Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Am Heart J ; 199: 51-58, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29754666

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Few therapies are available for the safe and effective treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure. Bucindolol is a non-selective beta-blocker with mild vasodilator activity previously found to have accentuated antiarrhythmic effects and increased efficacy for preventing heart failure events in patients homozygous for the major allele of the ADRB1 Arg389Gly polymorphism (ADRB1 Arg389Arg genotype). The safety and efficacy of bucindolol for the prevention of AF or atrial flutter (AFL) in these patients has not been proven in randomized trials. METHODS/DESIGN: The Genotype-Directed Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Bucindolol and Metoprolol Succinate for Prevention of Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter in Patients with Heart Failure (GENETIC-AF) trial is a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded "seamless" phase 2B/3 trial of bucindolol hydrochloride versus metoprolol succinate, for the prevention of symptomatic AF/AFL in patients with reduced ejection fraction heart failure (HFrEF). Patients with pre-existing HFrEF and recent history of symptomatic AF are eligible for enrollment and genotype screening, and if they are ADRB1 Arg389Arg, eligible for randomization. A total of approximately 200 patients will comprise the phase 2B component and if pre-trial assumptions are met, 620 patients will be randomized at approximately 135 sites to form the Phase 3 population. The primary endpoint is the time to recurrence of symptomatic AF/AFL or mortality over a 24-week follow-up period, and the trial will continue until 330 primary endpoints have occurred. CONCLUSIONS: GENETIC-AF is the first randomized trial of pharmacogenetic guided rhythm control, and will test the safety and efficacy of bucindolol compared with metoprolol succinate for the prevention of recurrent symptomatic AF/AFL in patients with HFrEF and an ADRB1 Arg389Arg genotype. (ClinicalTrials.govNCT01970501).


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/prevenção & controle , Flutter Atrial/prevenção & controle , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Metoprolol/administração & dosagem , Propanolaminas/administração & dosagem , Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 1/genética , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Antiarrítmicos/administração & dosagem , Fibrilação Atrial/etiologia , Fibrilação Atrial/genética , Flutter Atrial/etiologia , Flutter Atrial/genética , DNA/genética , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Testes Genéticos , Genótipo , Insuficiência Cardíaca/genética , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 1/metabolismo , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 9(15): 1576-85, 2016 08 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27491607

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study tested whether intramyocardial (IM) administration of mobilized, purified autologous CD34(+) cells would improve total exercise time (TET) and angina frequency in patients with refractory angina. BACKGROUND: IM administration of autologous CD34(+) cells has been associated consistently with improvements in functional capacity and angina symptoms in early phase clinical trials. METHODS: RENEW (Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Intramyocardial Delivery of Auto CD34+ Stem Cells for Improving Exercise Capacity in Subjects With Refractory Angina) was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing IM CD34(+) administration with no intervention (open-label standard of care) or IM placebo injections (active control). The primary efficacy endpoint was change in TET at 12 months. Key secondary endpoints include changes in angina frequency at 3, 6, and 12 months, and TET at 3 and 6 months. The key safety analysis was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events through 24 months. RESULTS: The sponsor terminated the study for strategic considerations after enrollment of 112 of planned 444 patients. The difference in TET between patients treated with cell therapy versus placebo was 61.0 s at 3 months (95% confidence interval (CI): -2.9 to 124.8; p = 0.06), 46.2 s at 6 months (95% CI: -28.0 to 120.4; p = 0.22), and 36.6 s at 12 months (95% CI: -56.1 to 129.2; p = 0.43); angina frequency was improved at 6 months (relative risk: 0.63; p = 0.05). Autologous CD34(+) cell therapy seemed to be safe compared with both open-label standard of care and active control (major adverse cardiovascular events 67.9% [standard of care], 42.9% (active control), 46.0% [CD34(+)]). CONCLUSIONS: Due to early termination, RENEW was an incomplete experiment; however, the results were consistent with observations from earlier phase studies. These findings underscore the need for a definitive trial. (Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Intramyocardial Delivery of Auto CD34(+) Stem Cells for Improving Exercise Capacity in Subjects With Refractory Angina [RENEW]: NCT01508910).


Assuntos
Angina Pectoris/cirurgia , Antígenos CD34/metabolismo , Células Progenitoras Endoteliais/transplante , Transplante de Células-Tronco/métodos , Idoso , Angina Pectoris/diagnóstico , Angina Pectoris/metabolismo , Angina Pectoris/fisiopatologia , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Método Duplo-Cego , Término Precoce de Ensaios Clínicos , Células Progenitoras Endoteliais/metabolismo , Tolerância ao Exercício , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neovascularização Fisiológica , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Fatores de Risco , Transplante de Células-Tronco/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA