length of stay, catheter dwell time, need for t-PA, and need for additional interventions (P > 0.05). However, there was an association between the number of collections and volume of the largest abscess with length of stay (P = 0.006; P = 0.058), catheter dwell time (P = 0.029; P < 0.001), and need for additional interventions (P = 0.029; P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that time between diagnosis of an appendicitis associated abscess and intervention is not significantly associated with need for tPA, need for additional intervention, drain dwell time, or length of stay.

Pediatric Chiari I malformation: novel and traditional measurements associated with syrinx and surgery.

PURPOSE: Multiple imaging parameters have been examined to estimate the presence of syrinx and the need for surgery in Chiari I patients (CM1); however, no consistent or definitive criteria have been proposed. The objective of this study was to review existing and identify novel radiological and clinical characteristics of CM1 patients that associate syrinx development and surgical intervention. METHODS: Patients with Chiari I malformation diagnosed on imaging between 0 and 18 years were retrospectively reviewed from January 1, 2007 to February 12, 2020. Participants were included if they had a baseline MRI of the head and spine prior to surgical intervention if required. Forty age-matched controls with cranial imaging were identified for comparison. Imaging parameters and clinical symptoms were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 122 CM1 patients were included in this study. Of the 122 patients, 28 (23%) had syrinx, and 27 (22%) had surgery. The following imaging parameters associated with syrinx and surgical intervention were identified: midbrain length (P < 0.001; P = 0.032), the obex position (P = 0.002; P < 0.001) and medullary kinking (P = 0.041; P < 0.001). Among the clinical features, the presence of overall pain (P = 0.017; P = 0.042), neck pain (P = 0.005; P = 0.027), and sensory dysfunction (P < 0.001) were found to be strongly associated with syrinx and surgery. CONCLUSION: While further investigation is needed, these specific radiological and clinical parameters should be considered when evaluating CM1 patients and may be used to guide further management.